Wonder if the American military experience is making White military men similarly "intolerant"? Or is this just a British phenomenon?

Nationalists of all sorts appear to be passing notes to each other these days.

That's the best sign of all!

There's some evidence of ignorance of Britain on this thread, though, which is a shame. Some of us have Captain Ramsey to thank for waking up in the first place.

Especially his chapters on WWII might be useful for some of us to keep in mind:

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/nameless/intro.shtml

The Nameless War by Captain A.H.M. Ramsey. The entire book is at the above link, scroll to the bottom of the page for the chapter menu.

Europe doesn't have a ZOG. Its decline is self-imposed.

Are you insane? The world is small today. Where does our movies, our philosophies, our self descriptors come from? (And not to mention: where does the finance of the ruling Labour party come from?)

That was a Gurka knife he was brandishing, but not proof he was SAS or ex-military. I don't think the SAS would bother making threatening videos.

It’s not “the SAS”, it’s one man (although I’m sure most of his colleagues would sympathise). He’s mostly likely SAS as he alludes to secretly taking out enemy soldiers behind enemy lines.

Please don't call this soldier an Englishman; he is Welshman. It is a big difference.

Not a big difference, he’s White.

Anti Islam is rife across all US/UK military in Iraq. Good that this guy also sees the wider picture.

USA was by no means innocent, don't get me wrong but Churchill was on the warpath and wanted war real bad from what I understand. I hold both countries equally responsible for the destruction of Germany and the spread of zog throughout the world.

Eisenhower was in cahoots with the Dresden bombing, as Churchill was a bloodthirsty, cigar smoking, drunk that wanted Germany to be wiped off the map. Usrael and Britain were the Allies of Evil.

Germans call Churchill a war criminal

By Kate Connolly
in Berlin

WINSTON Churchill was effectively a war criminal who sanctioned the extermination of Germany's civilian population through indiscriminate bombing of towns and cities, an article in the country's biggest-circulation newspaper claimed yesterday.

http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/02/11/DTel191102.html

The reason people think he's a soldier is because he made references like, "back in the Gulf again," and it was written up in the London Times that way. The knife he has is a lot more nifty than a Gurka Kukri too. There are more videos, but they were banned from Youtube and the MSM picked up on it after that. Final Warning to Invaders
Here's another of the banned videos.
http://www.flurl.com/item/88_Racism_u_178770

Europe doesn't have a ZOG. Its decline is self-imposed.

Are you insane? The world is small today. Where does our movies, our philosophies, our self descriptors come from? (And not to mention: where does the finance of the ruling Labour party come from?)

Yes, I am a little insane, but I don't believe my assertion is proof of that. What I am saying is simply that Europe doesn't need Jews to make it faggy and mixed: limp-wristed European humanitarians do the work all by themselves. If you got rid of the Jew in Britain, you'd still have the British to deal with. Same with Switzerland and Holland, et al. The populations of these countries, but for small national-minded circles and bourgeois patriots, have been quite completely chloroformed by One Worldism. Let me be blunt: Europeans are fags. You'd have to kill off a very large portion of they themselves to get back to zero.

That is a Joke.
If it not for the USA, Britain would have sucked Hitlers
Cock, after their morning tea.

Instead Britain is now sucking Jewish, American and Negro cock!
So you feel that Britain has gained somehow for its betrayal of Europe?

Europe doesn't have a ZOG. Its decline is self-imposed. It has parliamentary womyn and little bespectacled Belgian economists and Social Democrats. All that is as bad as a handful of Jews, though not nearly as entertaining. To turn Europe around, you'd have to eliminate the upper classes and leftist youth, starting with the Low Countries - first of all Den Haag, the St. Peter's Throne of worldwide "humanitarian" stupidity - and ending with the total destruction of Switzerland. Austria will accomodate itself to whatever new order arises thereupon.

On what basis do you state that Europe "doesn`t have a ZOG"?

I'm not European so take this for what it's worth. When I do travel to Europe I see much dissention amongst the many nationalities which, in my opinion, is extremely detrimental to whites as a whole. Seems most of the Europeans are proud of their assault on Germany and gauge their country's self-worth based on who was involved the most.

In America we have the opposite problem; whites,blacks, jews, mexicans ect are all considered "American" so we have this collective shitpot in which we are all thrown. Europe has an advantage with developing racial unity more than America does in my opinion. If the whites there can just see themselves as a white collective we would have serious strength coming from that part of the world...
P.S. That's not to say Europeans should leave behind their national identities; just don't put them before the race.

Nationalists of all sorts appear to be passing notes to each other these days.

That's the best sign of all!

There's some evidence of ignorance of Britain on this thread, though, which is a shame. Some of us have Captain Ramsey to thank for waking up in the first place.

Especially his chapters on WWII might be useful for some of us to keep in mind:

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/nameless/intro.shtml

The Nameless War by Captain A.H.M. Ramsey. The entire book is at the above link, scroll to the bottom of the page for the chapter menu.

Thanks for this book.

Seems most of the Europeans are proud of their assault on Germany and gauge their country's self-worth based on who was involved the most.

Good point. I've noticed the same. I have been in a discussion where a Dutchman, a Frenchman, and an Italian were all bickering about who put up the best underground resistance to Germany. They were all patriotic to the point of racism and at least acknowledged that Jews are a menace.

This is not only a problem between nations, but within, e.g., Germany itself, where "regional pride" is very often divisive enough. I'm not a cheerleader for "unity unity unity", but it's disappointing - though historically normal - to see German skinheads more uptight about their Gebiet than anything else.

I am not the only one who is concerned about Uomo's posts. Yesterday slating Germans as "krauts" and being hostile to the NPD. Today the Europeans are "fags" and it's pretty obvious that Uomo is trying to cause unecessary arguments.

I am suspicious.

That is a Joke.
If it not for the USA, Britain would have sucked Hitlers
Cock, after their morning tea.

Pornographically speaking is quite disgusting in relations to the allied forces defeating the courageous German Reich. Complete Garbage!!!

The mentioning of the Führer's genitals in a sexual manner is disrespectful and language like that would not be tolerated under NS Germany. Take this pervert Arthur Schnitzler for example:

Schnitzler was branded as a pornographer after the release of his play Reigen, and his works were later cited as an example of "Jewish filth" by Adolf Hitler.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Schnitzler

Now, for some reason I think Hitler's statement was fabricated and said nothing of the kind considering this is published by the enemy.

As for the US aiding Britain - Look at much force it took before Greater Germany fell!!!

I am not the only one who is concerned about Uomo's posts. Yesterday slating Germans as "krauts" and being hostile to the NPD. Today the Europeans are "fags" and it's pretty obvious that Uomo is trying to cause unecessary arguments.

I am suspicious.

Da bist du wahrlich deutsch! Hast Skadi kürzlich angeschaut? Es gibt viele junge Deutsche die feindselig oder kritisch zum NPD sind. Ich bin zwar nur kritisch davon, nicht feindselig. Aber weil du hier kam, erwartend mit einer freien Hand uns zu einschüchtern, bist du enttäuscht einen Amerinaker zu finden der nicht so blöd oder leichtgläubig ist als zu denken dass sechs Sitze in einem Stauwasserlandtag erheblich sind und der komm mit typischen europäischen Chauvinisten nicht weiter.

Maybe my German isn't great, so let me put it in my own good, hard, West Frisian speech: you can't take criticism, like everyone else in your scene. Some of us think for ourselves, and if no one else wants to, fuck 'em, I'll do it for them.

"As for the US aiding Britain - Look at much force it took before Greater Germany fell!!!"

Yes, it basically took the whole world to take down the Reich...

Europeans are fags. You'd have to kill off a very large portion of they themselves to get back to zero.

I’m afraid that this doesn’t sound very White, let alone White Nationalist, to me.

I accept that it is difficult to apportion exact blame. Greed for cheap labor has to take some of the blame, but you have to remember global capitalism has been around for hundreds of years. It is only now that it has become so raceless. Only now that we can tolerate importation of millions of 3rd worlders without revolution. The reason for this is that the white masses no longer realise they are a race. Whose ideologies tell them that? Moreover whose media re-enforces that every day of their lives? The Jews.