Archive for the 'War of 1812' Category

31 May, 2021

Memorial Day: Why Did So Many Die?

Posted by Socrates in "Civil War", America, jewed foreign policy, Jewish warmongering, Walt Rostow, war, war as a racket, war as unnecessary, War of 1812, War! War! War!, warmongers, World War I, World War II at 10:17 am | Permanent Link

There were only 2 wars that America had to fight: the Revolutionary War (which created The United States of America), and the War of 1812 (because British troops were seizing American ships on the high seas and also aiding Indian tribes in order to further anti-American schemes). So why did America fight all those other […]



Comments Off on Memorial Day: Why Did So Many Die?

27 May, 2019

Memorial Day

Posted by Socrates in genocide, genocide by jew, genocide of White culture, Harry Dexter White, Horsejews of the Apocalypse, jewed foreign policy, jewed politics, Memorial Day, Socrates, war, war as unnecessary, War of 1812, World War II at 12:17 pm | Permanent Link

(Above: the reality of war: deadly, not romantic, despite what your Army recruiter tells you. White men, stop dying in stupid wars — wars usually fought for Jewish benefit). This Memorial Day, let us remember all of the insane wars that America didn’t have to fight (most of them, in other words). If memory serves […]



Comments (5) »

13 January, 2017

The Constant Over-Glorification of U.S. Veterans and U.S. Wars

Posted by Socrates in Afghanistan, Britain, false heroes, Iraq War, ISIS, Israel, Israel - the facts, Japan, jewed foreign policy, Pearl Harbor, perpetual war for perpetual peace, propaganda, Vietnam War, war, war as a racket, War of 1812, War On Israel's Enemies, Zionism at 2:22 pm | Permanent Link

Seen: a female TV host thanking a U.S. soldier who served in Iraq or Afghanistan for “your service to our country.” Service to our country? What do you mean? I hear that completely inaccurate thank-you all the time. The implication is that the soldier is somehow defending America. Granted, those soldiers are brave – probably […]



Comments (6) »