I am going to guess that an actual agent provocateur would be the one pushing for the idea of an alliance between what is considered "terrorists" and white nationalists. Or also the one who is always preaching violence.

But foolishly those are the kind of people who get the most respect around here.

ha ha! HG buys into the old "muslims are terrorists" thing.

yeah, those palestinians are "terrorists" while the jews are "defending their homeland". ha ha ha!

and those iraqis are such evil "terrorists" every time they fight against the USraeli folks stomping on their own land for NO FUCKING REASON!

oh, and HG still probably believes that 19 arabs with boxcutters and the cave-man bin laden are the ONLY ONES responsible for 911; those brilliant boxcutter weilding "terrorists". amazing!

ha ha ha! that "terrorist" canard won't work around here, bitch.

(i suppose you must think the founding fathers of the usa were "terrorists"? that's what king george called them at the time.) GET REAL, WOMAN!

ha ha! HG buys into the old "muslims are terrorists" thing.

yeah, those palestinians are "terrorists" while the jews are "defending their homeland". ha ha ha!

and those iraqis are such evil "terrorists" every time they fight against the USraeli folks stomping on their own land for NO FUCKING REASON!

oh, and HG still probably believes that 19 arabs with boxcutters and the cave-man bin laden are the ONLY ONES responsible for 911]

can you read? I said what is considered as terrorists? Why do you suppose I always put the word terrorist in quotes? I am a firm believer in the line "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter"

Try to actually read next time instead of seeing what you want to see.

http://www.thephora.net/forum

FKA, Hitler Goddess, Starr

 

What I mean about women on the front lines, er..., not the front lines in the ME, but the front lines here on USA soil or UK soil. The women who fight the political front lines, so to speak. The ones who speak up for the illegal and non white immigrant and then some poor white women gets murdered and raped by one on USA or UK soil.

I am aware of the women’s role in the modern army, on the most part]
huh? Thats clearly not the front line you were talking about. HG was saying that it wasnt good we felt good about US soldiers dying for Israel and you answered that in wars people die. Hello?:o

"we"= white nationalists. there has never been an alliance with certain fractions of islam, not any formal one anyway.

[color="Pink"]"Liberalism" is a codename for retardedness.
You are not an "expert", only a lemming with a degree. Your place is at the mill or the Colloseum (aka football field).
And who said herd animals are white?

 

I am going to guess that an actual agent provocateur would be the one pushing for the idea of an alliance between what is considered "terrorists" and white nationalists. Or also the one who is always preaching violence.
.

Im seeking whatever is in the best interests of whites. They are considered terrorists by the down syndrome masses. Nothing is going to change without violence, woman.

But foolishly those are the kind of people who get the most respect around here.

What are you talking about, Im among the most hated posters here.

huh? Thats clearly not the front line you were talking about. HG was saying that it wasnt good we felt good about US soldiers dying for Israel and you answered that in wars people die. Hello?:o

"we"= white nationalists. there has never been an alliance with certain fractions of islam, not any formal one anyway.

Sorry, sometimes I am in a more general larger thinking realm, than the more specific. My thinking got a bit a head of the thread and the specific. lol I will pull in a little.

And I meant the USA has been allies with the shah of Iran, so more specifically I should say I don’t fear an alliance with Iran as a white nationalist.

88 and I am out of here for the day.....

Try to actually read next time instead of seeing what you want to see.

what i WANT to see is PERMANENTLY BANNED under the name Hitler Goddess.

there has never been an alliance with certain fractions of islam,

ummm...i think you mean FACTIONS, not FRACTIONS.

jesus christ! that's the kind of verbal mistake niggers often make when trying to sound ENTILLEEJINT, by using some word that is more than one syllable and using the WRONG FUCKING WORD that means something else but sounds similar to the word meant.

and i don't see how you can reasonably argue that you hit the "R" key "by mistake".

(maybe FRACTIONS could make sense, such as: a certain PERCENTAGE of muslims? but that doesn't fly with me. and it doesn't sound right to say FRACTIONS instead of PERCENTAGE. so you meant FACTIONS.)

ummm...i think you mean FACTIONS, not FRACTIONS.

jesus christ! that's the kind of verbal mistake niggers often make when trying to sound ENTILLEEJINT, by using some word that is more than one syllable and using the WRONG FUCKING WORD that means something else but sounds similar to the word meant.

and i don't see how you can reasonably argue that you hit the "R" key "by mistake".

(maybe FRACTIONS could make sense, such as: a certain PERCENTAGE of muslims? but that doesn't fly with me. and it doesn't sound right to say FRACTIONS instead of PERCENTAGE. so you meant FACTIONS.)

what are you going all hysterical about? An alliance with a certain part, fraction of islam. The one that is labeled as "radical".

Definitions: Fraction
Fraction
Noun

1. A component of a mixture that has been separated by a fractional process.

2. A small part or item forming a piece of a whole.

3. The quotient of two rational numbers.

what are you going all hysterical about? An alliance with a certain part, fraction of islam. The one that is labeled as "radical".

Definitions: Fraction
Fraction
Noun

1. A component of a mixture that has been separated by a fractional process.

2. A small part or item forming a piece of a whole.

3. The quotient of two rational numbers.

i don't know, it just didn't sound right to me. i still think it should be FACTION or FACTIONS when speaking in terms of alliances with "radical" FACTIONS! and if you meant FRACTION, why did you type FRACTIONS in the original post? (go look at it). you wouldn't say "fractions of islam", you would say "a fraction of islam".

anyway, i guess i'm a little gunshy now that chain's on his crusade to try and get anyone banned whose spelling and punctuation aren't pristine.

was just watching your back...you know he was going on about you too...
NOT that i trust you or anyone else around here.

i'm gunshy now that chain's on his crusade to try and get anyone banned whose spelling and punctuation aren't pristine.

If that were true, than your wish about me being banned would come true.

Kinsmen,

Lord, Wotan, Gaia -whoever! Preserve my insanity from these Pan-Aryanist fools. Conditional multi-culturalism is multi-culturalism all the same.
I don't have the time or the inclination to explain who is and who isn't white yet again.

Please refer to ( The Occidental People tag ) in the following post from another site. [color="Blue"]Here.

_JJT.

i don't know, it just didn't sound right to me. i still think it should be FACTION or FACTIONS when speaking in terms of alliances with "radical" FACTIONS! and if you meant FRACTION, why did you type FRACTIONS in the original post? (go look at it). you wouldn't say "fractions of islam", you would say "a fraction of islam".

anyway, i guess i'm a little gunshy now that chain's on his crusade to try and get anyone banned whose spelling and punctuation aren't pristine.

was just watching your back...you know he was going on about you too...
NOT that i trust you or anyone else around here.

I'd be concerned about someone like you "watching your back", janesilverstein88.

I'd be concerned about someone like you "watching your back", janesilverstein88.

so you are telling me to be concerned about someone like me watching my own back.

now that's a damned difficult thing to do without mirrors.

the wording of your sentence is unclear.

it sounds like you are telling me to be concerned about someone like me watching my own back.

now that's a damned difficult thing to do without mirrors.

Let me make it a little clearer for you, janesilverstein88: You're a faggot.

Let me make it a little clearer for you, janesilverstein88: You're a faggot.

in this and in past posts, you show a more than curious tendency to obsess on faggotry.

if it's wishful thinking on your part: sorry, i'm not interested. not my thing.