Joe,your obviously a flaming asshole or a kid.

Asshole? Yes. Kid? No, 35.

Unless white people stick together, there is NO HOPE of a future.Period!

Can you explain this? I doubt it. Why must Whites who are loyal to our racial destiny "stick with" traitors? If you really believe this, please explain it. If you actually believe that a 'great awakening' is possible, then we simply disagree.

You wouldn't defend a fellow white person,because you can't ]Did you just anonymously question my courage over the Internet? Really.

I'm not a Christian,but the reality IS that Christians are white people too, and command a very large part of white culture too,stupid.

I truly believe that this sort of racism IS a mental disease. If you don't understand that there exist differences between classes of people, then you are as much an egalitarian as the anti-racists and Whites who oppose us.

If by some far off twisted chance, you are a white man,you must be the worst lowlife piece of stupid shit-faced ignorant motherfucker, on the planet.

Speaking of ignorance, I recommend that you read the book "Which Way Western Man." I'll send you my copy if you promise to read it.

You wouldn't know a Real traitor if one kicked you in your worthless ass]Wow, what boldness! You're a brave MF fo sho.

Your a National Socialist like Aerial Sharon is a National Socialist]Oops, Ariel Sharon is a National Socialist.

YES,there certainly is "something" far worse than a traitor]At least I don't have a potty mouth like you. btw: You momma is a fat ugly cunt.

Vote from the rooftops

 

In all honesty, being a white man I'm still a human being....

I have read this over a few times and I still don't get it.

You really have to be more specific with the circumstances. there are numerous different reasons someone could feel motivated to kill someone else. A fight gone bad or anything similar to that I would feel no duty to tell anyone. If this was a guy who raped and killed a non-white child in front of me, that would call for a different response, for example. I would have to judge it mostly on how much of a danger the white killer poses to society.

Translation:

You would have froze and pissed yourself.

I have read this over a few times and I still don't get it.

Yeah I have a tough time understanding it myself. The only thing I can say is that I'm a segregationalist, and was brought up as a Catholic and went to private Catholic schools with predominately upper class Latinos, NOT your typical mud.

Flame away, but I'm being honest.

In all honesty, being a white man I'm still a human being, and know the difference between right and wrong. I'm sorry if that's not the right answer for some people, but it's the truth.... But it really comes down to the circumstances which are vague.

It really isn't that vague. In the scenario laid out by GB, 99.9% of the time the White man (or woman) is acting in either self-defense, defense of others or temporary insanity/righteous vengeance. In any of those examples, no murder has occurred, because killing in self-defense, defense of others or while temporarily insane, is not a crime.

A thug is a thug whether he be white or black.
In the coming Imperium we will ensure that all kinds of human refuse are elimated from the gene pool.We will need to embark upon a necessary cull of our own stock.

You are obviously talking about an exclusively White society, which by definition would be devoid of mud. Such a poll would be pointless then.

I agree that human refuse among Whites should be dealt with according to White laws, and harshly, when we have achieved our goal - White rule.

I voted "No", although I don't see how this poll is a good PR for us.

too bad cuz no1 is going to be removed its always goin to be liek this wether u like it or not and god will punish u all u say ur christian but look at all the shit u rite u ignorant bastards

This one is a keeper.

very good point. I voted "NO".

I voted no, and these are the reasons why.

Our ancestors fought and killed all of the time. We had a strong, prevalent warrior class. This manifested itself until the end of the wild west, where people dueled with pistols at high noon. It now manifests itself with anglo-saxon aggression in other people's countries, despite the fact that our leadership espouses xtianity (the religion of forgivness, tolerance and love, you know). Its in our blood, we cannot escape it, no matter how much the bleeding heart liberal says that we can. We all want a race war, there is no denying it. Our ancestral blood that courses through our veins demands vengeance upon our enemies.

The police are not to be trusted. If we do not know the circumstances of the battle, and if we contact the cops, we could be jeopardizing a fellow white who was just defending himself, or the honor of another. You are not allowed to defend yourself in many places anymore. The cop will find any and every reason to imprison our ayan friend. So I say walk away.

Now, here is a question. You come across a gang of subhumans attacking a fellow aryan. Do you:

1.-Call the cops?
2.-Walk away, like a cowardly waste of flesh, a disgrace to your race?
3.-Go into a berzerker rage and jump into the fray?

........

Now, here is a question. You come across a gang of subhumans attacking a fellow aryan. Do you:

1.-Call the cops?
2.-Walk away, like a cowardly waste of flesh, a disgrace to your race?
3.-Go into a berzerker rage and jump into the fray?

If you are actually involved in organizing Whites for pro-White anti-jew solidarity, then you won't waste your powder on a random lost cause.

There are a thousand battles out there and you need to size yourself up and gird your loins for the right ones.

If you are actually involved in organizing Whites for pro-White anti-jew solidarity, then you won't waste your powder on a random lost cause.

There are a thousand battles out there and you need to size yourself up and gird your loins for the right ones.

I understand your point of view, but I will not stand idle if I see a fellow aryan being ganged upon by a bunch of non-whites. If I help a fellow aryan, then the chances of adding him to our ranks will have increased exponentially. He or she would have just experienced, first hand, the harsh realities of multiculturism/multiracialism. Only if he or she walks away still blind, would it have been a random lost cause, and my efforts to aid that individual be for naught.

Even when the jewish problem is solved, we will still have to deal with the non-white problem, as they will still be among us.

It is a war with multiple fronts...

English common law -- there was no duty to report a crime. Generally that is the law in the USA but I cant speak for England.

In England it is an offence not to report a crime.

You are obviously talking about an exclusively White society, which by definition would be devoid of mud. Such a poll would be pointless then.

I agree that human refuse among Whites should be dealt with according to White laws, and harshly, when we have achieved our goal - White rule.

I voted "No", although I don't see how this poll is a good PR for us.

I see no reason to accord value where no inherant value exists.
Blood is merely the starting point for something greater.I see no reason to afford protection to criminals,white or otherwise.

Surely it depends upon the nature of his motivation?
If he himself is just a murderous thug it could be you or I that will be his next victim.
Indiscriminate murder is not even a tactic.It is the way of cowards.

I think the poll issuer's point is that we have to return to some form of group mentality (bound by commitment to truth, order and reason), otherwise our future is doomed. I personally voted "no", yet I cannot say I automatically disrespect people who gave the other option. It depends on the reasons why they did that. If the reasons are something like: "We are all humans and we shall all abide to the same law!", then I somewhat despise that person for being overly feminized. Even though we are indeed all humans, the law's equal treatment disregards the fact that, we are variable in quality. The law says it's the same if one kills a drug-dealing shitskin or a white scientist, if that act isn't done in self-defence. The law, in my oppinion, is just as absurd as puting as same worth on gold and bronze for having the common property of class (metals). I honestly think rooting out detrimental elements out of our immensely degenerate society, no matter how it's done, is beneficial rather than damaging for our cause.

I think the poll issuer's point is that we have to return to some form of group mentality (bound by commitment to truth, order and reason), otherwise our future is doomed. I personally voted "no", yet I cannot say I automatically disrespect people who gave the other option. It depends on the reasons why they did that. If the reasons are something like: "We are all humans and we shall all abide to the same law!", then I somewhat despise that person for being overly feminized. Even though we are indeed all humans, the law's equal treatment disregards the fact that, we are variable in quality. The law says it's the same if one kills a drug-dealing shitskin or a white scientist, if that act isn't done in self-defence. The law, in my oppinion, is just as absurd as puting as same worth on gold and bronze for having the common property of class (metals). I honestly think rooting out detrimental elements out of our immensely degenerate society, no matter how it's done, is beneficial rather than damaging for our cause.

I agree,"detrimental elements" need to be "rooted" out-and that includes whites as well.