I found this site while Googling my investment firm, the Vanguard Group.

I really don't think anyone here buys this story at all.

When I google Vanguard Group, the Vanguard News Network (VNN) does not appear in the first ten pages. The Vanguard Group appears on the top of the first page.

Even dropping "Group" from the search, The VG is the top hit and VNN does not appear until page three.

I'm afraid I do not believe your story.

I found this site while Googling my investment firm, the Vanguard Group. Not really sure what to make of this site, or what I assume to be the parent site, VanguardNewsNetwork.

When I google Vanguard Group, the Vanguard News Network (VNN) does not appear in the first ten pages. The Vanguard Group appears on the top of the first page.

Even dropping "Group" from the search, The VG is the top hit and VNN does not appear until page three.

I'm afraid I do not believe your story.

Right well maybe since the Jews have not succeeded in taking VNN down with their other frivolous bullshit, maybe they are trying to infilt the board as posters and manufacture false "evidence" of confusion! Thanks Torcher for helping establish that in fact, no reasonable person could be confused between VNN and The Vanguard Group mutual funds.

For what it's worth, I like John Bogle and the Vanguard Funds are an excellent mutual fund family and only downside to them is the fact they have previously threatened VNN in the past for no good reason.

VNN is a news and political speech website. If readers are looking for the Vanguard Group mutual fund family, go here:

http://www.vanguard.com/

as you can see, the URLs are entirely DISSIMILAR.

now kyle would you like to discuss any of the political issues of the day? because you must be interested in politics have if you went through the trouble to register. if you were looking for financial services, look elsewhere.

Not one to stick around Kyle, are you?

Which AF base are you stationed at?

Why are you guys so dang paranoid? I said was Googling Vanguard. If I wanted to go to Vanguards actual site, I'd just use their URL. This was to find out more about them, see if there's anything going on about I don't know of. In going through a few pages of results, I went to "Vanguard News Network", thinking it had news pertaining to my investment firm.

I'll admit upon looking closer the "uncensored news for whites" tagline got my attention. My overall impression of the VanguardNewsNetwork site is that it is similar to what some of my more unpopular students would hand in when I was a teacher, full of anger and offering little else but raw emotion..acceptable from angst addicted teenagers, but I'm guessing the webmaster is an adult? Is English his second language? If so, he gets a pass, if not, he really needs to take a writing course, even the Europeans speak far better English.

Well, thanks to Spengler, who actually answered my question.

I really don't see evidence for what you speak of concerning "jews and academia", but there are double standards in regards to racism, which yes, more white/caucasian people should take offense to. However, whenever I see people on the news making the "too white" claim...they themselves are almost always white though.

As for my duty station, should I act like you guys and give an interrogation?

Well, have a good week everybody, I get the impression I'm not too welcome here, so good luck with whatever you're doing.

It doesn't matter how you landed here. It's only important that you did. Welcome aboard and enjoy your stay

Well Kyle, before you dismiss VNNers as "paranoid" read this:

http://web.archive.org/web/20011117003220/www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/vnn3.htm

alex's side of the story

http://web.archive.org/web/20011117003354/www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/vnn4.htm

VNN: Where We're Headed, and How You Can Help

by Alex Linder, Editor

The big picture....

VNN is the first and only pro-White daily news service on the Internet. Begun on August 9, 2000, it has been in continuous operation for 14 months. During that time readership has grown steadily to the point where it attracts over 150,000 impressions and over 40,000 unique visitors a month. There is no end to this growth in sight.

Growing responsiveness to and readership for an uncompromising pro-White message threatens the powers that be. The Jews who control our government and almost everything we see, read and hear are worried by our success because it threatens their monopoly. Frivolous lawsuits are one of their tactics for harassing those who awaken Whites to their racial interests. A similar suit is in motion, for example, against Don Black's Stormfront, and we all know that Morris Dees has made a career and over $100 million through this sort of barratry.

The down and dirty...

Here's what likely went on behind the scenes. Some Jew noticed our site and referred it to one of the many professional Jewish hate groups we're all familiar with -- the traditional enemies of the truth, as the respected historian David Irving calls them. They watched us for a while, realized we were serious, decided to make a move. They probably had a Jew contact Vanguard Group and claim to be confused over the difference between a small White nationalist news service and a half-trillion-dollar mutual fund giant. They don't call them the "great masters of the lie" (Schopenhauer) for nothing. This bogus "case" is typical of the way they operate. We are not lying when we say that Jews are bent on the genocide of the White race. It really is that simple. Anything that gets in the way of their mission must be cut down. Hence this legal harassment.

The case specifics...

Here's the page that describes the way domain "disputes" are handled. I put 'disputes' in quotes because I will not pretend that this is anything other than a Jew-pressured attempted-theft.

Here are the three conditions Vanguard Group has to satisfy, according to ICANN policy, to steal our domain; our comments in blue:

(i) your domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and

Name is not identical, sole similarity is 'vanguard.' Note that there is a packaging company named "Vanguard Group" that owns the domain vanguardgroup.com, yet is apparently not being sued by the financial-services Vanguard Group! Hmm.... Vanguard Group -- the financial services company trying to steal our domain, not the packaging company -- owns vanguard.com, so that anyone simply typing in 'vanguard' will get its domain, not ours. Further, its colors and clipper-ship logo look nothing like anything on VNN.

(ii) you have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and

We have every right and legitimate interest: vanguard is a common English word that means leading the way, and that is what we are doing. It also nods at the 'vanguard' in National Alliance's National Vanguard magazine, which will reappear in 2002.

(iii) your domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.

Bad faith means we bought the site just to sell it back to someone or prevent him from obtaining it, which of course are not true. Vanguard Group was around long before we were, and could have registered the domain if it had wanted to.

And finally: In the administrative proceeding, the complainant must prove that each of these three elements are present. [Emphasis added.]

The simple fact is, by all reason and logic, Vanguard Group -- the financial services company -- can't prove that a single one of these elements is present.

You can see that legally, ethically and morally Vanguard Group has no case, and that we must win, save a political decision by the panel...........

the outcome was, as you can see, years hence VNN is still in Alex Linder's hands.

but we are ever vigilant against the never-do-wells, ie, the Jews and their lackeys, whether witting or unwitting, who would seek to disrupt Alex's free speech rights.

by hook or by crook, we will get the truth out !!

It doesn't matter how you landed here. It's only important that you did. Welcome aboard and enjoy your stay

Don't count on it KLM...

Well Kyle, before you dismiss VNNers as "paranoid" read this:

http://web.archive.org/web/20011117003220/www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/vnn3.htm

These Jews and their Irish step-n'-fetch-it Goy haven't a case here. As I looked up "Vanguard" thru Google, I found countless pages from record companies and even a university. If they think they can pull off acquisition of VNN, then they can lay claim to anything named "Vanguard". They would be forced to, otherwise they will have a countersuit to answer to for singling out one particular entity. Furthermore, if I decide to change my name to Vanguard then, by principal, they'll end up on the defendant side of an attempted slavery trial.
Another interesting item:
Lexmark and Lexware are 2 completely different entities. Take it from there

Did you notice, they've got their tentacles in Brussels and Moscow. Stinks of a Mafija connection to the EU government.
How supremacist is a White supremacist supposed to be? Calling a White separist a White supremacist hints of a possible liable suit
If things turn out for the worst, VNN could Aryanize the name to "Vangaard". But then, these Shysters might try soliciting their services to anybody willing who calls themseves that

Of course, the juden "justice" system would never allow it the other way around. It would be fun if "jew watch" could then claim ownership of all 20 million jews and legally convert them into dogfood.