17 April, 2006

Jew Auster on Despicable Taylor

Posted by alex in white nationalism at 3:48 pm | Permanent Link

[From reader…]

Lawrence Auster complains that Jared Taylor’s response is too little, too late — although he is accurate in pointing out that JT doesn’t say anything not already known.

This is a very instructive article which illustrates the Jewish attitude that you are either for them or against them. Being neutral, sitting on the fence, letting everyone have their say, forms no part of their worldview. If you are neutral on the Jewish issue then Jews consider you to be either anti-Semitic or potentially anti-Semitic, because you will be mixing with anti-Semites and thereby running the risk of being convinced by them or allowing others to be convinced by them.


Jared Taylor’s refusal to condemn anti-Semitism

(Note to reader: This article has been substantially revised since being posted on Saturday afternoon.) Jared Taylor of American Renaissance has written an article purporting to respond to the anti-Semitic manifestations that occurred at the American Renaissance conference in Virginia this past February. He also responds to, or, rather, he loftily dismisses (as a “mistake�) a letter that was sent to him by a group of AR subscribers and conference attendees last month calling on him to cease inviting anti-Semitic speakers to AR conferences, to discourage anti-Semites from attending, and to write an article in AR condemning anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. The letter said that while rational criticism of the role of Jews in leftist and anti-white movements is legitimate, blaming the Jews for all the problems of Western civilization—which is what the more committed anti-Semites do—is not. (In addition to the AR subscribers and attendees who signed the letter, I and several others signed the letter as “non-AR subscribers/attendees who are in support of this letter.� I spoke at the first AR conference in 1994, but have not subscribed to AR or gone to an AR conference in over ten years.)

While there are many ambiguities in this situation that I will explore below, the bottom line is that Taylor’s letter is a stunning disappointment. For example, he describes David Duke, who delivered an anti-Semitic diatribe from the floor, as merely “one participant well known for strong views.� Taylor does not admit that it was an error on his part to allow Duke, America’s most outspoken Jew-hater and a well-known publicity hound, to attend the conference, where it was inevitably that he would act out in the manner that he did. Taylor does not mention the most shocking incident at the conference—widespread applause at a speaker’s remark that Israel would not survive its first 100 years, with much of the applause coming from Stormfront followers, many of whom appear to have attended the conference after it became known that Taylor was permitting Duke to attend. These same people also said to some Jewish attendees that they did not belong there. Taylor evidences no sense of responsibility over allowing the situation to develop in which the anti-Semitic behaviors at the conferences occurred.

Perhaps most disappointing is Taylor’s moral equivalence between Duke’s anti-Semitic diatribe and Michael Hart’s retort: “You f***ing Nazi, you’ve disgraced this meeting.� In Taylor’s book, both were “disgraceful behaviors� that will not be allowed.

Yet—and here’s where the complexities begin—the AR readers commenting on Taylor’s article do not see it as I’ve just described. There are basically two sides among the commenters, one more or less pro-Jewish, or at least not anti-Jewish, the other anti-Semitic, and both sides see the Taylor letter as a strong statement against anti-Semitism. The pro-Jewish side praises it for this, while many on the anti-Semitic side have announced in a huff that they are withdrawing from AR because of it. What did Taylor say that so enraged them? First he said: “Jews have a valuable role in the work of American Renaissance, and are welcome participants and speakers. Anyone who thinks otherwise has the choice of staying home or keeping his views to himself.� But of course this has always been the case. Four of the ten speakers at the first AR conference were Jews, and there have been Jewish speakers and participants at subsequent conferences. So the anti-Semites’ rage on this point will probably die down when they realize that Taylor is not saying anything new. Second, Taylor said that openly anti-Semitic statements, such as telling Jewish participants that they shouldn’t be at the conference, would not be welcome. But surely that also has been understood all along. There have always been anti-Semites at AR conferences, but prior to this year’s conference they did not engage in anti-Semitic behavior toward Jewish participants. Third, Taylor said that “the role of Jews in a society� would not be discussed at AR. But this again is nothing new, as both the American Renaissance newsletter and the AR conferences have strictly avoided the Jewish question over the years. Fourth, Taylor expressed his own view that Jews are not the main cause of the West’s undoing, that gentiles have often done this to themselves. But this also is nothing new, since Taylor of course has never singled out Jews as a problem, and has always discussed the white West’s racial catastrophes as something whites as whites are doing to themselves.

Yet, amazingly, both the pro-Jews and the anti-Semites thought that these restatements of long-time AR policies were ground-breaking steps against anti-Semitism.

Some will conclude from the anti-Semites’ rage at Taylor’s letter that the letter is not as weak on anti-Semitism as I am saying, but is a document skillfully crafted by Taylor to get the anti-Semites to leave AR without his telling them to do so. Unfortunately, as already pointed out, the situation is more complicated than that. Taylor was not saying anything that has not already been tacitly the case for many years, and the anti-Semites will be mollified when they understand this. Furthermore, the online comments following Taylor’s article reveal, more than ever, the amazing number of serious anti-Semites—people who simply and unabashedly speak of Jews as the enemy—in the AR online community. And not all of them are leaving AR in a huff either. So, as a result of Taylor’s refusal to draw a line against anti-Semitism as such, AR (or at least its online discussion forums) will doubtless continue to be a community rife with anti-Semitism, a community where anti-Semitic statements are routine and accepted. Also, as objectionable as the viciousness of the anti-Semitism on display in the discussion forum following Taylor’s article, is the deeply moronic quality of so much of it, like something emerging from a sub-humanity. Yet these are the people who see themselves as the defenders of our civilization. In another sad irony, many of the “pro-Jewish� commenters at AR do not seem to react to or even to notice the extreme anti-Semites among them; many of the “pro-Jews� seem to be as non-judgmental about Jew-hatred as Taylor himself.

So here’s the situation. Instead of refuting and abandoning anti-Semitism, as Nick Griffin has been doing (though whether Griffin will ultimately succeed in cleansing the BNP of anti-Semitism remains to be seen), Taylor has opted for an in-between course. He says that Jews are welcome, even as he refuses to condemn anti-Semitism. The latter assures that anti-Semitic views will also continue to be welcome. Though some of the anti-Semites will leave, because of Taylor’s explicit welcoming of Jews, many others will stay, because they will recognize that, despite his welcoming of Jews, they, the anti-Semites, still have a forum for anti-Semitism at AR. Even if the online forum is closed in the future to anti-Semitic comments, as appears to have often been the case in the past, fierce anti-Semitism will continue to bubble in and around the AR circle, because Taylor has never taken a stand against it. In particular, AR conferences will continue to be gatherings for prominent and obscure Jew-haters, as is made clear by a biased but fact-filled account of the 2006 conference appearing at the “anti-racist� website Searchlight.

Another signer of the letter to Jared Taylor, calling himself Invictus, expressed at the AR forum his disappointment at the fact that the AR commenters thought Taylor’s article was strong, when in fact it was weak. In response, a commenter at the neo-Nazi website Stormfront wrote the below (no link):

“To get directly back on topic, I feel that Yggdrasil, Patrick R, Cjay and others are locked onto the gist of the AR situation. Jared Taylor is under assault by agents and Jewish infiltrators who are trying to pull off a direct palace coup if they can get away with it, or intimidate the hell out of him, and drive wedges between him and his genuine white nationalist base, at a minimum. My initial and instinctive reaction to the article by Taylor is in a prior posting, however, my assessment must now be modified by breaking events at AR. See the dastardly and clearly disruptive posting there by a Shylock named “Invictusâ€?. I don`t think that we should abandon AR in its hour of greatest need, as it is clear that this is exactly what the dissimulators like ‘Invictus’, one of the conspirators at AR, are striving for. To capitulate to these usurpers at this critical juncture, is to guarantee that AR becomes another useless false flag charade. It is axiomatic that the Jews would eventually resort to this type of infiltration and usurpation, as they cannot stand any else`s racism, except their own twisted variety. As America is further Balkanized, and the white racial breakdown is further exacerbated, I predict that the Jews will do everything to further cripple white resistance, including penetrating white nationalist organizations, and neutralizing them from within.

“We are dealing with cunning predators here folks, and if you think that you can avoid getting down in the gutter and coming to grips with them on their own terms, you must surely be misinformed. I will remain within AR and resist the viral kosher pathogen, in any way that I can. We owe it to our leadership cadres, and we owe it to our people! Why hand them an easy victory by cutting and running?? You can help by writing well reasoned comments on this subject here, and most especially on AR, where Jared, (or somebody) has so far, allowed an open debate on the subject. The window of opportunity at AR may close at any time, however, so fire away.”

The Stormfront commenter proves my point. This person, for whom the world consists of a war between whites and the “viral kosher pathogen,� is a supporter of AR, indeed he sees AR as a battle-front against the evil Jews. Virulent anti-Semites such as this are the kind of people Taylor has and will continue to have in his orbit. In our letter to Taylor we said he needed to repudiate anti-Semitism, in order to end the connection between himself and such people. He has refused, and so AR will remain a home to extreme anti-Semites. There is more to be said about Taylor’s non-judgmental, relativistic approach to anti-Semitism. In his article, he says over and over that he has avoided the Jewish issue at AR because it is so contentious and he doesn’t want to divide the right. But this assumes that rabid anti-Semites are a legitimate and desirable part of the movement that Taylor wants to hold together. Thus Taylor writes:

“AR has deliberately avoided taking positions on questions about which racially-conscious whites are likely to disagree…. By taking no position, AR has served readers who may be sharply opposed on these questions but who agree on the central importance of race, and are committed to our survival…. AR has likewise taken no explicit position on Jewish matters. Readers have always included both Jews and people who believe Jews play no useful role in a movement that promotes white interests…. There has always been a minority in the AR constituency that has criticized me and AR for welcoming Jews, and there has been another minority that has criticized me and AR for not denouncing the first minority…. The role of Jews in a society … should … be discussed openly in a free society, all in their appropriate places. AR is not that place. We cannot afford dissension that distracts us from our goal.”

Now someone reading this might think that this sounds reasonable; in the American tradition, Taylor wants a big tent, where all ideological camps can be included. But then you realize that one of the camps he’s talking about, one of the camps he wants to appease and keep in the fold, is the camp of insane anti-Semites who support David Duke, who support Stormfront, who think that the Jews were behind the 9/11 attack, who think that the Jews are the source of all the problems afflicting the white race. These are people so bent out of shape about the Jews they’d rather spend all their time attacking Jews than do anything about immigration or racial quotas or the other problems that they blame on the Jews. What do such people have to offer that is useful to anyone? And what do we, as civilized Westerners, have to do with these low-level, hate-filled anti-Semites? We should have nothing to do with them. We should simply shun them.

A few years ago, when serious anti-Semites would post comments at VFR, I would engage with them and get them to express their positions plainly. And when they had revealed, as they invariably did, the moronic anti-Semitic place that they were coming from, which never took long because their real beliefs were never more than a millimeter below the surface, I would draw lessons from their statements, while excluding them from my site and having nothing further to do with them (see this and this). And that, in my view, is the way all of us should deal with anti-Semites. (Nick Griffin is a special case as he is someone coming from an anti-Semitic background who is seriously criticizing anti-Semitism, an effort that is beyond Jared Taylor’s ken.)

By touching on the Jewish issue in print for the first time in his writing career, Taylor has made explicit the very thing which I began, to my distress, to see about him in the mid ‘90s, and which was the chief reason I dissociated myself from him and American Renaissance exactly 10 years ago: while he himself does not promote anti-Semitism, he has no objection to anti-Semites, no barrier that he will ever put up between himself and anti-Semites—with the caveat, which he now adds, that they refrain from making anti-Semitic comments directly to Jewish attendees at AR conferences.

Jared Taylor is a talented and impressive person. His contributions to the understanding of racial realities have been indispensable, if also at times limited in their value by his racial reductionism. In his courteous, gentlemanly manner, he gets along with everyone. He is personally comfortable with Jews and never articulates anti-Semitic positions. But he also has absolutely no problem with people who do, and no grasp of why others find this objectionable.

A recognition of racial realities, and a natural loyalty to the white West, are key elements in any effort to save our threatened civilization. But nothing good can come from people who have allowed their love for our civilization to be linked, if merely by the consistent refusal to say no, to the evil of anti-Semitism.

  1. Similar posts:

  2. 08/04/14 The New, Uh, Newer, Uh, Newest Anti-Semitism 44% similar
  3. 08/01/06 Incoming: FaceRight, Ratatosk 36% similar
  4. 06/20/11 Linder on The South 28% similar
  5. 05/09/17 The Alt-Right? No, The Alt-Sleight 26% similar
  6. 08/04/14 How We Must Safeguard Our White Children 24% similar
  7. 16 Responses to “Jew Auster on Despicable Taylor”

    1. alex Says:

      Jew Auster’s blowing smoke. Taylor makes it clear he does not allow criticism of jews at his site. He is a neoconservative. Auster uses ‘anti-semite’ as a way to make criticism of jews as a group. He too is a neoconservative. Neither of them have anything to do with White Nationalism, which is defined by two principles: 1) We are White. 2) Our enemy is the jew.

    2. the anarchist Says:

      Lawrence Auster comes across as a whiny fruitcase in his attacks on Jared Taylor. Since when did he expect White Nationalists of ANY kind to embrace him and the Jewish people as equals? White Nationalists have a hard enough time embracing different indigenous European groups as equals, so why a controversial group such as Jews?!

      Auster should read the work of Kevin MacDonald, but think a little deeper to see that a unified White resistance — with or without Jews — is impossible given the nature of Whites, as an atomized and individualistic race of peoples. The history of the West, which he romanticizes, is a history of fratricidal destruction among Gentiles and pogroms against his people. Making things aright in Jewish-Gentile relations is no easy task.

      I sympathize for Auster in a way, because I know what he’s talking about when he describes the irrational forms of anti-Semitism. But to expect the level-headed Taylor to shun the anti-Semites entirely or to keep them muzzled is ludicrous — and likely to add to the perception that Jews do not wish to debate openly but instead want to censor and control.

      Auster is a weak-minded, weak-willed racialist — alone, isolated and angry. He should have dedicated his time to advancing peace in this world, maybe using his insights to improve the situation of Jews and even Zionists (commendable, in my view) if that’s where his loyalties lie. But trying to make White Nationalists like you — that’s pathetic and stupid.

    3. karakazov Says:

      I spent a LOOONG time reading Auster, trying to decipher the clever obfuscating verbiage about how this strange destructive philosophy of “liberalism” had materialized out of nowhere and befuddled the minds of our people. Ironically Auster is just continuing the befuddling! Bottom line is, 1) it’s all about race, 2) Auster is a Jew, thus he jews (jewily).

      “Auster should read the work of Kevin MacDonald, but think a little deeper …”

      The problem is not a lack of knowledge on Auster’s part; it’s that he’s deliberately offering yet another false trail for whites inclined to nationalism to follow.

      “I sympathize for Auster in a way, because I know what he’s talking about when he describes the irrational forms of anti-Semitism.”

      One tactic used by the Jews is to pick everything apart. Really, you can tear any idea in the world to pieces by pointing out exceptions and contradictions. Thus a jew will take some 1,000 page book like Mein Kampf, pick out a single sentence in which Hitler calls the jews a name, and then dismiss the entire work as name-calling! What are the “irrational forms of anti-Semitism?” If a lion is going to eat you, what are the irrational, as opposed to rational, forms of anti-Lionism?

      “Auster is a weak-minded, weak-willed racialist — alone, isolated and angry. ”

      Nah, he’s a jew.

    4. Carpenter Says:

      Is this Jew giving his enemies a fair hearing? We shall see.

      the anti-Semitic manifestations

      anti-Semitic conspiracy theories

      anti-Semitic diatribe

      America’s most outspoken Jew-hater and a well-known publicity hound

      the most shocking incident

      Duke’s anti-Semitic diatribe

      announced in a huff

      the anti-Semites’ rage

      the viciousness of the anti-Semitism on display

      the deeply moronic quality of so much of it, like something emerging from a sub-humanity


      fierce anti-Semitism will continue to bubble

      prominent and obscure Jew-haters

      neo-Nazi website

      Virulent anti-Semites such as this

      rabid anti-Semites

      the camp of insane anti-Semites

      These are people so bent out of shape

      low-level, hate-filled anti-Semites

      the moronic anti-Semitic place that they were coming from

      the evil of anti-Semitism

      “Manifestations,” “virulent,” “rabid,” “insane,” “evil” – note that the language indicates he is not speaking of human beings, but crazed animals. Same way the Jew-created Left has always spoken of its enemies, in order to have an excuse for censoring and jailing them. And now that the Left is the whole spectrum, well….

      We should learn from this that you can give no quarter. Debate is useless, as they will censor you as soon as they have the chance.

      Auster includes a long post from someone at Stormfront, who is right in everything except in his suggested medicine: that you type away on the internet. “The window of opportunity at AR may close at any time, however, so fire away!” This Stormfronter confuses internet forums with activism. While the internet is a great tool for spreading knowledge, only physical action will cause change. Only those who are members of Amren and want to exclude the Jews have any chance to build enough numbers to do so. Posts like the one I’m writing here are only so much smoke, to be ignored at will.

    5. the anarchist Says:

      I for one think Auster is sincere and wants the West preserved, rather than lead Gentiles to a false path to destroy their civilization.

      As far as irrational forms of anti-Semitism, I will give examples (some minor): the belief that Jews are at the root of Whites liking porn; that Jews have brainwashed Whites into engaging in interracial relationships (funny that White male/Asian female pairings are usually ignored by WNs — although to the extent that they played a role in opening borders to non-Euros WNs may have a point); that Jews are at the root of the West’s suicidal liberalism (rather than the evolution of Whites in their peculiar environment); that Jews control the thought processes of Gentiles yet are “inferior”; that Jews stole all of their ideas from Gentiles (and never the other way around); that Jews are utterly lacking in humanity,* etc.

      I do agree with Carpenter, though, that posting via the internet is not activism, though many WNs think it is. That’s one reason why they remain so powerless. It’s also why Auster has overreacted a bit.

      *I realize I am speaking to a wall in this forum on this point. :D

    6. SHMUELY Says:

      Auster and his “concerned” co-conspirators are trying to strong-arm Taylor into conducting a Jewish led pogrom against the Jew Wise, genuine White Nationalist elements at Am. Renaissance. Taylor`s Jewish “friends” are showing their true colors, as well as bearing their venomous fangs. Kind of hard to be ‘respectable’ and please the ever demanding Jews at the same time.

    7. alex Says:

      As far as irrational forms of anti-Semitism, I will give examples (some minor): the belief that Jews are at the root of Whites liking porn

      No one believes that. It’s a strawman. The contention is that the jews who produce the porn determine the form it takes. Porn can be anything from a revealed ankle to cumshot. The jew shows a preference for anal and interracial sex because these serve his political as well as his commercial purpose.

      Jews have brainwashed Whites into engaging in interracial relationships

      When races are mixed politically, over time they will mix sexually. Most will not mix, but enough will that over time the effect will be visible throughout society. But the mixing doesn’t happen quickly enough, so the jew uses every media vector from retail circulars to porn to persuade women of the race he seeks to destroy that the lowest level males on earth, niggers, are desirable. This most certainly does have an effect, you can see it around you in everyday life.

      The claim that whites are suicidal is jewish/Canny Sammy balderdash. Whites vote against affirmative action and open borders every single time the issues are raised. But the bought-off elite enforce the jewish will. It is murder, not suicide, and only jew-exculpating liars and fools say otherwise.

    8. the anarchist Says:

      My claim that some WNs believe Jews create the demand (rather than the supply) for porn, or are at the root of Whites liking porn, is not a strawman: it’s simple-minded thinking, yes, and even embarrassing upon reflection.

      This is what Will Williams wrote in your more controversial porn thread:

      “For Whites in healthier times, until recently, sex was for procreation, a participatory activity between a man and his mate, not a spectator sport. We’ve been Jewed when it comes to sex, that’s certain.”

      I am not sure what planet Will Williams comes from, but it’s not the same one the vast majority of Whites live in. Have sex attitudes changed? Yes. But let’s give the birth control pill and advances in condom technology some credit here.

      Ironically, his prudishness about sex has *JUDEO*-Christian roots. I imagine the pre-Christian Europeans were more open about sex, not so inclined to see it as a “dirty” aspect of human nature — something not strictly for pro-creation.

      I have read dozens of “Canny Sammy’s” articles: I don’t think he posited that Whites are inherently suicidal (as I do) so much as that Whites are losing a culture war to those dastardly White and Jewish liberals. From my experience Jews (and most conservatives) tend to avoid evolutionary arguments.

    9. the anarchist Says:

      I thought I’d add more thoughts, upon some reflection.

      There may be a minority of Jews who see Gentiles as hostile and thus, due to their cohesiveness, bring changes to society perceived as negative by WNs (I have interacted plenty with Jews to know most do not fit the stereotypes presented by WNs; in fact not too long ago I was at the house of a Jewish millionaire who despises Blacks). So I see (without agreeing) where Alex is coming from in describing the changes to society as “murder.”

      Alex says polls show Whites are overwhelmingly opposed to affirmative action and illegal immigration. Polls may say one thing, but actions speak even louder. Why don’t the 97-98% of Gentiles awaken to their mental and political enslavement and resist these Jews who supposedly buy off their politicians (anticipating what’s coming, why don’t they counter it by funding opposing groups with their aggregate wealth and numbers)? That White Gentiles do not effectively resist against a population only a fraction their size demonstrates that Whites lack the will, or even interest, in making the changes necessary to satisfy the wishes of WNs. For Whites it is a benefit-cost ratio that’s not worth their time. Surely if they had the passion, Whites, though with a slightly lower average IQ, could overrun the Jewish schemers through sheer numbers.

      The bottom line is that Whites lack sufficient racial consciousness — with it it comes cohesiveness — to fend off against minorities within minority groups with much more willpower. White protestations against affirmative action and illegal immigration are limited to survey responses: you gave them a question and they are forced to answer. But they lack the motivation to do anything about it, because it’s low on the scale of their priorities. Thus, since they are not actively resisting certain changes in their society, but passively allow them to take place with at best weak protests, sometimes even with gleeful participation and reciprocity, “suicide” rather than murder better describes what’s happening.

      In all of this I have not mentioned that many changes perceived as Jewish-orchestrated are not actually Jewish-orchestrated, but reflect the nature of Gentiles that some WNs are unwilling to come to terms with due to their (largely Judeo-Christian) moral worldview.

      All of this, though, is academic. Bottom line is that the trends do not look good for racial-nationalists. It’s not about who can debate better but who is willing to fight for his interests the hardest and bring the necessary changes to society.

      Who cares if I have lost this debate? I sure as hell don’t. :D

    10. the anarchist Says:

      Actually, Alex wrote that Whites vote against AA and open borders, rather than oppose them in polls. It’s late and I gotta get sleep. Still, my arguments on White passivity apply even in that case for obvious reasons.

      I will be leaving this site after this post, because out of fairness I do not wish to waste the time of WNs who feel they are doing something valuable for society. To the credit of the Webmaster I have not been censored. To the credit of most participants I have not been cruelly flamed. I just don’t buy any ideology, and I don’t give a shit for politics anymore, quite frankly.

      Have a good life, friends. :D

    11. Harry Tuttle Says:

      Whitey = Mass Surrender.

    12. karakazov Says:

      the anarchist, your posts are interesting; you raise a lot of interesting ideas. Part of the reason I have been posting on VNN is to get straight for myself what I believe, and why I believe it, in particular when confronted with questions such as yours.

      Ultimately I’ve come to a simplifying conclusion, even if many of the doubts you raise are not completely answerable. Yes, Auster does truly care about the West (though I think by deleting the crucial role of the jews in its downfall he ends up doing more harm than good); yes some WNs are sometimes irrational and crazy (which has something to do with the social stigma against WN); yes the many complaints about the jews only apply to some jews, some of the complaints are weak, and some of the jews are fine people; yes whites have not acted and resisted as they should have (though of course the goal of WN’s is to do exactly that); and yes the outlook for racial nationalists may not be good (though who knows what the future may bring).

      My conclusion in the end, though, is based on the fact that all living things seek to protect and propagate the DNA closest to their own, and this seems to be the most fundamental fact about living organisms. Die or fight, and in fighting, win or die. Whites must join together and fight, or surely die.

      So I think that the questions, while legitimate and morally challenging, ultimately must be dismissed as overcomplicating in light of the nature of the world. Also, isn’t their moral challenge also derived from Christianity?

    13. Lokuum Says:

      The internet is new for the most part. It will grow. People will stumble onto subjects of ethnicity more and more. It will become obvious to whites that even if they wanted there will be no common ground with other races. It will steam roll. At some point globalism won’t pay off for individula whites and the only historical precedent for a nation is race or even more simply (unthreatening) explained, a people who do not share a history of conflict. Whites will feel a great burden off their shoulders when they realize they arn’t responsible for every ethnic groups problems. Just ten million whites out of the system donating ten dollars annually would be a hundred million dollars. We’ll build a new Republic alongside the US Inc. , keeping money out of the electoral system so our elections don’t look like a highschool pep rally. Without the social services the citys will empty out and we can take them back. It will happen, be patient. A new America, a new Independance. And remember, WE ARE THE WEST.

    14. Whites Will Win Says:

      It’s funny to see some people intellectualize porn in order to create spine cracking excuses that they hope will exonerate jews. A lot of porn is amazingly scatological because jews are very scatological. The do in fact determine the form that it takes, over time that can influence ‘taste’ in many people. Look at what the jews did in music. They increasingly made whites less visible and jungle savages more and more visible and more available. It wasn’t public demand. Slowly things are worked to alter what is available. The “1982” Year in Review issue of Life magazine is a great example of this. There’s an article stating that 1982 is the year that “Rap Swept America”. Yet, it wasn’t. It took years more of work, years of replacing everything on MTV with knuckle dragging silverbacks, 40 in one hand, mic in the other, screeching on a stoop in Brooklyn or Compton. But the zhids were working on making this mindless noise THE pinnacle of popular music today – according to the media. The media is run by whom? The same has gone on with porn, with the rabbis in charge making sure it shows more and more the true sexual proclivities of jews – along with the must see material that has savage, stinking blacks humping white women (preferably blondes, of course) – with the occasional asian or latin woman thrown in as a toy for the tree swingers. Just for the jew to demonstrate that they can denigrate anyone but their own. Sure, someone will point out that some of the women in porn are jews – but these women with their innate nymphomania are never pointed out as such, on screen they’re ‘white’ like jewish newscasters. A large part of this springs from the same motivations as more mainstream entertainment – the jews denigrate just to show they can, just to have a big laugh over it. While making a buck too.

      It only takes a small group of whites to turn the tables. The numbers of aware whites is growing. Not as fast as most of us wish, but jewish actions are forcing the issue, history repeating itself. This is why jew trolls and their sycophants come off as so shrill here and at other WN sites. On one level they can sense the big one is coming, but their ingrained arrogance won’t let them accept it, or fully believe it. One of their many weaknesses. They exploit our weaknesses, and their weaknesses always lead to a collapse of their power structures. It’s happening right now, even as they expand their campaign in the Middle East, and attempt to enlarge their domains in the media and elsewhere. Always over reaching, because of the ingrained greed that most of us are well aware of.

    15. Not Worried Says:

      “In all of this I have not mentioned that many changes perceived as Jewish-orchestrated are not actually Jewish-orchestrated, but reflect the nature of Gentiles that some WNs are unwilling to come to terms with due to their (largely Judeo-Christian) moral worldview.”

      Oh, the changes are jewish orchestrated – and they are realized because of the independent, atomized nature of whites, not the “Judeo-Christian” worldview. There is no Judeo-Christian worldview. Whites are simply too comfortable, not actively seeking confrontation, just stasis. Jews are restless because of their inborn fear and hatred of the ‘other’ – especially if the other is white. They fear the inventiveness of whites, the creativity of whites, the courage of whites when forced to go to war. They are jealous of white civilization, even as they feed on it, knowing they have never created a civilization of their own.

      Things will become more uncomfortable for whites. The more uncomfortable they get, the better things will be in the long run. The jews have forced the issue in the US and Europe. Don’t underestimate whites. Look at history. Not jew presented history. Real history. Whites will survive and thrive. Whites are being pushed into a corner, this is good. Because in the end, it will be the jews who find themselves surrounded. Of course, it won’t be their fault.

    16. Charles Martel Says:

      We could certainly use a bit more unity in our ranks. There’s no point in blasting people who are contributing in one way or another to our Movement. There are many tactics used by many different groups. This is good. We need more and more tactics. We should hit our many enemies on many different fronts. If you disagree with someone’s tactics then employ different ones. Become more active.