|
Terror Timeline Questions and Answers
Have a question about something on the Timeline? Ask Victor and get an answer.
Submit questions to wolzek@hotmail.com
09-19-02 Giuseppe asks: Weiss..the dentist who allegedly whacked Huey Long....I always assumed he was a Jew, but the Barnes Review published an article which made a point of saying he wasn't. And how about mass murderer Jew Joel Rifkin for your Rogue's gallery...and David Berkowitz, "the Son of Sam." Most Jews insist that these guys were both born gentiles and merely raised by Jews. Victor answers: First, Son of Sam David Berkowitz is already part of the Terror Timeline (see 1975). As the reference material (as well as the nose on his face) shows, he was born a jew, put up for adoption, and adopted by jewish parents. Joel Rifkin is a good tip for inclusion. I'll have to get reference info on him and add him to the Timeline. I too thought Weiss, Huey Long's assassin, was a Jew. He's currently included in the Timeline as such. I'm going to have to research him more closely and amend the Timeline if necessary. It is a work in progress and I refine it, as well as expand it, as much as possible. Thanks for the tips. PS - Wouldn't it be wonderful if jewish groups were open to questions, criticism, and refinement like we are? Imagine being able to to question some aspect of their sacred Holocaust story and getting a substantive answer, an admission of ignorance, and/or a promise to double-check the legitimacy of their claim -- a promise they actually kept! But alas, all they have is hyperbole, hate, and an arsenal of slurs (and lawyers!) to protect their profitable lie. It doesn't pay to be an honest White man in America, but it sure feels good.
09-09-02 Stepp asks: Germany 1945. Nazis lose. They sign to halt the fighting, but the lawful gov't (das Reich) never signed a peace treaty to end the war. Is Germany, like N & S Korea? Is Germany in a "peaceful war" and still a "colony" of the Allies? Victor answers: Interesting you should ask this, Stepp, as I just heard this theory myself for the first time a week or two ago when "Bob from Texas" brought it up on the Hal Turner radio show. It was a surprise to me, to Hal, and to others who called in afterward. The bottom line answer is, I don't know the answer. And thus far I've been unable to get a solid answer on the subject from my contacts. I'll continue looking into it, and if I come up with good info, I'll send it your way. If you pursue it further too and find good resources, please do the same.
09-07-02 Jim writes back: Thanks, Victor. The problem with that source is that it is just one man's word, not a publication (magazine, journal, etc.) and it won't hold up as a reference. In general, it's probably best to stick with high quality sources. Victor answers: Jim, I disagree with your assessment. It's not just one man's word, insofar as porn stars are named with stage name and real name, which may be independently verified; other books on the subject are referenced, and may be independently verified; what is written, say, about Ron Vogel's career, is either accurate or not, and is open to outside verification. Certainly the article is not a heavily footnoted academic piece, but nor are most articles in most magazines or journals. At risk of sounding nihilistic regarding sources -- which I absolutely am not -- there's an inherent problem, almost a paradox, in the idea of "high quality sources" for a subject, namely Jews, that isn't permitted in public discourse. It would be great to see Ford's article in, say, The New Yorker. And indeed the New Yorker did one of the most interesting pieces I'd ever read on the porn industry (back around 1995). But of course no article putting jews in the focus, especially one that makes links to Marxism and communism, etc, would ever appear in The New Yorker, unless it was a mocking profile designed to debunk such an article as absurdly hateful. The perfect example of this, in my opinion, is Alex Linder's essays and the Jack Halliday 8-part series "Blackout." These essays are more substantive and of higher quality than anything that's been published in Time or Newsweek for decades. Yet, they're just one man's word, sourced back to VNN, a "hate" site, and not only have zero credibility for use as mainstream references, they have negative credibility, meaning citing them will automatically discredit you as a hater and your article as worthless in principle. This has nothing to do with actual quality or truth content. Part of the dilemma of getting at the jewish problem is that one of the most devastating aspects of this problem is this: Jews (and by extension the controlled media and academia) simply do not allow jews to be openly criticized. The only books critical of jews that see the light of day come in two forms: 1) books that are utterly scholarly, i.e., so scientifically detached and rigorously academic that it's difficult for jews to openly pigeonhole it into one of their ready-made media caricatures without their racist agenda being obvious. Books like this -- e.g., the MacDonald trilogy and Cuddihy's The Ordeal of Civility -- today are still buried though (You can see this process in action here.) MacDonald's trilogy is without question one of the most important works of the 20th century. Yet none of the big papers or journals have reviewed it. Most scholars don't reference it. Even high profile "intellectual mavericks" like David Horowitz or Jared Taylor don't dare take it on. They pretend as though it doesn't exist and if it's brought up by someone else they sneer at it as the work of a Klan member in a tie instead of a sheet. And, 2) books by renegade jews like Shahak or Finklestein. And these books generally reinforce the overall Jewish position while stirring up profitable controversy by criticizing a part of the Jewish position. E.g., Finklestein critiques "The Holocaust Industry" not by claiming it's a basically a hoax, but rather arguing that some jews are desecrating the very real horror and importance of the Holocaust by commodifying it. So while everyone's debating whether The Holocaust is being desecrated, the latent assumption that the jewish account of the Holocaust is true is reinforced.To stick with what mainstream academics would deem "high quality sources" about jews leaves one with, well, a bunch of jews. Thomas Friedman is the voice of reason, David Duke is a fringe hater; Stephen Gould is a world-reknowned, erudite cultural anthropologist, Kevin MacDonald is...um, who's he? David Horowitz and Carol Swain are "high quality sources" because big publishing houses promote their work and big universities and research foundations pay them big bucks to do what they do, meanwhile William Pierce is banished from the public square. I realize I'm flogging a dead horse and that the point I'm trying to make could have been made much more succinctly, but I see this problem of "quality references" as being highly important. Nothing strikes me with more cognitive disonance than seeing writers criticizing jews appeal to jews for validation, as if coming from a jew makes a statement more reliable instead of less! Again, this should not be construed as "reference nihilism." An article that says, "Jews run porn. They use it to destroy white culture" isn't very substantive and is basically reduced to being one man's word or opinion, and it has nothing in it distinct enough to be checked or independently validated. But an article that lists key players, describes aspects of their careers, cites other works on the subject, etc, has an existence that is outside the domain of the author's opinion or word. This is not to say that the author is necessarily correct in his or her analysis, but his position is on the table. One could argue that all of the names and facts and references used by Luke Ford in his article would have to be independently validated and tacked on to the article before it will "hold up as a reference." But this begs the question as to why the same standard doesn't apply to sources garnered from Time or The WSJ or Frontpagemag.com. My guess is that what Luke Ford wrote about jews and porn is at least as accurate as what the New York Times wrote about Jews and The War on Terror today. Of course, this is just one man's word. 09-06-02 Jim asks: One of the the links in your terror timeline is to an article about pornography. Do you know where this article is from, i.e. what is the reference for it? Did you put it together from several sources or did you find the article as it is? Thanks for the help The article in question: http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/temp/TerrorTimeline/052600_JewsInPorn.htm Victor answers: Thanks for your query. I posted this early on before I streamlined my format for listed the original source location for the articles I reprint (which I do to ensure that the Timeline remains a fully interactive organ even after other websites go under and news sources change their links). So, you've reminded me to update this file with that info. Here it is for you: http://www.lukeford.com/subjects/content/jews_in_porn.html If you go to the general content index http://www.lukeford.com/subjects/content/ you'll see Luke Ford has an article on Hollywood Jews too (as well as lots of other more lurid stuff). 09-03-02 Maureen asks: Your Jewish timeline states that Leon Czolgosz (assasin of President McKinley) was a Jew, but the following on Leon implies/states that he was a Polish Catholic immigrant - http://205.180.85.40/w/pc.cgi?mid=13372&sid=7271. Which is correct? Victor answers: I was unable to check your source, because http://205.180.85.40/w/pc.cgi?mid=13372&sid=7271 brought up some ad reading, "Is there porn on your computer? Free online test" every time I went to it, with no clickthru to an actual page. However, while it's often difficult to nail-down exactly hoozajew, there are several sources that indicate Czolgosz was a jew. The one quoted below is from a source featured on VNN co-founder Regina Belser's site "Regmeister.net," and is interesting because it makes a point to show that the ethnic jew Czolgosz was deceptively referred to in certain news reports as being "of polish nationality." A variety of other sources, some explicit, some implied, can be found by Googling "Leon Czolgosz" +jew. While some of the sources equivocate on Czolgosz's ethicity/religion, they all make clear that he was an eastern European immigrant radical political anarchist, and that definition, especially back in 1901, was almost exclusively a euphemism for jew. The Catholic connection is interesting too. As I was gathering my understanding of racial issues, I never quite understood why so many white racial Christian groups like the KKK and Aryan Nations viewed Catholics and Catholicism as an enemy. I'm no theologian or historian of religion, but the gist of it is this: they see Catholicism as being a jewish led subversion of "real" (read: pro-white according to scripture) Christianity. Historically Catholicism has been an open hiding place for jews/conversos. This general position bears itself out today. The Catholic church is the religious wing of contemporary jewish multicultural liberalism. Catholic Universities such as the prestigious Jesuit Fordham University in New York, are stacked to the ceiling with Catholic philosophers, such as famous "big-guns" Merold Westphal and James Marsh, both of whom I've met/heard speak/and read at least one of their "important" works, and they are as leftist as the Mumia marchers. In fact, if you visit Marsh's Fordham homepage, he's standing in his office in front of a Mumia poster! Here: http://www.fordham.edu/philosophy/Faculty/marsh.htm The Jewish domination and saturation of the Catholic church -- and Catholicism's general blindness/openness to ethnic jews -- comes to a gruesome head with "Jean-Marie Lustiger" aka Aaron Lustiger, a jew who converted to Catholicism when he was adopted by Catholics at 14 years old, and is now one of the top contenders to becoming the next POPE! Check out the link below, it includes a nauseating photo. Check out the schnozz on that guy! And imagine thousands of white Catholics gathering to get a glimpse of him and to "feel" the divinity of the closest man on Earth to God -- A cryptic, converso, hooknosed Jew! http://www.usajewish.com/scripts/usaj/paper/Article.asp?ArticleID=1254 All of this is just to provide some context for understanding just what may lurk within a statement like eastern "Polish Catholic eastern European immigrant" especially when it's rounded off with an overt allegiance to anarchism and communism. It's possible that the critics got it wrong and in fact he was not an ethnic jew. It's also possible that even if all sources claimed he was jewish that Czolgosz could have lied or fabricated his jewish ethnicity to have more credibility among the predominantly jewish anarchist/communist groups he frequented (though jews claim to have a kind of "jewdar" that enables them to sense "real" jews even if the subject is never brought up). The evidence suggests he was a jew. If it turns out he wasn't, he was a jew saturated goy, explicity serving jewish interests. I hope this was somewhat helpful. Here's the link to the Regina Belser source. The relevant caption is pasted below. http://www.regmeister.net/verbrecher/chapter9.htm Caption: For example, it is almost completely unknown that the murderer of the American President MacKinley was the Jew Leo Czolgosz, in collaboration with the Jewess Emma Goldmann. Let her be recalled to memory once again(1). On 6 September 1901, Presdient MacKinley arranged a reception on the occasion of the Pan-American Exhibition in Buffalo. According to American custom, the citizens have the right to shake the hand of the President at such public receptions, at which they walk up to him, [166] one behind the other. In the line of those waiting, a "young, well-dressed man in a frock coat and top hat" (as the papers then were able to report) also approached the President. He held a handkerchief in his left hand, while with his right hand he gripped MacKinley's hand. Suddenly, with a revolver hidden under the handkerchief he fired off two shots at the President at point-blank range, which had frightful effects. The perpetrator was the Polish Jew Leon Czolgosz, who had travelled to Buffalo alone, in order to convert the plan which had been previously precisely decided upon with his Jewish accomplice, Emma Goldmann, into action. On 14 Spetember, MacKinley succumbed to his critical wounds, and on 24 September the jury found the assassin guilty; two days later the decision of the Court was announced that condemned Czolgosz to death in the electric chair. The Jewish murderer of MacKinley was well-known to the American police. In the album of criminals of the United States, there already was a comprehensive description of his personal data; the newspaper Post of 21 September 1901 discovered very interesting details from this: "Leon Czolgosz, alias Frank Niemann. Father of the criminal is of Polish (!) nationality. Residence in Cleveland. The assassin grew up in an area there which is especially strongly infected by Anarchism, found his life as a simple wire-worker too arduous and therefore found a way to live differently. He took over a bar in which an Anarchist club was established. He then knocked about in many cities, but most of all in Chicago. Here, his involvement with other Anarchists, especially with Emma Goldmann, was noted. This woman, despite her extremely unsympathetic character, seems to have made a great impression upon Czolgosz. He explicitly stated that he was spurred on to his crime by the speeches and letters of this woman. Since it is known that the murder of the King of Italy (Humbert) was hatched in Paterson [sic -- perhaps this should be Patterson (NJ)], the murder of the President thus appears to be only a further link in the chain of such crimes." Dear Friends, Doing the work is the easy part, it's a labor of love. Asking you to help us to continue doing it is the hard part, because it's the last thing we want to do. However, while Jews have countless foundations funding their war on the white race, all we white folks have is each other. If you get value from what we at VNN are doing, please consider supporting us. In the most literal sense possible, we get by with a little help from out friends.
Donation by credit card or directly from a bank account via PayPal. It's fast, free, and secure, AND allows you the option of *anonymous* payments over the 'net by credit card.
|