White supremacists were spreading hate via Internet, rights tribunal rules
March 10, 2006 - 18:48
By: COLIN PERKELTORONTO (CP) - Two white supremacists were spreading hatred when they posted highly offensive material on their websites about blacks and Jews, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal ruled Friday.
In a landmark decision, the tribunal ordered the men, one of whom ran the web-hosting service that carried the websites, to cease their hatemongering, levied penalties totalling $13,000 and awarded the complainant $5,000.
It is believed to be the first time Canadian Internet web-hosting service has been found liable for hate messages.
Bernie Farber, the CEO of the Canadian Jewish Congress was ecstatic with the decision and fines.
Farber
"It makes a huge and important statement," said Farber. "It shows the seriousness with which the tribunal viewed this matter."
The complaint was launched in February 2002 by Ottawa lawyer and human-rights crusader Richard Warman against Toronto resident Alexan Kulbashian, who is in his early 20s, and James Richardson, of London, Ont., who's in his early 30s.
Warman
Warman also named the Canadian Ethnic Cleansing Team, of which the two were members, as well as Kulbashian's web-hosting service Affordable Space.com and the defunct http://www.tri-cityskins.com, a website with neo-Nazi and white supremacist material.
Messages posted on the website included Holocaust jokes and songs about blacks, Jews, Muslims, Sikhs and other minorities.
"The material found on the tri-cityskins.com website is likely to expose persons who are non-Christian or non-Caucasian to hatred or contempt," the 48-page ruling states.
"Black persons and people of the Jewish faith are particularly laid open to ridicule, ill feelings or hostility, creating the right conditions for hatred or contempt against them to flourish."
Kulbashian was ordered to pay Warman $5,000 for identifying him in a hate message.
Tribunal decision-maker Athanasios Hadjis also ordered Kulbashian and Richardson each to pay $1,000 in penalties, and fined Canadian Ethnic Cleansing Team and Affordable Space.com $3,000 each.
Warman was "ecstatic" with the decision.
"It shows human-rights laws work," Warman said from Ottawa.
Richardson could not be reached and Kulbashian refused to comment.
However, a person who did not give his name but described himself as a "friend" of Kulbashian, an engineering student, said, "it doesn't matter, we'll see when asked about the ruling.
"I have to read the thing, the whole thing, before we come to a decision."
Kinsella
Warren Kinsella, a Toronto lawyer and author of Web of Hate, called the ruling "terrific" news in light of a 1999 decision by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission not to regulate the Internet.
"Any parent knows, any member of a minority group knows, the Internet has become a cyber-sewer," Kinsella said in a telephone interview.
"(The ruling) says, 'We believe we have jurisdiction over expressions of hatred over the Internet,' and that's a good thing."
Farber, an expert on Internet hate, said the lawyer had done Canadians a "valuable service," calling the websites "ugly, vile and brutal."
"This was exactly the kind of case that should come before the Canadian Human Rights Commission," he said.
The websites were shut down after the congress complained to Toronto police about four years ago.
At: http://www.680news.com/news/national/article.jsp?content=n031065A
Complete text of Warman/CHRC v. Kulbashian/Richardson
The CHRC should fine themselves the maximum penalty for re-publishing the following "hate speech" on the Internetin violation of s.13
"Nigger Jokes" page:
Q: What has four fuzzy legs and one black arm?
A: A happy pitbull.Q: Why are a nigger's eyes red after sex?
A: Mace.Q: What's missing from the unemployment line in Harlem?
A: 100 ft of chain, and an auctioneer.The "Jew Jokes" web page ..
Q: What was the best thing to ever come out of Auschwitz?
A: An empty train.Q: What did the German kid get for Christmas?
A: G.I. Jew and an easy bake oven.Q: How do you fit 100 Jews into a Volkswagen?
A: Two in the front, three in the back, and 95 in the ashtray.Q: What's the difference between a Jew and apple pie?
A: Apple pie doesn't scream when you put it in the oven.The "Other Ethnic Jokes" page ..
Q: What's the most confusing day on the Indian reserve?
A: Fathers' Day.Q: Why doesn't Mexico have a good Olympic team?
A: Anyone who can run, jump or swim is already in the U.S.Q: Why do Pakis stink?
A: So the blind can hate them too.
"Israel's values are Canada's values" Canadian PM
"An attack on Israel is an attack on Canada" Canadian PM
LMAO....
"Any parent knows, any member of a minority group knows, the Internet has become a cyber-sewer," Kinsella said in a telephone interview.
Well the peddlers of porn and race mixing need to re-think their comments...:box:
I'm NOT a jew, I just play one on youtube.... 
.
Come on down to Jersey Warman. I'll show you what hate is all about.
:box:
Canada's going down the toilet even faster than this country!
It only goes to show that nonjews don't have human rights.
But I fail to see the point of holocaust jokes that spread standard holocaust propaganda, even if they are somewhat funny. Why why waste your website on that?
"Go, Nazis, Go!"
America was founded on the HATRED of the British monarchy at the time.
France overthrew their monarchy because of HATRED of the King.
Hatred is not always a bad thing. I think we more people to get pissed off.
It only goes to show that nonjews don't have human rights.
Why should human rights apply to us? According to the Talmud, we're not even human! 
"A safe rule where Jewish propaganda is concerned is to multiply or divide their figures by ten, at least, before accepting them as the basis for discussion."
- Arnold Leese, from the December, 1937 edition of The Fascist.
Why should human rights apply to us? According to the Talmud, we're not even human!
Right, I doubt they would have a tribunal in Canada if the kikes were to put their talmud on the internet. That piece of work is hateful towards all of humanity who are not part of that tribe. What makes this decision worse is watching these kikes gloat over it.
Hail Jeboo!
Always the jew calls a thing its opposite. Loss of freedom = Human rights
Vote from the rooftops
Why should human rights apply to us? According to the Talmud, we're not even human!
I think you're on to them. Translated to jew-speak: Human = jew
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal = Canadian Jew Rights Tribunal
This is not so surprising, since it was jew pressure groups that lobbyied for it's creation.
Lubomyr Prytulak makes some worthwhile observations:
Is CHRC allocation of resources equitable?
The question of the CHRC servicing some ethnic and religious groups to the exclusion of others might be tested by examining the proportions of its hate-messaging budget that it has dedicated annually over the past decade to prosecutions (a) on behalf of various ethnic and religious groups, and (b) targetting various ethnic and religious groups — of particular interest perhaps being Arab, German, Jewish, and Ukrainian groups. Furthermore, the CHRC publishing on an ongoing basis, together with an annual summary, a listing of all hate-messaging cases would also be helpful in evaluating CHRC bias, and which would be no more than bringing the CHRC up to the standard of openness of a court of law, where all cases are a matter of public record, and where listings of all cases are available. I would appreciate your informing me where such CHRC funding and case information has been published, or if it has not been published, when it might be, or if it never will be, then what alternative evidence the CHRC intends to produce that will be capable of convincing Canadians of CHRC impartiality.
A million times the funding does invite a reasonable apprehension of bias
The need for disclosure of this information is urgent, because as things stand, a Ukrainian complained of by a Jew to the CHRC is likely to conjecture that the CHRC has to date allocated not ten, not a hundred, not a thousand, but a million times the funds to prosecuting Jewish complaints as it has to prosecuting Ukrainian complaints, which conjecture will suggest to the defendant Ukrainian that he stands before a kangaroo court whose intent is to conduct a show trial, and which conjecture is so damaging to the CHRC, and which is so likely to bring the administration of justice into disrepute, and which must so inevitably incite inter-ethnic and inter-religious animosity, that it is mandatory to quell that conjecture with hard data demonstrating that it is false. I urge you to brush aside every obstacle to the gathering and publication of this data, as the credibility of the CHRC is at issue, and that credibility will not survive stonewalling.
"Israel's values are Canada's values" Canadian PM
"An attack on Israel is an attack on Canada" Canadian PM
The Kikes really have a ball beating up on the gentiles in Canada. It doesn't really mean much for the rest of the world, Canada is a rather insignificant country.
These tribunals don't get anymore weapons or money for the murderous Israelis. This is more or less a side amusement for them I think.
I think IL Gov. Blagojevich most recent appointment to the IL Hate Crimes Commission provides some inspiration (and amusement). The Gov. appointed Farrakhan's top aide (Mrs. Muhammad) to the 26 member commission. Predictably some recent statements by ol' Louis offended the five jews on the commission who resigned in protest.
Jews Resign from IL Hate Crimes Commission
Seems these jews just can't tolerate diversity on the commission.
Farrakhan adviser on gov's hate crime panel
It's actually quite hilarious, and provides a excellent refutation to the idiotic slogan "Diversity is our strength". The jews lament it is bitterly ironic that this issue is unfolding in a way that is pitting African-Americans, gays/lesbians and Jews--the three most frequent targets of hate crimes in America--against one another.
"Israel's values are Canada's values" Canadian PM
"An attack on Israel is an attack on Canada" Canadian PM
Is there any legal problem with publicizing the home addresses of Farber and Warman?
.
Is there any legal problem with publicizing the home addresses of Farber and Warman?
I see no problem with a resident of the United States doing this. For a Canadian, it may be risky since the jews and their boot licking servents seem to make the rules up as they go along.
In fact an American could do alot to help his fellow Whites in Canada by making a list of Canada's most anti-White induviduals ( hate crimes cops, members of the human rights tribunal and the Canadian Jewish Congress) post their pictures, address and basicly expose these bastards for who they are.
A Canadian would risk jail for such free speech. An American could do this under the protection of the first Amendment. Just don't openly advocate violence, you would be just fine.
I see no problem with a resident of the United States doing this. For a Canadian, it may be risky since the jews and their boot licking servents seem to make the rules up as they go along.
We could simply label the list "PEOPLE TO REMEMBER". Nice inoffensive label with a very deep meaning .
.
[color="Red"]"sneaky 'GD' Jews are all alike." ......Marge Schott
" I'd rather have a trained monkey working for me than a nigger,"