I just posted an account of this on Phxnews.com, under my alternate nic of Alaska Wingnut

http://phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=33143

This website permits people to post news stories as well as comments. So this will attract more publicity. Usually they don't censor pro-white stories.

Good lick, A.A.

I'm not convinced either party can arbitrarily reject a qualified U.S. citizen from running on their "tickets". Monday, I'll contact a local attorney, and also The Federal Elections Commission and find out.

BTW, I phoned Greg Tlapek, Missouri head of the Libertarian Party this morning and left a lengthy message on his answering service, and requested he phone me with any questions. And gave him a brief biographical sketch, including my military credentials, educational background of 3 and 1/2 years college, etc. He hasn't returned my call, but maybe he will before their final decision, which I expect will be announced to the media on Monday.

I see nothing wrong in running for political office, anymore than I see running a horse in the Kentucky Derby. But just as it would be foolish and pointless to run a lame horse painted with
"Sieg Heil" & "We Hitler!" across its worthless hide, the same holds true for running (or attempting to) a candidate via the Democratic or Repubican parties. Here's a hint, Mr. Miller: They HATE your fucking guts!" They hate what you STAND for! And, most of all, you're not fooling any of them for one split second. They know you're not one of them, but just a wolf wearing a moth-eaten sheep's hide nobody's fooled by. And really, who would vote for an ex-felon like you anyway - other ex-felons maybe? You're an ex-con, an ex-thug, an alleged alcoholic, and the father of a non-white child. Boy oh boy, the news people would use that against you like a hot-buttered chainsaw shoved up your lying ass and split you in two. And again, what the crying fuck ever happened to the White People's Party? Why aren't you telling anyone here? Why the continued silence? Well, no matter. Anyone who thinks you're a good candidate to represent the White American is a worse idjit than Erich Gliebe. I'll tell you who would be better:

1: Alex Linder
2: Kevin Strom
3: David Duke
4: Bill White (as much as he makes me gag)
5: Jamie Kelso
6: Billy Roper
7: Ben Vinyard
8: Shaun Walker
9: David Pringle

I could name many more, most of them mediocrities, but definitely a better choice than you. Just because your running and saying, "Hey, hey! Look at me! All these chicken-shit papers are writing about how chicken-shit I am! I'm great, I'm great, I'M GREAT!!!

Errrr....ain't I?

And really, who would vote for an ex-felon like you anyway - other ex-felons maybe?

If that is the standard then he will fit right in. The following statistics are a bit dated, nevertheless it provides a more realistic view of that august body roaming the hallow chambers of capital hill:

29: accused of spousal abuse
7: arrested for fraud
19: accused of writing bad checks
117: bankrupted at least two businesses
3: arrested for assault
71: cannot get a credit card due to bad credit
14: arrested on drug-related charges
8: arrested for shoplifting
21: current defendants in lawsuits
84: stopped for drunk driving in 1998 alone

Waiting for Prince Charming, Captain Marvel, and Mr. Terrific to save the day is not very realistic. What we have is Rounder, and you never can tell, maybe the old warhorse will run like Sea Biscuit if given the chance. I say give him the chance.

“Anyone who thinks you're a good candidate to represent the White American is a worse idjit than Erich Gliebe. I'll tell you who would be better:…”

Well, that’s just dandy, too bad none your dream team favorites are in the running. As it stands now Rounder is the best candidate simply because he is the only candidate.

"Hey, hey! Look at me! All these chicken-shit papers are writing about how chicken-shit I am! I'm great, I'm great, I'M GREAT!!!
Sounds to me like you are suffering from a bad case of paper envy. If you are such a hotshot Professor where is your Curriculum Vitae? Well, you know the old saying Professor: publish or perish.

Professor of Racial Cleansing

How fucking stupid are you? Do you really think that anyone of those listed would have gotten any better reception from the Dems of Reps? Do you have shit for brains or are you just a filthy little jew, deathly afraid of a White man who dares to stand-up and be heard?

Every post that you’ve written attacks White people and smells like pure jew

Why not come out and admit it, you are a jew!

I’m just curious as to which one of the previous kike-poster’s sock-puppets you are.

The mods need to ban you as well.

He's either a GD kike, or another of those rejected, "know it all" punks here to disrupt, demoralize, aggitate and otherwise do damage to VNN.

I just sent a request that Punk Professor and Shit be chunked in the op forum for rule violation. Constructive criticisms ONLY are allowed on activism threads.

Kamerad Q : "Well, that’s just dandy, too bad none your dream team favorites are in the running. As it stands now Rounder is the best candidate simply because he is the only candidate."

And that's just my point. Is Rounder the BEST we could muster? Is our pool of potential candidates as pathetically anemic as that? Does anyone else here realize this state of affairs is not good, especilly when the only one we can get to run for office is an ex-felon which no one wants? And for the record, this IS constructive criticism. No criticism at all - like Rounder is trying to impose - is merely a much-too-obvious attempt of his to squelch constructive criticism, IF that criticism is rightfully directed at him.

Want more, Rounder? Got plenty on the cook wagon fer ya.

And that's just my point. Is Rounder the BEST we could muster? Is our pool of potential candidates as pathetically anemic as that? Does anyone else here realize this state of affairs is not good, especilly when the only one we can get to run for office is an ex-felon which no one wants? And for the record, this IS constructive criticism. No criticism at all - like Rounder is trying to impose - is merely a much-too-obvious attempt of his to squelch constructive criticism, IF that criticism is rightfully directed at him.

Want more, Rounder? Got plenty on the cook wagon fer ya.

Like I told you already on this thread, start your own thread and I'll be happy to oblige ya. Of course, I'll bitch slap you just like I bitch slap all you punks. But your bitch slapping will have to come after they let yo ass outa the hoosegow.

You did a good job of disrupting this activism thread though, I'll give you that much.

Rounder: "He's either a GD kike..."

And you've broken one of Alex Linder's cardinal rules, that being: No sissified calling any VNN member a jew UNLESS you have hard evidence to back up your claim. You have NONE, Rounder. You're a dirty liar, and though I know you're not a jew, you're using jewish means of confusing, distorting, lying, and deflecting your own nattering nabobs of nincompoopcy. Get it? I'm not a jew and don't you call me one again, you dirty piece of shit. You don't deserve to represent the white race upon any public platform, so the project should be dropped or name someone else to do it.

RE: Professor of Racial Cleansing

Why don't you tell us the real reason why you're going after Miller? You're making yourself look like an idiot by coming-up with the lame excuses. I will respect a candid response, however I will reserve the right to disagree with it.

I see nothing wrong in running for political office, anymore than I see running a horse in the Kentucky Derby. But just as it would be foolish and pointless to run a lame horse painted with
"Sieg Heil" & "We Hitler!" across its worthless hide, the same holds true for running (or attempting to) a candidate via the Democratic or Repubican parties. Here's a hint, Mr. Miller: They HATE your fucking guts!" They hate what you STAND for! And, most of all, you're not fooling any of them for one split second. They know you're not one of them, but just a wolf wearing a moth-eaten sheep's hide nobody's fooled by. And really, who would vote for an ex-felon like you anyway - other ex-felons maybe? You're an ex-con, an ex-thug, an alleged alcoholic, and the father of a non-white child. Boy oh boy, the news people would use that against you like a hot-buttered chainsaw shoved up your lying ass and split you in two. And again, what the crying fuck ever happened to the White People's Party? Why aren't you telling anyone here? Why the continued silence? Well, no matter. Anyone who thinks you're a good candidate to represent the White American is a worse idjit than Erich Gliebe. I'll tell you who would be better:

1: Alex Linder
2: Kevin Strom
3: David Duke
4: Bill White (as much as he makes me gag)
5: Jamie Kelso
6: Billy Roper
7: Ben Vinyard
8: Shaun Walker
9: David Pringle

I could name many more, most of them mediocrities, but definitely a better choice than you. Just because your running and saying, "Hey, hey! Look at me! All these chicken-shit papers are writing about how chicken-shit I am! I'm great, I'm great, I'M GREAT!!!

Errrr....ain't I?

Okay PRC….

I get your point and have heard this same point numerous times. But I look at that list, none appeal to me like Rounder. Rounder is loud and outspoken, a character. He also has had so much shit thrown his way, it just slides off. Yeap, we know all his ‘warts’, he is very open about it, which can also plays in his favor. People expect folks to have ‘warts’ these days, especially how the system is, his are all out there, not much more damage can be gained. Those that like what he says will forgive him and those that don’t well who knows if he would have appealed to them in the first place. Since our standards are lowered, thanks Bill Clinton, shit we may have a 50-50 on this one.

Plus Rounder will serve as a testing plate; see how many folks are moving our way. I just look at him as a flash point where us whites just might start gathering around. And he isn’t ‘boring’. He speaks to the people in layman’s terms right out; I bet a lot of people will be just grateful for that in itself. I am.

I have had my fill of politicians playing it soft and coy, nothing gets done and the enemy moves in closer and closer.

Players move around the board many times in a scene. Don’t freak. It is when they all find the appropriate space to work in, that perfect kinda of formula, when it starts clicking, that is what we seek.

And I have given my share of shit to Rounder, lol, my mouth, but when he announced this, I thought it fit him. Just my opinion though. It could all go to hell too. We ain’t got much to loose at this point in time, you yourself points that out, so why not throw this wild card out there. See what happens. I just love the fact someone is out there to say it, to show all those other traitorous statesmen how it should be done. What needs to be said. Someone has got to say it, no matter what. Rounder will be that soldier on the front line, that is what he was trained to do. We need a loud voice who ain’t scared to tell the jew to his face that ‘I don’t like ya’.

Plus he looks good on camera, has a nice smile, speaks like a normal person, not some overeducated do do bird in a suit.

And that's just my point. Is Rounder the BEST we could muster? Is our pool of potential candidates as pathetically anemic as that? Does anyone else here realize this state of affairs is not good, especilly when the only one we can get to run for office is an ex-felon which no one wants? And for the record, this IS constructive criticism. No criticism at all - like Rounder is trying to impose - is merely a much-too-obvious attempt of his to squelch constructive criticism, IF that criticism is rightfully directed at him.

Want more, Rounder? Got plenty on the cook wagon fer ya.

Is the glass half-full, or half-empty? Rounder is not perfect, none of us are, nor is our opposition. The difference with Rounder is we know all about the skeletons lurking in his closet, it is an open book. While it is true he is an ex-felon, it is blatantly false to say no one wants him. You may not want him, and that is your purgative, but many do, and since he is not hindering the prospects of your favorites in anyway whatsoever I fail to see the reason for your vehement opposition. Is your purpose to say the hour is late, the odds are long, and because we can only field one candidate who lived his life more aggressively than Tinkerbell, we should not field any candidates at all? Before Rounder our anemic pool was a big fat zero, nada, nothing, zilch, so yes, it is in fact the best we can do at this time. You call itpathetic]

Racist unites Democrats, GOP

Local white supremacist Frazier Glenn Miller believed that Democrats and Republicans were essentially the same party. He's not very astute for a political candidate.

It's too bad there aren't more issues where the two parties can come together for the good of the country.

Not very astute? Anybody who can profess that there is any difference between the "two" parties has to be either a paid liar in the jewsmedia, or dense enough to believe them.

It's too bad there aren't ANY issues "EITHER" party has the balls to pursue for the good of the country and the people who made it great. But on EVERY issue to further disenfranchise White people and harm what's left of America, "BOTH" parties do most certainly "come together" as one.

Even if every single bad thing Miller's critics say about him is true, compared to what's in second place (Roy Blunt or any other indistinguishable zog-whore) Miller, or any man who has the balls to publicly say what he sees, is God. How can you tell when (rare though it is) a "respectable" politician speaks his honest opinion? He takes it back. Then grovels and kisses ass.

I live in Missouri, and I'll vote for Miller, even though I'll (and I'm sure I will) have to write his name in. I would never endorse any media-approved ass-kisser, no matter how much of a 'lesser evil' he is marketed as.

Good lick, A.A.

I'm not convinced either party can arbitrarily reject a qualified U.S. citizen from running on their "tickets". Monday, I'll contact a local attorney, and also The Federal Elections Commission and find out.

BTW, I phoned Greg Tlapek, Missouri head of the Libertarian Party this morning and left a lengthy message on his answering service, and requested he phone me with any questions. And gave him a brief biographical sketch, including my military credentials, educational background of 3 and 1/2 years college, etc. He hasn't returned my call, but maybe he will before their final decision, which I expect will be announced to the media on Monday.

I went over to Sean Hannity's Forum and was working my way up to the point where I was going to put your name in a post and hotlink it to your campaign website when some twit reported me to a mod and I got permanently banned. No warning! What a bunch of touchy arses over there. I posted nothing abusive, used no cuss words.

Here's the sequence describing my banning:

http://www.hannity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=58877

One person took up for me; the rest were jackals. I should have known when J.P. Slovjanski got banned over there that it was hopeless.

And really, who would vote for an ex-felon like you anyway - other ex-felons maybe?

An "ex-felon"? As opposed to an amoral psychopath with not so much as a speeding ticket to his name, who would give an enthusiastic "Aye!" to the upcoming congressional resolution, "Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iran", and bask in the admiration of his fellow patriots as thousands of young White men prepare to meet their demise?

Some of the most monstrous criminals in this country are in the US Congress. They just aren't referred to as "felons".

Glenn Miller for Congress.

I'm not convinced either party can arbitrarily reject a qualified U.S. citizen from running on their "tickets". Monday, I'll contact a local attorney, and also The Federal Elections Commission and find out.

I would hope they can. Otherwise a future White Peoples Party or Aryan Party would be required to allow Hyman Greenberg, Jose Gonzalez, Wing Fong and Uhuru Baraka to run on its ticket.

Run as an independent. All these parties are beholden to jew interests. To run as an independent in Missouri you'll need the signatures of 10,000 registered voters. You won't need to pay the $100 fee.

http://www.sos.mo.gov/elections/indep_candidate.asp
http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/C100-199/1150000357.HTM

http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/C100-199/1150000321.HTM

"Independent candidate, how nominated.

115.321. 1. Any person desiring to be an independent candidate for any office to be filled by voters throughout the state, or for any congressional district, state senate district, state representative district, or circuit judge district, shall file a petition with the secretary of state. Any person desiring to be an independent candidate for any county office shall file a petition with the election authority of the county.

2. Each page or a sheet attached to each page of each petition for the nomination of an independent candidate shall:

(1) Declare concisely the intention to nominate an independent candidate]If an independent candidate is to be nominated for a statewide office, the petition shall be signed by at least ten thousand registered voters of the state.

. . . 5. The name of each person who files a valid petition for nomination as an independent candidate shall be placed on the official ballot as an independent candidate for the office at the next general election or the special election if the petition nominates a candidate to fill a vacancy which is to be filled at a special election.

(L. 1977 H.B. 101 ｧ 10.045, A.L. 1985 H.B. 620, A.L. 1993 S.B. 31)

However, before you start collecting signatures, you may also want to take a look at this:

http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/C100-199/1150000348.HTM

"115.348. No person shall qualify as a candidate for elective public office in the state of Missouri who has been convicted of or found guilty of or pled guilty to a felony or misdemeanor under the federal laws of the United States of America."

Good luck.

I would hope they can. Otherwise a future White Peoples Party or Aryan Party would be required to allow Hyman Greenberg, Jose Gonzalez, Wing Fong and Uhuru Baraka to run on its ticket.

I don't know what the law says, but I'll bet it depends on whether the party in question uses government money to stage its internal elections; ie, the GOP and the Dems have to be "open" because their primaries in most states are part of publicly financed, publicly administered state primary elections. If the party in question nominates its candidates through private, non-state funded party conventions and the like, then the law wouldn't have much say in who a party choses to nominate or how it goes about making that choice.

I find the electoral system in the US to be fascinating.

It is certainly quite different to a lot of other Western democracies.

My understanding of the Libertarian Party in the US is that they appreciate anyone who believes in less government, and lower taxes to pay for it.
They promote free enterprise, and oppose the interference of government in any aspect of the lives of citizens.

Having read the online autobiography of Glenn Miller, and read his comments on this site, I wouldn't describe him as a perfect match for the Libertarian Party, yet I haven't seen him often oppose the core policy planks of their party platform.

My guess is that they will look at what he believes, and see how close it is to their own message, in deciding whether to endorse him or not. It would be difficult for them to ignore all the other political baggage that he carries.