I guess the only way an "Activist" can earn your seal of approval is to "send you some freakin money".

Do you really think Geoff Beck is his real name? I have a bridge for sale in Brooklyn. Being on VNN radio constitutes "activism"? Hell, we may as well bring back that idiot "Rob Roy Macgregor" to work his activist magic on VNN radio.

and ANOTHER pointless saracastic remark from one of the more hallowed senior members of VNN.

I have to give Miss Goddess some credit for the sheer strength her stubborn, stupid neocon gall . Not only does she give her dead horse a thorough daily beating here, but just packing the smelly mess from thread to thread proves something about her determination to argue.

he will be able to answer this better obviously, but from what I have heard, many of them are a bunch of decadent thugs themselves. do you believe all muslims in Europe are like some Amadinejad figure? fighting the good fight against the Jews? lol. And for the ones who are disgusted with, what very correctly could be called filth culture, why are they there? I Have zero respect for people who do not approve of western policies and lifestyles and yet make their home in western lands. Why the fuck don't they go home and fight along side their people? Because it is easier to live here and since they are foreigners they get handouts? Because some of them want to see an Islamic Europe? Oh, wait is that a jew lie even though they have spoken of such things themselves?

So in your opinion we need to be taught a lesson by non-whites who should not even be living here? What effect do you suppose this would have, Miller? The anti-muslim feelings here run pretty high. You talk about the jews pushing for a clash of civilizations. If something like what you suggest, would be a good thing, begin to happen, you can imagine what the results would be? I am not really to keen on the thought of non-whites "cleaning up our streets." I am also not too keen on the thought of some Islamic male believing he has "the right" to rape or beat white women because they are not dressed in a way he approves of either(and there standards are often ridiculous) I have heard of instances where they use that excuse. Do you want an Islamic style culture for whites? Maybe sharia law? would that clean up the decadence? i personally do not approve of either extreme. A filth culture where anything goes or a completely repressive dark age style culture either.

And so if they kill white folks that don't have a whole hell of a lot to do with all of that, that is fine with you too? That is the problem when you say "us." Us, means all of us. If they decide to strike back and blow up a building for example, they are not going to care or know that you or anyone else who posts on this board is inside. Their anger is 100% justified, but that doesn't men I have to approve when they kill innnocent whites. IMO, if you approve of muslims raping white women to teach them a lesson or blowing up a building with white children inside there is something seriously wrong with you, and please, Miller, please, do not ever say these things in your paper, or anywhere else outside of this forum. White folks will hate you and for a good reason.

i think a distinction needs to be made between arab/persian muslims, and niggerow muslims from africa.

from what i hear, it's the niggerow variety that are invading europe these days.

I have to give Miss Goddess some credit for the sheer strength her stubborn, stupid neocon gall .

Again that you would call me a neo-con shows how out of touch with reality you are. Does understanding what motivates their actions, but yet not jumping up and down and approving of their actions make one a neo-con? I do not approve of them killing white folks or choosing to live among us and teaching whites a lesson, as Miller was all excited about, this makes me a neo con? No. Rather it makes him a sand wigger. The thing that bugs me most about what miller said is the "cleaning up the streets line." I can rightfully assume that you disapprove(as do I)of the decadent west trying to force our way of life on them in their lands. Why does Miller approve of them trying to force their way of life on the west? Unless, of course he, himself approves of Islamic culture in the west. It does not make me a neo-con to disapprove of either the so-called culture we have now or an Islamic style one. let's see, either everyone lives their life like one big neverending orgy where everything is acceptable or we go completely the other way and adopt a very prudish attitude about natural behaviors. Maybe even stoning people and adopting the whole honor killing thing to keep people in line and punishing them for the slightest offenses. I do not wish to live in either type of society. One extreme also gives rise to the other.

Again that you would call me a neo-con shows how out of touch with reality you are. Does understanding what motivates their actions, but yet not jumping up and down and approving of their actions make one a neo-con? I do not approve of them killing white folks or choosing to live among us and teaching whites a lesson, as Miller was all excited about, this makes me a neo con? The thing that bugs me most about what miller said is the "cleaning up the streets line." I can rightfully assume that you disapprove(as do I)of the decadent west trying to force our way of life on them in their lands. Why does Miller approve of them trying to force their way of life on the west? Unless, of course he, himself approves of Islamic culture in the west. It does not make me a neo-con to disapprove of either the so-called culture we have now or an Islamic style one. let's see, either everyone lives their life like one big neverending orgy where everything is acceptable or we go completely the other way and adopt a very prudish attitude about natural behaviors. Maybe even stoning people and adopting the whole honor killing thing to keep people in line and punishing them for the slightest offenses. I do not wish to live in either type of society. One extreme also gives rise to the other.

notice how this hebish godass thing indulges in fluff and dodges a serious topic.

address the issue instead of momus' flame:
shouldn't we make a very large DISNTINCTION between arab/persian muslims, and niggerow muslims from afreaka. the niggerow variety is the one stinking up europe in large part, i hear, and i suspect THEY are the ones who are the LOUD AND OBNOXIOUS variety discussed earlier.

i'd just like to get to the bottom of it.

now, i'll await your non-substantive, sarcastic reply.

Again that you would call me a neo-con shows how out of touch with reality you are. Does understanding what motivates their actions, but yet not jumping up and down and approving of their actions make one a neo-con? I do not approve of them killing white folks or choosing to live among us and teaching whites a lesson, as Miller was all excited about, this makes me a neo con? No. Rather it makes him a sand wigger. The thing that bugs me most about what miller said is the "cleaning up the streets line." I can rightfully assume that you disapprove(as do I)of the decadent west trying to force our way of life on them in their lands. Why does Miller approve of them trying to force their way of life on the west? Unless, of course he, himself approves of Islamic culture in the west. It does not make me a neo-con to disapprove of either the so-called culture we have now or an Islamic style one. let's see, either everyone lives their life like one big neverending orgy where everything is acceptable or we go completely the other way and adopt a very prudish attitude about natural behaviors. Maybe even stoning people and adopting the whole honor killing thing to keep people in line and punishing them for the slightest offenses. I do not wish to live in either type of society. One extreme also gives rise to the other.

HITLER GODDESS = AGENT PROVOCATEUR . Lose your time with her if you want, but she will never change and, as I have experienced, it is impossible to have any prolonged conversation with her because she wont answer. My advise: avoid her distraction.

notice how this hebish godass thing indulges in fluff and dodges a serious topic.

address the issue instead of momus' flame:
shouldn't we make a very large DISNTINCTION between arab/persian muslims, and niggerow muslims from afreaka. the niggerow variety is the one stinking up europe in large part, i hear, and i suspect THEY are the ones who are the LOUD AND OBNOXIOUS variety discussed earlier.

i'd just like to get to the bottom of it.

now, i'll await your non-substantive, sarcastic reply.

It doesnt matter what types of muslims are in Europe, the point is to make an alliance with CERTAIN FRACTIONS of Islam wherever they live.Again I dont care what they are, nobody is going to mix here. I also suggest, however, that you cannot consider equally Caucasoid and negroid muslims. Also there are muslims in eastern europe who fought for the SS during WW2. As well as armenians and many other middle easterns who fought in the SS. BUT AGAIN: it is not necessary to consider them white.

notice how this hebish godass thing indulges in fluff and dodges a serious topic.

address the issue instead of momus' flame:
shouldn't we make a very large DISNTINCTION between arab/persian muslims, and niggerow muslims from afreaka. the niggerow variety is the one stinking up europe in large part, i hear, and i suspect THEY are the ones who are the LOUD AND OBNOXIOUS variety discussed earlier.

i'd just like to get to the bottom of it.

now, i'll await your non-substantive, sarcastic reply.

A distinction always needs to be made among the races, but none of them belong among us as I am sure you would agree. And from what I understand of the U.K. it is a lot of Pakistanis who are not living what could be called honorable lives.

Also there are muslims in eastern europe who fought for the SS during WW2. As well as armenians and many other middle easterns who fought in the SS. BUT AGAIN: it is not necessary to consider them white.

I am so tired of this reasoning. Can we live in the present please. This is how the Germans did it then, which always means this is how we have to do it now. Things and situations change. some really can't seem to get past the fact that we are not living in the 1930-40 anymore. something being right 60 plus years ago does not make it right today.

A distinction always needs to be made among the races, but none of them belong among us as I am sure you would agree. And from what I understand of the U.K. it is a lot of Pakistanis who are not living what could be called honorable lives.

WHAT A FUCKING DISTRACTION YOU ARE HG!!!!

TOTALLY MISSING THE POINT OF THE THREAD AND PROBABLY DELIBERATELY SO

I have to give Miss Goddess some credit for the sheer strength her stubborn, stupid neocon gall . Not only does she give her dead horse a thorough daily beating here, but just packing the smelly mess from thread to thread proves something about her determination to argue.

And look, Nanny Goddess picks on the one who will give her her justifacation that anyone who disagrees with VNNF will be called a kike alike and what not.

She pokes at the rattlesnake.

As for the issue of innocent whites dying, well, 'war is hell' and we are at war.
Commie jew Liberals stick white women and white children on the front lines. Some will die, some will live....but back to the topic on hand....

I remember when we had an alliance with Iran, before the 80's.

Congrats, jane, you probably just earned your daily cookie. And a few people here might just think you are so cool.

And look, Nanny Goddess picks on the one who will give her her justifacation that anyone who disagrees with VNNF will be called a kike alike and what not.

She pokes at the rattlesnake.

As for the issue of innocent whites dying, well, 'war is hell' and we are at war.
Commie jew Liberals stick white women and white children on the front lines. Some will die, some will live....but back to the topic on hand....

I remember when we had an alliance with Iran, before the 80's.

Wrong, women arent on the front lines. Also women can join the army but are exempt from the draft, those that are there are feminists.
What alliance are you talking about?

HITLER GODDESS = AGENT PROVOCATEUR

I am going to guess that an actual agent provocateur would be the one pushing for the idea of an alliance between what is considered "terrorists" and white nationalists. Or also the one who is always preaching violence.

But foolishly those are the kind of people who get the most respect around here.

Wrong, women arent on the front lines. Also women can join the army but are exempt from the draft, those that are there are feminists.
What alliance are you talking about?

What I mean about women on the front lines, er..., not the front lines in the ME, but the front lines here on USA soil or UK soil. The women who fight the political front lines, so to speak. The ones who speak up for the illegal and non white immigrant and then some poor white women gets murdered and raped by one on USA or UK soil.

I am aware of the women’s role in the modern army, on the most part; they are not the fighters or the ones dying.

I believe we were allies with the Shah before he was booted out of Iran. We let him on USA soil after that and protected him.

The women who fight the political front lines, so to speak. The ones who speak up for the illegal and non white immigrant and then some poor white women gets murdered and raped by one on USA or UK soil.

This, in itself, is particularily insane since those non-white immigrants that they are standing up for would have some big surprises in store for them if they ever gained any real power. If these feminists actually cared as much about women as they pretend to, they would be some of the strongest opponents of third world immigration. But it doesn't seem to bother them the way women are thought of and treated in the countries these immigrants come from. In a retarded way it must confuse their mindset. Do they speak against these immigrants because of how they view women, or since all cultures and lifestyles are equal would that make them a judgmental bigot?