|
A Form Letter for Fortuyn
by M.X. Rienzi
Even though I disagreed with Fortuyn on some important issues -- for example,
his unwillingness to cooperate with rightists from other nations (and I also
saw online that he was against anti-Semitism and supportive of Israel; poor
Pim certainly has THAT backwards!) -- still, he was a nationalist against Turd
World immigration. Thus, he was essentially on our side, and his killing was
tragic. More than that, it underlines leftist hypocrisy. The leftists do what they
accuse of us of doing: using "hateful" speech as a weapon to induce a "climate
of intolerance," which "leads to violence." Isn't it interesting that at the
height of Marxist terrorism in Western Europe in the '60s and '70s, that all
the communist and socialist parties were NOT outlawed, while rightist
law-abiding parties have been outlawed, or are threatened with being outlawed?
Isn't it interesting that while the left has always been more violent and
intolerant and anti-"democratic" it is the nationalist right that always
gets labeled thus? Isn't it interesting that rightists are considered threats
to the holy cow of "democracy," while it is the leftists who protest against
election results and who assassinate political figures? And isn't it
interesting that the EU is so supportive of "democracy" that it imposes
sanctions and utters ominous threats when the outcome of an election does not
go the way it wants (in other words, a rightist has some success)?
Furthermore, isn't it interesting that while the leftists claim that they are
"anti-conformists against the system," the fact is that they actually ARE the
system? In what way does the leftist view on race and immigration differ from
that of the EU, the globalist elites, and the "conservatives" that the
leftists pretend to hate with such ferocity? There is no difference; they are
all system lackeys, all Finklesteins, coloreds, or the shabbos goy filth who
serve the Finklesteins.
Don't let them get away with this hypocrisy. Below is a form letter you
should adapt to write in and complain EVERY time some Jew ("X") or gentile
leftist moron ("X") criticizes a White nationalist figure or group ("Y"). Use
their own language against them. See? It's easy!
THE FORM LETTER:
I have to say that I am shocked to read the unreasonable comments by "X" about
"Y." One would think that after the tragic assassination of Dutch rightist
politician Pim Fortuyn in May 2002, leftist extremists would have the decency
to eschew spewing vile hate towards respectable and law-abiding right-wing
activists and politicians. But, no, the left, the "anti-racists," and other
such extremist elements have no decency, and continue to use speech as a
weapon to create a climate of intolerance and bigotry - a climate which led to
the death of Mr. Fortuyn.
Indeed, "X" feels it necessary to engage in the same sort of left-wing
rhetoric, the same name-calling, which heated passions in the Netherlands and
throughout Europe before Fortuyn's brutal murder. And, I ask, what has "Y"
done that makes him the target of such vicious demonization? That "Y"
defends the interests of his people? That "Y" believes that his people -- and
indeed all peoples of European descent -- have the same rights as do
non-Whites, non-Europeans? Perhaps "X" can explain why it is all well and
good for non-White, non-Western peoples to defend their interests, but when
someone stands up for White, Western interests, that person is subjected to
attacks and smears? Why, I may ask, is it alright for non-White nations to
preserve their homogeneity, while it is the height of "evil" for White nations
to do the same? Why was European colonialism of Asia and Africa "bad," while
the current Afro-Asian colonization of Europe "good?" Why must Whites become
a minority in America and in their ancestral homelands of Europe as well?
Would any other group accept this?
From any rational, objective standpoint, "Y" is perfectly justified in
defending the rights of his people to exist and flourish. The real bigots and
haters are those, like "X", who would specifically withhold these rights from
those of European descent, while, "of course," granting them to others. And
no childish anti-rightist name-calling ("Nazi," "fascist", "racist" ) can
change this fundamental fact.
As the left loves to tell us: "words and ideas have consequences; hateful
speech can lead to hateful violence." Yes, the hate-filled words of
narrow-minded leftist extremists can indeed have consequences, as we have seen.
That folks like "X" continues this tradition of soiling our eyes and ears by
spewing forth vile commentaries against law-abiding and thoughtful rightist
activists (and I note that leftist activists are often far from law-abiding
and thoughtful) is a sad commentary on "X's" intolerance and close-mindedness.
Like spoiled children, the "pro-diversity" left cannot stand for principled
opposition. Let an election go the wrong way, or potentially go the wrong
way, and out come the protests, the hate speech, the thuggishness, and, in the
case of Fortuyn, murderous violence. In some cases, the left works
hand-in-glove with the globalist establishment; far from being
"anti-conformists," today's leftists are actually nothing more than the
blindly conformist bully-boys of the elites that they pretend to oppose. For
shame! I call on everyone of character to eschew those like "X" who stand in
the way of the rights of peoples to pursue their biocultural interests in a
fair and reasonable manner!
END (of course, you substitute the names of the principals involved for "X"
and "Y")
----------------------------
Note 1: Always try and use the following words to describe the opposition:
"intolerant," "hate," "spewing," "spewing hate," "vile," "extremist,"
"thuggish," "alleged," "conformist," "narrow-minded," "hate speech," etc.
NEVER actually accuse them of anything, unless there is objective proof to
support the accusation. Instead, use subtle language to make implications and
"link" leftist "anti-racism" with violence, intolerance, etc. On the other
hand, to describe folks on our side, use: "law-abiding," "reasonable,"
"thoughtful," "right-thinking," etc. Please do not object and say that these
are "Jewish tactics." Remember, we are in a struggle for survival; adapt
whatever tactics can work. Remember: make NO threats, and make NO
unsubstantiated accusations. DO write reasonably and rationally, adapting
what you write to the particular circumstances at hand. The ultimate aim is to
make the "pro-diversity" crowd look mean, narrow-minded, thuggish, unfair, and
intolerant, and against basic human freedoms. This is a battle for hearts and
minds; do your part intelligently and shrewdly.
--------------------------
Note 2: I hereby give permission to use/modify this form letter to any person
who is on my side of the fence: White gentiles of European descent who are
pro-White/Euro, "rightist," pro-Western activists, AND who are pan-European in
perspective.
All others - Moshe, Tyrone, Ping Pong, Jose, as well as "White" leftist turds
and their kosher conservative friends and other system lackeys - do NOT have
such permission. Anti-panEuro nordnik extremists also do NOT have permission.
To all of these I say: write your own damn stuff.
M.X. RIENZI
|