25 November, 2013

Africa: The Horror Continues in Zimbabwe

Posted by Socrates in Africa, African dictators, Britain, British Empire, colonialism in Africa, England, Jew World Order, jewed foreign policy, jewed politics, Jewish Tyranny, Jewish World Revolution, New World Order, NWO, Rhodesia, Socrates, South Africa, Zimbabwe at 4:31 pm | Permanent Link

(You know things are bad when a communist country is openly criticized by a left-wing group; things must really be going to Hell in that country). Anyway, forty years ago, Zimbabwe was a wealthy, White-ruled country called Rhodesia [1]. The farms in Rhodesia were among the best in the world and they fed most of Africa. However, the racial set-up in Rhodesia (i.e., Whites ruling Blacks) ran counter to the New World Order plan. The White government had to be dismantled. Negroes now run Zimbabwe and the country is in the toilet; the NWO leaders are now trying to dismantle other White countries, like America and Britain. By the way, Jews were the key players in the transforming of Rhodesia into Zimbabwe, just as they were key players in the transforming of South Africa.

[Article].

[1] years ago, under colonialism, Whites controlled many countries in Africa. For example, France ruled Niger, Guinea, Cameroon and the Congo; England ruled Sudan, Botswana, Kenya and Ghana. Since the end of White rule, Africa has taken a turn for the worse. Poverty, disease, political turmoil and crime have risen dramatically. Blacks were better off under White rule, and one Black writer has admitted this


  • 11 Responses to “Africa: The Horror Continues in Zimbabwe”

    1. CW-2 Says:

      The refrain ‘things were better under colonialism’, while true, indicates there is still a residue of do-goodism within WN circles. Frankly, now that most Whites have left Zimbabwe, I couldn’t give a shit what happens there. If that region goes back to the pre-stone age and the blacks remain there, that’s fine.
      The 19th century scramble by European powers for empires in Africa has been an unmitigated disaster for us. Our best blood in soldiers, engineers, and even in administrators and missionaries was wasted in fetid regions unsuitable for European colonization. If the French had any sense they would have concentrated all their efforts on Algeria and Tunisia. Likewise, Britain should have completely Europeanized South Africa.
      Big jew reaped rich rewards from European control of Africa. All the mineral wealth, particularly in gold and diamonds, flowed into their hands. Plus European standards of agriculture and medicine enabled the negro population to increase by a factor of 100. That population big jew is now using as their foot soldiers against Europe and North America.

    2. -JC Says:

      http://weaselzippers.us/2013/11/26/zimbabwes-black-empowerment-ministry-orders-all-foreign-owned-shops-closed/

    3. Tim McGreen Says:

      Blacks cannot govern themselves in Zimbabwe, New Orleans, Haiti, Liberia or anywhere else. For some reason it’s always Whitey’s fault, never the Blacks’ fault. And for some reason it’s always Whitey’s responsibility to come to their rescue.

    4. CW-2 Says:

      The hard working White farmers of Iowa will soon have another burden placed on their shoulders…..feeding Zimbabwe. Without that bothersome thing called work, the blacks of Zim won’t have to worry about much and they can get down their important task of squeezing out more niglets.
      It’s called ‘global democracy’.

    5. fd Says:

      Negores had large portions of Africa to themselves for thousands of years, unmolested by White people. So why didn’t they build magnificent civilizations.

      I thought–we all be equal and shit. (ebonics aka nigger English)

    6. fd Says:

      Negroes

    7. Tim McGreen Says:

      The featured article by the colored conservative Walter Williams is pretty good. It asks if Blacks weren’t better off under White rule in Rhodesia, which of course they were. Now, if a White man like Pat Buchanan wrote that kind of article the Left would be howling about racism. But since it was written a Negro they simply ignore it. Negroes aren’t supposed to make such arguments, according to the sensitive, caring, all-inclusive Left. Remember when PBS fired Black commentator Juan Williams because he didn’t tow the liberal party line about “tolerance” for Mudslum passengers on airplanes?

      And when was the last time the liberals ever apologized for advocating something that turned out to be a disaster, like ending White rule in South Africa and Rhodesia? When are they going to admit that “global warming” is a hoax and a scam that benefits no one but wealthy, powerful globalists like Bill Gates and Al Gore? When will they admit that the Federal “war on poverty” has totally destroyed Black communities and enslaved entire generations of Blacks? When are they going to admit that their fetish for “equality” has only resulted in clogging up the courts with stupid discrimination lawsuits that make Jew lawyers rich?

      I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Liberals are children of the Devil.

    8. fd Says:

      War on poverty, war on drugs, war on crime, war on racism–all of it a fraud.

    9. Howdy Doody Says:

      fd Says:
      26 November, 2013 at 5:40 pm

      War on poverty, war on drugs, war on crime, war on racism–all of it a fraud.
      unquote

      War on YT now !

    10. Tim McGreen Says:

      The Afrikaaners/Boers should have driven out all the Blacks from S.A. and Rhodesia when they had the chance. Instead, Blacks were used as stoop labor and segregated in Black townships. NOT GOOD ENOUGH. Whites must learn to clean their own dishes and mow their own lawns. Never rely on Black or Brown people to do any of that. Never give them a chance to set foot in White communities for any reason. And the races must be separated, not just segregated. Nature herself has placed deserts, mountains and oceans in between the races to keep them apart from each other.

      Funny thing….During the Apartheid era Israel did LOTS of business with South Africa and Rhodesia. They sold all kinds of weapons to the Apartheid governments to keep rioting Blacks under control. Israeli tourists loved visiting those countries and being served by Black waiters and bellhops. Yet the liberal activist Kikes in western countries were always demanding worldwide sanctions against SA and Rhodesia, they were always bad-mouthing those places in their controlled media. But they never said anything about Israel’s lucrative business relationship with Pretoria and Salisbury, did they??????

      Ah, yes, another example of the old Jew double-standard. More Jew hypocrisy. When Apartheid ended the Jews were the first to scurry away from SA and Rhodesia so they could invade some other White nation, like Canada or Australia. But they never want to immigrate to Israel, I’ve noticed. You see, the Jew always wants it both ways…..he wants his “homeland” but he doesn’t want to live in it. Why can’t Whites have a homeland as well? How about the Palestinians?

      Because the Jew expects us to play by a set of rules he has devised for us, while he doesn’t have to play by any set of rules.

    11. CW-2 Says:

      Jews trade both sides of the street, but more significantly they have no wish to live in Israel as there is little profit for them. How can a con-artist and fraudster make a living in a ‘nation’ of fraudsters and con-artists. Much better to head for a trusting open-handed White country, especially one where the preachers are constantly telling their parishoners that jews are “gods people”.