5 October, 2020

Posted by Socrates in Jewed labor, jewed politics, labor, labor unions, Socrates at 11:52 am | Permanent Link

Jews and labor unions go together like peanut butter and jelly, like Negroes and rape, like Portland and antifa. I’ve previously mentioned many of these Jews (e.g., Sidney Hillman, David Dubinsky). Note the mention of the labor-union movies “Norma Rae” (1979) and “Salt of the Earth” (1954). Every communist in America loves the latter film especially. It really is a Marxist standard.

[Article, a .PDF file].

5 October, 2020

Posted by Socrates in Christ-tards, Christianity and communism, Christians, Cohencidences, communism, communism and Christianity being similar, jewed culture, jewed economics, Jewed philosophy, jewed politics, Jewed religion, Marxism, Marxism and equality, Mormons, race, race baloney, Race Denial, racial differences, racism, religion, Socrates at 10:08 am | Permanent Link

News quote: “The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints’ president issued another plea for members to help end racism, saying Sunday at the faith’s signature conference that God loves people of all races equally and that it pains him to see Black people suffer prejudice.”

Communism is the denial of race and creed. Christianity is also the denial of race and creed. Indeed, communism and Christianity are strikingly similar. And both were founded by…wait for it…Jews! [1]. Must be just a Cohencidence.

How ironic: up until 1978, the Mormons rejected Black members [2]. However, I do admire the clannishness of the Mormons. They really stick together.

Maybe if Blacks stopped committing murder, robbery, burglary, rape and other crimes, Whites would view them more favorably?

Also, how come, whenever people speak of “racism” you know they really mean “White racism” only? That’s very odd because non-Whites are actually more ethnocentric (i.e., racist) than Whites are.

[Article].

.

[1] Jews wrote the Old Testament, and, Jesus’ mother was a Jew, making him a Jew under Jewish religious law.

[2] “As early as 1908, a church publication stated that blacks could not receive the priesthood because their spirits were less valiant in the pre-existence. Church leaders used this explanation until 1978, when (church leader) Kimball publicly refuted it…” — Wikipedia, Oct. 2020

3 October, 2020

Posted by Socrates in China, China as a global superpower, Chinese communism, Lenin, politics, Russian Revolution, Russian Revolution of 1905, sanctuary cities, Sandy Berger, Socrates, Soviet holocaust, Soviet Union, The Coming of Brown Man, The Great Replacement (TGR), The Outsider/The Other, the Third-Worlding of America, Western civilization, Western culture, Western decline, White philosophy, White thought at 11:52 am | Permanent Link

A very interesting essay. While I disagree with it on a couple of points, on the whole it’s an important food-for-thought essay [1].

I want to make two general, historical points here, for newbies:

1. The stupidest thing White men ever did (and they have done some dumb things!) was to allow The Other/The Outsider to gain social/political/economic power in the West. Giving Blacks/Browns/Jews/women/Marxists/queers/trannies the power to vote, hold public office, etc., etc. is literally killing the West. Remember: Western culture is White male culture. Period. In fact, you could argue that the West is no longer western anymore. It’s now diverse. It’s run by “fringe” idiots who hate White men due to envy. Look for White men to be killed off soon by the always-angry loser fringe.

2. The Others are not nearly as capable as White men. There’s a reason why White men invented the world! No amount of fancy “fringe-‘splaining” can change the embarrassing fact that White men, if left to their natural talents only, and unhindered, will always dominate the world. Question: why is China a superpower now? Why has India risen so high lately? Answer: lots and lots of outside help from the West! After all, who shipped all the White jobs and White money to China (besides the Jewish Clinton aide, Sandy Berger, I mean)? Without a giant “leg up” from Whitey, the non-White world would still be a third-rate loser today (as Jim Carrey: “Looo-hooo-hooo-hooo-zer!”).

.

[1] for example, I don’t agree that the 1917 “Russian Revolution” was a remarkable feat. All it took was A) Jewish bankers like Jacob Schiff funding it, and B) the czarist government being asleep at the wheel — it surely could see the revolution coming, especially after the 1905 attempt at revolution, duhh!, mentioned in a major magazine in 1907 [here] and [here], (a revolution which was also driven by Jews)

2 October, 2020

Posted by Socrates in "civil rights", Comintern, communism, communism as a weapon against the West, communism in America, jewed economics, Jewed philosophy, jewed politics, Marxism, Marxism and equality, Marxism as anti-White, Socrates, Soviet propaganda, Soviet Union at 2:23 pm | Permanent Link

Gee, why would the Soviets want to do that?

A top communist figure in America, the Jew, Alexander Bittelman, writes as follows, concerning Blacks and communism in America (note: the Comintern was a global, Soviet, communist party entity; note also that the Soviet Union was Jewish-created in 1917):

“Once more came the ‘outside’ influence of the Comintern; and what did it say? It said that the struggle against discrimination and for Negro rights is a revolutionary struggle for the national liberation of the Negroes, that we must fight for complete Negro equality; and that in the Black Belt the full realization of this demand requires the fight for the national self-determination of the Negroes including the right of separation from the United States and the organization of an independent state.” — from “Milestones in the History of the Communist Party” by Bittelman, 1937.

2 October, 2020

Posted by Socrates in Black achievement, black behavior, black culture, Black mentality, dispossession & destruction, Diversity, multiculturalism, Socrates, space, Western civilization, Western culture, Western decline at 12:15 pm | Permanent Link

They’re sending a rocketship, with humans in it, into space on Halloween? Not a good omen. Bad karma coming!

Isn’t that a diverse space crew? Who picked the crew? A lesbian, mulatto Marxist at Berkeley?

Anyway: I say, if you’re gonna send a Black astronaut into space, he (or she) must have a suitable, pre-flight gear checklist. How about this one?:

— 6 large watermelons

— 15 boxes of extra-extra-extra-large condoms (if a male astronaut)

— 3 cartons of menthol cigarettes

— a pistol and a ski mask (you never know!)

— marijuana

— 20 pounds of fried chicken, pre-cooked

— a dozen gangsta-rap CDs

— an English-to-Ebonics dictionary

— Black Lives Matter literature

2 October, 2020

Posted by Socrates in leftism, leftist/liberal cruelty, leftist/liberal hate, leftists, liberal 'tolerance', liberal mindset, liberals, liberals as bullies, liberals-as-children, liberals-as-destroyers, Scandinavia, Socrates, Trump, Trump Derangement Syndrome, Trumpphobia at 10:59 am | Permanent Link

Liberals can always be counted on to do the wrong thing. This is why they should not be allowed to hold public office, or teach children (or have children for that matter).

Recently, the Left began legally euthanizing elderly people in Scandinavia who were no longer “useful.” Yep. It’s legal to kill Granny in Denmark now. Old people are afraid of being installed into rest homes there, for fear of being “offed” soon afterwards — a reasonable fear. And now this. There seems to be no end to the Left’s moral degeneracy. (Leftists are currently wishing for Trump’s death from Covid-19, just like I knew they would. Nobody is more cruel than a leftist, despite their claims that they’re “tolerant” and “easy-going”).

You know, the idea of 10 million American leftists crammed into “government re-education camps” in the Nevada desert just feels right. It feels wholesome and good. Don’t you think? No?? Oh. Never mind, then…

1 October, 2020

Posted by Socrates in America, Klan, Socrates, Who Rules America? at 5:08 pm | Permanent Link

Ha, ha! The media need not worry about the KKK (yeah, all 40 members of it, including the 15 federal informants and the 12 undercover cops). They never mention the Jews. I subscribed to a big Klan newsletter, published in the middle South in a state just below Missouri, for 2 years, and in all that time, it never mentioned the Jews once, which I found very odd. Blacks? Yes, it mentioned them. Mexicans? Yes. Fags? Yes. But it never mentioned Jews. So the press can stop moaning about the Klan. The Jewish media bosses have nothing to fear from it.

1 October, 2020

Posted by Socrates in Affirmative Action, Affirmative Action vs. merit, Arnold Aronson, Celler, Celler Rights Laws, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Civil Rights Act of 1968, civil rights movement, education, equality, human equality, Israel, Israel - the facts, jewed culture, Jewed philosophy, jewed politics, Marxism, Marxism and equality, NAACP, NAACP founders, Socrates, Western civilization, Western culture, Western decline, White philosophy, White thought at 10:50 am | Permanent Link

Re: the new book “The Tyranny of Merit” by Jewish author Michael J. Sandel; [Here].

What does merit mean? Well, for example, hiring by merit means “hiring the most-qualified person for the job.” In other words, not hiring negroes. But that’s a bad thing now, since all humans are equal. Ask Manny Celler.

(Question: does Israel have Affirmative-Action laws? Answer: Actually, it does have a limited, just-for-show, Affirmative Action system in some of the universities; it’s an odd system that, very importantly, is not race-based, so nobody can track admissions-by-race. Clever! It selects by “disadvantage” only, and the Jews decide who is or isn’t “disadvantaged”).

For years, the Left demanded that America get rid of the merit system, since Blacks cannot compete with Whites on a normal playing field [1]. So America did get rid of merit: in 1964, “we” (meaning various Jews) created Affirmative Action, which amounts to “forcing White people, by law, to hire less-qualified Blacks and Browns.” But apparently, that wasn’t enough! Now, it seems that America “must” remove all forms of meritocracy in order to make things even more “fair.” Holy Christ. How much more “fair” can we make America? And why should America (a White Western country) bend over backwards for non-Whites anyway? If they don’t like America, they can leave. We’ll even help them pack their bags, for a fee of course.

.

[1] the political Left in America is more-or-less a Jewish creation; as only one example, the NAACP was created by Jews, not Blacks

30 September, 2020

Posted by Socrates in elections, Joe Biden, politics, Socrates, Trump, Trump's policies, Trumpphobia at 12:53 pm | Permanent Link

Here’s a quote: “Matt Lewis of The Daily Beast, a Never Trumper, concluded that Biden “won the debate” but added the caveat: “If Joe Biden were looking for a pretext to skip the next two debates, he found it.” If the candidate you support won the debate, why wouldn’t you want them to participate in the remaining debates?”

That’s a great point: if Biden won the debate, then why doesn’t the Left want him to continue debating Trump? The truth is, Biden came across in the debate like a tired old man with no good, or original, ideas. He changed few minds last night. Trump, on the other hand, for all of his bluster, seemed energetic and in fighting mode. Trump won the debate.

Speaking of the debate, read this about Biden possibly being wired for sound. Big money says he was. Isn’t that called “cheating”?

29 September, 2020

Posted by Socrates in America, Big Biden Fiasco, Clinton, Clinton scandals, elections, Joe Biden, leftism, leftists, liberal mindset, liberalism, liberals, liberals-as-children, liberals-as-destroyers, Socrates, Trump, Trump's policies at 11:56 am | Permanent Link

I’ve said before (granted, so have many others) that liberals are children in adult bodies. But they aren’t sweet, innocent children. They’re dangerous, deadly children, like Linda Blair’s character in The Exorcist movie.

Surely, it must be a federal crime to install someone into the Oval Office who you know isn’t mentally qualified to be president. The crime? I don’t know. How about “knowingly compromising the Executive branch of the U.S. government”? No doubt, such a law must exist somewhere. Or, how about “treason” or “sedition” or similar?

Consider it: What if Joe Biden became president, and then, in March 2021, he had to make an extremely serious military decision involving China or North Korea? Or worse, involving nuclear weapons? What then? Could Biden make a good, logical decision? It’s doubtful.

Every American is in danger if a mentally unqualified man becomes president. But the liberals don’t care. They’re children who treat national security as a game. Indeed, security is like sandbox play to the liberals: the Bill Clinton Administration hardly ever vetted White House visitors. As one guy said, “the Clinton White House was more like Animal House”) [1]. Really. If you wanna get scared, read this book about the Clinton years.

Will Donald Trump have any liberals arrested for the Big Biden Election Fiasco after he (Trump) wins the election on November 3? Let’s hope so.

.

[1] “Since stories of its campaign finance improprieties first surfaced in the fall of 1996, the Clinton Administration has been forced to acknowledge again and again that it was inappropriate for particular unsavory individuals to have entered the White House or to have attended outside political functions involving the President or the Vice President. The repeated instances of White House failure to weed out problematic prospective invitees in advance of their arrival suggested at least the existence of a fundamental deficiency in the White House’s vetting process. The Committee has determined that the problem was, in fact, even more severe. Testimony of individuals familiar with the White House’s creation and evaluation of its guest lists revealed that a process for vetting proposed attendees was essentially nonexistent. [Here].