|
Judaism & Christianity: Different Names, Same Racket
by Gott
4 December 2003
Christianity was the first large-scale jew scam to impact on Aryan European peoples and cultures. Both the strategic aims and the tactics of the christians demonstrate that there is basically no difference between christian and jew.
Strategy? Then (christianity) and now (as they have a new control-the-goy religion in the holocaust, they no longer need their old front-organization and are icing it), the aim is to destroy the host culture so that their numerically inferior parasitical race can flourish on the lifeblood of the host people.
Tactics? As the jews are thoroughly evil and duplicitous by nature, they cannot win through honesty and so their arguments are always based on lies (Martin Luther: The Jews and their Lies, 1543). And, their hatred and contempt for the cattle, as they call us, is so complete, so homicidal, that they derive pleasure in seeing just how absurd a lie they can construct, and still fool the useful idiots. For instance, just as there is no physical evidence or original (i.e., not forged) documentation for any holocaust, so too, there is no historical evidence that jesus christ ever existed. I believe the first mention of any such person is in the gospels, a good 100 - 140 years after the event. And trusting in the gospels is identical to believing jew 'survivor testimony' about the holocaust.
So then, how do the jews and christians sell their snake oil? By undermining the superior persons who are the thinkers and the doers and leaders -- and in so doing, bring the host culture down to the lowest possible denominator. And thus 'the meek shall inherit the earth' and 'love will replace...' and other feel-good, nice-sounding christian platitudes are designed to make losers, the credulous, the stupid by nature, the uneducated, the emotional women and the cowards feel good about themselves. And indeed, just such persons flocked to the christian standard then, just as the contemporary emotional and intellectual cripples who are their descendants do today to the new jew front-organizations, shedding vulgar, stupid little tears over the poor jew victims of the holocaust, thrilling to the global village, diversity, and to the nigger pop-culture and jew Hollywood slop peddled along with it.
The jew propensity for the big lie best manifests itself in the '4 million murdered at Auschwitz,' which is now down to something like 87,000, almost all from disease and starvation caused by the allies bombing the German infrastructure during the last year of the war. 'Feeding the christians to the lions' is an earlier example of the same tradition. The Roman Empire employed 3 methods of execution: decapitation, crucifixion and exposure to wild beasts -- depending on the gravity of the crime. They didn't have electric chairs or gas chambers back then, and anyway, their methods were their methods, and their business. See Thomas Wiedemann's excellent Emperors & Gladiators for a refreshingly non judgemental study of this. As christians were recruited almost exclusively from the dregs of society until they wormed their way into the Palace and Imperial bureaucracy through slaves, eunuchs and women, they were not only often common criminals, but also, and always, seditious criminals. They refused to venerate the person of the Roman Emperor, which, with one exception, all other Roman citizens did. That exception? The jews, and what a coincidence. The Romans let the jews alone in this because they were a race/a people with ancient traditions, and the Romans respected such traditions in all peoples even if they found them repulsive and contemptible, as they did with the jews. As the christians were not a race and not a people, but a mostly urban rabble, they were in no way connected with any such traditions and so had no legitimate excuse for their treason to the state.
The Roman Empire was perhaps the only successful example in all history of a political and social organism that successfully spanned racial divides. And they managed to do that by coming together in genuine tolerance for all, symbolized by a purely formal obeisance to the person of the Roman Emperor - the one act that unified all citizens in patriotic commitment to the state. In refusing to do this, the Christians, like the jews, put themselves against the Roman Empire, refusing to give back anything in exchange for partaking of all the advantages of Roman civilization and culture that suited them. Additionally and unquestionably, the christians loathed virtually everything about Roman culture and the traditions out of which it came as it was entirely based upon polytheist religion beliefs that strongly connected with nature. And, the Roman Empire allowed all to worship freely, which is something christianity was never able to tolerate. The christians were not persecuted for their religious beliefs, but for refusing to acknowledge the authority of the Roman Emperor, who was the symbol of the Roman state and culture.
I suggest you reread chapter 16 of Edward Gibbon's The Decline and Fall of The Roman Empire, which is quite a bit more on the ball than Hillaire Belloc. In it, Gibbon goes through the actual evidence and ascertains the number of Christian martyrs and also the specific circumstances of said martyrdoms. His conclusions, drawn almost exclusively from church documents and writings, are that very few of them seem to have occurred (reminiscent of 4 million which becomes 87 thousand), and in almost all cases the Roman government did everything it could to stave off the final, fatal outcome by encouraging the accused to recant and thus save his or her life. Recanting required only that the accused drop a pinch of incense before the portrait bust of the Roman Emperor. Just as the jews need their anti-semitism to survive and thrive, the christians needed, and desired, and actively sought their martyrs in order to create and keep order in the ranks. Reading some of these christian martyr stories is surreal and weirdly funny -- the young lady wanna-be martyr who went around kicking husky Roman legionnaires in the balls till they obliged her by giving her 'the crown of martyrdom,' etc. Like the more absurd examples of 'holocaust survivor testimony,' down though the years the really amusing martyrs have tended to be weeded out by official church historians -- or should I say propagandists?
The moment the Christians had achieved their aim of taking over - they burned the temples and effaced the sacred rituals and smashed the art and destroyed the literature and dishonored the great men of the Roman Empire, and finally began burning the people who would not worship their rotten, kike god - who never existed. 'The meek shall inherit the earth' and all that love stuff? Except anyone who followed his or her conscience and either worshiped other or no gods was taken and tortured and burned. I'm not talking about a few hundred Christian martyrs through the entire existence of the Roman Empire, I'm talking about hundreds of thousands of people (at the least) tortured and murdered in the name of your jesus christ. Which makes the final, fitting, closing parallel to judaism. Under jew bolshevism there was a real holocaust in Russia and the Ukraine that exterminated even more millions than the copyrighted figure of 6 million phantom jews, who the Germans were supposed to have, but didn't, murder in the 1940s.
And today? We have long passed the burned temples, smashed art, destroyed literature and dishonored great men -- when is the last time you mentioned Thomas Jefferson's name without some idiot lemming piping in with the lie about him fathering a child off of some nigger slave? christianity is dead because the jews don't need it anymore. When are the moron millons going to wake up? As they are being led into the kike slaughterhouse?
GOTT
|