11 December, 2008

More About Obama’s Citizenship Status

Posted by Socrates in citizenship, Obama, Socrates at 12:55 pm | Permanent Link

The U.S. Supreme Court will hold a conference tomorrow about the Wrotnowski case:

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 01/25/09 More About Obama 86% similar
  3. 01/20/09 U.S. Supreme Court to Hold Conference Re: Obama’s Citizenship Status 85% similar
  4. 11/21/08 U.S. Supreme Court to Vote Re: Obama Citizenship Case 76% similar
  5. 06/22/19 Feminists are Freaking Out as People Reconsider the ‘Holy and Sacred’ Status of Roe v. Wade 60% similar
  6. 07/17/07 The Next Important High Court Ruling? 59% similar
  7. 9 Responses to “More About Obama’s Citizenship Status”

    1. Coup d'Etat Says:

      Not surprising the Supreme Court will not hear this case since most if not all are made up of liberals. Liberals don’t know how to read, interpret much less have ethical values and the duty to uphold the U.S. Constitution. Liberals make up whatever laws or deny them as they wish and the Supreme Court cannot be challenged. A great place for jews and liberals to be untouched while they ruin this country.

    2. sgruber Says:

      Let’s push the “government is illegitimate” angle in the newspaper. The Supremes’ denial of this case is plain evidence. Would strike a chord in many people. The government is obviously run by cheats and crooks.

      The time has come to get rid of the jews.

    3. a Says:

      These constitutional clowns are fucking deluded. They sit there and talk and do write-ups like this touting litigation as a remedy against the scum-sucking filth that is the government, the judiciary, the establishment and the media. The god-damn fucking remedy is a bloody reckoning where the scum are made a horrible and ghastly example of, for all time.

    4. B. Wilby Says:

      What happened to National Security Clearance?? The President of the USA must pass the most in-depth examination and background check to be issued the highest security clearance and certainly his actual real birth certificate would be required. Has his TOP SECRET security clearance been approved?? Who knows??

      NATIONAL SECURITY CLEARANCE:
      Confidential – Unauthorized disclosure could cause “damage to national security.”
      Secret – Unauthorized disclosure could cause “serious damage to national security.”
      Top Secret – Unauthorized disclosure could cause “exceptionally grave damage to national security.”

      Each level of access requires a progressively more in-depth background investigation before the clearance is obtained. The President of the United States should be able to flawlessly pass the most extensive investigation and a polygraph test. Both are required for workers in some Special Access Programs classified Top Secret.

      Is Obama hiding something? Most likely yes. A person just doesn’t spend something on the order of hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep one’s birth records a secret unless one has something to hide. I personally have had to provide my birth certificate to several employers before they would agree to hire me. For a normal person, showing one’s birth certificate is not a big deal. I’ve also had to give out my college records — again, not a big deal.

      So, why doesn’t Mr. Obama make his actual real birth certificate available to the various electoral commissions or an independent agency such as the FBI for verification? How can he have the highest level TOP SECRET SECURITY CLEARANCE in our government without true documentation?

    5. Johnny Booth Says:

      The Supreme Court? You mean that outlaw band of nine ghouls who blessed the elimination of the right to free assembly through “equal protection” and “affirmative action” litigation? Who have eliminated the right to freely alienate property through “civil rights” and “Fair Housing Act” litigation? Who give sodomites special, preferred treatment under the law of constitutional review? And who just came within one vote of eliminating the 2nd Amendment private right to bear arms? Legitimate?

      A legitimate target, perhaps.

      But first the lawyers.

      Sic semper evello mortem Tyrannis

    6. Zarathustra Says:

      Is it possible that the purple-lipped spook Obongo ran for President knowing full well that he was not elagable for the office because of where he was born? WHAT CHUTZPAH.

    7. Vaultner Says:

      “At the present time, only one case about Obama’s citizenship has a better than a one-in-a-million chance of making headway (only slightly better, in my opinion, because judges regularly find “legal justification” for ignoring the law, even the Constitution). That is the case filed by Alan Keyes, a 2008 presidential candidate for the American Independent Party, and Markham Robinson, a California elector. These men definitely have legal standing to sue. And despite protests to the contrary by many, good reason to sue.”

      What might the court award in damages you ask? A nigger will still hold the highest office in the land. All that so they can point their finger & say see your racist.

      It’s as if they’re playing by a rulebook they think we’d understand or agree with if we weren’t such children. When in reality it’s just the same liberal bullshit Robin Hood playbook they’ll hang themselves with.

    8. Dirk Says:

      I am an American citizen. I WANT HIM TO PROVIDE US WITH HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE! Why is that so much to ask?

    9. sgruber Says:

      Shit, guys, this sounds important and complicated, but the game is on. Niggerball comes first, last, and always. Gotta go to the cooler and get my beer. L8tr.

      – Thus spake the Kwan