Suicide is not part of the animal instinct. It is a result of large brains. The human animal is not emotionally capable of dealing with its own intelligence. In this sense, higher intelligence is not necessarily evolutionary beneficial.

Our reasoning powers tell us that one day we will die and that this will be the end of our existence. It has been hypothesized by evolutionary psychologists that the reason religion is hardwired into our brains is because any being capable of realizing he was one day going to die would essentially go insane and/or kill himself. The prospect of non-existence is a disturbing idea, hence an instinctual sense of an afterlife of some sort was necessary to prevent insanity.

This is why the suicide rate for whites is higher than negroes, and higher yet for Japanese. Negroes kill themselves least often, and I'd wager that the ones who do kill themselves are probably far more thoughtful and sensitive than the average. I am reminded of all the posters here making jokes about how they'd kill themselves if they woke up tomorrow as a nigger. Apparently some niggers feel that way too.

Dr. Pierce thought that the higher number of suicides is because there's no future worth living for anymore, and I agree. Our society is sick and there is no future for our race unless big changes happen. Depression assuaged by an epicurean lifestyle is the collective white zeitgeist for now.

Apparently the Japanese are not even the worst, according to this rather old stat., from 1998, Lithuania and Russia are on top, actually Japan comes way later. That the Japs are exceptional in killing themselves must be another jew fairy tale.

http://www.uni-wuerzburg.de/IASR/suicide-figure1.htm

http://articles.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20060310054109990001&ncid=NWS00010000000001

I've read references to the ancient Celts cutting off and collecting the heads of enemy combatants, but I don't recall any White cultures in history with a suicide ritual like seppuku. Do any of ya'll know of one?

Didn't the Romans use to slit their wrists in bathtub/pool as a result of loosing political intrigues?

The Warlord

What is the evidence?

http://www.white-history.com/ainu_in_japan.htm

http://www.white-history.com/ainu_in_japan.htm

Thanks.

From the conclusion of the article:

Despite these physical similarities to Caucasians, recent genetic studies (M. Bannai, and others] http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1034/j.1399-0039.2000.550204.x/abs/ [/url]) have shown no direct link between the Ainu and any currently existing White racial group, and have suggested that the Ainu are in fact descended from a distinct Upper Paleolithic population of East Asia.

The physical Caucasian appearance of so many Ainu still remains an enigma, and it is possible that further genetic testing of larger sample groups may yet deliver a different verdict on the origin of the Ainu.

I was aware of the Ainu, so this is not news to me. The Ainu may have some superficial similarities to whites, but that is a far cry from saying that they are white, let alone Aryan. IMO the Ainu are an asian caucasoid group, hence their appearance, but their genetic connections to European caucasoids are so distant that they really aren't any more closely related to us than mongoloids are, in spite of superficial similiarities in appearance. The same holds true with other asian caucasoid groups like the Polynesians. There have been plenty of reports of "white" Polynesians historically, but that doesn't mean that they came from Europe.

That the Japs are exceptional in killing themselves must be another jew fairy tale.

The way I understood the original poster, he wasn't saying that Japs have a monopoly on suicide, or that they are the only people who commit suicide over notions of honor (after all, Hitler committed suicide, and look at all those Palestinian freedom fighters today). He was making the point that they may be one of the few (if not the only) cultures that has made such a grisly ritual out of it.

If I was going to kill myself, it sure as hell wouldn't be by slashing my intestines to shreds then waiting to die.

The evidence is growing that the Samuri, the Japanese warrior class, the initiators I believe of the this ritual, were originally White Aryans.

http://www.white-history.com/ainu_in_japan.htm

Blackhistory.com and white-history.com....both utterly full of shit. I'd debunk these absurd claims but greg already did it for me. Moreover, Sforza et al mapped the ainu genetically and they were indeed mapped with mongoloids, not caucasoids.

The way I understood the original poster, he wasn't saying that Japs have a monopoly on suicide, or that they are the only people who commit suicide over notions of honor (after all, Hitler committed suicide, and look at all those Palestinian freedom fighters today). He was making the point that they may be one of the few (if not the only) cultures that has made such a grisly ritual out of it.

If I was going to kill myself, it sure as hell wouldn't be by slashing my intestines to shreds then waiting to die.

Thanks Amalekite, that's it exactly. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. I was curious as to whether any Euro culture had woven into it any philosophy or structure of ritual suicide. Falling on one's sword upon the loss of battle or at the command of a leader seems to me different than a highly formulaic, prescribed ceremony.

Thanks.

From the conclusion of the article:I was aware of the Ainu, so this is not news to me. The Ainu may have some superficial similarities to whites, but that is a far cry from saying that they are white, let alone Aryan. IMO the Ainu are an asian caucasoid group, hence their appearance, but their genetic connections to European caucasoids are so distant that they really aren't any more closely related to us than mongoloids are, in spite of superficial similiarities in appearance. The same holds true with other asian caucasoid groups like the Polynesians. There have been plenty of reports of "white" Polynesians historically, but that doesn't mean that they came from Europe.

Polynesians are Mongoloids.

Blackhistory.com and white-history.com....both utterly full of shit. I'd debunk these absurd claims but greg already did it for me. Moreover, Sforza et al mapped the ainu genetically and they were indeed mapped with mongoloids, not caucasoids.

No more bullshit than China's claim that it was the 'world's superpower' before the coming of the Europeans.

Blackhistory.com and white-history.com....both utterly full of shit. I'd debunk these absurd claims but greg already did it for me. Moreover, Sforza et al mapped the ainu genetically and they were indeed mapped with mongoloids, not caucasoids.

No, you're "utterly full of shit" on your discrediting of White-history.com. White-history.com is a major historical work by an excellent White historian. And White makes all the difference. This is why Whites, and not Asians, for instance, invented science. Asians and the other non-white races and mixtures do not value Truth. Aryans, the Race of Truth, do.

Obviously, sometimes Aryans lie -- but it's relatively rare and not our natural impulse. Certainly, it is not Arthur Kemp's (the White historian in point).

For these reasons, Black-history.com is a completely different story. And the fact that you, an Asian, equate this negroid spurious site with Arthur Kemp's March of the Titans tells us your level of valuing Truth and your propensity for not telling it.

White-history.com is a major historical work by an excellent White historian. And White makes all the difference.

They're both biased and pseudo-scientific. I look for objective truth, not ethnocentric nonsense. Fucking white Japanese? Give me a break.

The fact you are capitilizing "truth" speaks volumes.

Polynesians are Mongoloids.

And they sure don't look it, which was my point about the problems of relying on looks alone for classification. I'm not sure where I got the idea they were Caucasoid; probably from old definitions dividing humanity into three "races" and lumping anyone not obvious Negroid or Mongoloid into the Caucasoid category (for instance I've even read some claims that Australian Aborigines are "caucasoid" simply because they did not fit neatly into any other category). There were also some theories that there were east asian "caucasoid" groups that existed before they were displaced by Mongoloid groups, hence remnants like the Ainu. I don't know if that holds up in light of the new DNA evidence or not.

They're both biased and pseudo-scientific. I look for objective truth, not ethnocentric nonsense. Fucking white Japanese? Give me a break.

The fact you are capitilizing "truth" speaks volumes.

You are making yourself look like an idiot with your vitriolic attacks.

In case you did not notice, the "white history" thing he linked to did not support his assertion that the Ainu were either "white" or "Aryan".

Had you kept your head, you would have noticed that and pointed it out, as I did. But no, you flew off the handle. Your lack of objectivity on this topic is noted. You can't fool us with your appeals to objective truth; you have not demonstrated any emotional maturity to handle it yourself.

It is obvious that the so-called Japanese have been interbreeding with the Ainu for a very, very long time. The original Ainu well may have been a Caucasoid people. The myth of slant-eyed ancient civilizations is being disproved as long as science is free of political fetters. Witness the redhaired Aryan mummies of China, just as it was the Aryans, the culture bearers who gave the world the Rig Veda and high civilization in India. Buddhism and various martial arts all Aryan creations. To minimize the impact that our racial forebears had on Asian civilization is wrong and once the jew's grip on academe is lifted more evidence will come forth.