10 April, 2022

Posted by Socrates in manchildren, vaccine mandates, vaccine mania, vaccines at 11:56 am | Permanent Link

You’ve heard of a “man-child?” Well, keep reading.

A new trend:

“What about the theme parks? 60% of Disneyland visitors were adults with no children.”

“Adults with no children”? That’s really odd. In the old days, when you went to Disneyland, you’d see nothing but families (i.e., a father, a mother, and 2 or 3 kids).

How to explain that trend? Here’s one explanation: today’s “adults” aren’t really adults. Not mentally, at least. They’re stunted losers who never grew up, and who embrace antifa and “woke” and other nonsense. Why did they never grow up? Several reasons: the horrible public schools, poor discipline instilled in children by parents, too much TV-watching, and, believe it or not, all of the “vaccines” that kids get today (almost every kid gets 15 to 20 “vaccines” and most of those vaccines are unnecessary, but mothers are easily conned into getting Jimmy and Tommy jabbed-up. There is good evidence that some vaccines are harmful) [1].

[Article].

.

[1] the average American child gets 15 vaccinations during the first 15 months of his life. Ridiculous! And scary. But wait. There are more vaccines in store for him later. From 18 months to 18 years of age, there are 3rd, 4th and 5th doses of some of those first 15 vaccines. So you’re talking about probably 20 vaccines in all. One doctor told me: “those vaccines? I’ve never seen any of those diseases” (that children are vaccinated against, e.g., tetanus, of which he said “you don’t see it anymore unless you live in humid places like Florida and you step on a rusty nail, and even then it’s very rare; in dry areas like New Mexico you don’t ever see it”).

Trivia: web searches for “vaccines” show overwhelmingly positive mentions of various vaccines, and that’s the whole plan, of course, i.e., search engines are set up to show only “positive” vaccine mentions. “Negative” vaccine mentions are automatically flagged as “medical misinformation” and vanish from the search unless you use clever search words. Some people say, “well, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) doesn’t show many vaccine injuries” and that’s true, for several reasons: 1) many people don’t know that a vaccine caused, say, autism in their child and they’ll likely never know; 2) most people don’t know that VAERS even exists; 3) it’s usually doctors who report to VAERS and many doctors are reluctant to report to VAERS since it’s a long process and it’s difficult to prove that “X” vaccine caused an injury. The mania surrounding vaccines today is truly stunning: when Covid-19 first arrived circa March 2020, we were told that “children and adolescents are nearly immune to Covid.” But today, the “experts” want to vaccinate 3-year-olds. (The pro-vaxxers have awesome power, by the way: Western pro-vaxxers forced India to stop using Ivermectin pills for Covid treatment even though Ivermectin worked very well there).

9 April, 2022

Posted by Socrates in "gender theory", "gender", "woke", 'gender identity', 'sex-change', 'social construct', 'social construction', 'transgender' at 5:02 pm | Permanent Link

Millions of wild animals in America have successfully reproduced since 1950.

But how did that happen? After all, we are told (by the Left) that gender/sex is “assigned” by a doctor. But, in the wild, there are no doctors around to “assign” animals their gender/sex. So how did the animals know if they were “male” or “female”? How did they know who to attempt sexual acts with? How were they “sexually attracted” to other animals? How did they reproduce by the many millions? Did they just guess their “sexes” and “genders”? That doesn’t seem “natural,” does it? The animals who failed to properly guess their sexes/genders never would have mated. So most animals would have gone extinct by now. (A beaver, thinking: “Am I a boy beaver or a girl beaver? Damn it! I was never assigned a gender, so I don’t know who to fuck! And what’s a boy or a girl after all?? Aren’t boys and girls just social constructs created by evil, rich, bourgeoisie beavers??”).

9 April, 2022

Posted by Socrates in 'gender identity', 'sex-change', 'transgender', Cultural Marxism, Marx, Marxism, Marxism as anti-White, postMarxism, postmodern baloney, postmodernism, postmodernism and reality denial, the various Marxisms at 12:19 pm | Permanent Link

Seen today: 4 or 5 articles on “conservative” websites expressing concern about the “gender”/”transgender” madness. And rightly so. It’s getting ridiculous.

The entire political Right needs to get unified on this issue. How? Simple. Use this podcast, which tells the listener, step-by-step, how today’s “gender”/”transgender” madness is actually Marxism (it’s “gender Marxism or sexual Marxism, with a little help from Language Marxism [postmodernism]” to be precise; it’s Marxism applied to gender/sex/language).

Anyway, as soon as normal people learn that the “gender”/”transgender” madness is merely Marxism dressed up in different clothes, it loses a lot of credibility. A lot. This is an important detail to grasp. The devil’s in the details. (Newbies, all Marxism, no matter the type, has one goal: to destroy White Western culture by tearing down the existing White societies. Marxism is pure hate. They call Nazism “hate,” but Marxism is much more hateful and murderous).

9 April, 2022

Posted by Socrates in Australia, leftism, leftism as a Jewish construct, leftist/liberal cruelty, leftist/liberal hate, leftists, liberal vs. conservative thought, liberalism, liberals, liberals as bullies, liberals as female, liberals fooling the citizens, liberals-as-destroyers, Soviet holocaust, Soviet propaganda, Soviet Union, Walter Duranty at 8:55 am | Permanent Link

In the 1930s, liberals in America knew that the Soviet Union had murdered millions of people. Yes, millions. But the liberals said nothing about the murders publicly. They were silent. Why? Because liberals have no morals. They were born without morals. Read about Soviet apologist Walter Duranty, for example: [Here].

Same thing today. They have no morals. Recall the 1960s hippie slogan: “if it feels good, do it!” So, the opposite must also be true: “if it doesn’t feel good, don’t do it!” I saw a liberal on TV not long ago saying “it just feels wrong” (I don’t remember what the topic was). But I’ve heard that many times from liberals: how something “feels” is the important part. Feelings. This highlights what I said a few days ago: leftism is female at its root.

[Article].

8 April, 2022

Posted by Socrates in homosexual themes, Homosexual traits, homosexuals at 9:07 pm | Permanent Link

“Just remember, the rainbow flag doesn’t mean, “My people have a long and storied history from X region of the world” or “My nation on Y territory was founded on N date”… it only means “I like to stick my penis into other men’s buttholes, and I want to make sure you know that” [Webpage].

8 April, 2022

Posted by Socrates in Jordan Peterson, racial awareness among Whites, racial hierarchy, racial preferences, racism, racism accusations at 4:40 pm | Permanent Link

Interesting. A Black (mulatto?) guy saying “White racism: what’s the big deal?” That’s correct. No big deal.

Blacks in general fail to realize that, by obsessing over nearly-gone “White racism” they are actually making White people dislike them even more. If Blacks would just shut up about racism-racism-racism, that would lessen “White racism.”

As for “all Whites being racist,” all Whites no doubt have “a few racist bones in their bodies” and that’s totally normal. That’s ingrained. It’s a natural reaction to “the Other.” The outsider. Blacks are outsiders.

(Fact: I’ve been victimized twice by non-Whites. Assaulted, and threatened with assault [with weapons]. But I’ve never victimized any non-White. So, who are the “good people” and who aren’t?).

[Video; 5 minutes].

8 April, 2022

Posted by Socrates in Abbie Hoffman, counterculture, Paul Krassner, Sixties at 1:47 pm | Permanent Link

The 1960s were unique in many ways. It was the first era in our history in which the gulf between parents and children widened dramatically. Suddenly, the kids had their own culture: their own music (“counterculture” music), their own language (“groovy, man!”), their own ideas (e.g., boys having long hair). And that was almost completely brought about by Jews. Certainly, Jews impacted the 1940s and 1950s, but not nearly to the extent that Jews impacted the 1960s. Every key player in the 1960s counterculture movement (except Tom Hayden) was a Jew. Indeed, the list of those Jews is so long that I will only bother listing a few of them [1].

.

[1] Paul Krassner, Jerry Rubin, Abbie Hoffman, Todd Gitlin, Herbert Aptheker, Allen Ginsberg, Phil Ochs, Ted Gold, Saul Alinsky, Stew Albert, Paul Goodman, Ram Dass, Al Haber, and a large number of SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) members. The whole list would number 100 people — and I mean the key people, the leaders.

8 April, 2022

Posted by Socrates in memes, Western philosophy, White philosophy, White thought at 12:38 pm | Permanent Link

Give a White man a hammer and he’ll build a civilization.
Give an Asian a hammer and he’ll make more hammers.
Give a negro a hammer and he’ll use it to kill a White man.
Give a Jew a hammer and he’ll give it to a negro.

(So true!)

8 April, 2022

Posted by Socrates in economic growth, economics, economy, leftism and children, leftism as a Jewish construct, leftist/liberal cruelty, leftist/liberal hate, leftists, liberal 'tolerance', liberal mindset, liberal vs. conservative thought, liberalism, liberals, Reagan, Trump Derangement Syndrome, Trumpphobia at 11:48 am | Permanent Link

A List of Things Leftists Hate

— White men (they’re racist oppressors who had the colossal nerve to invent everything)

— traditional family values (they’re sexist and homophobic)

— children (they’re a burden and they’re expensive, too)

— old people (they’re a burden; “rest homes exist for a reason!”)

— conservatives (they’re all racists and haters!)

— traditions (they’re corny and old-fashioned)

— facts and truth (leftists must hide facts and truth, which hinder the “progressive” agenda, e.g., racial differences)

— religion (but Islam is okay)

— racial solidarity (unless Blacks and Browns have it/show it, then it’s okay!)

— patriotism (how horrible!)

— national sovereignty (how horrible!)

— suburbs (too White)

— the Midwest (too White)

— classical music (too White)

— heterosexuals (too normal)

— guns (they’re very dangerous!)

— small governments (“governments must be huge and must control everything!”)

— capitalism (rich White men exploiting Black people)

— rich people (unless they’re liberal, then they’re okay)

— low taxes (“Black people need our tax dollars!”)

— Ronald Reagan (“Under his presidency, the rich got richer and the poor got poorer!” aka, zero-sum thinking)[1].

— Donald Trump (“He’s just like Hitler, only taller! He has millions of robotic, racist followers who obey his every wish! He’s a danger to our democracy!”)

.

[1] an example of “zero-sum” economic thinking: if rich Larry gains $50.00, then poor Tom loses $50.00 by default. This is total nonsense. Reagan had a very good economy and Trump had a great economy, which is one reason why the leftists hate them. In the minds of leftists, a good economy means “poor Blacks are suffering while rich Whites are getting richer.”

8 April, 2022

Posted by Socrates in America, Cold War, Russia, Russia sanctions, Russophobia, Ukraine, Ukraine war propaganda, war propaganda, War! War! War!, warmongers at 10:05 am | Permanent Link

Fools lead America. Lead us where? Nowhere good, that’s for sure.

The general says: “we should build more military bases in Eastern Europe and begin to rotate U.S. troops in and out.” Why?? This is known as “poking the bear” (Russia) and it’s not smart. Indeed, that’s what started the Ukraine war!

Buchanan: “this sounds like a prescription for a Cold War II that America ought to avert, not fight. For the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine, while a declared goal of U.S. policy, is not a vital U.S. interest to justify risking a calamitous war with Russia.” Buchanan is correct. It’ll be a Cold War that could turn hot at some point. Why risk that over Ukraine??

[Article].