Conceptually evolutionary, socially achieved - none of which has spit to do with proving or disproving Creation.

Take the last word.

Haha and she will too. you watch.

Subrosa says: Good job going 'round with the guy in touch with his feminine self, Lisa

Just as a xian tells himself how smart important and loved he is by the omnipotent creator of the world, the evolutionist is convinced that he somehow is above not knowing how all things came to be. He must know the origin of all species - his is the all knowing mind. Unable to humble one's self to the greatness of the natural world is a sickness every bit as dangerous as christianity.

Those of you who have unquestioningly accepted the theory of evolution as a scientific fact, are urged to re-examine the facts.

p.s. Most scientists agree that evolution is a fact and that negroes are our eekwals.

I am as eager to know the truth as any scientist. I'd get on board the evolution train in a second if there existed a single shred of proof, but as the years pass into decades, into centuries, and our scientific understanding of the world expands, at some point we really need to consider letting this one die. Or are we regessing back to a Darwinian (1870!!!) understanding of the natural world?

Lots of inconsistencies there, Joe. "Humbling" oneself is a particularly xian talent. "Most scientists agree" is a particularly jewish debating tactic. "Are we regressing?" is another.

Just curious. Who are you?

I am a jew. My real name is Herb J. Schwartz.

I am a jew. My real name is Herb J. Schwartz.

Hit the showers,Herb...

Christianity is a little more than a death cult. Ironic since this is what so many Zionut Christians accuse Islaaaam of being.

The central psychodrama at the heart of the Christian mythos is the brutal torture and execution of Jesus. Their holy symbol is an primitive execution device for crying out loud. Is that a healthy message for children? Does that symbolise life?

The message of Christianity is to forgo physical salvation in this world (i.e. embrace death) for spritual reward in the next. It's the mentality of the suicide bomber or Stockholm syndrome sufferer. It teaches that the drive to protect oneself and one's family, and to react with hatred and malice towards those who would harm that which you love is a perverse, evil impluse that must be suppressed and overcome in order to achieve spritual salvation.

Ultimately, it's a selfish and dishonourable creed, because it puts one's own personal sprititual wellbeing above the duty to protect one's kin if the acts of violence necessary to ensure their protection are going to tarnish one's perfect and beautiful soul. If a man loves his family, shouldn't he be prepared to go to Hell for eternity to guarantee their safety?

-In theory. While it sounds like a really great explanation of the source of the diversity of life, this is simply not proven, nor provable. DNA research has made many of these theories seem as ridiculous as the old religions. If evolution could be proven, I'd quickly concede. I am as eager to know the truth as any scientist. I'd get on board the evolution train in a second if there existed a single shred of proof, but as the years pass into decades, into centuries, and our scientific understanding of the world expands, at some point we really need to consider letting this one die. Or are we regessing back to a Darwinian (1870!!!) understanding of the natural world?

Once again, you don't understand what "theory of evolution" means. Evolution was not designed as an alternative scenario for what the Bible or any other creation myth claims. Evolution HAS happened, the question is a matter of how and why.

Once again, you don't understand what "theory of evolution" means. Evolution was not designed as an alternative scenario for what the Bible or any other creation myth claims. Evolution HAS happened, the question is a matter of how and why.

Would you say that Whites are evolved from lower forms? If so, where are the lower forms today? Why is there a "missing link"? What happened to the millions of monkey people?

Would you say that Whites are evolved from lower forms? If so, where are the lower forms today? Why is there a "missing link"? What happened to the millions of monkey people?

The "higher" forms are the ones that survive, the lower are weeded out naturally, so there is no reason why those lower forms would survive over time. You claim you are not Christian yet you are quoting tired old lines from the Creationist agenda. The fact that there is a missing link means absolutely nothing to science. Biblical scholars like to harp on that because they think that science claims to be infallible and capable of explaining everything, like their Bible. If the Bible is infallible, one tiny flaw invalidates the whole thing- such is their belief. Science does not work in this way.

Welcome to VNN Lisa!

HA! HA! lol IMLMWAO! No, you didn't?! lol

You are right. My former boss is a Genetic/Biochemist! He hated that word "Eugenics" actually he hated how it always got lumped up with the actual study of genetics and was forever correcting his students and others....

Welcome to VNN Lisa!

HA! HA! lol IMLMWAO! No, you didn't?! lol

You are right. My former boss is a Genetic/Biochemist! He hated that word "Eugenics" actually he hated how it always got lumped up with the actual study of genetics and was forever correcting his students and others....

HA-HA. JP got beat up by a girl! HA-HA.

The "higher" forms are the ones that survive, the lower are weeded out naturally, so there is no reason why those lower forms would survive over time. You claim you are not Christian yet you are quoting tired old lines from the Creationist agenda. The fact that there is a missing link means absolutely nothing to science. Biblical scholars like to harp on that because they think that science claims to be infallible and capable of explaining everything, like their Bible. If the Bible is infallible, one tiny flaw invalidates the whole thing- such is their belief. Science does not work in this way.

Whatever my beliefs might be, let's focus on the subject. Does it even bother you that there is no evidence whatsoever of any of these lower forms ever having existed? I'd kick the shit out of jesus if he existed, so don't go thinking I'm a xian. Perhaps you, on the other hand, need to think about re-evaluating your religious (read evolutionist) beliefs.

Would you say that Whites are evolved from lower forms? If so, where are the lower forms today? Why is there a "missing link"? What happened to the millions of monkey people?

God forbid I should agree with Slovj, but when it comes to evolution, if creationism is the only alternative we have as explanation, then give me evolution with all it's flaws. Evolution is based on reason, fact, and scientific principles. I won't even address what creationism is based on.

These so called flaws and nagging questions mostly derive from the fact that racialist whites have a very difficult time imagining that they share a common ancestor with niggers. But aside from this difficult supposition, where does evolution fall short in it's explanation of how lower forms become (evolve over extremely long periods of time) higher forms?

Evolution is fact. The fossil record backs up everything that evolution has stated. Nothing in the fossil record backs up any claim made in the jew book, aka the holy bible]Wikipedia: Evolution[/url]

Understanding Evolution

Evolution Q&A

Don't confuse life with humanity, puny mortals.

Creationism is the only alternative if you are a self-obsessed twit who cannot accept the fact that some things are unknown to us.

FACT: There is no evidence of human life existant on earth prior to about 10,000 years ago.

Niggers have been on this earth for over a million years at least. They keep digging up their ancestors in East Africa, like lucy. Then they try to tag ALL of us with being descended from "it". Absurd!