27 June, 2018

Posted by Socrates in jewed culture, jewed economics, jewed politics, labor unions, leftism, leftists, liberalism, liberals, politics, Roosevelt, Roosevelt's Jewish cabal, Socrates, Supreme Court at 12:01 pm | Permanent Link

(Above: Three big labor-union icons, all of them Jews: David Dubinsky, Sidney Hillman and Jacob S. Potofsky)

The scary part is that the court ruling was 5-4. That’s very close. Why did 4 justices vote against the majority on such an obvious, no-brainer issue? (No need to answer).

One of president F.D. Roosevelt’s top Jews, Sidney Hillman, pioneered the idea of using labor unions for political purposes. His idea worked brilliantly, and soon liberal Democrats dominated the political landscape. For 50 years leftists and labor unions worked closely together, scoring victory after victory (even in non-union states) [1]. But today, the tide is changing. Unions are losing power every year.

[Article].

More about labor unions and who pioneered them [Here].
.

[1] even non-union states have unions, e.g., firefighters, police, and bus drivers unions

26 June, 2018

Posted by Socrates in "gay", Gertrude Stein, homosexual themes, homosexuals, Socrates, white nationalism, White Nationalists, White philosophy, White thought at 11:56 am | Permanent Link

by Robert S. Griffin, Ph.D.

[…]

“The basic point: I don’t see the (White) movement entertaining and incorporating gay perspectives or inviting gay involvement in its efforts, and I think it would be good if it did.”

First of all, why is Dr. Griffin using the word “gay”? “Gay” means “happy.” The correct word is “homosexual” (or “queer”). Anyway, I strongly disagree with Griffin. The brains of homosexuals are “wired” differently, i.e., they think differently. They also make up a tiny minority in the West. We nationalists don’t need the troubles that would come from “homosexual hang-ups.”

[Article].

25 June, 2018

Posted by Socrates in jewed culture, jewed language, jewed media, media, media control, media heroes, Socrates at 11:57 am | Permanent Link

Whether they’re on the Left or on the Right, all of the “media gods” in America are Jews. Charles Krauthammer, William Safire, Ted Koppel, Wolf Blitzer, Mike Wallace, Robert Novak, Barbara Walters, Carl Bernstein, etc. [1]. It’s just like living in Israel!

[Article], [Article] and [Article].
.

[1] Novak converted to Catholicism — a rare thing for a Jew

24 June, 2018

Posted by Socrates in anti-male themes, feminism, Feminists, feminization of the West, jewed culture, Jewed workplaces, Socrates, Western civilization, Western culture, Western decline, women, women and 'equality', women in the workforce, women voting at 1:44 pm | Permanent Link

Feminism is a destructive movement based upon lies. Yet, most women today could be classified as “feminists” for one reason or another. As an example, many women spend much of their time working outside of the home and they firmly believe in such work, even if their daily absence from the home is harmful to their families. In other words, their work comes first and their families come second. (In fact, I recall a “conservative” female CEO saying in an interview a few years ago that [paraphrasing] “when I have extra time, I spend it with my family”). That’s really shocking. (When a young mother works outside of the home, the natural bonding that occurs between mother and child is never really completed — it’s no wonder America has so many serial killers, sadists and creeps).

Here are some of the lies that feminists spout:

“Women don’t need men.”

“Men are bullies who abuse women.”

“There are no differences between men and women except in their sex organs.”

“Masculinity equals/leads to violence.”

“Motherhood is oppressive. Women shouldn’t have kids.”[1]

“Men have all the power, so we are forced to be feminists.”[2]

All of those statements above are untrue. Feminism is a pile of dung invented by Jews and leftists with no facts to support it. Under feminism, women went from being “oppressed” to being the oppressors: feminism is an aggressive, intolerant, anti-male, anti-family movement. Feminism pretends that there are no real differences between men and women, which is, biologically speaking, baloney. For example, a man’s brain is “wired” differently than a woman’s. Feminism denies that Western culture is, by default, White and male. Feminism treats men as, to quote one article about feminism, “obstacles to be overcome.” That’s just plain wrong. Many feminists come from broken, loveless, single-parent households. They didn’t have loving fathers, so they hate men. They’re angry and bitter. Also, many feminists are lesbians who ridicule the idea of “the traditional family.” And feminists are shockingly ignorant of Western history, Western culture and biology. Ask them a question such as “which Constitutional amendment gave women the right to vote” (answer: the 19th, after it was previously rejected by Congress), and you’ll be greeted with a blank stare, followed by lots of nervous sputtering as the feminist desperately tries to change the subject because she knows nothing about it [3][4]. Feminists only know what other feminists have told them.
.

[1] The truth is, most women want to have kids, feminist dogma be damned; it’s natural for a woman to want children of her own

[2] politically speaking, women have more power than men today, since they make up the majority of all voters in America (55%). They can outvote men

[3] see the newspaper article “The 19th Amendment That Gave Women the Right to Vote, 90 Years On” by Richard Adams, in The Guardian, August 18, 2010

[4] the idea of giving women the right to vote was proposed in Congress by Sen. Arlen Sargent in 1878 but was rejected by Congress for 41 years

22 June, 2018

Posted by Socrates in leftism, leftists, liberals, philosophy, politics, socialism, Socrates at 3:16 pm | Permanent Link

The video lasts 1 hour, 41 minutes: [Video].

21 June, 2018

Posted by Socrates in Cultural Marxism, feminism, Feminists, free speech, history, History for newbies, jewed culture, jewed economics, jewed education system, jewed politics, jewish criminality, Jewish Tyranny, Jewish World Revolution, Kaganovich, Karl Marx, Marx, Marxism, nation-building/nation-wrecking, political correctness, Socrates, Soviet holocaust, Soviet propaganda, Soviet Union, Stalin, universities at 4:39 pm | Permanent Link

If you’re going to remake the world, you must first remake the words, so that the new words can help you accomplish your political/racial agenda. That’s what Political Correctness (P.C., a.k.a. Cultural Marxism) is all about [1]. It’s “Marxism meets language.” It amounts to a handful of people (e.g., newspaper owners/editors, news columnists and university administrators, most of whom are Jews) telling Americans what they can, and can’t, say. It’s totalitarianism violating free speech.

The term “Political Correctness” came from the Soviet Union, and P.C. is based upon lies and deceit [2][3]. Among the first modern usages of the term “Politically Correct” — in a positive way — was by the Jewish feminist leader Karen DeCrow (real name Lipschultz) in 1975. (Among her other activities, DeCrow pressured NASA to recruit more women).

Like all forms of leftism, P.C. is very contradictory: on the one hand, it tries to make all humans appear to be equal; but at the same time, it tries to make White people look bad. It tries to do both at once. (The anti-racism movement is similarly contradictive, i.e., on the one hand, it says that Blacks are equal to Whites; but at the same time, it says that Blacks need Affirmative Action and six different kinds of welfare, even today; which claim is the truth?).

Cultural Marxism is a sub-ideology of The Frankfurt School’s “Critical Theory.” P.C. is part of Cultural Marxism (I call P.C. the “yolk” inside of the Cultural Marxist “egg”). In other words, P.C. is a Jewish movement.

It’s amazing that P.C. is tolerated in America, a country that supposedly values free speech above almost anything else. (P.C. is illegal if enforced by authority figures, since it violates the First Amendment right to free speech; university administrators are actually violating the Constitution when they enforce P.C. doctrines).

A few examples of Politically Correct words/phrases:

“Negro” or “Black”: You can’t say those words anymore. Now, the word is “African-American.” (But interestingly, Whites can be “African-American” as well. If they were born in South Africa and later moved to America, they’re “African-American”).

“Homosexual”: No, you can’t say that now, either. The word is “gay.”

“Oriental” or “Chinaman”: No. Now, it’s “Asian.”

“Illegal Alien”: No. Now, it’s “undocumented immigrant/migrant” or even “pre-American-citizen.”

“Disabled”: No. Now, it’s “physically challenged” or “differently abled.”

“Retarded”: No. Now, it’s “mentally challenged” or “developmentally challenged.”

“Policewoman”: You can’t say that anymore. Now, it’s always “police officer.”

.

[1] i.e., Marxism applied to culture rather than to economics

[2] Paraphrasing an old, infamous Soviet dialogue:
Soviet official #1: “That information is not factually correct.” Soviet official #2: “You’re right. But it is politically correct.” P.C. usually involves language/speech, whereas Cultural Marxism usually involves more physical actions, e.g., creating multicultural TV shows or filling up White schools with Brown and Black people. I like to think of P.C. as the “language part” of Cultural Marxism. As America becomes more violent and unstable due to ethnic conflict, it will become a Western version of the Soviet Union. Guaranteed.

[3] Trivia: the Soviet Union was created by Jewish revolutionaries in 1917. It was the first criminal state. All of its leaders had been in jail or prison. Vladimir Lenin was part-Jewish. Lev Kamenev, first head of state of Soviet Russia, was also part-Jewish. Leon Trotsky, the supreme commander of the Soviet Red Army, was a Jew, as was the head of the political section of the Soviet Red Army, Yan Gamarnik, as was the Soviet Finance Commissar, Grigori Sokolnikov. Three-quarters of the first Soviet Politburo was made up of either Jews or part-Jews. The head and the sub-head of the Soviet Comintern, Grigori Zinoviev and Osip Piatnitsky, were both Jews. The official Soviet newspaper, Pravda, was run by a Jew, Lev Mekhlis, who was also Joe Stalin’s secretary, personal assistant and close confidant, and Mekhlis was also an important political commissar who was in charge of “rooting out the political enemies of Stalin” in the Soviet Union. The man in charge of “genociding” the Ukraine was also a Jew, Lazar Kaganovich, who was one of Stalin’s top henchmen

21 June, 2018

Posted by Socrates in Socrates, William Pierce, William Pierce Wednesday at 12:48 pm | Permanent Link

(This week’s William Pierce Wednesday item is being posted today instead)

by Dr. William Pierce.

[…]

“And of course, “a new internationalism” is simply his way of saying “a New World Order.” And that really is a radical departure from the past, when America and Britain went to war to defend what they considered their national interests, not to impose “a new internationalism” on some other country which just wanted to be left alone. It’s good for America’s soldiers to understand that the reason they’re deliberately bombing civilian targets in Belgrade, shooting up passenger trains, and so on — and occasionally even risking their own lives — is to impose “a new internationalism” on the Serbs. To people like Estrich and Blair and Clinton, having armed forces for the purpose of national defense is old fashioned, an outmoded, 20th-century concept. The really trendy thing now — the 21st-century thing — is to use your armed forces to impose the will of the New World Order on countries too small to hit back.

“Bambi” also said in the April 19 Newsweek that the Serb policy of ethnic cleansing must not only be stopped but also “reversed.” Which really ties in with the insistence of the whole New World Order crowd that no ethnically clean countries will be tolerated in the 21st century. Only “multicultural” countries will be permitted.”

[Article].

20 June, 2018

Posted by Socrates in children, children-used-for-leftist-propaganda, illegal immigration, immigration, jewed culture, jewed politics, leftism, leftists, leftists-as-liars, liberal mindset, liberalism, liberals, propaganda, Socrates at 11:21 am | Permanent Link

What kind of people use lies about children in order to ruin America? Evil people, that’s what kind — namely, leftists and Jews.

When they want to accomplish a political/racial goal, the leftists and the Jews know that they should invoke “the children” whenever possible. For example, they’ll say “Children are suffering!” “Children are starving!” “Children are being eaten by the Ku Klux Klan!” and so on and so forth. And the bigger the lie about children, the better the outcome.

[Article].

19 June, 2018

Posted by Socrates in "gay marriage", "gay", Britain, England, Gertrude Stein, homosexual themes, homosexuals, jewed culture, propaganda, Socrates at 12:06 pm | Permanent Link

(Above: hey, it’s Joe! Uhh, wait a second…no, it’s Gertrude…an easy mistake to make)

Britain: another White country going to hell in a handbasket. (The Jewish writer, Gertrude Stein, coined the term “gay” as a very inaccurate label for homosexuals [1]. They aren’t happy people. In fact, suicide rates for queers are much higher than for normal people).

[Article].
.

[1] see Stein’s 1922 story “Miss Furr and Miss Skeene”

18 June, 2018

Posted by Socrates in 'hate', 'hate' haters, constitution, constitutional rights, dispossession & destruction, Diversity, diversity is hate, First Amendment, free speech, military, nation-building/nation-wrecking, niggers, racism accusations, Socrates, War On White People at 3:01 pm | Permanent Link

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech” — the First Amendment, in the Bill of Rights. (That’s “Rights,” not suggestions. Written in ink).

This White woman’s language about “niggers” isn’t the issue at all. Free speech is the issue. When was the First Amendment right to free speech voided? Last week? Last month? Web searches reveal no such voiding by any court. Let’s face it: Americans have lost their free speech right. Which right will be the next to fall? The Second Amendment? (It’s funny how liberals can say the most outrageous things without being punished, but one “n-word” from a White voids all of the rights that that person has. It’s almost as if negroes are “holy” people).

[Article].