5 September, 2017

Posted by Socrates in Alex Linder, Ayn Rand, Chile, Fascism, fascism accusations, individualism vs. collectivism, jewed culture, jewed politics, libertarians, Pinochet, Socrates at 2:42 pm | Permanent Link

(Above: Pinochet, seated in front, just after the Sept. 1973 Chilean coup).

(I’m sort of tempted to sign that anti-fascist statement in order to make a point: I’m not a fascist per se, and Alex has said the exact same thing, and most of the people in the White nationalist movement are also not fascists per se; although I do understand that, to save the sinking ship called America, there will likely come a point in time when fascist measures must be implemented for a few years, just like Augusto Pinochet did in Chile circa 1973/1974. To think that America can vote itself back to being a healthy republic is to be an idiot).

Give this libertarian credit for not signing that anti-fascist statement; however, it’s sad to see that a lot of people don’t understand the real nature of libertarianism: it’s a Jewish movement posing as a freedom movement. Libertarianism has no power in the West, and that was the whole idea from the beginning: to make White people think individually, not collectively.

[Article].

4 September, 2017

Posted by Socrates in Alex Linder, Alfred Rosenberg, David Duke, Hitler, Hitlerphobia, National Socialism, Nazi era, Naziphobia, philosophy, Revilo P. Oliver, Rockwell, Socrates, Western civilization, Western culture, Western preservation ideas, White identity, White ideology, White leaders, white nationalism, White Nationalists, White philosophy, White thought, William Pierce at 2:12 pm | Permanent Link

Western philosophy is full of influential people: Plato, Aristotle, Hobbes, Kant. But their ideas are outdated. The Western philosophy of old no longer matters. It’s moot now. Times have changed. Western culture is under constant assault today. But Western culture must survive, and in order to survive, White Nationalism (WN) must become the official philosophy of White people — that means all White people: Sally Soccermom, Joe and Suzy Suburbia, all of them, from California to Maine.

To help White Western culture survive, it would make sense that a leading White Nationalist philosopher be adopted and used by White activists, i.e., the philosopher’s writings and speeches should be made available to the White citizens as much as reasonably possible; granted, this has already happened to some degree, but often White activists quote themselves instead of quoting leading WN philosophers. As for the question, “which White Nationalist philosopher should be adopted/used by activists?,” this essay was written to address that. (Some White activists might ask, “why focus on the works of only one leading WN philosopher?” and my answer is: simplicity. Simpler is better; do people worship three gods?).

Who is, historically speaking, the “king” of White Nationalism? Probably Adolf Hitler. But that’s a problem for us, since, thanks to the Jewish media and Jewish Hollywood, Hitler is universally hated and so adopting him as the top WN philosopher for today is really difficult; even “conservatives” despise him. In the mind of Joe Sixpack, trying to champion Hitler is like trying to champion Satan.

That, it would seem, leaves either George Lincoln Rockwell, David Duke, Dr. Revilo Oliver or Dr. William L. Pierce to replace Hitler as the premier WN philosopher for today (I’m leaving out Alfred Rosenberg and Alex Linder on purpose) — someone to quote, emulate, follow and rally around [1]. No offense to Rockwell or Oliver, but Pierce gets my vote. He has the intelligence, the credentials (a Ph.D. from a well-known American university) and his just-the-facts style is perfect for the White layman. Pierce’s calm and reasonable philosophy (which is thankfully preserved in text, on audio and on video) will be vital during the next century. There is even a book about Pierce for those who want a more in-depth study of him [2].
.

[1] like Hitler, Rosenberg has too much historical baggage; ditto Rockwell with his “Hitler worship”; Duke is a Christian and Christianity is Jewish at its core — see the Old Testament; Linder is a very good philosopher already, but he seems too young to be in the same league yet as Pierce or Oliver, but maybe I’m wrong and he already is?; Pierce has some historical baggage, but not enough, in my opinion, to take him out of the running for top WN philosopher for today; as for Oliver, there’s not enough audiotape of him speaking, while there is lots of audiotape of Pierce; furthermore, while Pierce isn’t exactly a charismatic speaker, Oliver is even less so, in my opinion

[2] the book about Pierce is called “The Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds” (2001) by Robert S. Griffin

3 September, 2017

Posted by Socrates in communism, Germany, history, History for newbies, Hitler, Hitlerphobia, Japan, jewed culture, jewed politics, Jewish paranoia, Jewish power, Marxism, socialism, Socrates, Weimar Germany, World War II at 10:07 pm | Permanent Link

The power of world Jewry always amazes me. Here, we have a non-White, non-Western politician forced to backtrack on his words because the Jews – a tiny minority – moaned about them. Perhaps if the Jews hadn’t tried to destroy Germany, some people wouldn’t try to tell the truth about Hitler? [1]. Sounds to me like Imperial Japan needs to make a comeback.

[Article].
.

[1] before Hitler took power, Karl Radek, Rosa Luxemburg, Kurt Eisner, Karl Liebknecht, Leo Jogiches, Paul Levi, Rudolf Hilferding, Eugen Leviné, August Thalheimer and dozens of other Jewish radicals tried to enslave Germany, and they almost succeeded

2 September, 2017

Posted by Socrates in "civil rights", Chile, Christianity, Christians, communism, communism-as-Jewish, feminism, Frankfurt School, jewed culture, Jewed philosophy, jewed politics, leftism, leftists, liberal mindset, liberalism, liberals, liberals-as-children, Marx, Marx and England, Marxism, mestizos, Mexcrement, Mexico, Mexinvasion, nation-building/nation-wrecking, Socrates, Soviet Union at 2:54 pm | Permanent Link

(Newbies, here’s some currently unrealistic philosophy for you to consider. But I think there will come a time when leftism can, and will, be banned).

Most people wouldn’t tolerate a poison in their homes — e.g., in their carpets and in their furniture. But yet, they tolerate a poison every day in their communities: a social and political poison. It’s called Leftism. It’s toxic, and worse, it spreads [1].

Leftism (also called “liberalism”) should be illegal in all of the Western countries, but thanks to the global media and Hollywood, leftism is not usually seen as a bad thing but instead as “good” and “legitimate” and “normal,” even though it isn’t legitimate or normal because it is based on fantasy, not on reality [2].

Just as very-addictive street drugs are illegal (e.g., methamphetamine, crack cocaine) because they are very harmful to society (they cause crime such as burglary), leftism is very harmful to orderly societies and it should be banned by the Western governments.

Leftism goes directly against the natural order of things. It is not logical, it is instead illogical; it’s a type of social cancer. Like cancer destroys a human body, if allowed to spread, leftism destroys entire countries (a recent example of that is Venezuela; older examples of that are the Soviet Union and Chile).

Here are a couple of examples of how leftism goes against the natural order of things:

The natural order: a man and a woman fall in love, get married and have children.
An unnatural order: a woman falls in love with a man, but she doesn’t marry him or have children with him because that would interfere with her career. This is unnatural. It is feminism and it goes against nature. A woman has a womb for a reason.

Another example:

The natural order: White people live in White countries, Brown people live in Brown countries, Asians live in Asian countries, and negroes live in negro countries.
An unnatural order: negroes, Brown people and Asians enter White countries in large numbers, as immigrants, thereby upsetting the natural order of the White countries. Countries have (had?) borders and immigration laws for a reason.

Everything about leftism is against nature and is extremely harmful to orderly societies. Leftism should be banned in all of the Western countries: banned from the schools, from the media, from the movies, from the newspapers and the magazines. Leftism is a cancer that must be cut out of Western societies. If it is not stopped, leftism will destroy the West (in fact, you could argue that parts of the West are already destroyed, e.g., southern California, which is basically “Mexico North”) [3].
.

[1] Leftism (as communism) almost destroyed the world once, circa the 1920s and 1930s. Communism was poised to take hold worldwide, but it didn’t. The Jew, Karl Marx, wanted, first and foremost, for communism to spread to and take hold in England; when it didn’t, his dream of a worldwide communist movement vanished; communism was created by Marx to destroy the White countries, such as England, France, Germany, etc. Communism could be called “a Jewish weapon against the West”

[2] Leftism is a largely-fantasy-based political and social belief system which usually suspends reality so that wishes, or beliefs, “become” true, e.g., if you believe that “global warming” theory is legitimate and true, then it’s “legitimate and true” simply because you believe so (this is similar to Christian beliefs, which also suspend reality; Christianity shares several harmful beliefs with leftism, most importantly the belief in human equality). Not only is leftism based on fantasy, but also, it requires the telling of lies, daily, in order to fool people into embracing leftist baloney, e.g., “diversity makes America stronger,” which is standard public school propaganda

[3] the Jewish role in the spread of leftism cannot be understated. In fact, Jews were the driving force of leftism in the Western countries, e.g., the Frankfurt School and the U.S. civil-rights movement

1 September, 2017

Posted by Socrates in academia, anti-White themes, communism, communism in America, Cultural Marxism, Frankfurt School, jewed culture, leftism, leftists, liberal mindset, liberalism, liberals, Marxism, political correctness, psychology, race, race and IQ, race science, racial differences, racial hierarchy, Socrates, Western civilization, Western culture, Western decline, white nationalism, White Nationalists, White philosophy, White thought at 3:41 pm | Permanent Link

by Nelson Rosit.

[…]

“A third takeaway; the present system may be strong, but it is very brittle. It cannot bend, modify its policies, or compromise in response to the critique from the right. If it did so, its paradigm would shatter. The establishment’s only choice is to double down and unleash its curs, the twenty-first-century America’s equivalent of the Red Guard. The system perceives the White right as the only truly revolutionary ideology existent in the West today. No wonder elites hate and fear it.”

Yep. There’s one good thing about Cultural Marxism: it has a bad Achilles’ Heel: it must be forced onto people, and then, be re-enforced, over and over again, by Marxist “culture cops”; if not, Cultural Marxism would lose power quickly.

[Article].

31 August, 2017

Posted by Socrates in 'sex-change', Cultural Marxism, feminism, feminization of the West, homosexual themes, homosexuals, jewed culture, Magnus Hirschfeld, Marxism, New York, New York Shitty, Socrates, trannies, Western civilization, Western culture, Western decline at 12:36 pm | Permanent Link

by R. Houck.

[…]

“The Left justifies their attack on gender as an effort to end stereotypes, to break down barriers, and shatter the mythical glass ceiling that holds women down.”

End stereotypes? Break down barriers? Shatter the glass ceiling? That’s just more hot air from Jews and the Left. You could argue that modern feminism is an off-shoot of Marxism (“women are oppressed and exploited by bourgeois White males who are hostile to equality!” — that’s more-or-less the message). Western culture is White male culture, period — in other words, it was built by White men and it must be managed by White men; if not, it will cease being Western culture; in fact, there are places in America today that are no longer Western, e.g., New York City.

[Article].

30 August, 2017

Posted by Socrates in Socrates, William Pierce, William Pierce Wednesday at 7:35 pm | Permanent Link

by Dr. William Pierce.

[…]

“Actually, my reference to Ayn Rand as a “Soviet Jewess” was intended to mean only that she was a Jewess from the Soviet Union, not that she was an apostle of communism. Unlike many of her fellow Jews at the time, she did not preach communism. She was, however, an apostle not only of selfishness but also of other destructive ideas preached by nearly all of her fellow Jews, such as the idea that race doesn’t matter. In her book The Virtue of Selfishness, after railing vehemently and at length against what she called “collectivism,” she wrote, and I quote, “Racism is the lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism.” — end quote — Furthermore, Ayn Rand’s brand of selfishness was a far cry from the sort of self-reliance and individual responsibility in which I believe. The atomistic sort of selfishness she preached was intended — again I say intended — to sever a person from his racial roots, to kill his feeling for his race, to lead him to put his personal interests above his responsibilities to his race as a whole, and, in fact, to abjure his racial responsibilities altogether. And this was deliberate.”

[Article].

30 August, 2017

Posted by Socrates in "moral high ground", leftism, leftists, liberal mindset, liberalism, liberals, morality, philosophy, Socrates, truth vs. lies, White philosophy, White thought at 1:06 pm | Permanent Link

It’s not hateful or immoral to say something that is true; either something is true, or it isn’t true, I once heard a scientist say [1]. The truth can’t be immoral or hateful, just like a rock or a tree can’t be immoral or hateful. But deliberately saying something that you know is untrue is immoral, since it’s a lie. Who holds the moral high ground in America? Whoever tells the truth. Saying “Blacks commit a disproportionate amount of crime in America” is true. It is not hateful or immoral to say so — just the opposite, in fact: since crime is a very bad thing (sometimes it’s deadly), it’s your duty as a citizen to tell the truth about it. A bad citizen lies about Black crime. A good citizen is honest about Black crime. Which type of citizen are you? Good or bad?

.

[1] “truth” here means objective truth (genuine, provable, universal, without any biases), not “subjective truth”, i.e., “subjective truth” would mean each person has his own version of the truth, which, by the way, is a big part of leftist propaganda (the leftist will say, “there is no such thing as real truth because different people believe different things”; that is merely an attack on White science and White culture in general); so-called “subjective truth” isn’t really truth, it’s opinions and beliefs, which isn’t the same thing as genuine truth and the leftists know it. “A subjective truth is a truth based off of a person’s perspective, feelings, or opinions” — Wikipedia. Genuine truth is: a rock is hard, ice cream is soft, water is wet, fire is hot, etc. Universal and provable facts are truth. (So, if you want to occupy the moral high ground, the next time your wife asks you, “does this dress make me look fat?”, you should tell the truth and say “well, honey, every dress you own makes you look fat!” :-) )

29 August, 2017

Posted by Socrates in anti-fascists/antifas, anti-racism movement, anti-White themes, Cultural Marxism, egalitarianism, human equality, jewed culture, Jewed philosophy, jewed politics, morality, Socrates, War On White People, Western civilization, Western culture, Western decline, Western preservation ideas, White identity, White inventions, white nationalism, White philosophy, White thought, White-culture-as-superior at 1:29 pm | Permanent Link

by Richard McCulloch.

[…]

“Our anti-White antagonists were given, or arranged, the opening or opportunity they were looking for and took full advantage of it at our expense. They seized the moral high ground and from those heights are showering us with a torrent of moral invective, denunciation, condemnation and epithets, creating false pretexts to justify suppression of our message…”

I hear what McCulloch is saying, but then again, there will come a time when “having the moral high ground” won’t matter to White people. They will simply want to be with their own kind, “morality” be damned; yes, by that time, it might be too late to save Western culture. But actually, when you analyze the matter, the moral high ground is already held by Whites, they just don’t know it, due to constant cultural brainwashing. Western culture has given the world far, far more than it has taken away. In fact, the whole world owes White people big time. Should we Whites take back democracy, the concepts of free speech and human equality, and electricity from the world? [1]. Should we take back the telephone, which has saved many millions of lives, from the world? Or the airplane? Or the lightbulb — how would the left-wingers and Jews type their propaganda in the dark? Hmmm? Should we take back all the White inventions, like logical thinking and philosophy? I’d like to see how the world would function without all the nifty White stuff: no cars/trucks, no computers, no wildlife conservation, no mechanical farming equipment; if we took it all back, the world would largely stop and millions of people would die – many from diseases that White people cured with White medicine! And the anti-White creeps still have the friggin’ balls to criticize and belittle Whites?? We gave you the world, you little bitty men).

[Article].
.

[1] granted, “human equality” (“that all Men are created equal” — Thomas Jefferson, 1776) was not one of our better ideas, even though it only applied to White males back then

29 August, 2017

Posted by Socrates in alt-Right, America, Charlottesville rally, constitution, constitutional rights, First Amendment, free speech, genocide, genocide by jew, genocide of White culture, jewed culture, jewed politics, rallies, Socrates, South Africa, War On White People at 11:32 am | Permanent Link

This young woman uses the word “betrayed” in the video. That’s right. Whites were betrayed at Charlottesville. The Alt-Right/nationalist rally was declared an unlawful assembly by city officials – never mind the fact that the attendees had a permit to assemble. Trivia: the mayor of the city of Charlottesville is a Jew, Mike Signer. I can’t wait for Whites to file federal lawsuits over this rally (the Whites were denied their constitutional rights); granted, the lawsuits may not succeed.

[Video]. Her written narrative is [Here].