"Once Again David Duke Is Ahead Of The Curve" – Says The Times! – Page 2 – This Just In

ZOG CONTROL · 2006-09-02T02:28:35Z

9/2/2006 [color="DarkGreen"]Once again David Duke is ahead of the curve By Maria Mathews – Times analyst Since his political race for the U.S. Senate in the 90s, I have noted the controversial politics of David Duke, a former member of the House of Representatives in Louisiana. He is a man the media chronically labels a “white supremacist.” (Though he vehemently denies it). I also used that label in an article I wrote about him 15 years ago. Though a fascinating personality, he is not a man I am inclined to invite for tea. But, I read his website originally for a diversion much like one would go to a horror movie, yet I have been shocked not by his radicalism, but as a result of looking at his writings and speeches retrospectively. For good or ill, Duke has been a sort of unwashed prophet on some of the biggest issues of the day. Take for instance: Duke politically coined the term “Workfare instead of Welfare,” a term that describes a requirement requiring able-bodied welfare recipients to do work for their welfare checks. Bill Clinton later copied Duke’s phrase to bridge the gap between Liberal Democrats and enough conservative Republican voters and gain the U.S. Presidency. Duke argued as long ago as the early seventies, (long before the immigration tsunami) that massive, unrestrictive immigration into America and Europe would inevitably lead to societal unrest, riots and increased racism and ethnic hatreds, and threats to internal security. Witness the horrendous riots in East London and Paris. Witness the purveyors of 911. Witness the recent airline bombing plot by the radical spawns of immigration. But even more interesting have been his pronouncements on Israel and U.S. Policy. An opponent of U.S. support for Israel, he argued long before 911 that unconditional support for Israel and the Israeli agenda would lead to hatred and horrendous terrorist attacks against the United States. Does anyone really believe Bush when he said Al Qaeda attacked America because they hate Democracy? Before the Iraq War Duke pronounced repeatedly in the world’s media, including a stint on Al Jazeera (which the U.S. State Department tried to prevent), that Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction, no ties to Al Qaeda, no nuclear weapons program. He predicted the war would not be a “cakewalk,” cost many times more than Neocon predictions, and do nothing but fuel hatred and terrorism around the world. Far from fighting terrorism, the war would only foment it, said Duke. His crystal ball worked on that one. A recent American poll now says that only 30 percent of Americans support the war and most Americans think the war in Iraq will only increase terrorism around the world. Perhaps no American politician has spoken so forcefully and for so long against the power of the American Israeli Lobby. He said long before almost anyone else on the political scene that the Iraq War was “a war for Israel” and not in the interests of the United States.” Because Americans wouldn’t pay the horrendous cost of blood and money in a war for Israel, he argued that the lie of “weapons of mass destruction” was necessary to convince Americans that they were in danger from Iraq. Just recently, a dean at the most prestigious school of government in the United States, the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, issued a paper titled “Israel and U.S. Foreign Policy.” In it they say what David Duke has been saying for years: that the Israeli lobby controls American foreign policy to the detriment of the United States and that it orchestrated the Iraq War. As pro-Israel critics of the paper have correctly pointed out, every essential argument of the paper and many of the paper’s sources and citations have been made by David Duke long prior to Walt and Mearsheimer. However, to argue against the paper by pointing out that David Duke has said the same things as Walt and Mearsheimer is, of course, an ad hominem argument that in no way refutes the paper’s thesis. Should we toss out our toilet paper because David Duke recommends it? In effect, the pro-Israeli critics have not dimmed the academic stars of the Harvard researchers by pointing out that David Duke was way ahead of the curve on the issue. All they have done is to make David Duke’s dubious star shine more brightly, and that is a dangerous achievement. How many fringe political personages can claim to be ahead of the curve of America’s most prestigious university? Duke, who is now a Phd who lectures on international relations at some prominent Eastern European universities, must relish this recent development. Professor Alan Dershowitz and other Jewish critics of Walt and Mearsheimer have only made Duke’s leadership on the issue known to millions around the world. It has certainly caused thousands of academics to go his controversial website, davidduke.com. Now, Professor Duke, former XX, the unwashed (he is always introduced with a former something or other), is talking about a N...

On second thought "Maria Mathews – Times analyst" may of thrown me, sorry if I got anyones hopes up but I'm wondering if this one will show up in the London Times or NYTimes anytime soon.

I'll speculate that David recieved this article via email because it's not on the internet anywhere other than DD.com, possibly it was a courtesy preview to be published on Sunday or like Rounder said for a magazine?

The topic is controvercial enough that the author "Maria Mathews" may rightly be using some sort of a nome de plume explaining why I can't find her name on the internet either LOL, it's a mystery –

David has complained alot before on his radio show that his TV appearances often get cancelled or cut at the last minute, I'll give it a day, who knows may be the article will eventually show up in one of the bigger freaking "Times" -

Yeah, there must be something to it. Otherwise, David wouldn't have posted it on his website.

You'll be doing us all a favor by following up on it til you find out where the article was originally published.

I've never in over 30 years, read an article in any system publication that was anywhere near that favorable to DD.

The implications could be huge.

“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire

Speeches & Writings of Dr William Pierce

White Patriot Party

My Book - "A White Man Speaks Out"

Posted : 02/09/2006 3:19 pm

Vanguard News Network

Forum

"Once Again David Duke Is Ahead Of The Curve" - Says The Times!

LOXIST CULTURE

OUR CULTURE

WORLD

About

Contact Us