30 June, 2013

Whites: What’s Wrong With Them?

Posted by Socrates in Christianity, Hollywood, jewed culture, jewed media, media, media control, Old Testament, Socrates at 7:08 pm | Permanent Link

Re: universalism: a lot of it or even most of it came from Christianity, which came from Jews, so that means that there are at least two ways in which Jews have helped to upset the White apple cart [1][2]. Note also that Rand was a Jew. (I had never heard of Abraham Maslow until now. He was also a Jew).


[1] i.e., 1) Jews as a modern hostile elite (e.g., the media/Hollywood/pop culture) and 2) Jewish-created Christianity

[2] “universalism” is used in the non-religious sense of the word

  1. Similar posts:

  2. 09/10/19 Wrong Race, Florida Lawmakers: It Was the Jews Who Invented Racism and Supremacism, Not Whites 46% similar
  3. 12/22/13 Christianity: Not Good for Whites 42% similar
  4. 07/30/12 ‘Hostile Living Environment’ 38% similar
  5. 02/15/10 BNP Ends Whites-Only Membership Rule 35% similar
  6. 06/22/19 What Happens When Jews, Not Whites, Control Nationalist Gatherings in the Western World 32% similar
  7. 5 Responses to “Whites: What’s Wrong With Them?”

    1. CW-2 Says:

      A pretty weak and unconvincing article. The example of lemming-like “John Jones” was particularly annoying. We already know that a sizable percentage of young White adults fall into the described “John Jones” category. That’s the problem! We are looking for solutions and trying to change the thinking of John Jones and his ilk while the media is in the grip of a hostile elite is a forlorn task.
      An army is not destroyed and defeated by changing the thinking of every individual soldier. It is defeated by countering their General’s strategy. To that end a core of devoted fanatics, a vanguard, will serve us and our race best.
      While the John Jones’ of the world continue playing with their i-phones our numbers will grow.

    2. fd Says:

      Another status quo intellectual effort by the professor priesthood.

      natural selection — adaptation — evolution

      As stated above, the John Jones soap opera was annoying. Nature has the answer for the John Jones’s of the world. It’s called extinction by natural selection. John Jones is too weak to adapt.

      White people are linked by blood. Self-determination among the folk is far superior to Radical individualism.

      Ayn Rand had a tendency to lecture the reader. She was a hardcase anti-racist, individualist who was repulsed by a race and soil kinfolk society.

      Human equality and universal responsibilty wages war on nature.

    3. Sgt. Skull Says:

      I realize Mr. Griffin is trying to be an original thinker, but the kind of hyper individualism promoted by Jewess Ayn Rand serves little collective or evolutionary benefit for whites, but does serve the collective racial interests of the jews. Most of us know of or have seen white people acting in their own selfish interests and in doing so are betraying their race. How about the white gentile small businessman acts selfishly who employs illegal mestizos instead of his fellow whites? Or, a white female who can’t control her urges and fucks a few black bucks and sires mulattoes who grow to negatively impact white society?

      The John Jones skit was pretty spot on except I don’t agree with Griffin’s prescriptions and conclusions. It would be one thing for a racially conscious white man or woman to occasionally fall on their sword for reasons of self preservation, tactics, or strategy and quite another to completely sell out in mind, body and spirit just to survive. I’d rather kill myself.

      Perhaps I missed Griffin’s point about the fictional JJ and need to re-read, but that’s how I see it.

    4. Z.O.G. Says:


    5. CW-2 Says:

      Perhaps I was a bit critical of Robert Griffin. He has written a good biography of Dr Pierce and an even better account of WN thought among ‘average’ Americans, titled “One Sheaf, One Vine”. Both pdfs are available in the book section of vnn forum.