15 May, 2006

The Last Hurrah of Jean-Marie Le Pen

Posted by alex in Europe, France, Michael O'Meara at 12:14 pm | Permanent Link

By Michael O’Meara

A year from now, the French will go to the polls to
elect their next president. This will not be a normal
election: Not just because all the totalitarian forces
of the Judeo-liberal system will be mobilized against
the one man who embodies the hopes of the French
nation; but also because it will determine if the
European heartland is to remain European.

An election like this cannot but effect Whitemen
everywhere. As my friend Nazabekov writes: “France
today is very much like Germany in the early 1930s —
being, as Trotsky said of the latter, the key to the
international situation. The way she goes in the next
few years is the way Europe is likely to go; and the
way Europe goes will determine the fate of the White
race everywhere. Our future, in a word, hinges on
France, where the struggle between White and
non-White, Europe’s core and liberalism’s ethnocidal
state, First World civilization and Third World chaos,
is most acute and most pregnant with possibility.”
Indeed, there is something pre-revolutionary about
France today — and faintly reminiscent of Late
Weimar. This is especially the case politically.

Across the spectrum, the political class is held in
the utmost contempt. Its failings and betrayals,
which only hint at what has been going on in the
thirty-six years since Charles de Gaulle’s death, are
beginning to unfold one right after the other. In the
May 2005 referendum on the EU constitution, the state
was decisively rejected at the polls; during the
Ramadan race riots of November, it was badly mauled by
its imported jihadists; last month, a massive
trade-union/middle-class movement defeated its
legislation in the streets. Lies, smears, and
scandals, Le Pen argues, “are now the rule in our
banana republic.” The government’s approval rating
has fallen below 25 percent and talk of a “Sixth”
Republic is increasingly heard. The electorate is
also polarized, with 34 percent believing the “extreme
right” (that is, the national right) best represents
its concerns, and an even larger percent, anchored in
the modern, cosmopolitan sectors of France’s social
system, favoring the Socialist (35 percent) and
revolutionary Marxist (10 percent) left. Between the
populace (embodying the remnants of the French racial
type) and the gangster elites controlling its destiny,
the chasm grows — and as it does, so too does the
prospect of fundamental change.

*

The Norwegian writer “Fjordman” at the Brussels
Journal
recently (4-23-06) pointed out that French
Muslim blogs have begun calling for violence not only
against Jews, but against Whites. “We must burn
France, as Hamas will burn Israel.” The Muslim
immigration of the last thirty years which France’s
Judeo-liberal elites have encouraged has made France
not more powerful and prosperous, but more polarized
around her increasingly diverse ethnic communities.
(In the 1960s, before the Third World invasion had
begun, De Gaulle warned that “those who advocate
integration of Muslims have a hummingbird’s brain.”)
As the General predicted, these bird brains have
turned France into another Lebanon, rife with the
bloody communal strife that comes with the import of
racially and culturally hostile populations. But more
than embittering her once peaceful lands, the
demographic upheaval is draining France’s wealth and
resources, stifling her spirit, and racking the
national body with fever.

The introduction of these newcomers has been
categorically negative. Few of them have anything to
offer France, even economically. The state, as a
result, ends up paying the tab for their housing,
healthcare, and living expenses (estimated to cost
about $500 billion annually). As social-welfare
deficits shoot up, growth and investment in other
sectors stagnate. At the same time, everything else
is beginning to decline. Immigrant children have
succeeded in ruining one of world’s educational
wonders, with violence and sensitivity-training
replacing the traditional curriculum. The hostile
Afro Asian hordes surrounding her major cities have
also taken a high toll on her ancient culture, on the
genial character of her society, and on all the
avenues of her national life. Adding insult to
injury, thousands of mosques now blight the landscape,
offending France’s Christian heritage, her pagan
origins, and her modern secular conventions. As the
Koranic swarms reach critical mass, their shari’a
(Islamic law) supplants the republic’s laws and their
imams replace the state’s representatives. Europe in
these befouled territories has, in fact, begun to give
way to Eurabia — and not merely because of a failure
of integration, as liberals argue, but because of the
civilizational clash that inevitably comes when native
Europeans and racially foreign interlopers are forced
to share the same living space. The Islamization of
the population is preparing, in this way, for the
eventual Islamization of the West. Not unreasonably,
Muslim immigrants interpret Europe’s unwillingness to
defend its borders and uphold its standards as an
invitation to further conquests. Like Iran’s new
president, they feel that “Islam will soon rule the
world” and that they, even when they do nothing except
dwell in Western lands, serve as the vanguard of
Islam’s holy war against us.

These are “soul searching times in France,”
especially as her people re-examine the
liberal-democratic regimes of money which the United
States imposed on postwar Europe and which the
Eurocrats hope to take to new extremes of
deculturation and biological extinction. Because
these transnational forces pose a fatal threat to the
nation, the French are becoming increasingly critical
of them. Like the EU referendum and the mass protests
against Villepin’s new labor codes, opposition to
immigration is linked to the larger opposition
resisting the dominant world system. Anti-global
resistance, in fact, is more deeply rooted in France
than perhaps anywhere else in the White world —
another reason the French are on a collision course
with their New Class elites. One Establishment
politician let slip the remark that: “The French no
longer have any faith in their institutions and in
those who they embody.” The consequence, another
deduces, is that “We’re on the verge of disaster.”
Disastrous, though, as the situation may be, France
nevertheless remains one of the world’s great nations,
with a culture and tradition, however battered, that
has left her better positioned to challenge the
anti-White forces of the world system than we
Americans, with our tendentious creedal identity and
our lack of a common genetic/cultural heritage. As
the clashes between the pays legal and the pays réel,
between the French nation in its biocultural
incarnation and its bloodless managerial elites become
more conflictual and more consequential, so too does
the possibility of the Reconquest that will alone
secure the survival of la France française.

*

lepen.JPGIn 1972, when Jean-Marie Le Pen helped found the Front national (FN), he roused the ire of both conservative and liberal politicians. For more than thirty years these politicians have sought to silence him with accusations of racism, xenophobia, and fascism.
Today, however, the ideas with which he is associated and the party he leads dominate the national debate, for the warnings he’s raised and the predictions he’s made, despite the unrelenting media distortions, have
been borne out by events. As the International Herald
Tribune
reports (1-13-06), all the presidential
candidates must now address the issues that made Le
Pen an outcast. In Time magazine’s flippant (and
ungrammatical) language: “They’re not just for the far
right anymore — anti-immigration politics are going
mainstream.” FN ideas are likely to continue to gain
ground because Third World immigration has become so
threatening that even the powers responsible for it
can no longer ignore its effects. The big question is
how a system based on lies and illusions will be able
to deal with a reality that offends its virtualist
representation of it. The political class would
prefer, of course, not to deal with it at all, as it
has done for more than a generation. But the luxury
of denial is today no longer an option. As the
Communist L’Humanité puts it, a great specter haunts
the country’s political class — the specter of April
21, 2002, when Le Pen, in defiance of all the received
wisdom, forced Jacques Chirac (“Shirak”) into the
second round of the presidential election. If
immigration continues to be ignored, if the violence,
anarchy, and barbarism reigning in the gang-infested
ethnic enclaves of her banlieues (the invaders’
conquered territories) persist, if another daunting
crises should arise: the 2007 election may sweep Le
Pen not only into the second round, but into the
presidential palace.

Given that the situation today is qualitatively more
disastrous than it was in 2002, Europe’s most renowned
nationalist is predicting that he will not only make
it to the second round in 2007, but emerge victorious
— and this is not simply the usual political bluster.
The anti-immigrant, anti-globalist, anti-Europeanist
ideas that much of the French electorate embraces are
all closely associated with his name and career. The
accelerating currency of his ideas also comes in a
period of heightened alienation, which further
enhances their radical potential. Nearly 70 percent
of the electorate views the political class as a
threat to its basic interests — much of it sharing Le
Pen’s opinion that “the people who govern our country
are criminals” beholden to “special interests” and
indifferent to those of the petits blancs, whose
experience of Third World immigration is not a matter
of political or intelllectual debate, but of daily
terror. Relatedly, a third of the French electorate
now describes itself as “racist” and believes the
“extreme right” best speaks to its concerns.

sarkozy.jpg

Perhaps the greatest testament to Le Pen’s growing
authority is that the main right contender for the
presidency, Nicholas Sarkozy of the Union pour un
Mouvement Populaire (UMP), a little man who loves to
play tough whenever the TV cameras are on, has
recuperated aspects of Le Pen’s rhetoric and, as
Interior Minister, adopted certain measures that
superficially overlap his anti-immigrant stance. A
Jewish home-grown neocon whose right rhetoric serves
left purposes, Sarkozy has, of course, no real
intention of opposing immigration and hopes even to
introduce American style affirmative action that will
further empower Islam. (It’s no secret that the UMP
has put its membership “at the disposal of the great
capitalist powers.”) For Le Pen, rightwing
politicians like Sarkozy who talk tough, advocate law
and order, and call for more controls on immigration
“may speak like Le Pen, but they act like Chirac.”
That is, they act not against the system, but for it.
He’s confident that when the French go to the polls in
April 2007 they will “prefer the original to the
copy.”

The left (elements of which have also been affected
by the rightward drift in French politics) warns that
Sarkozy and other demagogic rightists have fostered a
dangerous lepenisation of the political system. The
left’s principal force, the Parti socialiste (SP), is,
though, in disarray, deeply split and tainted still
with the stigma of the corrupt Mitterrand presidency
and Jospin administration. The Socialist
Marie-Ségolène Royal may be leading in the polls, with
a 31 percent approval rating, but this Tony
Blair-clone has no effective mass base in the SP, has
little experience in electoral politics (which is why
she is liked), and lacks any sort of program — except
to make herself agreeable to the media, part of which
entails being agreeable to the anti-national
cosmopolitans controlling it. As in 2002, divisions
on the left, combined with its unwillingness to
address the grievances of the anti-immigrant movement,
are likely to turn the election into a contest between
“conservatives” and nationalists. That the left
continues to denounce the lepenisation of the
government also contributes to Le Pen’s growing
legitimacy.

Le Pen’s prediction of victory is not, then, totally
infeasible. In fact, his present standing in the
polls, at 14 percent, a year before the election, is
unprecedented. (One poll puts the figure at 20
percent. Some bloggers even contend that the polls
are rigged and that Le Pen’s following is far higher
than they suggest). And much, everyone knows, can
happen in the coming year. One Jewish “specialist on
the extreme right” (Jean-Yves Cohen) says, “Le Pen has
a good chance of winning because reality is working in
his favor.” Nevertheless, the road to the presidency
will be a rocky one. A major obstacle to reaching his
destination may, indeed, be the FN itself. It has yet
to recover from the devastating split of 1998, in
which Bruno Mégret, his former second in command,
broke from the party to form the Mouvement national
républicain (MNR). The split cost the FN half its
regional elected officials and led to the eventual
loss of 60 percent of its membership. (Contrary to
the contention of certain cyber-nationalists, there
was nothing unprincipled in the split — except the
belief that the nationalist movement could flourish
without Jean-Marie. Like many great leaders, he
doesn’t suffer rivals nor readily accepts criticism
from his ranks — which has had a stifling effect on
the party’s militants. To its credit, Mégret’s MNR
has recently agreed to close ranks behind Le Pen by
joining the FN’s union patriotique). Though the 2002
election and the November riots helped replenish FN
ranks, the party is still not completely operational.
Ideally, the presidential election will re-energize
it.

devill.jpg Another lingering effect of the ’98 split is the Mouvement pour la France (MPF), led by the conservative Philippe de Villiers, which has arisen to challenge Le Pen on the right. The MPF has already attracted a number of former FN officials and established itself as a credible presence in the
public sphere, especially with that segment of the population conscious that the Muslim community can never live in peace with non-Muslims. I’m not quite certain yet what to think of the MPF, but the NF (through its general secretary, Loius Aliot)
characterizes it as a divisive enterprise designed to
split the nationalist electorate. Though Villiers (a
parliamentary deputy who played a key role in last
year’s anti-EU referendum) has only a 4 percent
approval rating and lacks Le Pen’s charisma, he is
nevertheless a serious rival and could indeed divide
the nationalist vote. On the positive side, he’s more
aggressively anti-Islamic than Le Pen (“encouraging,”
as one liberal journalist put it, “the climate of fear
and hatred of Islam”) and is bound to contribute to
the polarization fueling the nationalist movement.
A perhaps greater obstacle to Le Pen’s presidential
ambitions may be his age and health. At 77, he’s
showing signs of fatigue and has already had a bout of
prostrate cancer. Several times now, Villiers has
made the case that Le Pen lacks “the lucidity or
energy to understand the questions of our time.” marine.jpg
Relatedly, there’s speculation that at some point his daughter, Marine Le Pen, one of the FN’s vice president and her father’s campaign manager, will step into her father’s shoes and carry the campaign to termination. (The differences between Marine and her father are, as I see them, somewhat analogous to those that once separated John Tyndall and Nick Griffin in
the British National Party. She will undoubtedly
mainstream the party and broaden its appeal, lacking
as she does the two-fisted pugnacity of her father’s
nationalism and being more attuned to her father’s
bourgeois drift of recent years. But, like Griffin,
she is no slacker and, if reviews of her recent book
are correct, is “conversant” with the more militant
and consequential expressions of 20th-century
anti-liberal nationalism. She is also more socialist
and Europeanist than her father, which, in my view, is
not a bad thing). But if she should claim her
“inheritance,” it will undoubtedly alienate the FN’s
“conservatives” (allied with Bruno Gollnisch),
accentuate factional divisions within the party, and
perhaps provoke a “war of succession,” all of which
cannot but have a negative effect on the movement.
Le Pen himself has also shown some disturbing
tendencies of late. Though still solidly
anti-Zionist, he’s become more circumspect with
Muslims and even made certain overtures to them.
(Reports coming from one New York Jewish publication
claiming that the FN has made a formal pact with Islam
are, however, entirely without substance). He is
nevertheless not as forthrightly anti-Islamic as he
once was. For instance, following the November race
riots, he claimed the three weeks of fiery mayhem were
an expression neither of race nor religion but of
anarchy. There’s of course an element of truth in
this, but it’s not one a nationalist ought to
highlight. Le Pen was also responsible for appointing
a Beur (an Algerian immigrant) to the FN’s political
bureau in 2000, compromising in some nationalists’
eyes the ethnic integrity of the movement. Similarly,
this year’s Mayday rally in Paris (to commemorate the
600th anniversary of Jeanne d’Arc) featured a
Caribbean steel drum band and a black yell leader —
in what the NY Times described as “an apparent effort
to broaden the National Front’s appeal and combat
charges that it is racist.” (The mere thought of
French nationalists mobilizing negroes behind their
banner is too bizarre to even contemplate). More
seriously, and this is a problem of longer standing,
both Le Pen and the FN executive stand for the
assimilation, not repatriation of the present
immigrant population. This is especially the case for
the party’s large Catholic wing, which doesn’t view
race as a hallmark of French identity. Though there’s
an implicit recognition in much of the party that most
immigrants cannot assimilate and should be
repatriated, both the question of race and the
imperative of repatriation have been largely ignored.
There are a good many other things a White nationalist
might find to criticize in the FN and in Le Pen, but
these, I believe, ought not to distract from the fact
that the National Front, with all its flaws and
failings, has been and remains le grand parti
populaire
of the French people. Whatever still exists
of the nation is, indeed, represented in its ranks:
For no other reason, I feel, this is cause for its
support.

*

One neocon at FrontPageMagazine.com (4-7-06) writes
that France is sinking, the economy crumbling, her
best people (that is, the Jews) leaving, the hopeless
immigrant youth still rioting and burning. More
seriously, many French resist integration into
Washington’s New Global Order, refuse to sacrifice
their culture on the altar of multiculturalism, put
social concerns above economic ones — but, above all,
constitute “the Achilles’ heel of the Global System”
(E. Leroy), that is, they represent a potential ally
of Russia and hence the basis of a possible
Eurosiberian alternative to Washington’s global order
— these are all reason, the New York neocons believe,
to condemn her to history’s dustbin.

But there’s another way of seeing the
structural-moral crisis besetting France. If viewed
from a bio-historical perspective based on race and
spirit, the French crisis, like the Soviet crisis of
the 1980s, seems less likely to be resolved through
another dose of the one-worlders’ highly profitable
system of egalitarianism (in this case, the cultural
and racial egalitarianism of the liberal neocons, not
the Soviets’ social and economic kind) — than through
its forceful repudiation. Le Pen might not win the
presidency in 2007 (there are more important things
for the nationalist cause). But if his electoral bid
succeeds in mobilizing the remnants of the French
nation behind the FN, heightening the nation’s ethnic
solidarity and its faith in itself, but most all
winning it to the cause of Reconquest, it will
undoubtedly prepare the French for the more daunting
struggles to come. Whatever happens, then, his Last
Hurrah offers the rising generation a legacy of
resistance — virtually unique in the White world —
that cannot but advance the nation’s interest. In
this light, it would seem more reasonable to see
France’s future not in terms of flight or collapse, as
the neocons would have it, but in terms of the
prospects the French still have, in this most pivotal
of historical periods, to take their stand on their
own land and reclaim their right to be a nation again.


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 02/09/08 Le Pen Found Guilty of Thought-Crime 48% similar
  3. 04/23/07 O’MEARA: Disastrous Harvest: Le Pen’s Worst Score in 26 Years 39% similar
  4. 12/16/07 Le Pen on Trial in France 39% similar
  5. 04/27/09 White Art: Jean-Honoré Fragonard 29% similar
  6. 07/09/07 French Company Fined for Lack of Racial Diversity 28% similar
  7. 39 Responses to “The Last Hurrah of Jean-Marie Le Pen”

    1. Jim Says:

      Excellent and well reasoned article. Let’s hope that when the revolution starts, the forces of the Sixth Republic make far more extensive use of the guillotine than their predecessors.

      ” Disastrous, though, as the situation may be, France
      nevertheless remains one of the world’s great nations,
      with a culture and tradition, however battered, that
      has left her better positioned to challenge the
      anti-White forces of the world system than we
      Americans, with our tendentious creedal identity and
      our lack of a common genetic/cultural heritage. ”

      This is perhaps one of the most important observations in the article. Too many WN’s have a tendency to be chauvinistic. They buy into that ” U.S. is the best ” nonsense. That might have been true a century ago but it isn’t any longer. Last week I wrote in one of my comments that we had to support those movements that offered the best chance of success regardless of where they were. We must concentrate our limited resources where they can do the most harm to the internationalists ( jews ) and their corrupt allies. A success in France or anywhere in the White world will be the hole in the dyke that starts the torrent flowing. The torrent will usher in a Europe far different than the current eurocrats envision. A European coalition that stretches from Ireland to Siberia. A vast bloc of talent and wealth to keep the Chinese giant at bay and squelch the interference of the rapidly declining Kwa. What will become of the Kwa? The white lemmings who haven’t left to take part in the European revolution will be tripping over each other trying to get jobs as security guards for rich jews while the rest of the ” cuntry” descends into a Brazil-like state. Sorry – no revolution here. Too many white imbeciles with ” vested interests ” in the status quo. Just my two shekels for what its worth.

    2. Celtic Warrior Says:

      The leaders of the Christian Churches in France will have to quit equivocating and fence-sitting. Will they come out in defense of the White Race, or will they show themselves to be the ball-less lackeys of the jew internationalists?
      I sincerely hope the former is the case. There is no alternative.

    3. Lutjens Says:

      If LePen gets in, there will be sanctions and ultimately military action against France led by the kiked State Department and Pentagon. Look what happened to Yugoslavia (Serbia) and the threat against Austria by Bubba and kikess Albright – all because they wanted leadership to take back their countries. Instead of going to the polls next time, go to the nearest gun shop and buy a nice hefty supply of ammunition. Let the madness begin.

    4. Jim Says:

      “Prepare to be an insurgent!!!”

    5. Carpenter Says:

      Too many WN’s have a tendency to be chauvinistic. They buy into that � U.S. is the best � nonsense. That might have been true a century ago but it isn’t any longer.

      Jim, no. All I see is self-hatred and loathing. Just like all the liberals will always bash American culture. Just like leftist Europeans will always bash American culture. The Jews have taught their victims well. But here’s a funny thing: despite all the self-hatred, the foremost part of Americans’ criticism of themselves will always be “We think we are so great….” And yes, that is funny. It’s just like self-hating Whites, in regard to Whites, say: “We think we are so great….” when all you hear from Whites is the bashing of their own race.

      As for a European coalition from Ireland to Siberia: Slavs and Westerners in a coalition? What do you think West European nationalists are fighting against? Saving their nations from being swamped by Slavs, with their gangs and their drugs and their rapes and hatred of Westerners, is just as much a priority as saving the West from Arabs and Blacks. To the ZOG, all these groups serve the same purpose: destroying the hated West.

      Go to a British nationalist meeting and tell the audience the Slavs are brothers, and you’ll be kindly shown the door. Thanks to the EU, the Slavs are joining the Pakis in record numbers. Their own governments rejoice in this just as much as Mexico rejoices in sending its refuse north.

    6. Carpenter Says:

      A few thoughts on these articles, in no particular order:

      The Norwegian writer “Fjordmanâ€? at the Brussels Journal recently (4-23-06) pointed out that French Muslim blogs have begun calling for violence not only against Jews, but against Whites. “We must burn France, as Hamas will burn Israel.â€? – So? You can always find some religious idiot to quote on anything. That doesn’t mean immigration is a religious problem – it’s a race problem. Christian Syrians and Iraqis, and all the atheists of the second and third generations of immigrants, behave in the exact same way as other Arab immigrants. And look at the race riots: organized Islamists did not take part, but in fact tried to stop the rioters, telling them there were better ways to channel their frustration. This is what the Islamists are always telling the youths in the banlieues: stop your drinking and fighting, clean up your act and channel your frustration.

      The great flaw of American nationalists, when looking at Europe, is to dream of the European Union as some great nationalist force that will challenge the ZOG. They hear “European” and start swooning and drooling. The great flaw of European nationalists, on the other hand, is to portray the mud problem as a religious problem. (What religion are Mexicans? Or Blacks?) This is nothing but an attempt to escape the “racist” charge by talking about religion instead, until your followers start believing in the deception. Very dangerous. The next step is to start supporting the neocons in their “clash of cultures.” Bomb them Iraqi Muslims!

      More seriously, and this is a problem of longer standing, both Le Pen and the FN executive stand for the assimilation, not repatriation of the present immigrant population. This is especially the case for the party’s large Catholic wing, which doesn’t view race as a hallmark of French identity. – Buggers. The lesson to be learned: a Christian contingent in your party will fuck up everything. “Just make the immigrants Christian, and everything will be aaaalll right.” This is how they think, these Catholics. It is surreal, but it’s the strategy they suggest.

      –No, Le Pen doesn’t stand a chance of winning the presidential election. You don’t win the presidency with 14 percent of the votes or even 20 percent, you win it with 51 percent of the votes. Sarkozy will have that – if necessary, he will get all the socialists on his side in a second round of the election, like Chirac got last time. Combined with his own followers that will give him 70-80 percent of the vote.

      –The “lepenization” of French politics came after the defeat of the EU Constitution, where the Front National was on the winning side. Suddenly, all their arguments had moved into the mainstream. It was to a great extent their arguments about East Europeans and Turks swarming across the borders, while industries move Eastward, that defeated the Constitution. All those years out in the cold finally paid off.

      –O’Meara gets it wrong when he attributes the Parti Socialiste’s inner conflicts to the Mitterand presidency and Lionel Jospin. These are ancient history. The Parti Socialiste is tearing apart mainly over globalization, especially the EU. The globalist leaders favored the EU Constitution while most of the socialist electorate was against it, and the leftist extremists in the party then also took the opportunity to call for a return to the strangling socialist economic policies of the past, which have hampered France for so long. (Neither globalists nor extremists are friends of France.) There doesn’t seem to be a way to resolve the conflict. A split would be in order, but there is so much money and trough-gobbling to gain by staying in the party, that a split seems unlikely.

      –It is true that Frenchmen are tired of their elites – and battling the elite, by the way, has been a main point of the Front National from day one. What does this elite consist of? It consists of men from les grandes écoles, the grand schools, and the elite of the elite come from the ENA. This university, founded by de Gaulle with the explicit purpose of producing new elites that hadn’t collaborated with the Germans, has only 1,000 graduates a year. These immediately go into top positions. Example: Seven of the past ten prime ministers and two of the past three presidents, including Chirac, studied at the ENA. The French were unaware of this establishment for a long time. Today, they are more aware. It has helped the Front National greatly that it is sort of the anti-ENA alternative.

      -Curiously, in France, a great proportion of newspapers are owned by the defense industry. By some estimates, 70 percent of newspapers. Like Le Figaro, owned by the gigantic Socpresse group, owned by the defense giant Group Dassault. The defense industry, of course, is entirely dependant on government contracts, and therefore always pro-establishment – criticize mass immigration, for example, and you may see contracts go to someone else. This situation seems unique among the world’s media. The average Frenchman is unaware of this, but still anti-establishment information has gained an audience. Why? Because…

      –…the French are an aggressive people, always in love with the next revolution that will produce an easy cure for their ailings. This is why the FN has had such a success where similar parties in many other Western nations have failed. The Front National has also been wise in using the internet systematically, by sending members to chatrooms to talk politics and promote the FN. Also, the FN has its own daily newspaper. This is the way to go – build new media hand in hand with a new party.

    7. jimbo Says:

      it all comes down to this: “only the Jew won World War Two”

      The Jew World Order, with all its anti-terrorism legislation, gun control, political correctness and ‘imprisonment without trial’ may well yet disintegrate in a balkanised, multi-cultural ‘civil’ war. The racial tsunami is going to overwhelm everything …… even the best laid plans of the yoos and their fellow-travellers!

    8. SHMUELY Says:

      Bingo, Jimbo! The blowback, or unintended consequences is coming on faster than the manipulators and their stupid minions can imagine. Look at the mudtide pouring out of Mexico, and the paralysis and ineptitude of the political whores, and even the dumb white bunnies themselves. Like Thomson says, “we feed, they breed”. Nothing new here to genuine thinkers, skeptics, or visionaries, but we need to keep raking the muck and reminding those who may listen to reason.

    9. jimbo Says:

      ‘SHMUELY’ said:
      “The blowback, or unintended consequences is coming on faster than the manipulators and their stupid minions can imagine”

      Raspail’s ‘Camp of the Saints
      could yet prove prescient

    10. Carpenter Says:

      Nothing new here to genuine thinkers, skeptics, or visionaries,

      I disagree. Far too many would-be revolutionaries think this way: they don’t need no new information, they got it all figured out! But that is when you lose the details, and that is when you lose your grip on the whole picture.

      I see a lot of posts here that could just as well have been posted in any thread. “The revolution is coming!” “Hell, yeah!” We can fill thread after thread with that. That is what is not new to genuine thinkers.

      People would be well advised to actually read the articles they are replying to – I believe Linder is picking the articles for a reason, and reading them is the main point here, not posting. Those who don’t have anything more to add, should consider not posting. Harsh? Yes. That’s not what a public school teacher would say. But I hope I can make a call for quality above quantity here, without raising anybody’s ire, since that is what we are all about.

      Certainly, the call should not be that we don’t need to learn any more, we know it all already.

    11. SHMUELY Says:

      THE CAMP OF THE SAINTS, by Raspail always comes to mind, as do the pescient books by Stoddard. Furthermore, I always find O`Meara`s articles about the French scene insightful and interesting. He is also published in the ‘OCCIDENTAL QUARTERLY’, which is recommended. Ideologically, I found nothing really new in the article, but yes, it was a learning experience. That`s why I said “…but we need to keep raking the muck and keep reminding those who those who may listen to reason.”

    12. HighPlainsDrifter Says:

      The NWO is hurrying toward its monopoly of force. Americans are in a much better position to resist, if some country in the world remains independent of the NWO, so that it can provide direct and indirect aid, such as the sanctuary Ukraine gave to David Duke.

      With the conquest of Afghanistan and Iraq, and the pending conquest of Iran, Moslem independence of the NWO is “on the ropes”. Since the “Orange Revolution” in Ukraine, Russia (a nuclear-armed power) and Belarus remain; but these countries likewise are “on the ropes” with problems old and new, and a cultural gulf that creates some difficulties for Americans trying to adapt to new lives there.

      The average White American would adapt more easily to exile in France (also a nuclear-armed power) than in any other currently NWO-resisting country. This is why the fight in France is so crucial. Just as in 1776, France – the real France, the France of LePen – is our best ally.

    13. apollonian Says:

      Bright Anti-Semitic Cultural Developments Still Expected
      (Apollonian, 16 May 06)

      Yes, above commentary is all so interesting–as the observation Le Pen has so little to say (evidently) about such as Ernst Zundel, his EU friend and neighbor in Germany, persecuted for thought-crime. “Camp of the Saints” is indeed excellent inspiration which people must think about.

      There still seems to be an interval until people can unite enough to throw off the Judeo-oligarchic yoke by, for example, convening in Germany to denounce holohoax for what it really is, dirty, stupid, brainless Jew-lies, repeated over and over. Forgiveness of debts would be another revolution to go along.

      CONCLUSION: White liberation-revolution ought to be shown for its bright possibilities, objectivistic rule-of-law and sanctity-of-contract; everyone else should shut up and let “Carpenter” speak, as what he says is most important. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

    14. Celtic Warrior Says:

      Let’s mimimise any in-fighting and promote White unity. “White Pride World Wide” Do you think the jew world order is going to remove its strangle hold from our necks if we ask it nicely! Conflict is inevitable and as soon as the French National Front wakes up to that fact the better for France and nationalist everywhere.

    15. jimbo Says:

      ‘High Plains Drifter’ reckons:
      “With the conquest of Afghanistan and Iraq, and the pending conquest of Iran, Moslem independence of the NWO is “on the ropes”

      A trifle pre-mature i think…..if the media coverage of the on-going daily military disasters afflicting ZOG-mil in Iraq and, to a some-what lesser extent, Afghanistan came any-where near that of the Vietnam War, then the JewSA would have vacated those premises @ LEAST twelve-months since. I put the fatality figures @ or above 15000 and the serious casualties up to THRICE that with probably ¼-million civilian fatals. An Iraqi-style ‘Tet Offensive’ is probably on the cards for the immediate future and may even be accompanied by some sort of ‘mutiny’ of the middle-level officer corps.
      As for Iran: such an escapade will almost certainly obliterate ZOG-mil. If the Iranians un-leash even a fraction of the high-tech weaponry the Russians have been supplying, then a ‘ground-invasion’ wouldn’t last more than a month @ best. The Russian ‘sun-burn’ hyper-sonic anti-ship missile will clear the Gulf of ZOG vessels in a matter of hours.
      Personally, i think ZOG is aware of this and has probably made secondary and tertiary contingency plans…..perhaps the total ‘ZOG-ation’ of the JewSA or, @ worst, the high-level yoos seeking calmer shores else-where: Oz might be a distinct possiblity: seeing as how that be-nighted nation is riddled with Freemasons, gun-grabbers, femi-bitches and the PM is a Talmudic ass-licker!

      re: Carpenter
      ‘reading & comprehension’ might be a more appropriate admonition…used to be taught to the littlies in those far-off halycon days before ‘schools’ became ‘schmuels’

    16. the anarchist Says:

      Carpenter writes: “Go to a British nationalist meeting and tell the audience the Slavs are brothers, and you’ll be kindly shown the door. Thanks to the EU, the Slavs are joining the Pakis in record numbers. Their own governments rejoice in this just as much as Mexico rejoices in sending its refuse north.”

      It may not have occurred to the BNP types that perhaps the refuse is found looking in the mirror rather than to the “eastern” bogeyman.

      Having been to Northern Europe, I have seen plenty of blonde girls paired up with Black boys. But to the blue-collar, single BNPers, it’s those Poles, Czechs and Baltic peoples that are the problem.

      Perhaps it should have been expected that the BNP would turn into a “reality” VNNForum (sans the duplicate screennames). While blue-collar Englishmen who litter WN boards with their mental “wretched refuse” focus their attention on their genetic cousins, they are being cuckolded by Africans in their own country.

      In the meantime, the Slavic nations remain much more racially homogeneous than England. Looks like, among Europeans, they may be the Darwinian winners. Then again, they may just hold out a little longer but share a similar fate.

    17. ataraxia Says:

      I’d like to do the blonde chick in the FNJ ad above.

    18. the anarchist Says:

      Ataraxia writes: “I’d like to do the blonde chick in the FNJ ad above.”

      Yeah, she’s hot. That’s one of the best political ads I have seen.

    19. jimbo Says:

      ‘anarchist’ says:
      “It may not have occurred to the BNP types that perhaps the refuse is found looking in the mirror rather than to the ‘eastern’ bogeyman.
      Having been to Northern Europe, I have seen plenty of blonde girls paired up with Black boys. But to the blue-collar, single BNPers, it’s those Poles, Czechs and Baltic peoples that are the problem”

      yeah…dunno if that’s a problem with the BNP or the Brits in general….don’t forget that a very large percentage indeed of the ‘white’ Brit population still think they ‘fought the good fight’ against Germany in WWII. The Scept’rd Isle has been heavily infiltrated by the kikes since @ least the late seventeenth century if not much earlier and, thus, the white population has been pretty heavily kike-ised: much longer even than the good ol’ JewSA(to my knowledge there has NEVER been any organisation there comparable to, say, George Lincoln Rockwell’s outfit or even the KKKK. Don’t forget, too, that there was a very strong resistance to the US’s entrance into WWII[not spoken of now, of course] led by such people as Lindberg and Elizabeth Dilling and others like Father Coughlan and Henry Ford. So much so that, even for a kike stooge like FDR, it would have been absolute political suicide to become openly involved. ZOG-SA had to content it-self with ‘Lend Lease’ and harrassing German vessels on the high seas[‘piracy’]. It took an incident like Pearl Harbour and a declaration of war by Hitler before FDR was prepared to ‘stick his neck out’. OTOH, there was NO SUCH opposition from the Brit’: they pretty much went along with the yoo-programme hook, line & sinker). Sure: some white stalwarts have appeared (the names John Tyndal and William Joyce come to mind) but, on the whole, few and far between
      Hence, it comes as no surprise that the Brits have been pretty much notorious for ‘doing the dirty-work’ of the kikes: DON’T FORGET that it was THE BRITS who pretty much started, continued and ultimately destroyed possibly the best chance that the White Race has had in the last 10000 yrs to break free of ZOG. The BNP makes a lot of noise about ‘Muslims’ but you’d have to use a pretty fine tooth comb indeed to locate ‘nary a bad word about our REAL ENEMIES: the effin’ yoos!
      Similarly, even an ostensibly White Power ‘site’ like ‘Combat 18’ has a lot of these characters creating a lot of smoke and dust about ‘Muslims’ (and, AFA non-white Muslims go: that’s as it should be) but, again, little or nothing concerning our DEADLIEST FOES. In fact, i have recently been ‘banned’ from their forum because one of the femi-bitch ‘moderators’ there took exception to my excessive ‘castigation’ of the yids as opposed to ‘Muslims’. I’m not boo-hooing over that though because i was going to ‘drop off’ posting any-way: most of their clientele seems to consist of brain-less adolescents any-ways. Interestingly, the most vehement opprobium directed kike-wards came from those of Eastern European extraction: clearly speaking from the wisdom of experience. I my-self can’t see any promising developments favouring the White Race arising from the Brit(although there will, un-doubtedly, be individual exceptions). Le Pen’s group presents a more optimistic possibility. But, generally, like Hitler, my eyes are turned East for REAL CHANGE!

    20. jimbo Says:

      re: abv post

      the best chance that the White Race has had in the last 10000 yrs to break free of ZOG

      should be: ……….
      the best chance that the White Race has had in the last 1000 yrs to break free of ZOG

      (10000 yrs is a bit too much even for a ‘foaming @ the mouth’ kike-hater like me!)

    21. SHMUELY Says:

      Jimbo, some very wise and prescient observations. It is clear that you have a very well developed, fully activated racial radar system, and a thought processor to go along with it. High value assets in the shrinking, somnolent world of white dissonance that we are slogging through. Keep up the fire.

    22. unbeirrbar Says:

      Instead of trying to atract the remaining conservative voters the FN should focus on those votig for the left.

      Seriously,conservative voters who even now would rather stick to the establishment parties then to vote for the FN are not going to change their mind anytime soon.

      On the other hand,the majority of the left-wing voters seems to be protest -potential.These are not multiculturalists or liberal French but dissatisfied voters from the lower-middle class/working class who are directly affected by the capitalist reforms of the “conservartives”.

      A nationalist Party can attract such potential if it adresses hot-issues like globalization and world-wide capitalism.

    23. Celtic Warrior Says:

      We can only hope that a true White revolt breaks out in Russia. Actually, all we need is for one White country to cast off the kike death grip for us to breath and breed again. France is our immediate hope. Unfortunately Britain is nailed down pretty tight, not surprising when you realise that the so called English aristocracy are a bunch of Khazari fraudsters.

    24. the anarchist Says:

      Jimbo writes: “…dunno if that’s a problem with the BNP or the Brits in general…”

      Fact is that historically England has been a very stratified and class-conscious country. Most of the works of genius coming from England have come from the upper and upper-middle classes (as pointed out by Lothrop Stoddard). The lower classes of England have accomplished comparatively little. Most of the English WN posters on the internet come from the lower and middle classes — what an insensitive eugenicist might label the “scum.” The type of people who’d likely be victims if their own political ideas were ever implemented.

      To answer to your comment above, I have not met enought Britons to form a solid judgment on their character. I could tell you things that I’ve heard, but that wouldn’t do. I suspect British White Nationalists are very unrepresentative of British society, in terms of morals and maybe even intelligence.

    25. jimbo Says:

      ‘the anarchist’ says:

      “I suspect British White Nationalists are very unrepresentative of British society, in terms of morals and maybe even intelligence”

      doubtless there are @ least some committed Brit’ WNs but the numbers would be tiny. The N9S possibly comes to mind….?……. and WCOTC if they have a chapter there. that’s about all i can think of……most of the ‘anti-paki’,’anti-moslem’ crowd could probably be categorised as merely ‘soccer hooligans’. this crew doesn’t seem to make any loud noises even about such a blatant ZOG outrage as the Iraq debacle. maybe they think it’s OK to ‘blow up’ sand niggas or sumthin’? They don’t seem to realise that this is a ‘yoo-friendly’ conflict from which only the yoo will gain(and, hence, they will lose!) and can’t seem to make the logical connection that it could well be (and was: re: Serbia) a white country to-morrow if they buck ZOG. Basically, they seem to be in the same boat as most of the patriotards in various ‘western’ nations: when you name the KIKE, they take FRIGHT!

    26. Carpenter Says:

      It may not have occurred to the BNP types that perhaps the refuse is found looking in the mirror rather than to the “eastern� bogeyman.

      Having been to Northern Europe, I have seen plenty of blonde girls paired up with Black boys. But to the blue-collar, single BNPers, it’s those Poles, Czechs and Baltic peoples that are the problem.

      Gee, no mass immigration into Poland? Obviously they are superior racialists then. And it’s always fun for a Slav to paint the image of blond Nordic girls paired up with niggers – much like the non-Whites love to defile White women in word and action. You defile that which you desire and envy, such as Nordic genes. This behavior is the same for Slav immigrants, Black immigrants, Arab immigrants, etc.

      And you wonder why Nordics may object to the Slavic tide teaming up with their non-White comrades in invading Western Europe? Hmmm….

      Your comfortable picture of worthless British nationalists and superior nationalist Slavs conveniently omits that the Slavs in Western Europe all vote for anti-White parties. Only a handfull do not.

      It’s the same as with the non-Whites: racial integrity in the homeland, race-mixing for the invaded countries. Directly from the Jew script.

      Why would anyone object to these race traitors invading Western Europe in large numbers, voting for the anti-White parties that let them in, being the perfect Jew-tools? Surely they are our loyal White brothers … uh….

      As for no mass immigration in Eastern Europe, could that be because the communist parties never needed it in order to stay in power? Could it be that once they had a tight grip on their slave nations, they didn’t need to destroy their cultures any more? History says yes. But that does not make Slavs superior in any way to Westerners. That only shows that they were controlled in a different way.

      And after that, they have overwhelmingly voted for the EU in their polls and referendums. Race-aware? The EU is an anti-nationalist ZOG creation, the purpose of which is very explicitly to make a nationalist reaction impossible, an organization which makes sure Western wealth and industries move to the Eastern nations – no wonder the Slavs vote to join it. Why should the Arab immigrants get all the loot? Also, the open borders give them access to Nordic pussy, and if the Nordic women won’t give it willingly, just rape them together with the Arab members of your gang. Such swell racial comrades. Why is the BNP objecting to them? Obviously the BNP are the rabble here.

    27. jimbo Says:

      quoth ‘Carpenter’:
      *This behaviour is the same for Slav immigrants, Black immigrants, Arab immigrants, etc*

      except that ‘Slav immigrants’ are white and the rest ain’t….or don’t you like seeing large-scale white immigration?

      *And you wonder why Nordics may object to the Slavic tide teaming up with their non-White comrades in invading Western Europe*

      ‘Slavic tide’….as in ‘mud tide’….hunh?…..i suggest a re-reading of either Carleton Coon or http://www.white-history.com there boyo! Oh…BTW….when was the last time knuckle-dragging-sub-humans like ‘da Cripz’ or ‘da Bloodz’ admitted white members?

      *Your comfortable picture of worthless British nationalists and superior nationalist Slavs conveniently omits that the Slavs in Western Europe all vote for anti-White parties. Only a handfull do not*

      proves…what….exactly…?…what % of the ppltn do ‘the Slavs in Western Europe’ constitute any-way?….and what possible relevance can this have when less than ¼ of the eligible electorate in either the JewK or the JewSA votes @ ALL?

      *It’s the same as with the non-Whites: racial integrity in the homeland, race-mixing for the invaded countries. Directly from the Jew script*

      except that inter-breeding with Slavs ain’t race-mixing……from the ‘Jew Script’ that AIN’T!

      *As for no mass immigration in Eastern Europe, could that be because the communist parties never needed it in order to stay in power?*

      no….it’s more likely because the rise of Hitler totally dis-combobulated their mental processes so that this vital ZOG ingredient was over-looked….a race CAN survive ‘tyranny’ but it can’t survive race-mixing-genocide…..and, since ZOG desires the obliteration of the White Race, this must have been on the ZOG priorities list but Hitler threw their plans ‘out of gear’ by the best part of 50yrs…..it has taken the ZOG-approved ‘counter-cultural revolutions’ of the 1960s/1970s and a good, strong dose of economic irrationalism to get them back on track again….since Eastern Europe removed the ZOG-yoke only 15yrs ago……white nationalism has a much better chance than in the
      Jew(W)est.

      *Could it be that once they had a tight grip on their slave nations, they didn’t need to destroy their cultures any more? History says yes*

      History says that the only way to under-stand History is through RACE…..the yoos made FORCED ERRORS as per above as per Hitler and, thus, they may yet PAY THE ULTIMATE PRICE!

      *Also, the open borders give them access to Nordic pussy and, if the Nordic women won’t give it willingly, just rape them together with the Arab members of your gang. Such swell racial comrades*

      Except that Nordic women ‘being raped’ by whites produces whites and Nordic women BEING RAPED by non-whites produces disposable mutants. And except that ‘rape’ by white males is usually an allegation trotted out 5+ yrs ex post facto by some embittered feminist CUNT who can’t excuse Nature for playing the dirty trick on her of not supplying testicles!

      *Why is the BNP objecting to them? Obviously the BNP are the rabble here*
      if it’s ‘kike-ised’ it’s RABBLE and, since the BNP never names the KIKE ergo it must be RABBLE…..just like supposedly ‘radical pro-White’ forums such as ‘C18’ who ban people for ‘khyboshing the KIKE’. What else but a MOSSAD ‘front’ would do that?…especially when they get feminist-slag-whores to do their DIRTY WORK for them!

    28. Celtic Warrior Says:

      Gentlemen, let’s not get into Slav bashing. Remember that John Sobieski King of Poland and his ‘slavic’ army played a crucial role in defeating the Turks, Tatars and Khazaris at the gates of Vienna in 1683.

      That victory gave Europe a 200 year breathing space.

    29. apollonian Says:

      Slavs Must Be Counted As White, I’d Say
      (Apollonian, 20 May 06)

      Yes, to second “Jimbo,” above, I’ll cite Calvin Kephart, and affirm Slavs, qua Slavs, are white by definition. Some “Slavs” aren’t entirely full-blooded whites or Slavs, like the Bulgarians–but that’s like confusing mestizos with whites. For only white is white in objective (Aristotelian) universe, all others being non-white, obviously and of necessity. “Carpenter,” like others, often has difficulty with equivocation fallacy by which he suffers confusion within his sometimes overtaxed mentality (but hey, as long as he continues to try being white, it’s okay, I guess). Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

    30. Pessimist Says:

      Within 3 years time, France will be a greater power than the United States in the fight against Worldwide Zionism. Although the whites and arabs are at each other’s necks, they have one very important virtue in common.
      They hate the International Jew and Israel much more than they hate each other.
      The soon-to-be launced Zionist ( US and Israel ) war against Iran and Syria will severely limit American ability to be a factor in the fight against Zionism. Patriotic Americans will want to do nothing but kill the Muslims when their Israeli mind-control warlords launch the false flag operation which sinks a US carrier in the Persian Gulf, simulataneously the Israelis will launch missiles into their own country, blaming the Iranians, from which the US will be called to defend both Israel and “itself”.
      France will reject participation in the effort to “defend” Israel, because France CANNOT run the risk of defending Israel.

    31. Carpenter Says:

      Jimbo says: except that ‘Slav immigrants’ are white and the rest ain’t….or don’t you like seeing large-scale white immigration?

      Uh … no. I do not like to see large-scale Slav immigration. What in my post was unclear about that?

      You sound like you think Western Europe needs larger populations. Western Europe could have half the population it has now, one third the population it has now, and it would still be doing juuust fine. How many people do you think lived in Western Europe, or all of Europe, a hundred years ago?

      Let’s summarize:

      –Slav immigrants in Western Europe move in in large numbers, lowering wages, increasing unemployment

      –Slav immigrants use welfare the same way as non-White immigrants: in an exploitative manner, completely unconcerned about solidarity with the Westerners they parasitize on

      –Slav immigrants form gangs styled on the Black ghetto culture. They hang out with the Blacks and Arabs, and team up with them in gangs against the native population.

      –Slavs, like non-White immigrants, are hugely overrepresented in crime statistics about rape, murder, robbery, etc. There is no difference between their behavior and Black and Arab behavior

      –Slav immigrants vote for anti-White parties, never for nationalist parties

      –Slav immigrants strongly support the anti-nationalist EU, as it keeps the door open for more of their brethren to flood the conquered nations

      –Slav immigrants team up with non-Whites to attack nationalist demonstrators

      –Slav immigrants are media darlings, just like the non-Whites

      –Slav immigrants control the drug trade in many Western cities. Slavic gangs fight each other, sometimes with guns and murder, for control of the drug trade.

      –In short, there is little difference in their behavior and non-White immigrant behavior

      …but according to our Slav posters here, it is Western nationalists who are anti-White for pointing this out.

      Funny how these Slavs in the U.S. have never once accused Balkan peoples of being anti-White, when these raped and killed other Whites in Bosnia. One standard for Slavs, another standard for the rest of us, eh?

      And funny that the “dirty, smelly nationalist” charge is brought out, just like the media do it, as an absurd justification for mass immigration. Once again no difference in Slav tactics and non-White tactics!

      No, it is not Western nationalists who lack racial solidarity here. It is the Slavs who are teaming up with non-Whites in gangs, and run drug operations. But, if you have an agenda, you will ignore that…

    32. jimbo Says:

      re: Carpenter

      i’m only going to address yr comments abt ‘Slavic crime’ &c: as in: ‘mafia’-style organised crime.
      what you are calling ‘Slavs’ are more likely than not ex-Russian yoos…hence: NOT Slavs
      Here are two of Dr Pierce’s broad-casts on the subject:
      http://jewwatch.com/jew-crime-mob-2.html#jew-mob-pierce
      http://jewwatch.com/jew-crime-mob.html#jew-mob-pierce
      (they’re from Weltner’s site…but he has some convincing stuff there…..there’s also much more there on the yooish nature of these ‘slavic'[Russian/yooish] crime gangs)
      Also: the ‘additional reading’ Dr Pierce mentioned:
      Friedman Robert I, Red Mafiya: How the Russian Mob Has Invaded America Little, Brown and Co
      2000
      (the other stuff he cites concerns life in the former SU: so: probably not 100% applicable)

    33. apollonian Says:

      “Carpenter” Continues Display Of Jew Characteristics
      (Apollonian, 27 May 06)

      Interesting about “Carpenter” he has so few citations to confirm or substantiate his assertions. Organized crime is Jew controlled, as I understand fm Mike Collins Piper, for one. “Carpenter” isn’t a bad lawyer-type as he shills, badmouths, and tries to plead various cases; he’s just piss-poor scholar and logician.

      White people who are truly white give their premises and observations for the conclusions they proffer. Notice how Carpenter prejudices his arguments?–rather calls into question his native whiteness. Perhaps Carpenter has learned too well fm his Jew-masters. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

    34. Celtic Warrior Says:

      Open debate and discussion of our ‘bed-rock’ beliefs is good, otherwise we are merely preaching to the converted.

    35. Carpenter Says:

      i’m only going to address yr comments abt ‘Slavic crime’ &c: as in: ‘mafia’-style organised crime.
      what you are calling ‘Slavs’ are more likely than not ex-Russian yoos…hence: NOT Slavs

      No. I am talking about mainly Yugoslav gangs who dominate the drug trade in many large cities. Pierce? Pierce lived in the U.S., not in Europe. He didn’t see these gangs, I do. By the way, he was only talking about some guys at the top of organized crime in Russia. That’s in Russia. These gangs are in Western Europe. They import their drugs through Poland and Yugoslavia mostly. Serbs, Croats, Albanians – every now and then they kill each other in the streets of Copenhagen, London or elsewhere, over control of the drug trade. And Polish gangsters do car-stealing raids into Germany and Scandinavia, then return home. (But again, Slavs living in the U.S. would NEVER accuse their Slavic brethren of lacking in racialism, right? Doesn’t matter if they kill each other in the Balkans, or kill each other and Westerners in Western Europe. Different standards for different people, it seems. Only those who OBJECT to the criminal, pro-immigration Slavs are lacking in racialism.)

      And another thing, those few Jews at the top of some crime networks in Russia, have nothing to do with gangs of Slavic youths raping and robbing in the streets of Western cities.

      Let’s put the cards on the table, Jimbo: you’re a Slav, right? We should be honest with each other, show our origins. I’ll do the same: I am Nordic through and through.

      By the way, I won’t hold it against you that appy is on your side here.

      He asks for sources: funny, appy has never bothered with sources before. Well, how about reading the newspapers my entire life, and reading crime reports published by the police, living in Western Europe, and you can be sure other West European nationalists will confirm this. Heck, I only have to visit the local high school to get new, fresh examples of what is going on. We have Slavic gangs all around us, just like Arabs and Blacks – actually they’re usually in the same gang.

      Let’s stop avoiding the facts. You Slavs live in the U.S. and you think you know what we see and don’t see in the streets here in Europe? Do you believe it yourselves, or is it just an agenda? Who should you condemn – the pro-immigrant gangbanging Slavs, or those who object to them?

    36. Carpenter Says:

      I should add that there are some nationalist immigrant Slavs, though they are few – proportionally, far fewer than us Western nationalists. You will see maybe a handful of Slavs joining organized nationalists in a country, and these are accepted. Usually they or their parents came over long before the recent mass immigration. Nearly all of them are North Slavs – the South Slavs are by far the worst, completely niggerized. (Just look at their vicious wars against each other….) What I hear is that the northern Slavs don’t feel much kinship with these.

    37. jimbo Says:

      ‘Carpenter’ (yet again!)
      “And another thing, those few Jews at the top of some crime networks in Russia, have nothing to do with gangs of Slavic youths raping and robbing in the streets of Western cities”
      well…that’s wrong……most if not all of the yoo mob bosses have fled Russia from what i under-stand.
      I couldn’t comment abt Polish ‘car-stealing’ gangs doing raids in Germany and Scandanavia or assassinations on Copenhagen streets but it’s WELL DOCUMENTED that the lion’s share of crime in the UK is now committed by
      non-whites….. this goes into it partly
      but also mentions Australia(where I originate from[by way of Welsh/Irish antecedents], incidentally, NOT Eastern Europe as you seem to think) which isn’t totally relevant as most of the non-whites currently there are Asians.
      more on Jamaican crime gangs here

    38. the anarchist Says:

      Carpenter writes: “And it’s always fun for a Slav to paint the image of blond Nordic girls paired up with niggers – much like the non-Whites love to defile White women in word and action. You defile that which you desire and envy, such as Nordic genes. This behavior is the same for Slav immigrants, Black immigrants, Arab immigrants, etc.”

      Obviously you have not read the works of Carleton Coon, who points out that blondism is much more common and widespread in Northeast Europe than Northwest Europe. Additionally, where did you get the impression that I am a Slav? And why would a Slav desire “Nordic” genes if they are already Nordic (in the Northeast)?

      For the record, the Nordicness of Britain is greatly exaggerated. Britons tend to be very fair-skinned, but in the British Isles there are many light-skinned Mediterraneans — like the pot-smoking tourists in Amsterdam coffee shops — and Upper Paleolithic types with tendencies toward corpulence. British Nordics are characterized by their lean bodies, dolichocephalic (narrow) heads, relative tallness, and brown to dark brown hair.

      Why would the fair-skinned, fair-haired Slavs envy Nordic-Mediterranean Brits who feel the need to exaggerate their Nordicness because their hair is so dark, and their geniuses and heroes so close the Mediterranean phenotype that E.A. Hooton labeled large segments from the British Isles “Nordic-Mediterranean?” In fact of Old American Whites E.A. Hooton considered the largest grouping to be “Nordic-Mediterraneans,” at approximately 30%! (Source: W. Robertson, “The Dispossessed Majority”)

      Britons just don’t compare to Swedes in their level of Nordicness, as anthropologists acknowledge. It is only their narrow-headedness which clusters them with their Scandinavian neighbors and gives them the almost meaningless label “Nordic” (which, if broadened enough, can include almost anyone in Northern Europe and, at least to Arthur Kemp, almost every Southern European and Middle Easterner who does not have olive skin and dark eyes).

      Carpenter writes: “Your comfortable picture of worthless British nationalists and superior nationalist Slavs conveniently omits that the Slavs in Western Europe all vote for anti-White parties.”

      I never claimed Slavic nationalists are superior. Many of them, from what I’ve seen, are morons. Most nationalists are morons. That’s why nationalists have a hard time nowadays in terms of social and political influence all throughout the West. And that’s why British nationalists appear to be less cultured than their more liberal compatriots.

    39. the anarchist Says:

      Carpenter writes: “…the South Slavs are by far the worst, completely niggerized. (Just look at their vicious wars against each other….)”

      As Jimbo pointed out, Britain fought against the Germans during WWII, helping to bring about the multiculturalism so widespread and dominant in many parts of Western Europe today. Even today, Britons, even within the BNP, believe their fight against the Germans was justified and good.

      Let’s not forget the way the RAF bombarded German cities in order to inflict as much terror and civilian casualties as possible, to bring about the multiculturalism which today reigns supreme in Britain, where lovely brunette Nordic girls can cavort with West Indian boys without the slightest protest from the generation that fought the “good war.”

      Yes, mate, British nationalists sure have their heads straight on who their enemies really are. Gotta scare away those South Slavs from your beautiful, pluralistic, multicolored country, for they are evil and prone to destructive warfare. The adjective “niggerized” wins you extra points from the well-read stray visitor who just wanted to learn more about racial nationalism, indeed.