Vanguard News Network

Here we go again. Another intellectual effort to uncover the Jew.

Religion and dna are apples and oranges. Jews are Asiatic at root. They are a spinoff of the the racial cauldron of Arabia. Jews use their religion as a fence to accomplish whatever

Most people are aware that Sephardic Jews are darker than Ashkenazi Jews. The former has ancient roots in North Africa; the latter has roots in the Middle East and from there migrated to Europe which explains their lighter skin.

Well said, CW. My “take” on this issue is that the Jews started off as a Semitic tribe of nomads in the Near East and/or North Africa. They spread their DNA around with the various empires they attached themselves to, so that by AD1100 there were Jews found all over Europe, Russia and Central Asia, in addition to their original spawning grounds in the Near East. Gradually those scattered Jews absorbed the genes of the local host populations, so that some Jews looked more Asiatic, while others looked more European and so forth.

But no matter how much gentile blood they had in them they were always raised to act and think like Jews. They were always told to regard themselves as Jews, first and foremost. So there is more than just DNA to consider when deciding who is a Jew. There is also a “Jew mentality”.

As far as Palestine goes it is a crossroads of 3 continents, so many different peoples can and have considered it their homeland….Turks, Greeks, Syrians, Armenians, Arabs, Persians, Christians, Muslims and Jews all have some legitimate claim to some of Palestine. But none more than any other.

I refuse to let Jews perplex me. There are two constants: Jews are Asiatic at root and they are mongrels at root.

Let’s pull the history book and look at their accomplishments from day one forward: Jews have never possessed a creative culture nor have they possessed a real state other than the modern artificial state maintained by fire and sword. And who are their great men known to the world in the last two thousand years. Before the 19th and 20th century, can anybody name distinguished Jewish writers, inventors, warriors, etc. Anything accomplished by the Jews has taken place on the soil of their host.

Their culture takes the downward path of destruction.

I’m interested in the ethnic composition of Jewish DNA whether Khazar, Semitic, Slavic or a combination thereof. However, in the end all that is important is how they have behaved throughout history and in contemporary times towards us. There are still some “anti-semites” who believe the Jews behave destructively only because they believe bad things owing to their religious texts. This is similar to Christians and Catholics like E. Michael Jones who believe if only the jews would accept Christ and Catholic dogma their nature would be transformed for the better.

But even when jews convert they still act like jews. And it was the sheenies of antiquity who codified anti-gentile hate and culture (race) destroying into the religion known as Judaism, so those arguments don’t withstand scrutiny.

If genetics didn’t matter then no one would trouble themselves to breed dogs, for example. Sure, less is learned (environment) than inherited (genetics) in lower animals but breeding determines character to a great extent and mankind has long known it. My introduction to the Jewish problem was through a copy of The SPOTLIGHT that a public librarian told me was there because they had received a free subscription with the understanding that it would be placed among the other periodicals.

In 1999, in Las Vegas, I attended a seminar, sponsored by The SPOTLIGHT, on how to publish a newspaper. Using the right software and a laser printer that would create 11 x 17″ galleys, all it took was sufficient capital and hard work. I met Willis Carto and, several years later, was invited to his and his wife’s San Diego County home for a meal and conversation. He had Kevin MacDonald’s books on an end table in the living room and he heartily recommended them as some-of, if not THE, most important scholarship in Carto’s lifetime. I read The Culture of Critique, immediately, while I was on the road.

Not everyone is interested in scholarship, science, history, religion, politics, what have you. The majority of people aren’t interested in much. I wish I could say I’ve thoroughly read Dr. MacDonald’s four books, cover-to-cover, but I haven’t yet. I’ve bought them several times and several times I’ve given them away when a friend was interested. But I consider his work, including his editing and teaching to be critical at this juncture. Good advice is not to be a tool for so called critique, to avoid attacking individuals, and consider keeping silent if you’re not familiar-enough with the material to have an informed opinion. Seems Brer Rabbit’s mother said something similar. I believe we’re very fortunate to have Kevin MacDonald to assist inquiring minds.

“The Court Jew,” by Selma Stern, Jewish Publication Society of America, Philadelphia, 1950, 312 pp, w. index, notes, & xvii–is well-written, at least entertaining, so far as it goes, but it’s also quite informative for the power of the Jews, and their sociologic relation, and an important story for history and account of the Jews’ ascendance. Stern writes then about the Jews’ place as financiers, military commissaries and suppliers, court contractors, agents, factors, mint-masters, “shtadlan” (community leaders), and even diplomats, this in the “baroque” era, preceding the the modern, till the French Revolution, during the two centuries, or so, the 17th and 18th, during the period of absolutism in Central Europe.

And of course, these Jews of the period in question, 17th-18th centuries, thrived upon the strife among the gentiles of Europe of the time, especially in view of the great religious differences btwn Catholic and Protestants. Hence the Jews became so prominent esp. in the German empire, still called the Holy Roman. And note the German empire was situated amidst the French, Dutch, Italian, Scandinavian, the eastern powers, and the Muzlim Ottomans, giving Jews fullest opportunities for trade, commerce, and diplomacy.

Thus, Stern informs us, the era and situation in the German empire, at the time, was one of “absolutism” (as of Louis XIV of France, at the same time) actually the consolidation of centralized state power for the various, numerous German states and principalities–against the formerly competing feudalist and corporative powers of church, monasteries, universities, guilds, and free cities–all this, ironically enough, within the large German empire where these states were competing against each and one another–Jews must have LOVED this free-for-all, tooth-and-nail strife and competition within the gentile world.

Get the picture?–thus the various heads and leaders for the numerous German states sought to most directly “hook-in and -up” with the amazing growing power of this European-wide Jew network of merchants and bankers for general purpose of finance and funding. Stern gives outstanding details for many instances of this sort of relationship btwn politics and finance.

Consider the case of outstanding gentile scholar, Johann Andreas Eisenmenger, Professor of Oriental languages at U. of Heidelberg, at the close of the 17th, onset of 18th cent. Eisenmenger was known and outstanding expert at translating the Bible fm original Hebrew–and also the Jew Talmud. Eisenmenger thereupon wrote and sought to publish his discoveries about the horrific perfidy and satanic anti-humanity of the Talmud (see Hoffman’s RevisionistReview.blogspot.com, also see Come-and-hear.com for best Talmudic expo) in his work, entitled, “Judaism Unmasked.”

Jews thereupon mobilized, the leading Jew financier, Samson Wertheimer, promptly wrote to the Austrian emperor explaining that such a book could well agitate the population against Jews which would then jeopardize the emperor’s precious funding. Further, Wertheimer offered to bribe and compensate Eisenmenger for his publishing costs for the book’s suppression. The emperor immediately ordered the suppression even with the opposition of numerous anti-semitic partisans, including noneother than the king of Prussia who warned explicitly against the growing power of the Jews–and this was in the ancient year of 1700, don’t forget, nearly a century before the French Revolutionary “emancipation” of Jews.

Stern, typical Jew liar, goes on in her account to say Eisenmenger knew little of the Hebrew language and “mistranslated many passages” of the Talmud. Mike A. Hoffman II (see above citation) has published Eisenmenger’s (somewhat abridged) work w. an extensive introduction and historical account of the entire story about this outrageous suppression and censorship engineered by Judaic liars and subversives–even in the year 1700 (!–again). The actual truth is that Eisenmenger was SO accurate for his translations, EVEN JEWS themselves preferred Eisenmenger’s account for its veracity.

Amazingly, Stern herself testifies to the already, even at that time, monumental and over-whelming power of these Jew monsters. Thus when, in 1670, the emperor Leopold determined to expell Jews fm Vienna, the Jews went to work, mobilizing their tremendous network: “[i]t was to Manuel Texeira in Hamburg [originally fm Spain] that they [Jews] turned….” Texeira made use of his numerous contacts–he personally knew the former Queen of Sweden, Christina, aside fm friends he had in the Spanish Court. And in Rome there was the Cardinal Azzolino who had influence w. the pope. Texeira was actually successful in getting a delay for the expulsion for half a year.

The Christian empress Maria Theresa was less successful in 1744 when on 18th Dec. she ordered Jews out of Prague and Bohemia. Stern writes, “[a] few days after the order was issued, the campaign to rescue the Jews got under way. Wolf Wertheimer . . . . assembled his forces like a general about to storm an enemy fortress . . . . he drew all the threads together and managed to weave about the queen a web that reached from Augsburg over Swabia, Bavaria, Franconia, Saxony, Brunswick, Berlin, Hanover, Holland, England, Denmark, and Italy to Austria. He called upon all of them, the Court Jews of the archbishops and bishops, dukes, Electors, governors and margraves, to intervene with their rulers and persuade them to induce the queen to withdraw her order. . . . all united with Wolf . . . and lent him their aid. All these efforts . . . bore fruit, after some three years. . . . in 1748 [the Jews were] allowed to return to the city . . . after they . . . prepared to pay . . . 240,000 florins for this act of grace.”

Thus we see Stern’s work the typical Jew production, emphasizing some aspects while down-playing others, but the work is otherwise excellent for the details it gives regarding Jews’ steady, inexorable ascendance, especially economically and politically. Governments rise and fall for financial reasons, never doubt, and Jews, most organized, connected, and criminally-oriented of all racial/religious groups, play a principle role in this war we call life, including the history of the West. Stern’s “Court Jew” is extremely useful.

Okay pardon me gentlemen I will suffice to post the link, with my opinion instead on the next one.

Excellent A-1 posts above are appreciated.

OK, I retract the meathead part. I know you are trying to be civil.

Even though All in the Family was thoroughly Jewish and actor Rob “Meathead” Reiner is a Jew I liked that show. It demonstrated that the Jews are fully aware of all the charges against them. It even poked fun at Vietnam War-era liberals like Archie’s son-in-law Mike Stivic. I don’t know of any current TV sit-com that tackles controversial social issues. The programming now is geared towards yuppies addicted to consumerism. With the exception of that other thoroughly Jewish but undeniably funny series The Simpsons.

One has to wonder if Ms. Stern plagiarized her information from the work of Peter Deeg’s large, incisive tome, Hofjuden, which was published by the Stürmer Verlag of Julius Streicher?

The Khazars converted to “Judaism” in the Middle Ages seeking to avoid conscription, taxation, and restrictions on usury that they would have been subject to under the Pope or under the Caliphate. Judaism set them apart, and allowed them a certain autonomy. Probably having a zone where usury was legal represented a convenience to those subjects of either empire wealthy or reckless enough to take financial risk back then; just as gambling casinos on Indian reservations are enjoyed today.

Easy to see this arrangement may have set up certain attitudes on both sides. To Khazarians, religion was just nonsense, (or at least Christianity & Islam were nonsense) and its adherents hypocrites and fools; to the subjects of the religious states, the “Jews” are engaging in a sinful practice, and making quite a profit.

The flip side of their autonomy is that they had no military protection.
The Rus (Vikings) conquered and destroyed Khazaria in the 11th century.

Why Ashkenazi Jews apparently consider the suggestion that they are part-Khazar to be insulting is unclear. Khazaria was an important power in its time. Maybe they were so traumatized at losing to the Vikings that they went into permanent denial?