One could claim that using the picture below to characterize feminism is trivializing feminism.

But is it really possible to trivialize an "intellectual" movement that included an objectives from the 1960s of having wymyn stop shaving their underarms to help attract a husbands? Considering that 40 years later wymyn were shaving their snatch so that men they "hook-up" with could have a visually more pleasurable experience when fucking wymyn style, could any "intellectual" movement be considered more absurd?

Some points about the chained toilet seat:

• Why do feminist assume the toilet seat default state is down?[/*:m:2w4akhla]
• Feminist are not intelligent enough to realize wymyn are the beneficiary of the bi-state toilet seat.[/*:m:2w4akhla]
• Feminist are not intelligent enough to realize that it is wymyn who will mostly suffer if the toilet seat is chained down.[/*:m:2w4akhla]
• Feminist are unwilling share equally responsibility in the raising and lower toilet seat. Is this really too much to ask for wymyn soldiers and CEOs?[/*:m:2w4akhla]
• Are feminist smart enough to realize it would be in their best interest that they raise the toilet when done? Why depend on the men?[/*:m:2w4akhla]
• Will feminist acknowledge that it was men who invented the brassiere, tampon, birth control pills, etc, along with the bi-state toilet seat to make life convenient for wymyn? [/*:m:2w4akhla]
• Feminist likely consider the picture below as making a profound statement about men.[/*:m:2w4akhla]
• Feminist likely consider the picture below "art".[/*:m:2w4akhla][/list:u:2w4akhla]



Feminism, as explained by stock images




"I die in the faith of my people. May the German people be aware of its enemies!"
Paul Blobel, SS Officer, 1951, last words prior to being executed