2 May, 2007

Monkey-Braun Mugged by Coons, Saved by Humans – Why?

Posted by alex in black crime, Curt Maynard at 7:15 am | Permanent Link

[Curt Maynard] No surprise here, mugged by blacks, saved by whites. Same story over and over and over and over and over. How many blacks did you see volunteering to save their fellow blacks after Katrina?

Former U.S. Sen. Carol Moseley Braun (center, inset) was rescued by University of Chicago students Rachel McFadden, 19, (left) and Zachery Trayes-Gibson, 21.


  • 9 Responses to “Monkey-Braun Mugged by Coons, Saved by Humans – Why?”

    1. John Says:

      Like oh my god just like on the oxygen channel. Headlines should read like this “Whites + College = Educated idiots”

    2. Americafirst. Says:

      This savage coniving bitch was appointed ambassador to Auckland N.Z. puppet ruled by dyke Helen Clark by Clitoooon when he was allowed to rule.

      She was given this post to protect her at the time from investigations going on at the time. Any way this thing representat US in N.Z. it was a show indeed.

    3. Walter Ring Says:

      I think the headline asks a very good question: WHY? Why would two decent White students risk their lives to rescue some anti-White nigger bitch who is getting mugged by her fellow nigger coon apes? The answer is that these two White students are self-hating blithering idiots who are also anti-White. If David Duke were getting assaulted by niggers, would they have done the same thing? Hmm. That’s a tough one there…

    4. jackumup Says:


    5. Charles Says:

      I think that white people showed their ideals and moral values, the descendants of Japhet are the light of this world !!

    6. Dudeman Says:

      Of course not. Nigger savages are just that, and always will be. You’re expecting them to have an evolved frontal cortex that can register things like self-sacrifice or empathy of suffering? Please. I’m sure that within a few weeks the niggress that they save will forget herself about the whole thing and will be back to wondering what be on sale at de target. And how many ham bones an collad grains fo de suppa she can git fo cheap at the winco food mart.

    7. John Says:

      Unfortunately whites have a history of saving niggers from niggers.

    8. meanwhile back at the zoo .. Says:

      The Truth of Interracial Rape in the United States
      By Lawrence Auster
      FrontPageMagazine.com | May 3, 2007

      Like Ahab’s search for the Great White Whale, liberals’ search for the Great White Defendant is relentless and never-ending. When, in 1988, Tawana Brawley’s and Al Sharpton’s then year-old spectacular charge that several white men including prosecutor Steven Pagones (whose name Brawley had picked out of a newspaper article) had abducted and raped the 15 year old was shown to be completely false, the Nation said it didn’t matter, since the charges expressed the essential nature of white men’s treatment of black women in this country. When the Duke University lacrosse players were accused of raping a black stripper last year, liberals everywhere treated the accusation as fact, because, just as with the Nation and Tawana Brawley, the rape charge seemed to the minds of liberals to reflect the true nature of oppressive racial and sexual relations in America.

      To see the real truth of the matter, let us take a look at the Department of Justice document Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2005. (Go to the linked document, and under “Victims and Offenders” download the pdf file for 2005.)

      In Table 42, entitled “Personal crimes of violence, 2005, percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender,” we learn that there were 111,590 white victims and 36,620 black victims of rape or sexual assault in 2005. (The number of rapes is not distinguished from those of sexual assaults; it is maddening that sexual assault, an ill-defined category that covers various types of criminal acts ranging from penetration to inappropriate touching, is conflated with the more specific crime of rape.) In the 111,590 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was white, 44.5 percent of the offenders were white, and 33.6 percent of the offenders were black. In the 36,620 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was black, 100 percent of the offenders were black, and 0.0 percent of the offenders were white. The table explains that 0.0 percent means that there were under 10 incidents nationally.

      The table does not gives statistics for Hispanic victims and offenders. But the bottom line on interracial white/black and black/white rape is clear:

      In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.

      What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.

      The Department of Justice statistics refer, of course, to verified reports. According to the Wikipedia article on rape, as many as half of all rape charges nationally are determined by police and prosecutors to be false:

      Linda Fairstein, former head of the New York County District Attorney’s Sex Crimes Unit, noted, “There are about 4,000 reports of rape each year in Manhattan. Of these, about half simply did not happen…. It’s my job to bring justice to the man who has been falsely accused by a woman who has a grudge against him, just as it’s my job to prosecute the real thing.”
      No wonder there was such absolute belief in the guilt of the Duke students among the leading sectors of liberal America. A drug-addled, half-deranged, promiscuous black stripper accused three young white men of raping her. There are virtually zero rapes of black women by white men in the United States, and half of all rape charges against specific individuals turn out to be false. But in the gnostic, inverted world of liberal demonology, the white students had to be guilty.

      Meanwhile, in the real America, week after week, the newspapers report the rapes of white women by black men—though, of course, without ever once using the words, “a white woman was raped by black man.” Just last week in the New York Post there was a story about a serial black rapist who invaded women’s apartments on Manhattan’s Upper West Side; you knew the rapist was black from a police drawing accompanying the story, and you knew the victims were most likely white from the neighborhoods where the attacks occurred. But even when news media’s reports of black on white rape make the race of the perpetrator evident (which the media only does in a minority of instances), no explicit reference is ever made to the racial aspect of the case. Each story of black on white rape is reported in isolation, not presented as part of a larger pattern. There is never the slightest mention of the fact that white women in this country are being targeted by black rapists. In the inverted world of liberalism, the phenomenon does not exist.

      Lawrence Auster is the author of Erasing America: The Politics of the Borderless Nation. He offers a traditionalist conservative perspective at View from the Right.

    9. charles Says: