Archive for the 'Fourteenth Amendment' Category

23 August, 2015

Posted by Socrates in "civil rights", constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, Socrates at 1:04 pm | Permanent Link

Or, maybe they do know the history of it, but won’t say so due to the fact that all civil-rights laws are based on the 14th Amendment [1]. Anyway, this article is just a bunch of empty words, since the 14th Amendment wasn’t properly ratified by Congress. Only 21 states ratified it; that wasn’t enough […]

26 June, 2015

Posted by Socrates in "gay marriage", Big Fag, constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, homosexual themes, homosexuals, queers, Socrates, Tenth Amendment at 9:39 am | Permanent Link

This court ruling cheapens traditional marriage and also violates the Tenth Amendment by “federalizing” what should be a state-by-state issue [1]. But what did you expect from a non-White Supreme Court? (By the way, the Fourteenth Amendment wasn’t ratified properly, making it null and void). [Article]. . [1] 10th Amendment: “The powers not delegated to […]

9 October, 2014

Posted by Socrates in "civil rights", "gay marriage", constitution, counterculture, Cultural Marxism, egalitarianism, equality, Fourteenth Amendment, homosexual themes, homosexuals, Socrates, Supreme Court at 5:48 pm | Permanent Link

Queer marriage cheapens real marriage by default, and it legitimizes the counterculture. Newbies, the 14th Amendment wasn’t properly ratified in Congress, meaning that it doesn’t really exist. (All civil-rights laws are based on that bogus amendment). [Article] and [Article].

22 April, 2014

Posted by Socrates in "civil rights", Affirmative Action, Affirmative Action vs. merit, Celler, Celler Rights Laws, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Cultural Marxism, education, egalitarianism, Fourteenth Amendment, jewed culture, jewed education system, jewed law, Socrates, Supreme Court at 1:28 pm | Permanent Link

On the one hand, it’s good that the U.S. Supreme Court has just upheld a Michigan ban on Affirmative Action in college admissions [1]. But on the other hand, Americans shouldn’t be going to college anyway – they’ll only have their heads filled with Cultural Marxism, and they’ll pay $90,000 or more for the privilege. […]

25 June, 2013

Posted by Socrates in "civil rights", Affirmative Action, anti-White themes, Celler, Celler Rights Laws, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Fourteenth Amendment, Socrates, Supreme Court at 9:56 pm | Permanent Link

According to the court, it’s still okay to discriminate against Whites, even though, in some places in America, Whites are now the minority (e.g., California). By the way, the 14th Amendment wasn’t ratified correctly, meaning that all court rulings based on it are illegitimate. [Article] and [Article].

31 July, 2011

Posted by Socrates in "civil rights", Celler, Celler Rights Laws, Fourteenth Amendment, Israel, Israel's "right to exist", jewed culture, jewed law, Jewish politicians, Jewish Tyranny, Socrates, Zionism at 1:09 pm | Permanent Link

(Above: “Manny” Celler) The unconstitutional Civil Rights Act of 1964, which came from a yid named Emanuel Celler, has now been “re-interpreted” to benefit Jews even more than it already did [1]. [Article]. [1] modern “civil rights” laws are based mostly on the improperly-ratified 14th Amendment

16 June, 2010

Posted by Socrates in constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, illegal immigration, immigration, immigration bills/laws, Socrates at 9:46 pm | Permanent Link

Of course legal scholars find Pearce’s idea funny. They only know what their Jewish/liberal college professors and their Jewish/liberal-edited history books told them, i.e., that Reconstruction-era Amendments are legitimate: [Article].

29 April, 2009

Posted by Socrates in Fourteenth Amendment, illegal immigration, immigration, public skools, Socrates, Supreme Court, U.S. Constitution at 10:04 pm | Permanent Link

Checking the citizenship status of students who attend American schools is against the law, according to a horrible 1982 court ruling. (The court ruling – called Plyler v. Doe – apparently only applies to minors. However, since the Plyler ruling was based on the 14th Amendment, it isn’t legit, since that Amendment wasn’t properly ratified): […]

6 May, 2008

Posted by Socrates in "civil rights", egalitarianism, Fourteenth Amendment, jewed culture, jewed law, race, race-mixing laws, Socrates at 7:15 pm | Permanent Link

The infamous U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Loving v. Virginia, banned laws that prohibited interracial marriage. Of significance is that two Jewish lawyers aided the Lovings in their legal fight [1]. Also of significance is that the Loving ruling was based on the 14th Amendment, which wasn’t ratified properly, therefore, the court’s ruling is legally invalid: […]

20 October, 2007

Posted by Socrates in ACLU, federal power, Fourteenth Amendment, Socrates at 9:56 pm | Permanent Link

Lawsuit claims violations of Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. (Trivia: the Fourteenth Amendment was apparently not ratified properly) [1][2]: [Article]. [1] more about the Fourteenth Amendment, which America’s civil rights laws are based on: [Here] and [Here] [2] more about the ACLU: (scroll almost 3/4 down the page): [Here]