the "Greatest Generation" ought to be called "the worst" because they presided over the civil rights and immigration reform era, which marked the fulfillment of the jew takeover ofthe 1930s. Consequently their spawn the "baby boomers" and our own "generation X" might also be known as the Last White Majorities.

I think it fitting that the "greatest generation" and "baby boomers" get their social security snipped off at halfways, which is sure to happen in a big government default that the colored masses will not hardly give a damn about. Collectively, they dont deserve any pensions whatsoever.

If you are older and dont want the day of reckoning to approach, better make plans to hop on the White bandwagon because good relationships with your own kind is the only thing that will keep you secure. The Nanny State is definitely going broke.

Younger people better work for White revolution, unless you want to possibly be saddled with and increasing tax load to pay for this and the next generation of colored retirees as well.

Does anyone else notice that these financial crises always come around election time and then they are never mentioned again for 4 years?

Follow the deficit through the Clinton Bush campaign.

One minute it is through the roof the next minute we have excess and then the next minute we are unable to pay it again.

It is nothing more than a numbers game to scare people. Remember that Jewish banks own the money in your pockets so it doesn’t really matter one-way or the other.

I think it fitting that the "greatest generation" and "baby boomers" get their social security snipped off at halfways...

This remark is both malicious and ignorant. One might very well lay blame on the "greatest generation", but the "baby boomers" were already born into this mess, and therefore had neither political or social say in what subsequently followed. True, baby boomers NOW have political and social say, but they're only following the brainwashed masses in a society that was already pre-ordained. The baby boomers didn't create the society we have, they inherited the ugly mess. They're victims, more than anything.

Not malicious or ignorant. Fact, perhaps offensive to you, and so you consider it malicious.

To what generation did the "freedom riders" belong? Were they WW2 veterans or long haired hippies and jews born after the war? Which would be called: _______________.

Generation X was "born into it." In case you forgot here are a few mileposts: 1965 Civil Rights Act, 1965 Immigration Reform Act. More of the same on through 68. Generation X was "born into it." Baby Boomers from 1946 through 50 supplied the youth power in the streets to make the massive public disorder that helped scare Congress into these ill considered schemes. So maybe your later group of the baby boomers was born into it, but not the front end.

http://goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=13864

I don't have a crystal ball to see the future, but there's been a lot of talk lately at the goldismoney forum that July 1, 2005 is the date when our debt system collapses.

The end could very well be near!

Also, silver is above $7 again, so I wonder if Todd in FL still thinks the price will drop to the $5.50-$6 range again by November. The price in dollars would become irrelevent in the event of a debt collapse, however.

This remark is both malicious and ignorant. One might very well lay blame on the "greatest generation", but the "baby boomers" were already born into this mess, and therefore had neither political or social say in what subsequently followed. True, baby boomers NOW have political and social say, but they're only following the brainwashed masses in a society that was already pre-ordained. The baby boomers didn't create the society we have, they inherited the ugly mess. They're victims, more than anything.

Turner Diaries, Chapter XXVII:

"After all, is not man essentially responsible for his condition- at least, in a collective sense? If the White nations of the world had not allowed themselves to become subject to the Jew, to Jewish ideas, to the Jewish spirit, this war would not be necessary. We can hardly consider ourselves blameless. We can hardly say we had no choice, no chance to avoid the Jew's snare. We can hardly say we were not warned. . . . The fact is that we are all responsible, as individuals, for the morals and the behavior of our race as a whole. There is no evading that responsibility, in the long run, any more for the members of our own race than for those of other races, and each of us individually must be prepared to be called to account for that responsibility at any time."

Johnny McRacist is an SPLC Jew troll: http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=9458&page=32&pp=10&highlight=Johnny+McRacist

John

So what to do about it? The most cost-effective policy I can see is to start working seriously on treatments to reverse aging.

Haha.. what planet is this writer living on? Does he really imagine that ZOG wants us to live longer? I see no evidence for this delusion.

I think the writer is deliberately overlooking the most likely "solution" for this problem. That being - euthanasia. Euthanasia is intellectually compatible with abortion. If it's OK to kill the inconvenient young, it no great leap to killing the inconvenient old. The arguments and rationale for euthanasia will no doubt be phrased somewhat differently. Instead of a "woman's right to choose", it will be "quality of life", etc...

I seem to recall Netherlands terminates about 15,000 "useless eaters" per year under the guise of euthanasia. The financial incentive for HMO's, hospital's, etc.. to cut costs will further accelerate the push for active euthanasia programs in the future.

Euthanasia is also compatible with "Club of Rome" goals:

During the Carter Administration, a task force was appointed to expand upon this report, and on July 24, 1980, a two-volume document called "Global 2000 Report," which had been written by former Secretary of State Cyrus R. Vance, was presented to President Carter, and then Secretary of State Edward S. Muskie. It attempted to project global economic trends for the next twenty years, and indicated that the resources of the planet were not sufficient enough to support the expected dramatic increase in the world population. The report called for the population of the U.S. to be reduced by 100 million people by the year 2050.

Howard T. Odum, a marine biologist at the University of Florida, who is a member of the Club of Rome, was quoted in the August, 1980 edition of Fusion magazine, as saying: "It is necessary that the United States cut its population by two-thirds within the next 50 years." He didn't say how this would be accomplished.