Vanguard News Network

My opinion is this is the most important work published in my lifetime. It should be read, archived, and distributed far & wide. The Praeger print editions are expensive and it is not only generous of Dr. MacDonald to distribute it as an Adobe portable document file (.pdf) but demonstrates his commitment.

For some reason I can’t fully open this file. I do have Adobe 9 too. Could it be this file has a virus in it?

Linc: as far as I know, VNN does not endorse any specific genetic test.

As far as Jews/genetics, it is my understanding that all Jews have unique genetic markers, so, in theory, a genetic test could reveal Jewishness, or lack of.

jc–
“My opinion is this is the most important work published in my lifetime.”

Yes, I agree. I have an autographed copy of the “Culture of Critique” and the first volume of the three volume series. Prized positions.

The semitically correct “Bell Curve” is another–for getting the ball rolling on racial thinking in the mainstream again. I recall the furor of it’s release. Things have never been the same.

This is the book that woke me. Before I read it, I had my suspicions; I saw that too much of what was wrong with things had been put in place by jews. But, like most, I just couldn’t get passed the brain-washing. Then I read the Culture of Critique, which showed me not only what was being done, and who was doing it, but, more importantly, WHY they were doing it. That was a question the answer to which had eluded me. MacDonald answered it, and swept away the remaining delusions. I can’t thank him enough.

Jews trace their lineage through the maternal line. The genetic markers should therefore be found in the Mitochondrial DNA.

And right after Kevin Macdonald said that he believed the “Holocaust” did happen, “Peter Schaenk”(fake radio name) agreed with him and said that the “Holocaust” did indeed happen.

LOL

MacDonald has also said in the past that he is agnostic concerning the orthodox Holocaust narrative. His position is tactical, I believe. He would rather not discuss it. Thing is, the accepted Holocaust narrative, as described by “eyewitnesses”, is simply not physically or technically possible. Germar Rudolf went to Auschwitz and performed tests on the walls of ad hoc “gas chambers” looking for the chemical residue that would be present had Zyklon-B been used at levels necessary to exterminate millions of people – he found nothing. And now he is in the gulag. That is ballgame.

In contrast, the crimes of the Bolsheviks, which dwarfed the “crimes” of the Nazis – even assuming one accepts the standard narrative – are not and cannot be in debate because their own documents say just what was done and who (Jews) did what.

MacDonald has gone further than any other academic in the United States in terms of naming the jew, and he’s done it as part of his specialty.

You could say Arthur Butz has been bolder but he’s kept it completely separate from his academic position.

Any movement will have radicals and moderates. The moderates pave the way for the radicals to make inroads.

I would even include sites like Amren, even though I agree with Alex Linder that Amren is a jewish front. But because of the kind of front it is it makes people think about and study the negro problem, and for the determined researcher that leads inevitably to the jewish problem.

An analogous process happened to David Duke, whose participation in the John Birch Society, a jewish front group, led to his meeting a jew wise volunteer, who proved to him that communism was jewish.

Professor Kevin MacDonald:

“But I do wanna say that…that uh I’m not a Holocaust revisionist. I THINK THAT THE HOLOCAUST DID HAPPEN…(unintelligible) this immoral travesty.”