7 August, 2014

Newspaper Columnist: the De-Whitening of America is the Key to Its Survival

Posted by Socrates in anti-White themes, Bork, multiculturalism, nation-building/nation-wrecking, Socrates, War On White People, Western civilization, Western culture, Western decline at 1:57 pm | Permanent Link

Incredible! Given the fact that non-White people are not Western people, and America is a Western country, the columnist’s statement really boggles the mind. Western culture is just that. It’s not Eastern, or African, or Mexican. As Robert Bork said, America must remain majority-White or it won’t last.

[Article].


  • 16 Responses to “Newspaper Columnist: the De-Whitening of America is the Key to Its Survival”

    1. Sean Gruber Says:

      America has gotten so nasty that it’s hard to walk one block down the street without encountering mystery-meat landwhale cunts with an attitude problem, giving you a “hate whitey” hate-stare. They hold all positions of power over the common people: they are your manager, your HR rep, your co-“worker.” Thanks, jews!

      Isn’t it time the jews were destroyed?

    2. fd Says:

      African American, Mexican American, Asian American, etc. The aforementioned identity became popular in the 1970s. You never here Jew American. Jews set themselves apart. They pretend to be curious onlookers. They pretend to be White. Hitler said the Jew will never say I am a Jew German. They prefer German Jew.

      So the republicans want to stop the flow of non-Whites into the country. Will they fight in the streets with a demoniac fury as southern democrats did in the 1960s. Not likely. Both parties are broken.

      The so – called little pond is best compared to the North Sea: treacherous and unpredictable. Calm one hour–rough the next hour. Southern down-homers who cut their teeth in the Gulf building offshore oilfields moved forward to tap the North Sea for Europe. Maybe their grandsons will experience the call of the blood.

      The Asians are going around the Negroes and Mexicans with great speed. A possible race war among the 3 groups is a possibility.

    3. Festerbestertester Says:

      What happened to the ” open thread ” featured at times ?

    4. Tim McGreen Says:

      What happened to the ” open thread ” featured at times ?

      Good point Festerbester. I shall tell you what happened to it. It has been discontinued because up until just a few years ago these threads used to attract literally dozens of comments each, sometimes well over a hundred. But now only half a dozen or so people bother to post their comments per thread, if that. Why is it that other websites, including the non-racial ones, get swamped with comments, many of which are pro-White/anti-Jew, yet vanguardnewsnetwork.com, a pro-White/anti-Jew website if ever there was one, attracts so few respondents?

    5. fd Says:

      I miss the open thread too.

    6. Tim McGreen Says:

      So are we supposed to be happy that it’s the Chinks who are going to overtake Whitey and not the beaners or the niggers? If the Chinks conquer Amelica then the country turns into an Oriental totalitarian police-state. No more inventors, no more creative minds, no more individuality, no more entrepreneurs. Just that relentless Asiatic same-ness. And the dominant Oriental ethnic group (which will probably be the Chinks, as opposed to the gooks/zipperheads) will ruthlessly suppress or kill off all the other Oriental ethnic groups. There won’t be any room for “tolerance” or “diversity” in a Mongolianized USA. Well, at least the Chinks will know how to deal with the coloreds.

      Like Michael Collins Piper always says the media is the enemy. To hell with the Washingcoon Compost and Miss Dana Milbank.

    7. fd Says:

      Tim, the slant eyes won’ take over whitey. I see Mexican and Negro jealousy of the Asians collapsing into a war of the 3 ethnic groups. Non-Whites fighting non-Whites.

    8. Sean Gruber Says:

      The de-jewing of America is the key to its survival.

    9. Tim McGreen Says:

      Herr Gruber, we’ll also have to deal with the millions of gentiles who have either actively or passively enabled the Jews to wreak so much havoc. Bring it on, bitches, bring it on.

    10. Mary O Says:

      Victory for our side: mainstream politician advocates pro-White perspective, while capitalizing on the unpopularity of the nonwhite president.

      Quote from Milbank article:

      Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama, a Republican immigration hard-liner and part of what the Wall Street Journal just branded “the GOP’s Deportation Caucus,” was giving his retort to the paper’s pro-business editorialists on Laura Ingraham’s radio show Monday: “They need to be patriots, and they need to think about America first,” Brooks said. …“This is a part of the war on whites that’s being launched by the Democratic Party,” Brooks said. “And the way in which they’re launching this war is by claiming that whites hate everybody else. It’s a part of the strategy that Barack Obama implemented in 2008, continued in 2012, where he divides us all on race, on sex, greed, envy, class warfare.”

      Leftist retaliation:

      Dana Milbank writes about political theater in the nation’s capital. He joined the Post as a political reporter in 2000.

      Brooks’ powerful statement is thus reduced to mere “theatre.”

      Note that despite Milbank’s weak arguments, mediocre writing style, incoherent logic and failure to give any specific examples, he is glorified in the WaPo as “political reporter.” He must be a diversity candidate.

      Milbank makes emotional comment:

      It was the battle cry of the white man, particularly the Southern white man, who is feeling besieged. I don’t share the fear, but I understand it.

      Battle cry implies that Brooks is like a primitive chieftain leading a group of American Indians, and may also suggest that we will lose the “battle” as surely as the Indians did.

      The United States is experiencing a rapid decoupling of race and nationality: Whiteness has less and less to do with being American … But for the country, the disassociation of whiteness and American-ness is to be celebrated. Indeed, it is the key to our survival.

      This strong statement is not backed up with any evidence. The awkward construct “American-ness” is a cowardly way to avoid the phrase “American national identity,” which would both more clearly express his thought, and more clearly show his illogic.

      “Whiteness” is also awkward, and imprecise. He means White racial identity.

      Milbank apparently is trying to say that due to very recent social changes having an American national identity is no longer associated with being White. Then, where exactly are these patriotic nonwhites?

      Do Asians care about America, or just their own personal financial prospects? The Mexicans here call themselves “Mexican.” A new trend among Latinos is to call themselves “Spanish.” Does Milbank imagine that the immigrants care anything about America except how many free benefits and privileges they can get?

      In a narrow political sense, this is bad news for the GOP, which is dominated by older white men such as Brooks.

      Is the GOP “dominated” by older White men, or is its freely elected leadership comprised mostly of Whites, who are older because gaining the right experience takes time?

      This is the theme of my friend Eric Liu’s provocative new book, “A Chinaman’s Chance” …[in which] … Liu says. “China does not want to or know how to take people from around the world, welcome them, and empower them to change the very fabric of their nation’s culture.”

      Yes. And, according to tradition, the Chinese have survived 10,000 years.

      The son of Chinese immigrants, Liu observes that American culture now has an excess of individualism, short-term thinking and prioritizing of rights over duties. He calls for “a corrective dose” of Chinese values: mutual responsibility, long-term thinking, humility, moral character and contribution to society.

      Does Liu have Whites in mind while making these statements? Whites may be too individualistic, but are we generally too short-term, with sense of neither duty nor responsibility, no moral character and no regard for society?

      The problem is that we have excess regard for the society. The arrogant foreigner like Liu who insults us should be hung in Washington Square Park. If we have any fault, we are way too nice.

      Why are we giving these ingrates a free middle-class American lifestyle anyway?

      [Quote from Liu: ]
      “Creative change is easier here because we pick and choose from among all the world’s cultures. That inherent advantage in the American system will continue — if we don’t get hung up about whiteness.”

      Pick and choose what from those other cultures? Most of the immigrants are violent gang-affiliated drug dealers. The changes they bring to our society are mostly destructive, not creative.

      Lui is wholly interested in China; he is afraid that if we Whites unite and exert ourselves politically, the endless train of freebies to foreigners might stop. He cloaks his greed in false concern for American creativity.

      Note especially that he refers to America as a “system” not a nation.

    11. Mary O Says:

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2718633/Ill-love-Tragic-final-words-boy-9-brother-brutally-stabbed-death-playmate-12.html

      The Verkerke family were also concerned about the Jamarion Lawhorn’s family.

      ‘Even though we’re dealing with a different type of pain, they’ll be dealing with a similar pain every day for the rest of their lives. That’s not to be taken lightly,’ said Stearns.

      The family of the victim always makes this exact same statement immediately after the crime. Could there be some foundation which sends out coaches to pay them to make these statements?

      If their White neighbor kicked their dog; no matter what the circumstances, they would hate that neighbor until the end of time.

      My previous theory was that such statements are motivated by the Great White Saving Angel (GWSA) complex, in which the White person games the system by selling other Whites out, or ignoring or undermining White interests. For example, the doctor who caught ebola, and was transported to Atlanta was a GWSA. Most liberal women show some degree of GWSA. College humanities professors are usually GWSA. The Ivies are GWSA factories.

      Virtually all entry-level management positions go to diversity candidates or Jews, who of course will neither assist nor promote any White subordinate; young Whites are thus confronted with an Affirmative Acton barrier. The GWSA can easily vault this barrier, and get State Department, other government and even corporate sinecures. (Note how perfectly idiotic most of those State Department officials are. ). Unlike most Whites, esp. less than wealthy Whites, GWSAs have managed to protect themselves from accusations of racism.

      How does one become a GWSA?

      1. Marrying a nonwhite is the easiest route to being an iron-clad GWSA; however, if the nonwhite spouse then turns against the GWSA, they can be totally ruined. “Honestly, Judge, he got drunk and called me a …”

      2. Paying to serve as an aid worker in some third world cesspool. Yes, the volunteers pay “tuition” for being allowed to dig latrines and other menial work in places like Nepal.

      3. Being prominent in most any Christian church also guarantees GWSA status.

      HOWEVER, this family does not sound like the typical scheming GWSA.

      Obviously this family, though nice-looking, and probably of German and Irish descent, was in desperate financial straits. They lived in a trailer park, and had to start an internet fund for the boy’s funeral. The GWSA would look down on them with such contempt.

      But maybe a slick Christian shows up, and waves a cool $20K under their noses. “All you guys have to say is how you care so much about the murderer’s family, and you are helping law enforcement too by preventing a riot.”

      Could it go further? Does law enforcement tell the family that they better comply or be charged with incitement?

      How is it that the parents and family of the victim are never White nationalist? The UK Time On-line never quotes the father as saying “We blame the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for our child’s tragic death. They may as well have set hungry wolves loose in the playground.”

      So no more of this dumb Southern “Huck Finn.” Even the slightest edge of mistrust in the eyes of the two brothers would have scared this murderer away.

    12. CW-2 Says:

      Liberals and Christians think they have escaped from Nature’s laws, or that her eternal laws of kinship are held in abeyance just for them so they can feel ‘righteous’. They are both in for a long overdue surprise.

    13. Don Says:

      Mary O, you dissected and interpreted brilliantly. Well done.

    14. Mark A Cesare Says:

      The problem is the Rothschilds and other greedy people, especially other wealthy white people who put profits over their own people or nation. America is just resources to be tapped by these monsters (multi-headed businesses, some with tentacles reaching from outside the US) to strangle white America with the help of our traitors (especially in our federal government) who are paid pennies on the dollar they extract from this nation to help them do it too. Many Jews are in there control, and were subject -just like we are now- to their take overs in the past. God help and bless America as our founders formed and meant it to be. Thine heaven come, not the hell that is being imported here with the Rothschilds covert leadership in this assault and invasion of America (with the 3rd world), and with the help of the sell out on the inside too. Thank you.

    15. Mark A Cesare Says:

      …and we’re racists too if we don’t agree with this invasion, speak out again it, or demand common sense from our government any more. It’s a game, they are playing us – don’t be fooled. These people deserve to live better in their own nation, not have to come here for a better life, that btw will not happen anyway. They are being brought here to lower our standard of living – to enrich the Rothschilds and their slave drivers, our traitors – not to raise theirs. Thanks.

    16. Mark A Cesare Says:

      Correction: Many Jews are in their* control…