28 March, 2006

Suckpoop Joe Prepares WNDiots for False-Flag Nuking

Posted by alex in jewed foreign policy, Jewish Tyranny, Muslims, WND at 2:44 am | Permanent Link

By Robert Pfriender
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com


Robert Pfriender

The focus on the ports fiasco obviously would pale in comparison to a terror nuke actually detonating in one of our ports. But what about the flipside of that terrible event? What would happen to Islam as a result of a massive nuclear retaliatory counterstrike against Islamic targets?

[This is a direct threat to the American people: Pfriender is saying, in coded language, that the same people who blew up the WTC are going to drop a nuke on us, since our interest in warring abroad has waned after their shoddy Iraq campaign.]

Article.


  • 2 Responses to “Suckpoop Joe Prepares WNDiots for False-Flag Nuking”

    1. Carpenter Says:
      28 March, 2006 at 8:29 am

      Nowhere in the story does he write “This is insane, you can’t destroy cities that have nothing to do with al-Qaeda! It would be like nuking Chicago if some terrorist happened to live in Illinois.” Should the neocons start nuking cities in the Middle East, the whole world would unite against them, and there would be a severe economic depression. White Nationalism would have its best chance ever of waking people up to the ZOG.

      From the story:

      The likely target list for retaliation for a nuclear terror attack against the United States includes Iran, Syria, and Libya as the primary targets. We can supplement those targets with countries such as Saudi Arabia – where most of the 9-11 terrorists came from (and that are most likely targeted with the “neutron bomb” designed with such a scenario in mind that kills with enhanced radiation levels but essentially leaves facilities and oil infrastructure intact – except for holy sites such as Mecca, Medina, Hebron, Qom and others, which planners might want to completely annihilate). There are likely other “Islamic” countries also on the potential target list and even ones we generally consider as being friendly to the U.S. such as Pakistan, especially if radicals gained control of its nuclear weapons.

      You may recall that Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., suggested exactly that awhile back, and while his statement met with denials from the State Department, the Department of Defense and the White House were silent on the Tancredo comment.

    2. Arch Stanton Says:
      28 March, 2006 at 5:42 pm

      We can only hope that fools and knaves like Mr. Pfriender will be at the ground zero of the jew zionist’s deception, thereby fulfilling their own prophecy. Barring that may we live long enough to see traitors like this dancing in the wind at the end of a rope.

      Arch Stanton