Remaking Alex Haley...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Remaking Alex Haley's Fake Roots - Why the Racism-Industrial-Complex refuses to let the lie die.

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
795 Views
(@newsfeed)
Posts: 22095
Illustrious Member
Topic starter
 

In May, the History Channel will air its remake of Alex Haley’s Roots: The Saga of An American Family.

Unsurprisingly, the advertising for the broadcast fails to mention that Roots is a fake, and a fake of the first order.

First of all, the book upon which the successful mini-series was based was actually authored by [Jewish] Murray Fisher, Alex Haley’s editor from Playboy magazine.

Secondly, Roots wasn’t just ghost-written; it was plagiarized: In 1978, Judge Robert Ward concluded that Haley had stolen the idea for Roots from Harry Courlander, the white man who authored The African. Courlander charged Haley with having “copied [from his book] language, thoughts, attitudes, incidents, situations, plot and character.”

In spite of having initially denied it, Haley ultimately acknowledged that he lifted from The African verbatim at least 81 passages.

He settled with Courlander out of court by agreeing to pay him the equivalent of 2 million dollars in today’s terms ($650,000).

Finally, when, years later, Judge Ward told BBC that Haley “had perpetrated a hoax on the public,” he doubtless wasn’t just referring to his plagiarism.

Gary B. and Elizabeth Shown Mills are professional genealogists who have shown that, far from substantiating the claims that Haley makes regarding his genealogy, “plantation records, wills,” and “census records” undermine those claims. The Mills assert that the evidence “contradict each and every pre-Civil War statement of Afro-American lineage in Roots” (emphases original)!

The American slave “Toby” whom Haley identifies as his African ancestor, Kunta Kinte, had been in America for years before the ship that allegedly carried him from Africa arrived in North America. And it is “inarguable” that “the 182 pages and thirty-nine chapters in which the Virginia lives of Haley’s ‘ancestors’ are chronicled have no basis in fact. Neither of the two relationships that are crucial to his pedigree (the identity of Kizzy as daughter of [Kunta] Kinte alias Toby, and the relationship of Bell as wife of Kinte and mother of Kizzy) can be established by even the weakest genealogical evidence.”

Nor is there any support for Haley’s account of his post-bellum ancestry. Yet what’s true of Haley’s account of his antebellum post-Civil War ancestry any better supported than his antebellum genealogy. The Mills write that “the total absence of documentation for any alleged event, individual, or relationship” instills doubt about “the very essence of family life portrayed in Roots.”

The late black commentator Stanley Crouch refers to Haley as a “ruthless hustler,” “one of the biggest damn liars this country has ever seen.” Such is the magnitude of Haley’s “hoax” that serves as a textbook illustration of “how history and tragic fact can be pillaged by an individual willing to exploit whatever the naïve might consider sacred.”

Even black Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr., a friend of Haley’s, spiked Haley from

----- snip -----

read full article at source: http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/261874/remaking-alex-haleys-fake-roots-jack-kerwick


 
Posted : 19/02/2016 7:14 am
Share: