Archive for the 'genetic interests' Category

27 September, 2010

Posted by Socrates in genetic interests, genetics, Kevin MacDonald, race science, racial differences, racial science, Socrates at 11:22 am | Permanent Link

“Collectivist cultures are associated with two genetic markers both of which make people more prone to stress in the absence of the kind of social support found in collectivist cultures.” That’s interesting, since people from collectivist cultures are flooding into the West: [Article].

5 June, 2010

Posted by Socrates in genetic interests, genetics, Jewish genetics, race, race science, racial differences, racial science, science, Socrates at 4:02 pm | Permanent Link

Jews aren’t a race? According to the standards used by one U.S. government agency (the Census Bureau), they are a race [1]. It’s time for “race” to be redefined by the scientific community to include not just Jews but other people who are heavily inbred: [Article]. [1] go [Here] and scroll 7/8 down the page […]

13 March, 2010

Posted by Socrates in anthropology, book reviews, book selections, genetic interests, genetics, Jewish genetics, Jewish history, Jewology, Nazi era, Nazis, race science, racial science, Socrates, Western culture, what is a jew? at 2:33 pm | Permanent Link

If the West were a sane region, the scientific study of yids would be all-important: who/what are these people who have brought more misery to the White countries than any other humans? [Book Review].

19 October, 2009

Posted by Socrates in Britain, British Empire, empire, England, genetic interests, genetics, Hitler, jewed culture, Socrates at 10:25 am | Permanent Link

Interesting. The British are very successful people (at one point in history, their empire covered half of the world). Some have theorized that one of the reasons for that success is the fact that the UK is an island, which limited their breeding partners and made them slightly inbred, producing more-uniform people, which improved their […]

21 March, 2009

Posted by Socrates in genetic interests, genetics, intelligence, IQ, Jewish genetics, Marxism, science, Socrates at 11:41 pm | Permanent Link

“…the genes we inherit play a far greater role in intelligence than was previously thought.” Well, isn’t that interesting? So much for the old “nurture, not nature” propaganda that Marxist high-school teachers spoon-fed to us. What else will science reveal in the next decade? Something really interesting about Jews, perhaps? [Article].

7 August, 2008

Posted by Socrates in Australia, birth control, dispossession & destruction, dysgenics, eugenics, feminism, General Decline, genetic interests, genetics, genocide of White culture, Jew World Order, jewed culture, New World Order, Socrates, Western culture at 7:50 pm | Permanent Link

After all, the creation of more White kids might hinder the feminist, anti-family, anti-White-male, dysgenic (read: Jewish) agenda that’s being pushed in the Western countries: [Article].

25 July, 2008

Posted by Socrates in Cultural Marxism, egalitarianism, genetic interests, genetics, Jewed science, political correctness, race, race science, racial science, science, Socrates, UNESCO, Western culture at 2:43 pm | Permanent Link

No humans are superior? How do you explain this, for example? Or this? Further, do “moral” questions belong in science? Isn’t science supposed to be neutral? Who decides what is and isn’t “moral”? (For newbies: Jewish “scientist” Ashley Montagu – not his real name – long ago announced that all humans are “equal.” Montagu’s announcement […]

16 June, 2008

Posted by Socrates in genetic interests, genetics, Jewish genetics, race, race science, racial science, Socrates at 2:22 pm | Permanent Link

True, the definition of “White” has shifted somewhat, e.g., Italians and Spaniards used to be considered non-White. But “White” will always mean “your ancestors originated from a White European country.” [1]. That automatically excludes negroes, Mexicans, Jews, Asians and various mixtures of those groups. They can call themselves “White” but it won’t mean that they […]

21 February, 2007

Posted by alex in evolution, genetic interests, Kirksville, racial science at 6:54 pm | Permanent Link

Mr Linder: Here is a most interesting post that should be on VNN. DEP Gary Bontlebiase Said, February 21, 2007 @ 12:29 am About fifteen years ago I told a female friend (I thought she was) that she was making a big mistake marrying a man who was not a Negro, but a dark […]

3 February, 2007

Posted by alex in genetic interests, White identity at 10:27 pm | Permanent Link

Alex — GREAT GOYFIRE #47. Laughted my “A” off and learned a lot too. Here’s a correspondence clip I think VNN readers will value. It’s sorta related to the recent Curt Maynard post. ———– “This is an interesting phenomenon…the natural leadership of the European Whites, unlike their Hebraic counterparts, have apparently bought into the notion […]