21 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in anti-White themes, Cultural Marxism, dispossession & destruction, Diversity, diversity is hate, jewed culture, jewed media, Madison Avenue, race, race-mixing, Socrates, tv, TV culture, War On White People at 2:02 pm | Permanent Link

Do you have a relative who still watches TV? Why not suggest to him/her: “unplug your TV and read books instead. It’ll save your brain and save you money, too.”

The Jews on Madison Avenue (i.e., the advertising industry located in New York City) apparently think it’s big fun to create domestic-themed TV commercials featuring mixed-race couples (very often, the wife is White but the husband is Black; they’re usually sitting at a table, happily munching on fast food; a variation of that is a White mother hugging/doting on her child of questionable ethnicity). This sickening, anti-White trend is getting worse and worse every year. (Today, 90% of all TV commercials have negroes in them, yet Blacks make up only 12% of the U.S. population – figure that one out!).

[Video] and [Article].

20 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in Chile, Fascism, fascism accusations, fascism vs. communism, France, jew mentality, Jewish behavior versus White behavior, Jewish brain features, Jewish nation-wrecking, Jewish Tyranny, Jewish World Revolution, left-wing vs. right-wing rule, leftism, leftists, liberal mindset, liberalism, liberals, liberals-as-children, nation-building/nation-wrecking, Nazi era, Nazis, Socrates, Soviet Union, Trump, Trump-as-a-fascist, Trumpphobia, Venezuela at 3:06 pm | Permanent Link

You’ve heard the Jews and their useful idiots, the leftists, warning about Donald Trump and his “fascism”; some of them have even threatened to move to Canada as a result of Trump’s presidency (I don’t know if any have done so).

But do the leftists and the Jews really have anything to worry about regarding Trump or similar “fascists”? Let’s consider that:

When the Nazis controlled France beginning in 1940, did they wreck the country as some people expected? No, just the opposite: they were very conservative in their actions and deeds. They behaved like adults and practiced moderation and temperance – in fact, life in France hardly changed for most of the citizens (it was “allied” bombing that leveled buildings in France, not Nazi policies [1]).

However, when the Left takes control of a country, it will be ruined sooner or later. Guaranteed. Because leftists, like children, have no self-restraint or temperance. They are kids in adult bodies. Examples abound: France circa 1790; Chile in 1972-1973. Venezuela is in ruins today and the citizens are eating mice and lizards in order to survive. The Left, paraphrasing someone, will always “drive a country over a cliff.” Remember that whenever you see leftists and Jews moaning about “fascist right-wingers” who pose a “danger” to the free world. It’s quite the opposite: it’s the leftists and the Jews who are the destroyers of civilization. If you care about preserving White Western culture, you must work hard to prevent leftists and Jews from achieving political power. (In fact, wise White leaders would jail, or expel, leftists and Jews, but lucky for them there aren’t any wise White leaders).
.

[1] “In all, 1,570 French cities and towns were bombed by Anglo-American forces between June 1940 and May 1945” — Wikipedia

19 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in alt-Right, Socrates, White activism, White campaigns, white nationalism, White Nationalists, White philosophy, White thought at 5:40 pm | Permanent Link

Video of his speech at Auburn [Here]. Note Spencer’s speaking style: calm, friendly, easy-going — a style that, in my opinion, should be adopted by WNs. Shouting and arguing won’t win people over to our side. But some may disagree with that opinion…to each his own.

The Q & A session [Here].

About Spencer’s speech, which Auburn did not want to happen: [Here].

19 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in Socrates, William Pierce, William Pierce Wednesday at 4:19 pm | Permanent Link

by Dr. William Pierce.

[…]

“One hundred thirty years ago, right after the Civil War, we could have ended this problem peacefully. We could have sent them (Blacks) all back to Africa. But we put it off, and now we’ve lost the opportunity for any peaceful resolution. In fact, we’ve lost the opportunity for a peaceful resolution to a lot of other problems. We let things slide to the point that we no longer can vote our way out. The two-thirds of the population which approves of Bill Clinton and thinks that he shouldn’t be impeached just for lying about a few cigar tricks he did in the White House has got the decent, hardheaded people outnumbered now. The feminists and the queers and the welfare rabble and the non-Whites, together with the part of the White population which will vote for anybody who promises them more ball games on TV, can outvote the rest of us. And that’s exactly what they’ll do, shepherded by the Jewish media bosses. They’ll destroy what’s left of our civilization. They’ll take us straight to hell, because all they care about is hanging onto the perks they’re getting from the system. That’s really all they care about.”

[Article].

19 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in anti-fascists/antifas, left-wing violence, leftism, leftists, liberal 'tolerance', liberal mindset, liberalism, liberals, Social Justice Warriors (SJWs), Socrates, White activism, white nationalism, White Nationalists at 12:42 pm | Permanent Link

Reading the federal law, it seems that the U.S. Justice Department could, if it wanted to, charge “antifa” people with federal criminal conspiracies. Since nationalists have been charged with crimes under the flimsiest of “rights violation” excuses, federal charges could also go the other way, huh? (Newbies, most political violence in the world comes from leftists, not rightists, an interesting fact given the Left’s frequent claim of being more “tolerant” than the Right). Anyway, here’s the federal law:

“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States…They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;”

[Article] and [Article].

More here: [Article].

16 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in America, America the White nation, America's founders, anti-White themes, college, Cultural Marxism, democracy, democrazy, First Amendment, free speech, leftism, leftists, liberal 'tolerance', liberal mindset, liberalism, liberals, political correctness, republic vs. democracy, republican government, Socrates, universities at 2:31 pm | Permanent Link

“The founding fathers put free speech in the Constitution” — well, it’s interesting that college liberals would acknowledge 118 politically-incorrect White men who would be very angry at the censorship of White speech on college campuses today!

But really, someone needs to explain to the thousands of college loonies that America is a republic which, unlike a democracy, holds fast to the constitution, which in this case guarantees freedom of speech even if that speech may not be popular with certain people [1]. You know, it’s truly crazy: when a leftist on a college campus talks about “free speech,” he doesn’t mean any free speech, he means “speech that he and his liberal friends, who dominate campus discourse, agree with.” If they don’t agree with your speech, then it’s not free speech, and you “can’t” say it, and the constitution be damned! But newbies, make no mistake: in our White republic, the First Amendment guarantees all speech, not just speech that the liberals want to hear. It’s your constitutional right to say “racist” and “xenophobic” things. If someone censors your White free speech, find a lawyer who will represent you pro bono and file a lawsuit.

[Article]. [Update: original link is broken; try This One].
.

[1] a republic is a constitutionally-protected country with constitutionally-limited governmental power. A democracy has no real limits other than what the majority (51%-or-more of a decision-making body, or the mass of the people) wants – in other words, your rights hinge on “mob rule” decisions made next week or next month, and not on the protections of a written constitution. The old saying, “democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding on what to have for dinner” is apt here: the sheep loses by default because he’s outnumbered, just like “normal White people” are outnumbered on college campuses; (it’s the liberals who are always calling America a “democracy”)

15 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in Africa, African National Congress, anti-White themes, apartheid, black nationalism, black rule, communism, dispossession & destruction, Diversity, diversity is hate, jewed culture, jewed politics, Marxism, nation-building/nation-wrecking, Slovo, Socrates, South Africa at 3:26 pm | Permanent Link

(Above: the communist Jews, Joe Slovo and his wife, Ruth First, several years before First became [briefly] airborne via a mail bomb. Today, Slovo and First are portrayed as heroes in South Africa – destroying a successful, stable White country is a good thing, apparently).

Actually, make that “could be facing more trouble” because they’ve been facing it almost constantly since 1994 (when Whites stupidly agreed to give the Blacks political power). Now South Africa is in the toilet due to Black rule and thousands of Whites have fled to other countries. No Black-ruled country has ever been successful; S.A. will eventually collapse entirely. Newbies: there’s only one name that you need to know regarding the wrecking of South Africa: Joe Slovo. He was the Jew who, more than anyone else, delivered S.A. to the Blacks. Communist Jews led the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa; even though S.A. had a common-sense law called the Suppression of Communism Act, it failed to stop the Jews from wrecking S.A. and the law was later repealed.

[Article].

More about the Jewing of S.A. [Here].

14 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in "war on terror", 'Middle East', Afghanistan, Mossad, Socrates, war, war as a racket, War On Israel's Enemies, Zionism at 5:49 pm | Permanent Link

U.S. General #1: “We aren’t winning the war in Afghanistan. We’ve been there for 37 years, 9 months and 18 days. Do you call that ‘winning’?”

U.S. General #2: “I know, I know, but what the hell can we do??”

U.S. General #3: “I’ve got an idea: let’s drop a super-duper-mega-huge bomb on Afghanistan and then call it a ‘wonderful success’ — the people will believe it.”

U.S. General #1: “Hey, that’s a great idea. Pretty sneaky!”

U.S. General #3: “Thanks. I was trained in Israel by Mossad.”

[Article].

12 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in Socrates, William Pierce, William Pierce Wednesday at 7:12 pm | Permanent Link

by Dr. William Pierce.

[…]

“Perhaps in 1937 and 1938 the bosses in the Kremlin simply thought that it was time to apply the lash to the Ukrainians again. In any event, the NKVD was given the task this time. The NKVD was even more Jewish than the rest of the Soviet communist apparatus. The commissar of the NKVD until September 1936 had been the Jew Genrikh Yagoda, and he had staffed his instrument of terror and repression with Jews at every level. And those who were not Jews were the worst sort of Russian and Ukrainian rabble, the resentful louts and ne’er-do-wells who saw in communism a way to get even with their betters. In any event, the Ukrainians were fully aware of the preponderance of Jews in the secret police, and they suspected that there was a Jewish angle to the pattern of arrests in 1937 and 1938. And indeed, it did seem as if the Talmudic injunction to “kill the best of the Gentiles” were being followed, for those who were arrested seemed to be the most solid, the steadiest, the most reliable and irreproachable of the Ukrainians.”

[Article].

11 April, 2017

Posted by Socrates in Africa, anthropology, Boas, Boasian Jews, Claude Levi-Strauss, college, colonialism in Africa, communism, Cultural Marxism, jewed culture, jewed education system, Jewed science, Marx and England, Marxism, race, Race Denial, race science, racial science, Socrates, Soviet Union, universities, Western civilization, Western culture, Western decline, White inventions, white nationalism, White philosophy, White rule is better, White thought, White vs. non-White countries, White-culture-as-superior at 6:05 pm | Permanent Link

(Above: the Jewish “scientist” and race-denier Franz Boas. It was recently discovered that Boas produced fraudulent work [surprise!]).

Before it became corrupted, there used to be an honest scientific field known as Physical Anthropology (i.e., the study of man). Then around 1900 came some new baloney known as Cultural Anthropology, which is a whole different thing. Cultural Anthropology rejects the idea that race is important and biological. Cultural Anthropology is mostly about fake Jewish or Marxist “scientists” trying to convince people that all of the human cultures are equally important (but of course they’re not. White Western culture is superior) [1][2][3]. Cultural Anthropology is now considered to be a legitimate part of anthropology even though it was founded by liars and race-deniers.

[Article].
.

[1] Cultural Anthropology was pioneered by Jewish race-hucksters such as Franz Boas (often called “the Father of American Anthropology” – there’s a scary thought), Claude Levi-Strauss and Ashley Montagu. “Race” doesn’t exist, those Jews say, or, if it does exist, it’s meaningless. But that’s baloney. The truth is that “race” is the prime reason why White Western countries rule the world and Black countries are third-world toilets. Thanks to those idiots, roughly half of all anthropologists today believe that “race” doesn’t really exist – can you imagine that? That’s akin to weathermen not believing in the existence of rain. (Here’s a question to ask an anthropologist: “why are all the least-successful countries, without exception, Black or Brown”? Newbies, the continent of Africa is in much worse condition today precisely because most of the Whites left Africa by 1980)

[2] “By 1926 every major department of anthropology was headed by Boas’s students, the majority of whom were Jewish.” — Dr. Kevin MacDonald, in his important book “The Culture of Critique”; see page 25

[3] Allow me to say something about the denial of race or creed: the Communist Party has long said (as late as 2001, judging by web searches) that all humans are equal regardless of race, creed, sex, etc., so what does that make Boas and his followers? Right. They’re all Marxists, even though they would surely deny that. If you believe in human equality, then you’re a Marxist, whether you know it or admit it or not; egalitarianism is part of the “standard Marxist worldview”; the top Soviet official and theoretician Nikolai Bukharin, for example, wrote this way back in 1920: “Should the Russian worker and the Russian peasant look upon the Germans, the French, the British, the Jews, the Chinese, or the Tartars, as enemies, irrespective of the class to which these belong? Are the Russian workers and peasants entitled to hate or to regard with suspicion those who belong to another nation, for the sole reason that these latter speak a different tongue, that their skins are black or yellow, that they have different customs and laws? Obviously, this would be quite wrong. The German workers, the French workers, the Negro workers, are just as much proletarians as the Russians are.” (bold text is mine) That was very uncommon thinking in 1920, when “racism” was the norm. Such thinking isn’t surprising, however, when you realize what communism was designed to be: an attack on White Western civilization; it’s Karl Marx’s bad luck that communism didn’t take hold in the West, as he had hoped, at least not officially; unofficially it’s been here awhile