Never trust a man surnamed after a woman's snapper.

I've read several of Kunstler's books and corresponded with him. I agree he is hard on Iran, but it goes in with his concerns about middle east oil and its control. In his books, he's no friend of multiculturalism, and I feel he's really not that crazy about blacks and muds. He argues that with the end of oil and cheap gas, most of Aztlan will be meaningless anyway, and calls for us to stop using so much oil. He argues the idea of bringing 'democracy' or fighting 'terrorism' in the mideast is a smokescreen...we're there for the oil, and this is refreshing. He hasn't said it, but I think he would acknowledge that Israel's days are numbered. A U.S. with no oil can't take care of itself, let alone our little brother in the levant.

It just goes to prove that racial sterotypes almost always prove to be true.

No ! You really can't mean that ?

Never trust a man surnamed after a woman's snapper.

Never trust a man of Kosher origins !

He hasn't said it, but I think he would acknowledge that Israel's days are numbered. A U.S. with no oil can't take care of itself, let alone our little brother in the levant.

I think that you project too many of your thoughts onto an unworthy individual .

I don't think I'm projecting. Kunstler takes the view that a lot have that israel is an outpost of the west and is, as they say, 'a canary in the mine', that if it goes out, the west is next. But he realizes that things are too precarious to keep on going the way they are. Israel would live a very short life if the west weren't feeding it, and reminds me of the Christian state established by the Crusades, which also failed...just too many Indians surrounding the wagon train. He argues Iran is dangerous, and despite what a lot of people on this website think, I think Islam means to take us over. It really is us against the coloreds and the tribe. That being said, I stil enjoy Kunstler's fiction and reportage. Does anyone remember Erdman's book THE CRASH OF 79? Erdman had the Shah attack Iraq to get the oil supplies, but was beaten back, then set off nuclear bombs to contaminate the oil fields..using weapons provided by Israel, the jews figuring that without arabs using oil as a weapon, Israel would be safe. Cock-eyed, but i can see the Israelis doing something stupid and manipulative to start a war. They're getting war-weary, and can't fight off the arabs forever. Kunstler argues a new oil crisis would shut down everything. We'd get local real fast.

Never trust a man surnamed after a woman's snapper.

Which reminds me...

Ya here about the girl who went out fishing with seven guys?
She came back with a red snapper.

(I know, I know -- Stfu, you're not funny. )

I've read several of Kunstler's books and corresponded with him. I agree he is hard on Iran, but it goes in with his concerns about middle east oil and its control. In his books, he's no friend of multiculturalism, and I feel he's really not that crazy about blacks and muds. He argues that with the end of oil and cheap gas, most of Aztlan will be meaningless anyway, and calls for us to stop using so much oil. He argues the idea of bringing 'democracy' or fighting 'terrorism' in the mideast is a smokescreen...we're there for the oil, and this is refreshing. He hasn't said it, but I think he would acknowledge that Israel's days are numbered. A U.S. with no oil can't take care of itself, let alone our little brother in the levant.

I'll agree with you on all your above observations about Kunstler. As I said, I routinely kept a tab on his Clusterfuck Nation blog because he offered straight talk that was perceptive and on target and not littered with canned propaganda lines. And your're right, you got the impression that he was no big fan of American style "diversity" or non-whites in general. He deliberately chose to live in upstate New York in a rurual all white area for obvious reasons.

But when it came to Iran, honesty and objectivity suddenly disappeared and were replaced with canned Zionist propaganda, almost all of it based upon easily proven lies and half-truths and distortions.

It's hard to believe that Kunstler, as knowledgable as he is, didn't know he was pushing pro-Israel propaganda. And the thing that was so obvious is that none of it made sense or fit in with the very rational mindset he has used to gain the respect of a lot of intelligent and independent-minded readers.

The only way one can explain this sudden lapse of character is loyalty to the Tribe, doing his part, etc.

Kunstler is obviously a Jew first in all things. And thus he instantly has no more credibility than any of the other Jewish talking heads we see and hear and read daily.

Rather than say no credibility, I would say selective credibility. I'm not exactly a fan of Iran, and I've said before I don't trust Muslims, but I have no animosity against them, nor want a war. A strike against iran would be a 'quick fix', an attempt to repeat the Israeli strike on Iraq, and Iran is a much tougher customer. Kunstler argues correctly that Islam is a threat to us, and even if Israel vanished, they would still be. I really doubt all those mobs of muslims in europe would hug us as Israel went down...they'd start on us. I'm not like Michael Savage who blathers about 'Hitler in a headscarf', and neither does Kunstler. He argues that its our stupid lifestyle that has made us dependent on mideast oil that is the real enemy. And no one in power is doing anything about it, nor do they wish to. But I think he's wrong to argue striking Iran, but not on a lot of other things, and the ton of mail he got against his views was acknowledged by him. As I told him, for all the talk he might have against extreme Christians and whites, when the system breaks down, he's going to feel safer with us than with those precious little ethnics. As the Palestinians say, 'the Jews will never leave Palestine...they'll flee.'