My website has the White nationalist version of this post, which you can find at...

http://www.jabpage.org/posts/apocalypse.html

That page has links to David Price's page (137) at dieoff.org and to Matt Savinar's "Life After the Oil Crash" website.

I found a satellite photo of North America at night-time that shows the lights of the major cities. These will be the areas were niggers and other subhumans will be most on the prowl for prey -- anything from rats and stray dogs to people. My enlarged satellite image pic says (click the small pick to see it): "Get AWAY from the lights or the Niggers will EAT you!"

From the US Census Bureau, I was able to get county-level US demographic data showing the percentage of Blacks on a graded color scale. I similarly acquired a graph showing the percentage of Latinos. And then I made one showing the degree of urbanization for all counties and parishes in the United States. I combined these with photoprocessing software and enhanced the contrast a little, and the result is an estimate of the degree of threat (versus violence) during the die-off period.

Interestingly, Pocahontas County, West Virginia, is more or less in the clear from urban and negroid aggravating factors. It's rural and White, and so are all of the counties immediately adjacent to it. Dr. Pierce chose well: better than even he knew.

My threat assessment graphics can be found at

(For the whole US)
http://www.jabpage.org/posts/safeco.html

(Detail for the Eastern United States)
http://www.jabpage.org/posts/thasde.html

To follow is the version of my die-off essay that's I've been posting elsewhere, most of the time.

====== Top of Article ======

The depletion of crude oil reserves and natural gas during the early 21st century will cause the collapse of industrial civilization and a reduction of the world's human population to levels consistent with hoe-and-spade agriculture. Others have already described it well. For examples, see these pages:

http://dieoff.org/page137.htm
http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/

To the warnings of David Price and Matt Savinar, I will make my own modest contribution.

Since the 1960s, people in the know with the oil industry have been warning of the eventual depletion of fossil fuels. They've been saying that our world will be broken, civilization smashed, when the deposits of crude oil run out. Every informed prediction placed the onset of the cataclysm in the first half of the 21st century, with the troubles continuing until the early 22nd.

Among the more interesting predictions is this one. The world's population in 2050 is expected to be between 9 billion and 11 billion. In 2100, though, the world's population is expected to be four billion at most and possibly as few as 400 million. Canada, the USA, and Mexico at present have more people than this between them. (Certain UN projections made since World3 have been "sanitized" for political reasons. Don't believe any projection that simply shows the human population of the globe going up without end.)

Indeed, the lower population figure may be optimistic. For several centuries during the Middle Ages, the human population of the world hovered around 400 million, which can be presumed the stable population level based on hoe-and-spade agriculture, if augmented by an established system of agricultural trade. Mechanized agriculture, through the overuse of tractors (resulting in lost topsoil) and artificial fertilizers (resulting in sterile topsoil), will have made the Earth much less responsive to hoe-and-spade farming in 2100 than it was in 1200.

Can you appreciate what that must mean? It means that there's going to be a massive die-off of humanity, along with a great deal of this planet's life. What will happen in the next hundred years will be of geological importance, the like of which hasn't happened since the extinction of the dinosaurs, 65 million years ago.

Technology won't save us. Technology was invented to use energy; it doesn't create new energy resources. Even technological improvements in our ability to tap energy depend on the availability of a sufficient energy resource to be tapped. That's the problem: there won't be any such resource. There never will be a "Star Trek" future. Homo sapiens is nearly finished as a technical species.

Oh, we might have done it. We might have reached the methane oceans of Titan, or set up ten thousand nuclear reactors on the moon. With the resources of the whole solar system at our command, we might have found even interstellar travel possible. But we didn't take advantage of the generous window of opportunity that nature had given us. And now it's too late. Burn your science fiction books; they'll only make our descendants sad for a future that will never be theirs. But keep your fantasy novels. They'll enjoy those.

Your government won't save you. It isn't even going to try. The politicians have begun looking upon their own electorates as the primary threat to their safety. When the crash happens, people will understand that they were misled and betrayed. The new security measures, including the closure of Pennsylvania Avenue and the concrete bunkering of the British Parliament, aren't wards against terrorists. They're wards against you. A great deal of the changes in the national security practices of Western countries, lately, has been made in anticipation of defending the national betrayers from the national population. And as the economic situation worsens, the government elites will provide themselves with more of that kind of "national security" while stridently directing your attention at supposed foreign threats.

You have maybe 20 years to provision and fortify yourself against privation, happenstance, and banditry. Cities will be worse than the countryside, but the countryside will certainly not be safe. Humanity may become extinct in very large regions, surviving only in pockets where food will still grow. Get yourself into one of those pockets, then, before the competition gets too stiff. Buy a few acres of land. Secure your title from legal challenges. Secure your possession from illegal ones. Provision yourself against natural ones. Keep a low profile. Listen to the wind. Heed your instinctive warning feelings. And wait.

I'm 44 years old. My parents' generation was the last not to be affected by the depletion of fossil fuels. My generation will be the first to be affected somewhat--about when I'm 65 years old. Since beyond that moment retirement will be the same as death, you can appreciate the morbid, cynical joke implied by the phrase "retirement age." My daughter's generation will be the first to be hit hard in mid-life. My grandchildren will live most of their lives after the crash. My great-grandchildren will never know any other life but that of the post-industrial chaos.

If anything deserves to be called the Apocalypse of the Book of Revelations, then the 21st century die-off surely is it. Nasty times are coming. They won't last forever, but they will occupy perhaps 50 to 90 years of the near future. When those who are to die in the troubles have died, when all those who remain are able to support themselves without electricity or petro-chemicals, then people can begin to trust each other again. But not before. You must carry your family successfully through every one of the dangerous years, during which one misstep, a single error of judgment, might be fatal.

It's possible, though not certain, that 2004 is the last year in which our present civilization can carry on with business as usual. After the presidential election this November, some of the political pressure to keep the oil prices from hitting their first spikes will be off. Petroleum will become much more costly; and consequently so will the cost of manufacturing and distributing goods. If you want to prepare for the crash, you'd probably better do it this year. Although it might be possible for another 20 years to obtain necessary goods, their prices may rise sharply after 2004.

I've been hearing objections to the Peak Oil argument that have been fully answered already by the criticized writers. I answer, again, the most common objection. Nuclear power can't become available fast enough to offset the lessening power available from fossil fuels. Neither can any other energy source be made sufficient in the remaining time. It's too late, now, to avoid a hard crash.

The human lifespan is short in relation to the march of events in history. The generation that must die off was "outvoted" by the generations that enjoyed the good times. Or, rather, the generation that must face its own destruction never had a chance to vote in opposition to the course of action that made that destruction unavoidable.

====== End of Article ======

Columnist Charlie Reese has also acknowledged the die-off. See his column at

http://reese.king-online.com/Reese_20040303/index.php