James Buchanan pass...
 
Notifications
Clear all

James Buchanan passes a huge White benchmark.

4 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
620 Views
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

He explicitly states appreciation and concern for the White Race. To my knowledge, he's never had the courage to say the word "White" before. Since he's only a step away from mainstream -- having even run for President once -- this is a good sign. We -- the White Race -- only have maybe 20 years of existence as a viable people left, with the possibility of having our own nations. So this near main-streamer becoming actually White race conscious gives a bit hope -- since he is more than a near mainstreamer, he's even a potential White leader. Here's his article:

-------------------------------------------------

How Will 2006 Elections Turn Out?
Report; Posted on: 2006-09-24 01:10:28

"As of right now, there is little assurance your vote will count."

by James Buchanan

We are rapidly approaching the 2006 elections. Americans are mad about the pointless war in Iraq and illegal immigration, but will their votes count this time? Of course, there’s the usual problem of the two-party system not giving us a choice. In 2004 we had the pro-war Bush regime and the only slightly less pro-war John Kerry. Neither candidate talked much about immigration then. Added to this was the widespread appearance of Diebold electronic voting machines.

Many Americans have complained that our elections are like professional wrestling matches: phony, staged, decided in advance and the wrestlers (or politicians) are preordained to lose certain matches and win others depending on how certain behind-the-scenes wire-pullers want things to turn out.

An article on CNN reports “As of right now, there is little assurance your vote will count. As we’ve been reporting almost nightly on my broadcast for more than a year, electronic voting machines are placing our democracy at risk. Across the nation, eight out of every 10 voters will be casting their ballots this November on electronic voting machines. And these machines time and again have been demonstrated to be extremely vulnerable to tampering and error, and many of them have no voter-verified paper trail. There is simply no way in which election officials and their staffs of thousands of volunteers with limited experience and often poor training can possibly carry out reliable recounts. Only 27 states have laws requiring the use of voter-verified paper trails in electronic machines. Eight more states utilize a paper trail in their machines but don’t require it, leaving 15 states with no mandated requirements for safeguarding your vote. But with no national law in place, our midterm elections are being threatened by a system lacking any real regulation and standards.”

Despite all the pessimism about elections, we still need them to send a message to the government. Any Congressman who comes out strongly against illegal aliens is almost certain to win in 2006. In just a few elections, we could vote out of office every open-borders Congressman. Sooner or later we need to flex our political muscle and make a stand on a few key issues. If we don’t seal off the borders AND deport the 20 million illegals in the US today, we won’t have a country worth fighting for.

If we don’t change current trends in immigration, eventually we’ll have a nation with 100 million Mexicans. 200 million Asians and another 100 million Muslim Middle Easterners. We’ll be driving on freeways that are clogged 24 hours a day. Our wages will be slashed thanks to the flood of foreigners, and the creators and inventors, who made the US a great nation, the White people will be destroyed by race-mixing with the gigantic number of non-Whites.

(Snip)

---------------------

Slightly continued: http://www.whitecivilrights.com/how-will-2006-elections-turn-out_582.html#more-582


 
Posted : 24/09/2006 9:19 pm
elbwgreez
(@elbwgreez)
Posts: 332
Reputable Member
 

There might be hope for the old boy yet. Welcome aboard, Pat (it took you freakin long enough!).

Notice he diplomatically avoids mentioning Americanus Niggerus. And of course the J word.


 
Posted : 24/09/2006 11:03 pm
(@devere)
Posts: 2756
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

Hey, just a minute. This is James Buchanan, not Patrick Buchanan. I guess we're back to square one. No benchmark crossed. Is this guy related to Patrick?


 
Posted : 24/09/2006 11:35 pm
MOMUS
(@momus)
Posts: 4739
Illustrious Member
 

Let's not confuse Buchanans. Pat Buchanan ran for president and is now a paleoconservative pundit. James Buchanan not only ran for the presidency, he won it- back in 1856. The author of this article is another person entirely.


Hmmph!

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/

 
Posted : 24/09/2006 11:42 pm
Share: