5 March, 2020

The Judeo-Left is in a Panic as Trump’s Re-Election is Likely and “a Woman’s Right to Choose” is Being Threatened by Fascism! OMG!

Posted by Socrates in abortion, abortion movement, constitution, constitutional rights, fake rights, fascism accusations, federal courts, feminism, Feminists, feminization of the West, jewed culture, jewed law, jewed politics, Roe v. Wade, Socrates, Tenth Amendment, Trump, Trump-as-a-fascist, Trumpphobia at 12:38 pm | Permanent Link

(Under genuine constitutional law, the 1973 Roe v. Wade court ruling was a complete, left-wing fraud that hinged only on a fake excuse of “privacy” — as if abortion is performed by you, in your house, without any doctor or nurse present! Ha-ha! It’s total bullshit. There is nothing in the constitution that would remotely suggest that a woman has a so-called federal “right to choose” to abort her baby. That’s right. Nothing. Zero. That means that abortion would fall under the 10th Amendment and each state would decide the issue for itself. Roe v. Wade was about advancing feminism and nothing more).

When a man murders a pregnant woman, and he is federally (i.e., not just locally) charged, he is always charged with two counts of murder, not just one count [1]. Yet, we are told, when a woman gets an abortion, it’s merely “the woman’s choice” and it’s not murder. Get that?

Also, note for the historical record that the abortion movement in America was, and is, Jewish-led.

Furthermore, Schumer is Jewish; Arquette is Jewish under Jewish religious law since her mother was Jewish.

[Article] and [Article].


[1] e.g., “The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law which recognizes an embryo or fetus in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence.” — Wikipedia

  • One Response to “The Judeo-Left is in a Panic as Trump’s Re-Election is Likely and “a Woman’s Right to Choose” is Being Threatened by Fascism! OMG!”

    1. Luke Says:

      I have no problem with abortion being legal in cases of rape or incest, or perhaps in rare instances where it is determined early on that the child will be born with serious birth defects that would condemn it to a lifetime of total dependency. In those cases, the parents could be willing to care for the child – but, what happens when the parents grow old and die? Who steps in and takes over? Those are worthwhile considerations and reasonable questions to ask.

      But, over all – I oppose abortion for White women for reasons of racial survival. The White birth rate is below replacement level in nearly every historic White European nation. And, our #1 enemy celebrates this almost daily and loves to taunt Whites and rub our noses in the success they’ve had in promoting their White genocide agenda. They even crow about how fantastic it will be when Whites become extinct in the not too distant future.

      I think a rational change to the abortion laws would be to disallow abortions among demographic groups who’s birth rates are below replacement levels – and permit abortions for demographic groups who’s birth rates are above replacement levels. With, of course, the exceptions cited above.