22 May, 2006

Let Them Eat Kike

Posted by alex in heretical.com at 7:57 am | Permanent Link

That’s why one clear message rings down more than two millennia of Western history: “Jews are poison!� Ignoring this message has been the biggest mistake we’ve ever made and the message now sniggered behind the hands of race-traitors like Bush and Blair is: “Let them eat kike!� But there’s reason for hope. Jews and their shabbas goys have tried to hold back reality with a dam made of lies, but the dam is leaking badly in a dozen places. The more it leaks, the weaker it grows; and the weaker it grows, the more it leaks. When it finally collapses, there won’t be room in the Jew-canoe for the present gang of traitors, criminals and parasites to ride out the flood.

The O’Farrell Column, heretical.com

  • Similar posts:

    1. 07/17/06 O’Farrell: Spiv and Let Die 27% similar
    2. 10/18/08 Heretical Two Denied Bail Hearing 2% similar
    3. 08/08/06 Simon Sheppard, Luke O’Farrell Charged under “Incitement to Racial Hatred” Laws 2% similar
    4. 49 Responses to “Let Them Eat Kike”

      1. Celtic Warrior Says:

        Very well written and amusing too. Unfortunately I don’t see any evidence for the dam of lies collapsing just yet! White Nationalists are engaging in wishful thinking. Not one in a thousand of ‘joe public’ know the truth of history and of race. Our first goal must be giving the public the suppressed facts.

      2. Ceallachain Says:

        The real test will be Iran. Fool me once, shame on Jew. Fool me twice, shame on me. If we attack Iran right after the fiasco that is Iraq, there truly is no hope. What do you do when AmeriKwa tries to draft you? 1) go get the free military training so you can be a better insurgent some day 2) go to jail (many great men — like Hitler — have spent time in prison 3) flee the country or try to hide in it 4) Go fight for Iran

      3. Don Miller Says:

        >

        My remark is just a comment on these two sentences. The tactic of interviewing or polling colored ethnic group members after one of their number commits an atrocity against a white person is very common, and the results must not be taken at face value.

        In the United States, after a particularly cruel public murder or atrocity by a member of any colored ethnic group, reporters usually rush to other members of that ethnic group to discuss their fears of a “white backlash.” It’s just a way to equate the possibility of white revenge with the reality of colored crime. It’s such a common technique that we rarely notice it. It diminishes the horror of the crime by a member of the colored ethnic group through the technique known as “equivalence.”

        There are two proofs that this tactic is fraudulent.

        1) The only time such an inquiry into “fear of backlash” is not made is when the notorious criminal is white and the victim is colored, then whites are not interviewed or polled as to their “fear of backlash.”

        2) If you pay attention over time, you will see that none of the members of the colored ethnic group actually left the area. It’s just a learned, game-like PR stunt, much like how the “walk of privilege” is learned by colored ethnic group members, but not by white people.

        We’ve been so judaized that we don’t even recognize it, but this is one of their tricks.

      4. Don Miller Says:

        The posting deleted the two sentences referred to above. Here they are:

        >

      5. Carpenter Says:

        On the contrary, Ceallachain, if the ZOG would invade Iran it would be great for us; the result would be a disaster, and people would be looking around for those responsible. It would also hurt the economy greatly, which is the only way to make the lemmings wake up. There won’t be any draft – but if there would be, it would affect every American man, woman and child, and that’s exactly what we need.

        In the end, September 11 and the invasions in the Middle East will turn out to have been to our benefit, I believe. People will be asking questions for a long, long time, and they will find the neocons.

        Good essay by O’Farrell, except:

        Islam has no tradition of free speech, let alone of “freedom, democracy and liberty�,

        Well duh, no religion has a tradition of free speech. Singling out Islam as some sort of evil religion only serves the neocon talk of a “clash of cultures.” To anyone like O’Farrell talking about Arab immigrants as “Muslims,” as if their religion would be significant, I ask: do the Christians from Syria and Iraq behave any better? What about Christian Blacks and Mexicans in the U.S.? Is it about race or religion?

        P.S.: let it be noted that Marie Antoinette never said “Let them eat cake,” that was just a satiric cartoon in a revolutionary rag. This shows us once again how our history has been distorted, from the big to the small.

      6. James C. Says:

        Marie Antoinette – I thought she said it, but she wasn’t referring to expensive (birthday?) cakes, she was referring to the caked crumbs stuck to the sides of the ovens after the bread is removed.

      7. Carpenter Says:

        Nope, it’s from a satiric comic, I think in Marat’s paper. I have seen it.

        Consider this one phrase, how it has been used repeatedly to justify the French Revolution. Showing that those in charge were stupid, uninterested in what makes a country work. Such an impact it has, when you repeat it.

        (The French Revolution, of course, led to the executions of tens of thousands of people, two thirds of which were peasants, not nobility. It led to prize controls that wiped bread off the market, causing people to starve. It led to rampant paranoia where the population was constantly whipped up into a frenzy over threats from neighboring armies that never came. It led to plans to either kill off the Germans on the border or forcibly spreading them across the country, plans to dress everyone in grey uniforms, to “democratize” churches by cutting off the towers as they were taller than the buildings around them. And so on and so forth. Mass drownings in one town, mass arrests for the slightest suspicions all over. Riots and counter-riots as the whole experiment started to crumble. And in the end, Napoleon and his wars, more devastating to France than anything a monarch would have come up with. And yet “let them eat cake” is still with us, not any catchy comment about mass killings or wild social experiments.

        …and also suits. Grey, dull suits, across the globe, are the result of all the movers and shakers in France suddenly desiring to dress in drab clothing like the simplest commoner. Before that, bright colors had been the style everywhere. Thanks, Jacobins.)

      8. jimbo Says:

        re: O’Farrell ‘column’: OK: not too bad of a read with a coupla caveats: O’Farrell seems to be falling into the ‘ZOG-approved’ trap of ‘Moslem smear’: i.e: the ad-hom of naming someone as a ‘Muslim’ and, ergo, ‘a terrorist’……..when the line of demarcartion IS NOT ‘religion’ but ‘race’……..for instance: Jews are terrorists per se because it is in their GENES to kill, steal & destroy: especially white goyim. Although most Muslims are non-white, the criteria is RACE…..which is, of course, something you can’t convert to!
        re: the 7/7 London bombings: from what i can determine, the evidence points to, once again, ‘an inside job’ courtesy of MI6 (viz: MOSSAD). Apparently, bombs were planted UNDER the trains (which was ALSO the case in the Madrid bombings)
        That means there were NO ‘suicide bombers’ as such…..also: it means that some-one had to have access to the trains at the marshalling yards where there would, undoubtedly, have been all sorts of security….the by-passing of which would require much more than a few home-grown sand niggas…..so: again: as O’Farrell says:
        “Cui bono?”
        “Jui bono?”

        re: Carpenter & French revolution……
        this was a ZOG ‘dry-run’ for Russia 1917-
        …..Sir Walter Scott’s two-vlm biography of Napoleon names the KIKE as the movers, shakers and, once again, the TERRORISTS, behind the now-familiar ZOG-hallmark of white genocide!

      9. Jackumup Says:

        Why does hollywood have so many Jews in acting?, because acting is lying and jews are natural born liars , Jews perpetuate lies as easily as the goyums breathe. White Nationalist must remember the golden rule, that those with the gold make the rules. The jews power (or for a better term Satans spawn) derives fom the Christians Church’s faliure to prevent the worship of wealth, they invent, produce, and create nothing.
        IF THERE IS NO DESIRE TO BE RICH THERE IS NO REASON FOR THE JEW TO EXSIST
        To beat them is to take away the desire to accumulate unnesissary material goods eliminating the need for thier talent of buying ,selling & lending

      10. jimbo Says:

        ‘Jackumup’ says:
        “To beat them is to take away the desire to accumulate unnesissary material goods eliminating the need for thier talent of buying ,selling & lending”

        here’s ONE good method…….dumpster diving
        i.e: rummaging through the dumpsters outside super-markets and ‘shopping malls’. I know it sounds a bit gross but many super-markets discard perfectly good produce, groceries, clothes, toiletries, toys, electrical equipment, whatever….because there is some slight blemish or it is near or a few days past the ‘use by’ date(which, AFA de-hydrated and canned goods are concerned, is probably inaccurate any-ways!). Think of the ADVANTAGES…..you automatically BREAK the ZOG-consumerist-cycle….work…pay ZOG taxes…..what’s left over: pay vastly inflated prices to buy ‘necessities’(most of which are CRAP any-way)….thereby increase the wealth of ZOG thus aiding and abetting the ZOG agenda of pauperisng/enslaving the White Race. You also save HEAPS of money: a dedicated ‘dumpster diver’ living in a squat, for instance, or living with friends/relations or wherever can live on as little as $US20 a week…..the savings can be used for more useful items like: guns, ammunition, stockpiles of…whatever……white power literature and flyers to distribute where-ever……the purchase of ‘portable assets’ like gold/silver bullion &c to ward off the coming ZOG-MEGA-COLLAPSE!
        All MUCH BETTER than en-riching the bank account of some fat, slimy, greasy, filthy JEW BASTARD!

      11. Sandor Says:

        Carpenter –
        My only reading on the French Revolution has been Simon Schama’s ‘Citizens’. What would you recommend as a good place to start?

      12. Carpenter Says:

        Sandor, I would suggest a Google search for “french revolution atrocities”. Here are two links:

        http://www.city-journal.org/html/16_2_urbanities-robespierre.html
        http://www.culturewars.com/CultureWars/Archives/Fidelity_archives/parricide.html

        On Vendee, where a revolt was beaten down, every man, woman and child was killed, even Republicans as all had to be cleansed:

        Another amusement for the “Bleus,” who referred to themselves as colonies infernales, was to roast women and children in baking ovens. In order to get maximal sadistic pleasure from this practice, the victims were placed in cold ovens, which were then heated.
        ……
        In the Vendee, however, a particularly popular sport among the Blues was to throw children out of windows and to catch them with their bayonets. Equally popular was the practice of slicing open pregnant women in order to chop their unborn children into pieces and then let the mothers bleed to death. Other pregnant women were crushed to death in wine and fruit presses. Also popular was the burning of victims in houses and churches. This bloodlust increased so vehemently that Commander Grignon gave the order that everyone they met was to be immediately killed, even if they were Republicans.

        The whole thing started with a few years of harsh winters and bad harvest, which caused starvation. Also, France had spent a great deal of money in helping the American Patriots beat the British. How coincidental history is, sometimes: without the last cold winter, none of this would have happened.

        The Jacobins and Girondins (clubs of intellectuals that met at coffee shops in Paris) essentially betrayed the people. The people loved the king and did not want to overthrow the monarchy. This is shown by a typical scene: a large crowd of women was supposed to go to Versailles and fetch the royal family; once in Paris, the king would see the people’s hardships and help them, the Parisians believed. Off they went, a train of women, along with many men dressed in women’s clothing and many who didn’t bother to disguise themselves. At Versailles the royal family stupidly let them inside the gates, and the crowd killed their guards and put their heads on pikes. The royal family was brought to Paris, prisoners in reality, though they were allowed to bring with them a long list of servants. The people in Paris cheered, and the French tricoleur was born as a combination of Versailles white and Parisian red and blue. (It is not a symbol for “liberty, equality and fraternity.” That is a lie you will hear as the true story, that the French commoners weren’t hostile to the royal family, doesn’t fit in with the narrative.

        The royal family was eventually executed, when large crowds of royalists started rioting and causing unrest. The Jacobinians were afraid the people would rally around the king and put an end to their reign. The royal family was not executed simply because a revolution was going on, as that would have upset the people. A long list of crimes was invented, such as that the king would have conspired with foreign armies to invade France, and that the queen would have taught her children to masturbate. (“I appeal to the decency of all the women in this court,” Marie-Antoinette appealed during the trial, and a silence came over the crowd of onlookers as embarrassment over the ridiculous charge spread.)

        It is noteworthy that many of the initial leaders of the revolution were themselves killed under Robespierre’s Reign of Terror. During La Terreur, Robespierre sought to change everything: measurements, the calendar (ten days in a week, three weeks in a month, leaving five days of the year which were Republican holidays), religion (the goddess of Reason was laughed at), every institution, even the laws of economics (price controls forced many out of business in the affected branches). The early leaders had only sought more votes for the Third Estate in the National Assembly, at the expense of the nobility and priests, and tax reforms. Here started the Left and Right in politics: those sitting to the Right in the National Assembly were more moderate reformers. These were soon dead.

        Napoleon rose to the rank of general by killing royalists rioting in Paris. He was a political genius, that much is clear: without him, the monarchy would probably have been restored much sooner. Now it had to wait until after the Napoleonic wars.

      13. Celtic Warrior Says:

        Count Leon de Poncins’ books are a good place to start re the French Revolution. He blames the occult hand of Freemasonry. Of course he knew and we know who controls and directs The Grand Orient lodges. Guess who? Jew who!

      14. Celtic Warrior Says:

        PS Nesta Webster’s book, ISBN 0939482096, available from Noontide Press is probably the most accessible and informative from a White Nationalist perspective.

      15. Carpenter Says:

        He can blame the Freemasons as much as he wants, that doesn’t change the fact that it was the Jacobins and Girondins who started the revolution. How many of them who were in Freemasonry is really beside the point. Freemasonry is an “I scratch your back, you scratch mine” middle-class club with some funny made-up rituals, nothing more.

        Jews? I don’t doubt they supported the revolution. I don’t doubt there were Jews among the revolutionaries. But did they start it and control it? I hear some posters repeat this, but they never provide anything to support their theory.

      16. Tim Johnson Says:

        Can we get back to the topic of American today?

        The jew-controlled media is mind-washing hard for the Mexcrement amnesty. One senator actually read the bill – and almost had a heart attack. Sen. Sessions has called attention to the horrific nation-wrecking the beaner amnesty would be.

        So what does jew do? Blast Sessions as an evil “rassist”! Oy!

        http://isteve.blogspot.com/2006/05/sen-sessions-commits-unpardonable-hes.html

        I like Stevie’s last line about this agitprop bitch “reporter”: “Seriously, this country is not going to get back on the right track until much of the Establishment is purged from their sinecures.”

        Purged…I like the sound of that. “Dana Milbank.” Sounds like the Simpsons character. “Milbanks.” LOL

      17. jimbo Says:

        so saith ‘Carpenter’:

        *“Jews? I don’t doubt they supported the revolution. I don’t doubt there were Jews among the revolutionaries. But did they start it and control it? I hear some posters repeat this, but they never provide anything to support their theory”*

        Nesta Webster’s “Secret Societies and Subversive Movements” is a good place to start. Churchill reckoned she was ‘spot one’. Failing that, you could always give the yooish ‘encylopaedia’ a whirl

      18. Sehnsucht nach dem Reich Says:

        Nesta Webster has written a whole book on the French Revolution thereby pointing out the role of the Jews. You can read that book online here:

        http://www.yamaguchy.netfirms.com/webster/webster.html

        A good introduction to the jewish role in the French Revolution might be a chapter of Captain Ramsay´s classic book The Nameless War. You can read the book here:

        http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/nameless/intro.htm

        Juri Lina writes quite a lot of the Jewish role in the French Revolution in his book The Rise of the Red Scorpion.

        I think all these sources don´t give the whole picture. And I would assume the Jewish role might well be greater as these authors suggest. You can hate the Jews as much as you want you have to admit that they generally don´t brag about their deeds outside of their community. That´s why nodal parts of the assassination of Kennedy and of 911 are still unexplained. Perhaps the Jews will open their archives when they rule the world undisputed out of Jerusalem. That might make most history books pretty obsolete. But I would prefer we would beat the Jews and have a false history.

        I know it sounds rather kooky to assert the historic role of secret societies. But isn´t Jewry a giant secret society? And most people don´t know this. And if you read the classic books on freemasonry, the books of Wichtl and Ludendorff for example, which played a major role in the intellectual background of the NSDAP (the SS had an archive of books on freemasonry, Evola worked there for a short time), you must come to the conclusion that Freemasonry is an important part of the jewish conspiracy. I doubt that Freemasonry is kind of a country club as “Carpenter” suggests. The minor levels of Freemasonry might well be unimportant but not the upper echelons. It might be that now the role of Freemasonry is not so great as it has been, because the Jews don´t need Non-Jews as much as before and they can hire their puppets without an esoteric smokescreen. But I think the role of Freemasonry is still there. And it certainly was an important part of the French Revolution.

      19. Carpenter Says:

        I know it sounds rather kooky to assert the historic role of secret societies. But isn´t Jewry a giant secret society?

        No, it is a race, and that’s a world of difference. They are driven by a biological instinct to preserve their own, not by secret meetings. What secret meetings there are, change over time, appear and disappear, and are entirely dependant on the biological instinct, which also drives a whole lot of actionst that are not planned secretly.

        And yes, Freemasonry is little more than a country club. Anyone who has a window to the inside will know this. Had it been pivotal in the French Revolution it would certainly had become known, as there are always people ready to talk about major, long-term projects. And to someone who has studied the French Revolution, with knowledge of the important role of the Jacobins and Girondins, Freemasonry sure seems an unnecessary addition. We have these two major clubs with their proven role, and that is not enough? It just gotta be secret to be satisfying?

        Since noone has provided the slightest information about the Jewish role in this thread – note that I provided names and examples for anything I claimed, which is what you’re supposed to do, of course – I will take the time to read those links. Since none of the major French leaders of the Revolution were Jews as far as I know, this better be good.

      20. Carpenter Says:

        I have now read Nesta Webster’s description of Freemasonry, and its role in the French Revolution.

        FREEMASONRY: Nesta Webster claims that the symbols of Freemasonry are derived from the Cabala – an earlier form of Cabala, “not at all incompatible with Christianity,” not the latter form that Rabbis mixed with magic. This is what she provides as concrete proof of a connection to Judaism. She theorizes about Templars bringing the symbolism to Britain, after the fall of their order – the Templars got hold of that symbolism while in Jerusalem. Or, she says, possibly it could have come from a Jewish friend of Oliver Cromwell. Along the way she dismisses many other theories, but not entirely. “To sum up, then, the origins of the system we now know as Freemasonry are not to be found in one source alone. The twelve alternative sources enumerated in the Masonic Cyclopædia and quoted at the beginning of this chapter may all have contributed to its formation.”

        So she provides no names of Jews in Freemasonry, nothing of that kind. Symbolism from the Cabala many centuries ago – well, could be. But that is not enough for us to call Freemasonry a conspiracy run by Jews. Note that Nesta Webster herself does not think of these various symbols as incompatible with Christianity or Europe, and she does not cite them as proof of Freemasonry being a Jewish tool.

        THE FRENCH REVOLUTION: Nesta Webster quotes a British Freemason, John Robison, who wrote a book in the 18th century about subversives gathering in German and French lodges that he had visited. This, he said, was anathema to Freemasonry, which had always held that nothing touching on religion or politics should ever be uttered in the lodges.

        Quintin Craufurd, a friend of Marie Antoinette, wrote in a letter to Pitt in 1794 that the beliefs of the revolutionaries were similar to the beliefs of the Illuminati, that Weishaupt had founded in Germany. From this Nesta Webster concludes that Illuminati doctrines must have been imported to France through Freemasons. From this, some WNs draw the conclusion that the French Revolution was a Jewish conspiracy.

        Weishaupt was indeed a Jew. But that is far from enough evidence of a Jewish conspiracy; you could just as well say that Weishaupt was affected by other thinkers of the time, such as Voltaire. The Enlightenment was already well established. Note, also, that many in Europe, Freemasons and others, were highly influenced by the American Revolution – you could make the claim that the overthrow of the French monarchy was an American conspiracy, works just as well as anything else. One Jew in the game does not a conspiracy make.

        The strongest ideological influence on the French Revolution was beyond all doubt Voltaire. He was not a Jew. He did join the Freemasons, but only shortly before his death in 1778. Why is it that some are so ready to forget the widespread influence of this famous thinker?

        Mirabeau and two other founders of the Jacobins were indeed Freemasons, and other Jacobins were as well. However, I doubt that all Jacobins were Freemasons, as Webster claims – she provides no proof of this, and as the Jacobins grew in numbers…. Still, even if every one of the Jacobins would have been a Freemason, as Nesta Webster quotes from John Robinson these members of the Freemasons were of a perverted kind; their subversive thoughts on politics were not allowed in larger Freemasonry.

        Nesta Webster also mentions considerable differences in opinion among the Jacobins – hardly a uniform conspiracy. Robespierre would later execute several Jacobins, until other Jacobins, along with other leaders, turned against him.

        The Girondins, the second of the large clubs behind the Revolution was not a Freemason invention, as Nesta Webster notes, although they certainly worked closely together with the Jacobins. These, too, had differences in opinion, and Girondine thought changed over time, and some were executed while others were not. Again, hardly a uniform conspiracy.

        The only Jew we see here is a certain Ephraim, who was sent to contact the revolutionaries on behalf of the king of Prussia. He was arrested for libel and for plotting against the queen, spent two days in jail and was then sent back to Prussia.

        In short: the only Jewish influence Nesta Webster describes in Freemasonry consists of Freemasons adopting certain symbols and some rituals from the old form of Cabala.

        Nesta Webster does not describe any particular Jewish influence in the French Revolution.

        Nesta Webster claims that the Jacobins were founded by a small group of Freemasons, but also says that their political debates were anathema to real Freemasonry, which stayed out of politics and religion altogether.

        Nesta Webster makes a claim that will seem naïve to a White Nationalist – she claims that these perverted French Freemasons would be the origin of Marxism. She provides no more proof of this than any of her other leaps of faith: “Certainly it has to be…” etc.

        Though I do not dismiss her writings, she writes a lot that is interesting.

      21. apollonian Says:

        Subjectivism–Core Of Conspiracy, Spenglerian “Decline”
        (Apollonian, 25 May 06)

        To put the conspiracy issue in best historical context, ck book by Jew, Bernard Lazare, “Antisemitism,” which confirms Jews controlled banking, esp. fractional-reserve banking, since 14th cent. Face it: banking is a Jew scam and racket, esp. fractional-reserve which is fraud and conspiracy by definition. Such fraudulent banking is useful for “taxation” by which incessant warfare is financed, thus the gentile rulers’ need for Jews as financiers and accomplices against mutual enemies.

        And of course, Jews are frauds by religion, as we know fm Talmud, fundamental to Judaic religion which constitutes war against rest of humanity–and indeed, war against reality itself which is objective, Jews the ultimate subjectivists who narcissistically worship themselves, pretending they’re God, capable of “creating” reality, subjectivism most active within the mind.

        This subjectivist insanity and obsession of Jews will actually work and succeed given only presence of a host upon which Jew-parasite can feed, like the “greatest generation” of dupes and murderers who cheerfully worked as Jew enforcers. Jews are quite literally a disease of human population, worshipping their pretended subjectivist manipulation of a world subject to their wishes and whims. That Jews are “persecuted” by “jealous” goyim is useful religion shared by Jews and successfully imposed upon stupidest gentiles.

        Bank of England was instituted about 1694 as fractional-reserve operation, the currency not at first “legal tender.” (See Griffin’s “The Creature From Jekyll Island.”) Masons then are quite often gentile accomplices and contacts with these Jew-banker conspirators, masons esp. heavy in banking among the gentiles who work that industry. Note masons are direct followers of the Templars who were betrayed by the Roman Pope and French King Phillip IV.

        French Rev. was borne of a monetary-financial-banking crisis in which Jews (bankers) were necessarily involved, and they certainly benefitted as fm F. Rev. Jews were legitimized in France and all over Europe affected by France and revolution.

        Necessary cultural plan for white liberation against the Jew (hence subjectivist delusion) has two components (at least): (a) the concrete-practical, political-military, consisting of elimination of Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) counterfeiting fraud and financial instrument, the actual engine behind present Orwellian “perpetual war.”

        (b) Encompassing this specific concrete plan (a), above, is the larger abstract mentality involving more general antisemitism–BUT WE MUST NOT FORGET THE GENTILE component, accomplices, and co-conspirators who are identifiable as subjectivists, especially “moralists,” founded especially upon the “good-evil” fallacy (Pelagian heresy).

        And there are yet other heresies like “Judeo-Christianity” (JC–see Whtt.org) by which stupid gentile dupes are inveigled to serving and enforcing the Jew-oligarchal conspiracy, “supporting Israel,” etc. Another obvious heresy is non- or anti-racism.

        Note then Jews and gentile collaborators capitalize upon the heretical, narcissist, hubristic tendency of sinful humanity (usually in guise of “morality”). Jews thus run the MAMMON culture founded upon this heretical complex, never outrightly daring to impose Talmudism explicitly–just stupid, popular, dumbass, foolery like holohoax for the “lowest common denominator.”

        CONCLUSION: Jew dominance is cyclic phenomena feeding off gentile dupes–of whom there are still too many. Meantime the free internet continues to inform our INDUCTIVE LOGIC as to exactly how things work for the Jews, Jews the only consistent victors no matter what else happens. “It’s the Jews, stupid,” truly, but there’s something else, most essential, at the foundation common to Jews and their gentile co-conspirators: SUBJECTIVISM and obsession therewith, esp. in form of MORALISM. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

      22. Carpenter Says:

        Sehnsucht, I have now read the chapter from Nameless War that deals with the French Revolution.

        The author’s proof of Jews controlling the French Revolution is – that the Protocols of Zion says “it was wholly the work of our hands.” Come on! The Protocols was written by a Russian who sought to warn the world of Jewish tactics and intentions. Mostly very insightful – I have read most of it – but it was not written by a secret Jewish world government of elders.

        All this NW chapter gives as concrete evidence is the names of a couple of Jews involved in banking in France. And that is presented as evidence that the French Revolution was controlled by Jews!

        What, then, of all the other states where Jews were bankers, where revolutions did not take place? If the presence of Jewish bankers = Jews control politics, then it would seem these Jewish controllers wanted the monarchies intact, except in France.

        Actually, there was ambivalence toward the Jews among the Jacobins and Girondins. Especially the Jacobins from Alsace were vehemently opposed to Jewish emancipation, when Mirabeau and a couple of others argued in favor of it. The Jews were eventually emancipated, but several bankers in Bordeaux who had sided with the Girondins against the Jacobins were persecuted and fined severely. At other times wealthy Jews were attacked by the mobs and their leaders, just like they attacked anyone with money. Again, as I wrote above: hardly a uniform conspiracy, is it?

        With absolutely no proof the chapter in NW insinuates that the king’s minister of finance was a Jew, just because he came from Germany. Now this is funny: the highly popular Necker was not a revolutionary at all.

        The chapter also says that the Illuminati “was … behind freemasonry”. In fact, the short-lived Illuminati was only loosely connected to the much older Freemasonry, thanks to Baron Adolph von Knigge. (He was not a Jew)

        The whole chapter consists of loose assumptions, based on this logic: “Jews were behind the Illuminati, the Illuminati controlled the Freemasons, the Freemasons controlled the revolution.”

        The author even writes of Robespierre having a prominent position in a Parisian synagogue. Robespierre was vehemently anti-religion, and invented his own worship of Reason. There is no source anywhere that says Robespierre would be a member of a synagogue – and why should he, he wasn’t a Jew. This Nameless War author can’t even spell Robespierre; he writes it “Robes Pierre,” which is funny since in French it means “Female Dresses, Pierre.”

      23. jimbo Says:

        re: ‘Carpenter’

        what sort of ‘proof’ do you expect to exist concerning the connection between the Jews and the French Revolution any-way? The sort that would fulfil the common-law criteria of ‘beyond reasonable doubt’
        NO HISTORICAL EVIDENCE from 200+ yrs ago will fit THAT criteria.

        A large % of the population thinks that The Holohoax has been established beyond reasonable doubt
        Clearly, they are WRONG because this fraud is demonstratbly a scientific absurdity. The same applies to such incidents as 9/11.

        The world contains a mass of facts: those facts only become ‘evidence’ when they fit a particular hypothesis: that hypothesis only becomes a valid theory when it satisfies the Popperian criteria of: falsifiability, predicative power and testability/reproducibility. If it fails on any or ALL of those it is an INVALID THEORY.

        As such, it would seem that only current and repeatable phenomenon can meet such rigid strictures. For a recent historical event like The Holohoax or 9/11, the best that can be achieved is to show that the commonly touted explanations for those events are scientifically improbable or impossible and, thus, those explanations are invalid per se.

        To conclusively establish the rôle of the demon-kikes in such calamities as ‘The French Revolution’, argument by analogy is probably the best methodolgy possible. If one looks at their fairly-well attested rôle in events over the last 100yrs; say, for instance, in fermenting WWI & II, the disastrous ‘counter-cultural revolutions’ of the 1960s/1970s, the extortion of BILLIONS of $s from various Western guvmints on the basis of ‘a hoax’, their well-documented control of the Western media, their well-documented involvement in such disastrous social phenomenon as homosexuality, pornography, gun control, abortion, feminism, ‘easy divorce’ and globalism then it is not illogical to draw an inference to a probable conclusion and say that, on the balance of probabilities(the next ‘level of proof’ but one from ‘beyond reasonable doubt….and, in all likelihood, the BEST & ONLY criteria that can be used to accurately establish historical events) it is MORE LIKELY THAN NOT(and taking into account such ‘material’ as NW DOES provide….and also taking into account, for instance, the observations of Sir Walter Scott in his 9vlm ‘History of Napoeon’[good luck to any-one trying to locate THAT, BTW!] ) that the kikes were involved UP TO THEIR DIRTY, FILTHY NECKS!

        The Jews control all Western media, in case you didn’t know? Or don’t you think there is sufficient extant evidence to verify this?
        (and i use the term evidence here because this is something that can be verified right here, right NOW as we blog!)

        So: they’re not going to allow anything to come to light that’s gunna alert the great mass of the goyim to their filthy plans are they?

        The involvement of the kikes in the Russian Revolution, for instance, was only revealed because the likes of Anthony C Sutton un-covered numerous US diplomatic telegrams while laboriously sifting through the Library of Congress.

        To automatically dismiss the involvement of Jews in historical events both ignores current evidence and recent historical material that establishes this to a sufficient level of proof that would satisfy all but the most rigorous criteria. Bearing this in mind, the CORRECT REASONING SHOULD BE: “Most, if not all, detrimental socio-political/socio-economic phenomenon over the last few hundred years are attributable to the Jew. The French Revolution was just such a phenomenon. Ergo, The French Revolution is attributable to the Jew too(unless there is an overwhelming weight of material to the contrary)”
        “Cui bono?”
        “Jui bono”

      24. Carpenter Says:

        what sort of ‘proof’ do you expect to exist concerning the connection between the Jews and the French Revolution any-way?

        Ah. Just as I expected; after a long discussion where no evidence is presented, and where I alone go through the material offered, we see the “Believe or you’re a heretic!” argument. Complete with sarcasm: “The Jews control all Western media, in case you didn’t know? Or don’t you think there is sufficient extant evidence to verify this?”

        Gee, Jimbo, why do you think I’m here? Because I know Jews dominate U.S. media, and the media in many other Western nations. How do I know that? Because there is proof of it; the names of these Jews are well documented. Just like the names of the Jews involved in Bolshevism, and in other communist movements of the 19th and early 20th century, and Jews involved in the civil rights movement, and Jews in neoconnism. According to you, Jews won’t allow any such evidence of their involvement to exist. And yet, there it is. But not in the French Revolution.

        It would have been impossible to suppress information about Jewish dominance of the French Revolution, as it happened so long ago, and it would have been spread all over the White world long before the 20th century. French anti-Semites, living in the most anti-Semitic of all West European nations, would definitely have mentioned it over the last centuries – but reading Nationalist material from France (Yes, I speak French, unlike you I bet) I have found nothing pointing to Jews controlling the Revolution.

        The German National Socialists would surely also have mentioned it. But guess what? They didn’t. Because all the major players in the French Revolution were White. That’s right: Whites can, on occasion, act in ways that are anti-conservative and even anti-White.

        I tire of this. There is plenty to hold against the Jews, well-documented charges presented by men like Pierce. Jewish influence has been noted in numerous time periods and changes. That doesn’t mean we have to assume it’s everywhere or else be labeled heretics.

        I have gone through the material offered, because it is an important subject; took me a couple of hours. Something tells me you have not, Jimbo. Would take too long, wouldn’t it? You already have your beliefs ready to warm your heart, you don’t need no stinkin’ facts.

        And you finish your post with “Cui bono?” Gimme a break. That’s what the accuser always says when he has nothing to offer. Cui bono, let’s see … Britain, Austria, Spain, Prussia, Italy – all enemies of France. So according to your “cui bono”-logic, they were all behind the French Revolution. Right?

      25. Carpenter Says:

        In my last three posts above this one I present what I found when sifting through the sources offered, and I conclude that there is very little pointing to Jews controlling the French Revolution. Practically nothing, in fact. This should be contrasted with the many historical movements where we have extensive documentation of Jewish involvement.

        I also note that no prominent French Nationalist accuses Jews of having dominated the French Revolution. They would surely have known, since the Revolution is a major issue for French Nationalists.

        That is not to say that Jews did not benefit from the Revolution, as some of the revolutionaries eventually succeeded in their plans for Jewish emancipation.

        I believe this is all there is to say in this matter. Those who wish to see my analysis of the two offered sources can read the posts above. By all means, take your time to visit the links provided by Sehnsucht. Post, but post when you have read all the facts, or lack of such. But let us hear no more argument of this kind: “It was a revolution, so it’s gotta be Jewish.” By that logic, the American Revolution was Jewish too.

      26. jimbo Says:

        so saith ‘Carpenter’ (again!):
        *”Ah. Just as I expected; after a long discussion where no evidence is presented, and where I alone go through the material offered, we see the ‘Believe or you’re a heretic!’ argument”*

        whoa up there Cochise! The purpose of my post was not ‘evidence’ but to address how ‘historical material’ is interpreted
        (and, BTW, you conveniently mis-define ‘evidence’: for an event as far in the past as The French Revolution there can be NO evidence……only historical material of varying degrees of reliability which support a conclusion based on the balance of probabilities….EVIDENCE is something that can be used to test a theory in a laboratory!)

        *”Complete with sarcasm: ‘The Jews control all Western media, in case you didn’t know? Or don’t you think there is sufficient extant evidence to verify this?’ “*

        well now…..the ‘sarcasm’ is surely ‘in the eye of the beholder’?

        *”Gee, Jimbo, why do you think I’m here? Because I know Jews dominate US media, and the media in many other Western nations. How do I know that? Because there is proof of it; the names of these Jews are well documented”*

        And?….once again: this is something that can be demonstrated
        QED in the here and now. What happened or didn’t happen 250yrs or so ago cannot.

        *”Just like the names of the Jews involved in Bolshevism and in other communist movements of the 19th and early 20th century and Jews involved in the civil rights movement, and Jews in neoconnism. According to you, Jews won’t allow any such evidence of their involvement to exist. And yet, there it is. But not in the French Revolution”*

        now come on there…..if u read my post(and NOT READING stuff is what you are accusing me of, BTW!)…..you will read this: “The involvement of the kikes in the Russian Revolution, for instance, was only revealed because the likes of Anthony C Sutton un-covered numerous US diplomatic telegrams while laboriously sifting through the Library of Congress”
        So: firstly: such evidence was only exhumed after EXHAUSTIVE investigations by committed,determined and able people.
        Secondly, even post-WWI, the dissemination of information was a QUANTUM JUMP if not several QUANTUM JUMPS more advanced than during The French Revolution…..telephones, international telegraphy, mass circulation newspapers and books….&c &c….or are you trying to tell me that the yoos allowed such material to appear regularly in banner headlines all over the Western World? And, yet, people still had to DIG and DIG DEEP to un-cover it! For yoos ‘involved in the civil rights movement and neo-conism’ we HAVE ANOTHER quantum leap in information with television and the internet…..yr confusing two different time periods and two different issues….and: MY POINT STILL STANDS….yooish involvement in ‘the civil rights movement and neo-conism’ IS NOT SOMETHING that the great mass of white patriotards know or care to know. Believe it or not, those who know this are STILL a small minority…….perhaps less than 15% of the population.

        *”It would have been impossible to suppress information about Jewish dominance of the French Revolution, as it happened so long ago and it would have been spread all over the White world long before the 20th century. French anti-Semites, living in the most anti-Semitic of all West European nations, would definitely have mentioned it over the last centuries”*

        nonsense! the VERY FACT that it WAS so long ago means that there would be LITTLE or NO information on the rôle of the Jews extant. How could the information “have been spread all over the White world long before the 20th century” without THE MEANS to do so? Modern information technology is A MAJOR HEAD-ACHE for the Jew World Order. Their increasingly frantic efforts to ‘control’ the Internet clearly demonstrate that they are on a hiding to nothing here and that, like a greased pig, ‘the technology’ keeps getting away from them. People living in those far-off days had NO SUCH LUXURY…..in fact: the LITERACY RATE was probably @ or near to-day’s Turd World levels……somewhat less than ¼ of the adult population IF THAT!

        *”but reading Nationalist material from France (Yes, I speak French, unlike you I bet) I have found nothing pointing to Jews controlling the Revolution”*

        ‘nationalist material from France’?
        Hope yr not referring to publications originating from Le Pen’s organisation? Highly un-likely THEY’d be naming the KIKE….seeing as how they have kikes working for them…..as for any other orgs: they’re probably more concerned with getting EATEN ALIVE by Turd Worlders than worrying about what did or did not happen 250-odd yrs ago ….and…oh….BTW….“Yes, I speak French, unlike you I bet”….why don’t you finish emptying the ad-hom bucket there, boyo?!……”I read, un-like you i bet[!]”

        *”The German National Socialists would surely also have mentioned it. But guess what? They didn’t. Because all the major players in the French Revolution were White”*
        why should they? The Nazis were concerned primarily with their own situation(s) and they had enough to do just awakening people to the central rôle that the yoos were then playing in Talmudic World Bolshevism

        *”That’s right: Whites can, on occasion, act in ways that are anti-conservative and even anti-White”*
        it’s debatable….if they do so…..it’s because of the yoo……MacDonald’s books (books it might well behove YOU to read!) for instance say that the greatest current achievement of the yoos is to get modern Americans thinking, talking and acting like pseudo-kikes.

        *”I tire of this. There is plenty to hold against the Jews, well-documented charges presented by men like Pierce. Jewish influence has been noted in numerous time periods and changes. That doesn’t mean we have to assume it’s everywhere or else be labeled heretics”*

        another straw man!……..we only have to ‘assume’ that where there’s anything that adversely affects the White Race: then there lurks the kike…..’lance a social abscess’ and find….guess who?…..a yoo!

        *”I have gone through the material offered, because it is an important subject; took me a couple of hours. Something tells me you have not, Jimbo. Would take too long, wouldn’t it? You already have your beliefs ready to warm your heart, you don’t need no stinkin’ facts”*

        i’v read NW & similar stuff….by the standards of proof that one would expect for such distant events: for me: the material is sufficient

        *”And you finish your post with ‘Cui bono?’ Gimme a break. That’s what the accuser always says when he has nothing to offer. Cui bono, let’s see … Britain, Austria, Spain, Prussia, Italy – all enemies of France. So according to your ‘cui bono’-logic, they were all behind the French Revolution. Right?”*

        ‘Britain, Austria, Spain, Prussia, Italy – all enemies of France’…proves?….we can write the Brits off for a start….they were totally ‘kike-ised’ WAY BACK….do you deny that the yoos had penetrated most of the courts of Europe by the time of the French Revolution?…this contagion was released from their ghettoes well before these events….while it may some-times be ‘a logical fallacy’ to claim ‘post hoc ergo propter hoc’ in this case i think it is justified….
        and: ‘who gains?’: is a major plank in the modus operandi used by detectives world-wide: viz: ‘motive, means, opportunity’……or do you now want to claim THAT’s invalid too?

      27. Celtic Warrior Says:

        Gentlemen, let’s not engage in too much in-fighting! As White Nationalists we should concern ourselves with defeating the ENEMY by countering his tactics and upsetting his strategy. The past is prologue.

      28. Carpenter Says:

        Okay Jimbo, I’ll let you cool off for a while by not replying to all of that. I was going to, but it’s just you throwing out anything that comes to your mind, as cover for not having a shred of evidence to support your theory. Go ahead, call me a traitor for not believing exactly everything in history has been controlled by Jews as an article of faith. That belief will get you absolutely zero converts, whereas mine follows in the real WN tradition of finding out the truth, not guessing.

      29. jimbo Says:

        re: ‘Carpenter’

        i’m not interested in ‘winning’ an argument…..if u reckon u’v proved that the yoos weren’t involved in the FR in any significant way….the best of British luck to u! Most people @ VNN already know wot the yoos are like any-way…so it’s just gunna be ‘preaching to the converted’ as it were…..wot i was mainly trying to convey was the correct interpretation of facts and how that is subject to all kinds of misapprehensions and mistakes….no good having a lot of information if you can’t analyse and assess it properly! HOwever, i maintain that even NW’s stuff would be sufficient for a ‘conspiracy’ charge against the yoos to hold water in a US court to-day or even in most ‘Western’ countries especially when you consider the Talmudic nature of these so-called ‘anti-terror laws’; this is from the David Lane wb/st concerning his ‘conspiracy trial’ in a US court in the 1980s. David Lane was a member of the Bruders Schweigen or: The Order
        (and the current laws are much worse!)
        ****************************
        If your time in Federal court comes, it is imperative to know about the conspiracy laws. They are designed so there is no defence. The rules of evidence state that, in conspiracy trials, hearsay evidence in furtherance of the conspiracy is admissible, but hearsay not in furtherance of the conspiracy is not admissible. In other words, no defence is allowed. The way it works is this: The government blackmails, terrorizes or hires three degenerates to say you did it. Then under the rules of evidence the jury hears no other evidence. You may have told a hundred people you had nothing to do with the crime, as I did in the Berg killing, but that is not admissible. If you object, the judge will tell you that you will be chained and gagged or that you will watch your trial on TV from another room.
        The trial itself is more carefully orchestrated than a Shakespeare play. All evidence and testimony are decided in advance and the judge will tolerate no surprises. If there is any indication that effective defense evidence is forthcoming, the judge will immediately send the jury to another room while the details of the screwing you are getting are smoothed out. In addition, the judge is a highly skilled actor appearing firm but fair when the jury is in the courtroom, and becoming a tyrannical dictator the moment they are gone.

        The prosecutors have absolutely no shame in fabricating perjury and false evidence or in the methods employed to gain perjured testimony. Even the FBI experts from the crime lab will lie about voice prints, about fingerprints, about ballistics or whatever the prosecutor wants. Why should it surprise you that federal devils who will burn alive a church full of women and children while cheering for the “Real Texas Barbeque” will present false evidence in court? It is time you joined the real world. The Feds can
        create voices, handwriting, trick photos, perjury or invented evidence, and they do. If they want to get rid of you they will. You might use that knowledge to judge the veracity of some who claim the Feds are out to get them. If so, they would be got!

        ***************************

      30. Final Verdict Says:

        In a five-part series on the origins of the Jewish NWO, Kevin Strom claimed that the mass of evidence links Jewry to the French Revolution:

        The History and Significance of the New World Orde: Parts I to V
        http://www.natall.com/cgi-bin/audio.cgi?year=1996

        Yes, I’m aware that’s an argument by authority, but an interesting series of broadcasts, nevertheless.

      31. van helsing Says:

        The jews ran the bank of england back then too. The frogs tied up the British navy so reinforcements couldnt get to the Brit army (full of hessians, I might add, not only Afficans sell their progeny off) over here during the Revolutionary War (Or as the Brits call it, the Presbyterian War). Brits surrender, bank colonies lost (Dont worry the bank would send enforcers back in a few years.). Jews decide, fuck them French (I wonder if they put out an article like they did in 1933 re the Germans…). Less than a decade later, they pulled it off.

      32. Sehnsucht nach dem Reich Says:

        I will later post my reasons why I firmly bevlieve that the French Revolution was organized by Jewry. In the meantime I might post the chapter Juri Lina book, the correct title is In the Sign of the Scorpion, not the title I have given above. When all his assertions are true, then there can be little discussion about the strong Jewish influence on the Frensh revolution. For those who speak German I might recommend Wolfgang Eggerts Israels Geheimvatikan Volume One for further details of Jewish involvement in the French Revolution.

        Regards.

        The Illuminati’s First Coup d’Etat

        Adam Weishaupt also worked intensively as a member of the Masonic order Grand Orient to prepare a so-called revolution. (Nesta Webster, “The French Revolution”, London, 1919, pp. 20-21.) At the same time, the Illuminati had gained a secure footing in France. A Portuguese Jew, Martinez Paschalis, had formed Illuminati groups all over the country up to 1787. Count Honore Gabriel Riqueti de Mirabeau (alias Leonidas) became the most important Illuminati leader.

        Another important Illuminatus, the writer and publisher Johann Joachim Christoph Bode (1730-1793), alias Amelius, had travelled to Paris in the same year to organise the French revolution and to give the go-ahead signal for the rebellion two years later, according to Johannes Rogalla von Bieberstein’s book “Die These von der Verschworung 1776-1945″
        (Frankfurt am Main, 1978).

        As an Illuminatus, Bode had been successful in making contacts with other freemasons, also in Sweden. He published the first Masonic periodical during the years 1786-1789. He also took part in the Masonic convention in Wilhelmsbad in 1782.
        Weishaupt had earlier sent the Jew Giuseppe Balsamo (born 8th June 1743 in Palermo), who presented himself under the false title of Count Alessandro Cagliostro, to France so that the Illuminati would control the French Masonic orders. Cagliostro-Balsamo had been recruited in Frankfurt am Main in 1781. (“The Trail of the Serpent”, Hawthorne, California, 1936, p. 163.) One year earlier he had declared himself leader of the Egyptian freemasonry. Cagliostro also took part in the important
        Masonic congress in Paris on the 15th February 1785.
        Cagliostro was expelled from France in 1786 in connection with the “necklace affair”. He was jailed in Rome in 1789, after attempting to set up a Masonic lodge and was sentenced to life imprisonment. He died on the 26th August 1795.

        Rothschild’s most important lackey, Weishaupt, was also sent to Paris with unlimited funds to bribe capable men, organise a revolt and depose the king. A secret committee was set up at the Masonic convention in February 1785 to co-ordinate the actions of the revolution. It included Saint-Martin, Etrilla, Franz Anton Mesmer, Cagliostro, Mirabeau, Charles Maurice de Talleyrand (actually T. Perigord), Bode, Dahlberg, Baron de
        Gleichen, Lavater, Count Louis de Hesse, and representatives of the Grand Orient from Poland and Lithuania. (“The Trail of the Serpent”, p. 73.)

        Weishaupt always played a leading role at the Illuminati’s meetings in Paris. He invited thousands of murderers to Paris.
        Many lampoons against Queen Marie Antoinette began to circulate in Paris (Svenska Dagbladet, 27th September 1987). After this, leaflets were spread to incite the people to revolt. The aim of the freemasons was to dethrone the king. The propaganda machine was skilfully tended. Marie Antoinette became a symbol of all evil in the kingdom.

        These so-called revolutionaries, who worked to undermine the
        established order, were often young and many among them were Jews or reemasons, according to the historian Henrik Berggren, Ph. D. (Dagens Syheter, 20th January 1987, Berggren’s “The Grammar of the Revolution”). The three hundred men who seized power under the French Revolution were all Illuminati. (Gerald B. Winrod, “Adam Weishaupt – a
        Human Devil”, p. 37.) Marat and Robespierre officially belonged to a “revolutionary” organisation, The embittered. The Association of equals had also been active in Paris since 1786. This organisation had, in the same year, already decided where to imprison the “enemies of the people”.

        The revolutionary leaders Mirabeau, Garat, Robespierre, Marat, Danton, Desmoulins and many others were Illuminati, according to Gerald B. Winrod, “Adam Weishaupt – a Human Devil” (p. 36).

        According to Nesta Webster, Danton and Mirabeau were originally members of the Masonic lodge Les Amis Reunis (The Reunited Friends), upon which the Illuminati also put their mark. Louis Leon Saint-Just, called one of the fathers of totalitarianism, was also a freemason. The Illuminati took over the Jacobin clubs already in 1789. 152 of these clubs were active on the 10th August 1790, according to the Encyclo-
        paedia Britannica. The Jacobins had a centralised network over all France.

        The first club was taken over by Weishaupt’s close collaborators Bode and Baron de Busche. The Jacobin funds amounted to 30 million livres in 1791. Honest researchers have pointed out that the history of the Jacobins is in fact a part of the history of the Illuminati. We must not forget that one of Weishaupt’s titles was “Patriarch of the Jacobins”. The Jacobins also wore red caps, which they called “caps of liberty” or Jacobin caps.
        According to the still current propaganda, Louis XVI was a merciless and stupid tyrant. In actual fact, he was a kind, well-meaning person, a warmly religious family man and, besides, extremely clever and well-read, according to the French historian Eric Le Nabour’s biography of the king, “Le pouvoir et la fatalite” (“Power and Destiny”). He often read his encyclopaedias. Louis was so near-sighted that he had difficulty
        recognising people only a few yards away. He was a good locksmith and had a knowledge of mechanics, which surprised contemporary experts. He liked carpentry and woodwork. The king had no interest in the glamorous aspects of court life. Louis was 16 when he married the 14-year-old Marie Antoinette. He never travelled abroad.

        The Illuminati have managed to present as negative a picture of Louis XVI and his France as possible to the post-revolutionary world. It was not the extravagance and wasteful spending of the court that caused the enormous state deficit, but rather France’s support of the American Revolution. The costs of the war against England became astronomical. Louis XVI was the first head of state of the Old World to recognise this new
        republic. Gustavus III was the second. Louis XVI had reformed the judicial system, abolished torture in 1788, humanised the prisons and developed the health service. He paved the way
        for the fall of the monarchy through constant, small concessions to the freemasons and the Illuminati. The revolution was not organised in a destitute country, but in a flourishing nation. France’s exports had multiplied
        ten times during the century. Industry and agriculture had made great advances. The French network of more than 40 000 kilometres of stonepaved roads was admired by an amazed world. (Rene Sedillot, “Le cout de la Revolution francaise” / “The Cost of the French Revolution”, Paris,1986.)

        A presage of the catastrophe to come occurred almost exactly a year earlier, on the morning of the 13th July 1788, when a great storm swept across the country. In a few minutes, the temperature dropped 13 degrees, the sun was hidden and hailstones the size of a baby’s head swept over the
        richest farming country in the land – 900 000 hectares were affected, trees were uprooted, vineyards destroyed and harvests spoiled. Over a thousand villages suffered. Roofs blew off and church steeples were brought down.

        It was not long before the superstitious were proved right – it was a terrible sign of calamity and violent, sudden death. Neither was it a good sign that the price of bread began to rise day by day, hordes of beggars moved along the roads and over 100 000 destitute people found their way to Paris.

        Another bad omen was that the winter of 1788-1789 in France was extremely severe. The harbour of Marseille froze over. All traffic between Dover and Calais stopped. The mills iced over and could not grind flour, so that the shortage of bread became disastrous.

        This is why the populace could be incited to revolt. The riots went on throughout the winter. On the 1st of March 1789, the 19-year-old lieutenant Napoleon Bonaparte was sent to Dijon to crush a riot but he refused to take the king’s side. He chose to go over to the revolutionaries.

        Dark Illuminati forces fomented the riots in the French countryside. The debts owed on the state deficit consumed half of the French budget. All this money found its way into the hands of profiteering Jewish money-lenders. All of these factors were exploited. The time to strike had come for the conspirators, who had united the Jacobin clubs.

        As a kind of prelude, Mirabeau called in the Estates-General on May 5th 1789, just after the thirteenth anniversary of the Illuminati’s founding.

        Marx described Mirabeau as the “lion of the revolution”.
        At the beginning of the revolution, there were 282 Masonic lodges in France, of which 266 were controlled by the Illuminati, according to Nesta Webster (“World Revolution”, London, 1921, p. 28). It was these same groups which organised all the riots and troubles.

        On the 13th of July 1789, at 11 o’clock, the conspirators gathered at the church of Prix Saint-Antoine where they set up a revolutionary committee and discussed how to organise the revolutionary militia. Dufour from the Grand Orient chaired the meeting. Even the fall of the Bastille was planned by these freemasons, according to Gustave Bord’s testimony. (V.
        Ivanov, “The Secrets of Freemasonry”, Moscow, 1992, p. 120.)

        On the following day, July 14th, people were incited to head for the Bastille fortress with axes in their hands. Contrary to what the Illuminati’s myths say about it, there was no storming and capture of the Bastille. It simply capitulated to the threats of four freemasons. In this way the Bastille was taken. Actually, it was quite meaningless to take the Bastille – the authorities had already decided to demolish it to build a housing area.

        Not a single political prisoner was found in the Bastille. There were only seven people incarcerated there. Four of these were infamous frauds and forgers. The young Comte des Solages had been imprisoned at his father’s bidding since he had committed serious offences (incest). Two of the Bastille inmates were mentally ill; one of these was an Irishman with a three foot long beard who claimed to be God himself.

        The revolutionaries continued to mislead the people by showing them a printing press, which they claimed, was an instrument of torture. They also asscrted that an old suit of armour had been used as a straitjacket for refractory prisoners.

        Actually, the prisoners had had it fairly easy. They had their own
        furniture and were allowed to wear their normal clothes. They were also served several courses for dinner. The dungeons had been used to store wine. The warders had been decent, and visits from friends and relatives had frequently been allowed. The library was of a high standard. The daily walks in the little garden of the Bastille had been pleasant.
        T
        he freemasons, headed by Camille Desmoulins, agitated the people more and more intensively with shouts of “Down with the Bastille!” The tumult cost 83 attackers their lives. Another 73 were injured, of which 15 later died of their injuries (Svenska Dagbladet, 25th June 1989). Earlier, the liberal governor had even invited the freemasons’ messenger to dinner!
        He was tortured and killed by the crowd. His head was cut off and carried in triumph on a pole through Paris. Afterwards, three officers were murdered and two invalids were hanged.

        The “revolutionaries” waved their red flags. Afterwards, agents of the freemasons were sent out across the country. Their main task was to foster panic simultaneously in most of the provinces. During this summer of famine, they began to spread lies in different cities and villages about the roaming bands of beggars and unemployed, calling them bandits and arsonists who killed women and children. They also lied about an impending attack by the Germans and the English. Within 36 hours these evil rumours had reached the great masses
        around the country and created an enormous panic on the 22nd of July.

        The leaflets appeared to be official declarations. They would read: “By order of his Majesty, the burning of all castles and the hanging of anyone who opposes this is allowed from the 1st August until the 1st November.”

        People were taken in by these lies. The peasants took up arms. They attacked and plundered manors and castles. They burned terriers and other documents and thereby also burned their own history.

        Behind the idea of the “Day of Terror” was the freemason Adrien Dupont, who wanted to exploit the people as much as he could for “revoutionary” reasons, according to Nesta Webster (“World Revolution”, London, 1921, pp. 31-32). To speed up their own seizure of power, the freemasons checked any attempted reforms.

        The National Assembly was moved into an old manege on the Rue de Rivoli in October 1789. The radicals sat to the left of the chairman, the conservatives to the right. Hence the Illuminati created left and right as ideological concepts in world politics. Everything that had to do with the left was thereafter considered progressive since it was true Illuminism.

        The murders began under Rothschild’s red banner and the Illuminist slogans: “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity!” and “Freedom or Death!” In Lyon the “enemies of the people” were shot down with cannons, in Nantes, following the slaughter of 500 children, 144 seamstresses were drowned in old barges on the Loire River. Their “crime”: they had sewn shirts for the army. People were executed without trial, despite the ostensible
        introduction of so-called revolutionary tribunals in September 1789. One of the judges presiding at these tribunals was the perverted Marquis Donatien Alphonse Francois de Sade, who had been brought straight from a mental hospital. De Sade was responsible for giving the concept “sadism” a name. He also died in a mental hospital.

        The Illuminist coup in France brought none of the improvements that corrupt historians try to make us believe in; instead it resulted in an orgy of violence and intrigue.

        To make the killing more efficient, the “revolutionaries” began using the guillotine in April 1792. The idea originally came from Joseph-Ignace Guillotin, a professor in anatomy. The doctor and freemason Antoine Louis constructed the killing machine. The record of Henri Samson, the chief executioner, was 21 heads in 38 minutes. The real reign of terror, however, began on the 10th of August 1792, which was a Yahweh day, when the monarchy was abolished and the Paris commune was established. The commune leadership included 288 Illu-
        minati headed by Chaumette, Danton and Robespierre. The leaders of the Jacobins and especially of the Enraged (Les Enrages) wanted to destroy all who had shown any misgivings about the “revolution”. Georges Jacques Danton, infamous as a rogue, became minister of justice. He wanted every
        suspect imprisoned. Many priests and relatives of emigrants were also incarcerated. In this way the leaders of the revolution gained access to enormous assets. Danton himself became incredibly rich. Earlier, he had taken large bribes from those wishing to save their lives. In the beginning of September 1792, Danton encouraged the mobs to massacre the “enemies of the people”. In Paris alone, 2800 people were murdered
        between the 2nd and 4th of September, according to the historian Nesta Webster. Among the victims of this bloodbath was a friend of the queen, Princess de Lamballe, who was attacked in the street and hacked to pieces.

        Every aristocrat was automatically guilty, but only those who
        threatened the Jacobins’ position perished. The Jacobins had begun to shut the Masonic lodges – they had played their part. In 1794 there were only 12 lodges left, those most useful to the Illuminati. The king’s cousin, the Duke of Orleans, who had begun to call himself Philippe Egalite (equality)
        was also guillotined despite having renounced his title and in 1792 leaving his position as Grand Master of the Grand Orient which he had held for 20 years since the founding of the Order. He knew too much about the preparations for the revolution. He had worked with the Jacobins in the hope that he might be allowed to take the throne as a constitutional monarch.
        Philippe Egalite explained why he left the Grand Orient in the
        following manner: “…I no longer know who belongs to the Grand Orient. Therefore, I believe that the Republic should no longer allow any secret societies. I no longer want to have anything to do with the Grand Orient and Masonic meetings.” The Illuminati could not forgive this and exacted their revenge upon him, despite the fact that his vote had been decisive in the
        process of deposing the king.

        Nothing was said about guilty peasants and workers but it was mainly they who suffered from the “revolutionary” punishments. Marat wanted 100 000 people guillotined to scare the enemies of the “revolution”. Saint-Just promised in the name of the republic to eliminate all adversaries. The Jacobins’ (Illuminati’s) terrorism claimed 300 000 human lives, according to Nesta Webster (“World Revolution”, London, 1921, p. 47). The
        historian Rene Sedillot, in his book “The Cost of the French Revolution”, calculates that the “revolution”, on account of the terrorism and the civil war, claimed at least 600 000 victims. Charlotte Corday murdered the powerful and bloodthirsty freemason Marat on the 13th of July 1793.

        Less than one in ten of those guillotined were aristocrats. This was revealed just before the 200th anniversary of the revolution. This information is based on the protocols of the revolutionary tribunals, which include the names of all those executed. Nine per cent of the decapitated “enemies of the people” were nobles, 28 per cent peasants and 30 per cent
        workers. The rest were servants. (Dagens Nyheter, 1st July 1989.) In other words, those killed were quite ordinary people.

        In Paris alone, 30 people were executed every day. The Jacobin executioners usually preferred blonde victims.

        In 1903, Lenin proclaimed: “A Russian social democrat must be a
        Jacobin.”

        This was just the beginning. After the “revolution” came the wars. The Jacobins explained in their inflammatory speeches how “a war would be ablessing for the nation. The worst thing that could happen to us now would be if we did not get a war”. On the 20th of April 1792, France declared war on Austria. After that, Belgium, Holland and parts of Germany were invaded. All those wars claimed two million lives. All of France’s 27 million inhabitants were made to suffer from this madness.
        With the help of French “revolutionary” troops, the Republic or Commune of Mainz, Germany, was proclaimed on the 18th of March, 1793.

        The 18th of March had a special significance for the Illuminist conspirators. On the same day in 1314, the Jewish Grand Master of the Knights Templar, Jacques de Molay, was burned at the stake. Because of this,some of the more important Illuminati actions were planned for just this day, as a kind of revenge for his execution. Revolts were organised to
        break out on the 18th of March, 1848, in several European countries. A coup was staged in Paris on this day (1871) after which the Illuminati proclaimed the Paris Commune. Thanks to the efforts of the Prussian army, the snake-pit in Mainz was liquidated only four months later – on the 23rd of July 1793. Goethe accompanied the Prussian army as early as
        1792 in its campaign against the “lawless Frenchmen”. (Dagens Nyheter, 4th of February 1989.) On the 17th of January 1795, a revolutionary “sister-state” was founded in the Netherlands – the republic of Batavia, where Amsterdam became the capital. Napoleon oversaw the conversion of this state into the king-
        dom of Holland in 1806.

        Jewish “revolutionaries” immediately saw to it that the Jews received full citizenship and so that they had their hands free to act. Maximilien Marie Isidore Robespierre (1758-1794) published a work entitled “To Protect the Political Rights of the Jews” as early as in 1789. Protection of Jewish rights was obviously considered the main priority. Louis Joseph Marchand, friend of Napoleon Bonaparte, wrote in 1895 that Robespierre was actually a Jew by the name of Ruban from Alsace (“In Napoleon’s
        Shadow,” San Francisco, 1998).

        The slogan which best summed up the Jacobins’ aims was: “All power to the bourgeoisie!” (the Illuminati). And the power certainly became centralised in France, according to Leo Gershoy, “The Era of the French Revolution 1789-1799″ (New York, 1957, p. 41).

        Everything that was non-essential was suddenly presented as essential. However, the Buddhist work Dhammapada (11-12) says of this: Those who take the non-real for the real
        and the real for the non-real and thus fall victims to erroneous notions never reach the essence of reality.
        Having realised the essential as the essential and the non-essential as the non-essential, they by thus following correct thinking attain the essential.
        Illuminist Jews saw to it that everything that was good about France was destroyed during the “revolution”. What was good disappeared at the same rate that the evil grew. The road network was allowed to fall into disrepair, overseas trade ceased almost entirely and it took until 1809 for the industrial production to reach its pre-Revolutionary levels again,
        according to the historian Rene Sedillot (“Le cout de la Revolution francaise” / “The Cost of the French Revolution”).

        Many villages were razed to the ground, churches and castles were destroyed on purpose. The cultural heritage was ravaged, including medieval buildings. The largest Romanesque architectural structure, the 10th century abbey in Cluny, was
        destroyed. Only one tower remains today. Those barbarians even began to tear down the Papal Palace in Avignon. The steeple on the Notre-Dame of Paris was considered offensively tall and was torn down.

        At the same time, the “revolutionaries” began to plunder castles of their art treasures. The Jewish writer Anatole France described in his book “The Thirsty Gods” how inspectors with tricolour ribbons around their collars began to turn up at the homes of the wealthy to search for riches.

        Delighted foreign art dealers bought sculptures and fragments of frescoes. Load after load of confiscated art collections were shipped over the English Channel. The “revolution” was lucrative for the Illuminati and the speculators. All of this was repeated during and after the so-called Russian revolution. The mighty finance dynasty of the Rothschilds was born out of
        the French “revolution”. The Rothschilds are still in control behind the scenes today, especially within the European Union.

        The government reached a deficit that made the pre-Revolutionary debts seem quite modest in comparison. The debt equalled 800 tons of gold, or 40 per cent of the total gold production of the world during the entire 18th century.
        The real losers in the “revolution” were the Illuminati’s tools – the
        simple people. The land rights of the small peasants were taken away. The church charities ceased abruptly and any attempt at improving the conditions for loan-takers was regarded as a conspiracy against the state.
        The ranks of derelicts swelled. During Napoleon’s days one in five
        Parisians lived by begging.

        The myth maintains that this was done to throw off the yoke of tyranny and to protect human rights. In actual fact, the Illuministic reign of terror abolished human rights altogether. It became forbidden for workers to organise and strike for better conditions. This prohibition was legislated on the 14th of June 1791. (Etienne Martin-Saint-Leon, “Les deux C.G.T.,
        syndicalisme et communisme”, Paris, 1923, p. 7.)

        The theatres were given free rein at the beginning, but later the actors began to be punished for undesirable productions. The Academy of Art was closed and anyone who wanted could call himself an artist. Anyone was allowed to be a doctor and to mix medicines, which had a very negative effect on the state of general health in France – but then, maybe this was the intention?

        The 21st of January 1793, the Jewish chief executioner and freemason, Samson, and Samson’s son Henry executed Louis XVI. Samson said: “Louis, son of the holy one, rise up to heaven!” The execution of the king was celebrated every year until Napoleon’s coup in Bruimare (November) 1799. (Dagens Nyheter, 25th January 1989.) Even the word “roi” (king)
        was abolished. Marie Antoinette was executed on the 16th of October (Yahweh’s Doomsday) in 1793.

        The young Hungarian philosopher Ferenc Feher, Lukacs’s disciple,
        living in New York, claimed in 1989 that Louis XVI was judged on
        political, not judicial, grounds. Because of this, he ascertained that it was terrorism, not democracy that was introduced. Feher believed that what was built up after the French revolution was simply unfounded lawlessness. (Expressen, 21st of August 1989.) The playwright Eugene Ionesco observed in 1990 that this revolution was a big mistake, which led
        to the spread of the most terrible false doctrine in history.

        The Illuminati wanted to completely politicise society. This was the job of the “insinuating brothers” under the name of the “Committee of National Security ” with its chief Chauvelin. At the same time, society was being undermined through the secret lodges, which began to prepare a dictatorship and a world revolution, which was intended to utterly overthrow the social order. This world revolution was designed to be
        accomplished by a handful of Illuminist conductors. (Svenska Dagbladet, 16th August 1989.) The homosexual Robespierre was publicly regarded as a tyrant or dictator.

        The new rulers demanded that the populace address all as “citizens”. The year was to begin upon a new day, the months were renamed, and the week became a 10-day period. An hour consisted of 100 minutes. All these idiocies were abolished by Napoleon in 1806.

        The peasants in the Vendee province had had enough of all this
        “revolutionary” stupidity: their king had been murdered, schooling had been abolished, their oldest sons had all been enrolled into the army. On the 10th of March 1793, they rebelled. At the beginning they were quite successful but when the Jacobins realised that the populace was beginning
        to threaten their position, they imposed their dictatorship, which began on the 31st of May 1793, and lasted until March 1794. The terrorism during that period was the worst yet seen. Virtually rampaging marauders murdered everyone in the province of Vendee. Only 12 000 people in the whole province survived the assaults. One general reported to Paris:
        “Vendee has ceased to exist.” Another wrote that his band of army raiders daily managed to kill 2000 people. A new rebellion went on during the years 1794-95. In total, 600000 lives were extinguished in the Vendee province. In their struggle for power, some “revolutionaries” even happened to execute each other. Some leaders, above all those who wanted to limit the
        extent of the terrorism, were done away with (Georges Danton, Camille Desmoulins and other Dantonites went to the guillotine on the 5th of April 1794 as “enemies of the people”). This awful end also awaited Robespierre. On the 27th of July 1794, the leader of the Jacobins was arrested together with other leading Communards (his brother Augustin, Saint-Just and Georges Gouthon) and was guillotined without trial. The reign of
        terror was over. The directors dissolved the Paris Commune on the 26th of October 1795.

        The famous French historian Urbain Gohier revealed in his book “The Old France” (1922) how a certain speech, which Robespierre held for two hours at the convention on the 26th of July 1794, had meant his end. He condemned all the eager foreign agents who tried to direct the development of commerce in France too intensively and demanded that those
        agents be rendered harmless. On the following day he was arrested together with his brother, Saint-Just and Georges Gouthon. All of them were executed without trial on the 28th of July. This speech has been left out of the official version of events. Officially, the “revolutionaries” justified their craving for power as “moral”, but the people were forced to
        be “virtuous” and to change their minds.

        These experiences were exploited later in Russia when the Illuminati, who called themselves Bolsheviks, paid homage to the men responsible for this revolutionary terrorism: a statue of Robespierre (Ruban), whose family had immigrated to France from Ireland, was erected and a massive armoured cruiser (as well as several factories) were given the name Marat
        (actually Mosessohn).

        What have Jewish ideologues said about this “revolution” in France? Archives Israelites admitted very ambiguously on the 6th of June 1889: “The French Revolution has a very expressive Hebraic character.”
        The aim of this new politics, pursued for the people’s (the Illuminati’s) own best, was indubitably totalitarian (Svenska Dagbladet, 14th March 1989). Later, the question arose whether this conspiracy to overthrow the church and the state had begun somewhere in Germany (Svenska Dag-
        bladet, 16th august 1989). Other states now sought to defend themselves against Illuminism. The Turks dismissed suggestions from Russia to take a joint action against France.
        Gustavus III was also prepared to send 16 000 Swedish soldiers to help forge a European alliance to crush the French Revolution. He banned the Marseillaise in Sweden. Because of this, the earlier decision to murder the king was carried out. On the 16th of March 1792, Gustavus III was fatally wounded at a masked ball by the freemason Jakob Johan Anckarstrom.
        The king had been warned about possible assassination attempts but had not taken these warnings seriously. A bust of Anckarstrom stands in the lodge chamber of the Grand Orient in Paris. In 1818 the freemasons put one of their agents from France on the Swedish throne – Jean Baptiste
        Bernadotte.

      33. jimbo Says:

        re: Sehnsucht nach dem Reich

        yes…i’v read Lina’s book. Unfortunately, most of his citations are from the Swedish or German and, hence, difficult to find and yet more difficult to read if yr not conversant. From memory, it was Lina who mentioned the (now almost impossible to obtain!) Sir Walter Scott 9-vlm ‘Napoleon’ biog` as containing the accnts of bands of kikes armed to the teeth swarming around the country-side and inciting, if not implementing, all kinds of atrocities (and not just against ‘the aristos’ as is commonly believed….most of those had already fled to England or else-where). If u were white and weren’t favoured by the self-chosen then you were a TARGET period…..as per: Russia 1917-

        I don’t have the book to hand @ the moment as i’v leant it to a WCOTC reverend. When he’s finished, i may re-read the relevant parts……..what-ever!

        Actually, while i’m @ it [!] Wilmot Robertson’s Dispossessed Majority ALSO makes note of the jewish influence on the FR; although he metions it mainly in the context of the ‘anti-white’ character of most of these so-called ‘revolutions’.
        “Although the French Revolution is supposed to be the prototype of the modern class war, it might be profitable to heed what a leading British literary journal had to say about Restif de la Bretonne, whose eye-witness accounts of Paris in the hey-day of the Terror provide an almost inexhaustible store-house of back-ground material for historians…..
        ‘There are hints in Restif too of a class racialism, of the fears felt by the bourgeois and by the artisan for the pale men with dark ill-kempt hair, piercing eyes and shaggy mustaches…His canaille is always dark and glowering……The respectable, the men of property, the virtuous craftsmen, are fair and have good complexions….Restif dwells on Charlotte Corday’s essential innocence, for she is blonde and Norman. In the 1780s, the population of Paris…..was still pre-dominantly fair. In the 1790s, Royalist pamphleteers make much of the fact that the terrorists tended to be dark and from the Mediterranean area: Marat, in particular, served their purpose in this repect. And, so, too Restif’s massacreurs would almost inevitably be depicted as men of the South’ ”
        [seems like there's MORE THAN A HINT of yoo there to me!]
        (from: The Dispossessed Majority
        by: Wilmot Robertson, 1981 rvsd edtn, Howard Allen pblshrs[chptr XXV: 'The Biology of Revolution'] and: quoting from: The Times Literary Supplement; Octbr 27, 1961)
        for an event as far in the past as the FR, anecdotal accounts and ‘personal diaries’ are probably the best yr gunna get in the way of ‘evidence’. I still maintain, however, that this stuff would sway a modern jury as per our Talmudic ‘anti-terror’ laws.

      34. Sehnsucht nach dem Reich Says:

        Jimbo, I don´t think Lina mentions Scott´s book; I have it in an electronic version, so I could check it out. But Captain Ramsay to whose book I linked above does mention this strange book, whose fate is a perfect example of Jewish censorship in the old days.

        Ramsay summarizes some points of Scott. Carpenter, I appreciate that you have read the material I have recommended. But it was the most uncharitable reading I could imagine. So for those who didn´t bother to read the stuff so far I want to say that the authors are much better than the “summaries” of Carpenter suggest.

      35. Final Verdict Says:

        Question for all:

        Is it just me, or do many modern French have distinctly Hebraic phenotypes? Here’s one example of a “French” grandmaster:

        http://chessbase.com/news/2006/kouatly01.jpg

      36. Carpenter Says:

        Sadly you are right, Final Verdict. Though, we’re talking South French here. There is a difference, even though they are becoming more common.

      37. Carpenter Says:

        Jimbo says:

        [seems like there’s MORE THAN A HINT of yoo there to me!]

        It is an open statement about the South French being swarthier Mediterraneans. And as the north was always wealthier, and more peaceful, it is not strange that the poorer and more hot-tempered southerners would make up many of the revolutionaries. Interesting, I had never read an account about that before.

        Most people @ VNN already know wot the yoos are like any-way…so it’s just gunna be ‘preaching to the converted’ as it were…..

        See, here’s the problem: you think that if I say there’s no Jewish domination in a course of events, then I’m saying something positive about the Jews. They simply have to be found guilty any time a charge comes up, is what that line of thought leads to.

        That’s not new: many people of all kinds of ideologies reason that way about their enemies. Me, I say that kind of thinking only hurts us. We look very bad if we choose to believe in every single accusation, without investigation.

        Now, you say there’s enough circumstancial evidence, despite the fact that the history of the Revolution doesn’t show us a single Jew among the leaders – compare that to:

        the Bolsheviks
        the Frankfurtians
        U.S. television networks
        U.S. newspapers
        the Communist Party USA
        the civil rights movement
        Hollywood
        the neocons
        the Boasians
        organized crime

        In all these instances we see Jews in leading positions. We don’t have to guess, their names are right there for all to see. There’s no hiding it.

        But you are saying that the French Revolution would break the pattern? That it would be a Jew-led thing like the rest of these, while unlike the rest of these there’s not a single visible Jew leader. Why would the names of the Jews be erased in this case only?

      38. Carpenter Says:

        Sehnsucht, with uncharitable I think you mean I was looking for the same things I’m always looking for, the things that Rockwell and Pierce and Oliver and others have provided in the movements where Jews are involved: names of the major Jews involved, and accounts of what they did.

        There is no doubt that Nesta Webster is only talking about the Freemasons. (and again, she even mentions that the lodges in question are perverted, as politics and religion, she writes, were normally forbidden topics in Freemasonry.) She does not say that the Freemasons would be controlled by Jews. She only says that many of their symbols came from the early Cabala, many centuries back, and she speculates in how those symbols could have been imported (like, through the Templars). Not even in regard to the symbols does she speak of any active Jewish involvement, except, possibly she says, a Jewish friend of Cromwell.

        You have to agree that this is correct: Nesta Webster speaks of Freemason lodges in the French Revolution, not Jews. On this we can agree, right?

        As for the chapter in the book, its proof is that the Protocols of Zion says “we were behind it.” That is no proof, since the Protocols, though mostly insightful about Jewish ways, was written by a Russian. It’s not heresy for me to say so: leading WNs have said the same thing, like Pierce. I thought that point was settled.

        If there is anything else in those sources you would like to bring up, do so. If there was Jewish leadership in the French Revolution I want to know. I admit it would give me a sort of satisfaction, knowing that such heinous acts could not have been initiated by Whites acting on their own. Alas, that seems to be the case here though.

      39. jimbo Says:

        ‘Carpenter:’
        Sehnsucht, with uncharitable I think you mean I was looking for the same things I’m always looking for, the things that Rockwell and Pierce and Oliver and others have provided in the movements where Jews are involved: names of the major Jews involved, and accounts of what they did

        Ain’t that TOO BIG an ASK?
        The kike rôle in the RR, for instance, was only un-covered after the most meticulous and rigorous investigation by committed, determined and intelligent people. And then: those revelations never got to be ‘bruited’ around in the mass media. Even to-day, nearly 100yrs afterwards, it’ll be a cold day in HELL before you’d see such dis-closures on the public record.
        (i believe that any-one asking for Lina’s book in the JewSA @ regular-type book-stores is met with stunned panic attacks verging on hysteria. for me, that sez it ALL!)

      40. Sehnsucht nach dem Reich Says:

        I will post tomorrow the reasons which I deem conclusive that the French Revolution was a Jewish production from start to finish.

        Regards

      41. apollonian Says:

        “Carpenter” Put Sadly To Shame By Means Of Scholarship
        (Apollonian, 31 May 06)

        Thanks much to “Sehnsucht nach dem Reich” (“SndR,” for short), above, for that tremendous posting of 27 May–what brilliance, what magnificent scholarship. “Carpenter” why can’t u begin to emulate SndR, u crass, creeping, lowlife? SndR, u really make VNN shine not only for white patriots, but for all scholars and humanity, including non-white gentiles who clamor for freedom fm Judaic yoke, yes indeed.

        Again, Jews are demonstrated as THE leading bank-scam artists, featuring “fractional-reserve” money and banking which their own Jew, Bernard Lazare (“Antisemitism”), admits they’ve controlled since 14th cent. as I pt. out in above post. Ck G.Edward Griffin’s “Creature From Jekyll Island” for definitive exposition on such Fed-scam.

        And note Carpenter, thou thick-skulled troglodyte, all those problems preceding French Rev. were NOT CAUSED BY “JEWS-MEDIA.” Rather, banking, finance, and money is at the bottom of it all, culture-wise, for practical, concrete purposes. The only thing more fundamental to such cultural analysis would then be the abstract qualities having to do with why and how humans fool themselves in hubris, making themselves subject to the Jew fraud and insanity. But Jew insanity works like disease-of-opportunity upon an already hubris-stricken weakling, mired in subjectivism, narcissism, MAMMON, etc.

        Hence history, esp. ancient, stagnated by means of Jew fraud and doublethink thence come face-to-face with Aryan, Greek logic which was staggered by the assault until 4th century AD when Saint Constantine the Great won such a shattering cultural victory over the Jew, who then devised the devilish Talmud.

        In mid-7th century the Jews came back with Islam but still suffered regional defeats, esp. 1492 in Spain when they were decisively expelled. Jews then migrated, as to England and Holland, then especially to the Ottoman empire, making ready the French Revolution. Note Jew banking is always on rise–as long as there’s warfare, as Jew banking is founded upon gentile rulers’ need to raise funds for evermore war.

        CONCLUSION: Thus Jews help fuel and lubricate the war system by which humanity, esp. Western, keeps its population numbers in Darwinian check. Jews truly fulfill grim socio-biologic purpose, their effect upon civilization quite CYCLIC (Spengler) in manifestation. Thanks again to “SndR,” above, who provides most tremendous info for all patriots and scholars, unfortunately lost upon such troglodytes as Carpenter. Honest elections and death to the Fed. (Incidentally, note my essays are now back up at NewNation.org, under “commentary” heading.) Apollonian

      42. jimbo Says:

        follow ‘the money trail’ and find…..guess what?…..a KIKE

      43. Sehnsucht nach dem Reich Says:

        Yesterday I made the rather bold statement that I will provide conclusive reasons for the thesis that the French Revolution was a Jewish production from start to finish, well today I have to show my cards, here are my humble thoughts on that matter. I will give ten reasons, which I deem altogether conclusive for my strong thesis. I think, one reason should be enough for us, especially reason eight, but well, Carpenter was rather stubborn, so I will give reasons from very different perspectives. In the few days since the topic was brought up I couldn’t unearth new material, of course. To see the Jewish origin the French Revolution it wasn’t necessary to discover for example a missing link between the Bavarian Illuminati and the Jacobins. And it wasn’t necessary either to make sensational claims who was a Jew or not. All my reasons are more or less a product of common sense:

        Reason One: The French Revolution is celebrated in France today although it was as a bloody mess which every decent white man must be disgusted at when he is fairly familiar with the general outlook of the event. As Carpenter said, the French Revolution consited of “heinous acts”. But he can´t explain, why this “heinous acts” are celebrated and are used in the self-identification of modern France. As far as I am informed, national holidays in France today celebrates a symbolic event in the French revolution the so-called storm of the Bastille. In 1989 there was a real frenzy celebrating the 200th anniversary of this event. Before I became Jew-wise I couldn´t understand why one should celebrate such a carnage of innocent men and woman, a event where nothing noble is apparent, where the slogans were empty phrases, where pornography, sexual perversion, mob-rule, broken promises, chaos, female blood thirst, plundering, chaos, charlatanry, genocide (Vendee) ruled supreme. Now I can understand it easily. The Jews are exterminators (read the Old Testament with open eyes) and always have been. So their religious holidays celebrate carnages of Non-Jews (Purim etc.) It is obvious that the Jews have the French in a death grip since the Dreyfus affair, with the short interruption of Vichy France. So it is obvious for me now that the ruling Jews in France are celebrating the carnage of Non-Jews in the French Revolution, when they are celebrating national holiday.

        Reason Two: Jews themselves sometimes admit that they were behind the French Revolution. Juri Lina cites the admission of the Archives Israelites in 1889. Disraeli admitted it, Rankowski did it in “Red Symphony” Marcus bragged about it in “You Gentiles”. Why should they do it? And Carpenter, I would like to add the Protocols of Zion as well, because I don´t find the ruling of corrupt court in a corrupt country (Switzerland) very convincing. I deem it much more plausible that the Protocols are written down by a Jew who knew the program of his fellow tribesmen than by a prophetic Slav, although the Slavs had some prophetic minds, Dostojewski for example. When I think the Protocols are written by a Jew in the know I share here the opinion of Revilo Oliver and George Lincoln Rockwell, which you, Carpenter, deem as a musters of scholarship (I like them too, btw). But let´s not argue about this, the first sources should be enough to bring my point home.

        Reason Three: In general Jews try to hide their role in the French revolution. The censorship of the only group of people who has the power to censor on all levels effectively can be seen in the case of Walter Scott’s La Vie de Napoleon, as Jimbo has pointed out. In the Britannica-Edition I have this work of Scott is not mentioned. Ramsay pointed out his difficulties to find an edition, because the Jews have a long practice of book burning, as Revilo Oliver has pointed out repeatedly. How can a work of a famous author disappear out of his bibliography? The only plausible answer is that the Jews know that Scott is right about the heavy Jewish involvement in the French Revolution and they don´t want the public to know the truth. The same thing the Jews tried to do with their involvement in the Russian revolution (With the advent of the internet the Jews had to change their tactics a bit, of course, to undermine the force of this reason three). This reason three might seems to contradict reason two. But this contradiction is only apparent. It serves the Jews sometimes for their political purposes to stir up the Now-Jews with a little bit of anti-semitism (think of the pamphlets of the British agent Trebisch-Lincoln during the republic of Weimar). And not all Jews are always under control (think of the Harold Rosenthal interview, for which he got killed after his amazing confessions). In general the Jews try to hide their involvement in the French Revolution, but sometimes they let a bit of their knowledge out, albeit in very general, unspecific terms. If you cite the admissions of the Jews, then you are called an “anti-semite”, of course.

        Reason Four: Race played during the carnage a mayor role when the victims were chosen. As Revilo Oliver has pointed out the French Revolution has primarily diminished the Nordic population of France. Juri Lina says that most victims were blonde. Now only one out of ten Frenchman is blond, before the French revolution the majority of the French were blond.

        Jews are the most race-conscious race on earth. And they always hated the Nordic Aryans. As I am myself blond and blue-eyed and met some Jews during my official “education” I know this quite well. You can only understand the racial targeting during the French revolution when the Jews called the shots.

        When Disraeli confessed that the whole secret of history is race, he probably meant that the political ideologies are only smoke and mirrors of the Jews, to befuddle the non-Nordic Goyim to participate in the slaughter of the targeted group of non-Jews (in most cases members of the Nordic race).

        Carpenter, you are a victim of this smoke and mirror, when you repeat common wisdom, that Voltaire was a major influence on the Revolution (btw. you forgot to mention Rousseau and Montesquieu, of whom your professors certainly told you as well.) I think the influence of the Talmud was greater: Even the best goyim must be killed.

        The French aristocracy was in the main Nordic. The racial targeting of the aristocrats could be concealed by the ideologies. But as Juri Lina and many others have pointed many of the victims were farmers and craftsmen. In most histories these victims are left out, because they point to the fact that their murderers were Jews who didn´t care for their ideologies. It was the same in Russia and it will be probably be the same in the United States very soon.

        The racial aspect of the revolution is obvious in Haiti, which was a French colony and which had its little imitation of the revolution in the motherland. Here all the whites were killed. Stoddard writes about this in his book The French Revolution in Haiti. Who stirred up the negroes? Is it far-fetched to suppose that the Jews over there did just this, probably descendants of the slave handlers? I think not.

        The citizens France has now completely changed. A former Nordic, Germanic nation has turned to a Mediterranean nation. This change was not only done by the French Revolution, but also by the Jew loving freemason Napoleon, by the Jew Clemenceau in the first world war, by the Jew loving freemason De Gaulle (the so called “purge” after the second world war, in which one million French disappeared as so-called “collaborators” at the hand of the Jews operated on similar principals of racial targeting).
        John Nugent has written a valuable essay in the Barnes Review, which you can read online. There he describes the change as follows:

        “The major German tribe to settle (and endure for centuries) in France was the Franks (hence Frankfurt, Franconia in Germany)…In records of Napoleon’s military draft, 50 percent of French recruits had blue eyes. After he killed most of them, and Sicilians rushed in to replace them, then World War I happened, and Sicilians, Portuguese and Spanish replaced those casualties; the French are now 80 percent brown-eyed.”
        I can´t understand that white nationalist look hopefully to France. I think this country can´t be a source of hope for us any more, and the other Mediterranean countries can´t either. It annoys me that white nationalist claim out of ignorance that the grass is greener in the neighbour’s garden when it is obviously often even more rotten.

        Probably the racial properties of the French will decline further, as the French get darker and darker. And soon France we be even darker when the Arabs and Africans in France will kill off the Mediterranean Whites. A rerun of the events in Haiti seems to await the French.

        I might add as an afterthought that the ideologies of the French Revolution, which were smoke and mirrors to conceal the racial targeting are still in the world befuddling the stupid Non-Jews. The French Revolution is the origin of the Left and the Right as labels in the political discussion whereby the Left gets through Jewish media conditioning somehow the flavour of being the progressive and that means ultimately winning. In the history since the French Revolution the Jews were always on the left and they were winning. Now we are in the situation that the Jews have to create a fake right (the neocons) to maintain the fake dualism.

        Reason Five: In the French Revolution you can detect symbols which point to the Jewish “religion”. I don’t know whether the Jews have certain “magical” knowledge or whether they a superstitious tribe, fact is that the Jews choose certain dates when they have the freedom to decide. For example they chose the religious holiday of Purim as the day to start the ongoing war in Iraq. They chose the religious holiday of Purim to hang some of the heroes of the Third Reich. They chose the Day of Atonement on the two greatest Wall Street crashes. When Juri Lina points out that crucial events of the French Revolution happened on days, which have only religious significance for the Jews, one has to conclude that the Jews were in control of the whole event.

        There is another peculiarity none seems to have mention. As everyone knows the beheading became a mass sport during the French revolution. But as only a few might know, the Talmud asks for the beheading of so-called idolaters, and for the Jews Christians are idolaters (for more details read the excellent article of Carol Valentine about the Noahide Laws, which every man curious about the immediate future should read).

        http://www.public-action.com/christmas.html

        Btw. I can´t understand why the Noahide laws are seldom discussed here at VNN, the implementation of Noahide laws seem imminent, as certain declarations of the US-President and the UNO seem to indicate.

        When Juri Lina shows that the master of ceremonies of the beheadings was a Jew this is no surprise.

        Reason Six: Christian churches were destroyed not synagogues. Similarities with the Jewish Revolution in Russia come to mind. Read certain passages in the Talmud about Christ and his followers and you will understand. One has to admit it is tempting to become Christian when you see how the Christians were hated by the Jews. The sparing of the synagogues can only be explained when behind the demolitions of the Christian churches was not Atheism but Judaism.

        Btw. Rankowski says in “Red Symphony” that the Palais´ of the Jewish banking families, for example the huge Palais of the Rothschild familiy were spared by the Jews. Could it be that the leaders of the mob were Jews?

        Reason Seven: The mob tactics and mechanism of political control you see at work at the French Revolution have the clear handwriting of the Jews.

        I think this is a very central point and the discussion of reason seven must be rather lengthy and complex. And much of the discussion between Jimbo and Carpenter revolves around this reason. I will side here Jimbo who made some valuable epistemological points.

        We all know from the present that Jews operate well hidden from behind the scenes and the hire puppets to do the dirty work. Think of how well hidden is the Jewish role in 911 and how much more befuddled we would be without the work of Christopher Bollyn and Eric Hufschmid, who. As Jimbo pointed out, it takes committed, determined and able man to unearth the material. But Ramsay was such a man and he stood on the shoulders of men like Scott, Robison and others. The same holds true for Juri Lina. When I read their rendering of the historical events I see the Jewish handwriting in the mob tactics and the mechanism of political control.

        Of course Ramsay and Lina have to take a different epistemological stance as Bollyn and Hufschmid, because the event they analyse happened long ago. They use their structural knowledge of other revolutions in their search for evidence of Jewish involvement during the French Revolution. That’s a legitimate epistemological stance, as long as they present such evidence, which they do.

        Ramsay makes his epistemological stance clear with the following words:
        “A new phenomenon then appeared before the world. Never before had a mob apparently organized successful revolution against all other classes in the state, under high sounding, but quite nonsensical slogans, and with methods bearing not a trace of the principles enshrined in those slogans…With this knowledge [of the Jewish role in it] we shall find we possess a master key to the intricate happenings of the French Revolution. The somewhat confused picture of characters and events moving across the screen, which our history books have shown us, will suddenly become a concerted and connected human drama. When we begin to draw parallels between France of 1789, Britain of 1640, Russia of 1917, Germany and Hungary of 1918-19, and Spain of 1936, we shall feel that drama grip us with a new and personal sense of reality”.

        Carpenter, when I said that your reading was “uncharitable” I meant that you pretended that Ramsay had not delivered evidence for his thesis that the mob tactics and the mechanism of political control showed the typical Jewish modi operandi. Ramsay´s assertion that the Protocols brag about the Jewish role in the French Revolution and his assertion that Necker was a Jew, were rather minor points, and btw. I think Ramsay made those minor points with good reason. The central pieces of argument in the recommended chapter of The Nameless War were Ramsay´s analysis of the political control behind the scenes through money control, the role Jewish pornographers played in stirring up the mob, and the Jewish organization of a trigger event, namely of the famous necklace affair and of the role the Jew Caliostro played therein. All pieces of evidence Carpenter hasn’t mentioned at all!

        I will here shortly categorize the evidence for reason seven:

        As everybody should know (read Lazare) the Jews controlled the finances in Europe even in the 18th century. Money control is necessary to bring about the financial crisis, which is a prerequisite of a revolution. And Ramsay explains how Jews brought about such a crisis in France.

        We all should know from the present situation that with the financial control you can control politics from behind the scenes. The so-called leaders become mainly puppets, when they are in the death grip of public and private dept. Ramsay shows that during the initial phase of the French Revolution the politicians were such puppets. He names the Jewish bankers Duke D´Orleons and Mirabeau, who both were heavily indebted.

        From the Russian Revolution and other Revolutions we know that crypto-jews played important roles. Juri Lina says that Robespierre and Marat were in fact crypo-jews. Lina gives his sources, but it is obvious that in world of lies and deceit such sources can always be doubted. Walter Scott says the same, when he says that the Jacobins were mainly “foreigners” and when he speaks of the “Sanhedrin of the Jacobins”. And unsurprisingly when these men get the power thing get really bloody. That fits perfectly. (Btw The Sowjetunion honored the leaders of the Jacobins, eg. a battleship was called Marad (Stuka-Ace drowed).

        The Jews have to pick or create the group of persons they want to use as a mob to intimidate, rob and kill the enemies of the Jews during the revolution.

        How the Jews have created the mob in Russia has Julius Evola written in an excellent article, which you can read here.

        http://thompkins_cariou.tripod.com/id52.html

        I have not read a sociological analysis of the mob during the French Revolution. I guess Jimbo is right when he suggests that it consisted mainly of the proletariat of Mediterranean descent. Ramsay cites Scott when he speaks of the “sudden appearance of strong bands of armed hooligans, who march on Paris from Lyons and Marseilles; and are recorded as being obviously foreigners”.

        In France it was necessary to destabilize the proletariat psychologically. Ramsay seems to be right when he asserts that pornography played an essential part in this destabilization. How pornography can be put to use in politics is the theme of a book written by Dr. E. Michael Jones who deals with the French Revolution as well. To understand the political force of pornography one has to read Platon´s Gorgias where the point is made that a man who is the slave of his desires is basically a slave regardless of his social position. (It is hard to understand why the Jews who are rather horny themselves are immune to enslaving effect of intemperateness. One is tempted to say that their demonic nature makes them immune).

        If one has to name one exclusively Jewish profession, pornographer would certainly be a correct answer. And the Jews not only to make money from pornography but also use it to weaken their host. And Ramsay shows that pornography before and during the French Revolution was in the hands of the Jews, one of the, namely the author of Liaisons Dangereuses, de Laclos, is still famous today, with the little help of the Jews of Hollywood.

        The Jews are masters of trigger events to sick the mob on their target. Think of 911, Pearl Harbour etc. During the Russian revolution the trigger event was the shooting at the winter palace. Read what Juri Lina has to say about this event.

        During the French Revolution one trigger event to sick the proletariat on the wife of the king, a German princess, was the necklace affair. And guess what, a Jew played a decicive role therein, namely Caliostro, who had direct connections to the Jew Weishaupt. Ramsay mentions other trigger events organized by Jews.

        An important part of the trigger event is the media control, and, guess what, the Jews played a major role as pamphleteers during the French Revolution.

        I could go on and on. For me the mob tactics and the mechanism of political control during the French Revolution point to the Jews.

        I will admit that we don´t have a complete picture of how the Jews organized the mob during the French revolution. But we have never a complete picture, neither of the present, nor the past. Jimbo explained, why it is no surprise, that the picture of the French Revolution is rather sketchy in comparison to the picture of the Russian revolution. But I maintain that we have enough evidence to assert beyond reasonable doubt, that the Jews organized the French Revolution.

        Carpenter, you have argued against my thesis that conspiring Jews organized the French revolution, with the argument, that the events in France were too complex for being the result of a conspiracy. This argument is not valid, because conspiracies have to deal with the complexity of reality. Often conspiracies fail, even Jewish conspiracies. So the attempted revolutions in Germany 1848 and 1918/8 failed although there can be no doubt that the movers of these events had been conspiring Jews. And the revolution in Russia, which was also undoubtly the product of conspiring Jews, was rather complicated also. When you look at the structure of the French and the Russian revolution you can´t deny certain similarities. First there is a soft revolution, then there comes the bloodthirsty tyranny and chaos, then everybody is happy with a strong dictator appears with effective policing method, who restores order and let the Jews unharmed and in their wealth and political power behind the scenes.

        Reason Eight: Jews not the French profited from the French Revolution. I am generally not a great fan of people who think they have shown their mental superiority when they have asked in Latin “Cui bono”. These people insinuate that always events enfold as they were planned. That is clearly not the case. On the other hand often they do. The Jews profited immensely from the revolution. The revolution brought them the so-called “emancipation”, which brought even worse results than the “emancipation” of women. It was like letting the tigers out of their cages. Napoleon was an integral part of the French Revolution; he spread this “emancipation” throughout Europe. On the relations of Napoleon and the Jews you might find this article interesting.

        http://www.napoleon-series.org/ins/weider/c_jews.html

        And for his misdeed Napoleon is predictably hailed in our schools, remember your teacher blather about the “modern” and “progressive” Code Napoleon. The final stone of this process was the congress in Vienna, which would deserve a detailed analysis from the perspective of white nationalism. As the power of France destroyed and Germany still in the shackles of the peace of Westphalia of 1648 it would seem the net result of this French revolution was the Jewish Empire with the center in London, and more precisely the Jewish dominated City of London (read Knuth`s Empire and the City for more details). After the French Revolution most monarchs were only puppets in the hands of the family of Rothschild. But this is a theme, which might be discussed, in another thread.

        But the Jews profited not only politically, they profited materially as well. The Jewish dominated revolutions are unsurprisingly also large-scale wealth transfers in the form a large-scale robberies. And the hapless countries, which are afflicted with such revolutions, lose their treasures quickly, because the perpetrating Jews don´t know for sure, how things might evolve. London was the secure haven into where the treasures of the French Revolution were funnelled. During the Jewish Revolution in Russia the meanwhile establishes Second Jewish Empire, the USA, which are ruled from the Jewish dominated Wall Street, was another secure haven besides London. I am not only sure that most robbed treasures of the French revolution ended up in the hand of Jews, I am also sure that the whole infrastructure for the mass scale plundering was staffed by Jews who have always dominated the art-trading. Lina mentions this aspect of the French revolution, he elaboration on it more when he deals with the Russian revolution in his valuable book. But I would be grateful for more details on this subject.

        Reason Nine: The Masonic loges played a big part in the French revolution and the Masonic lodges have always been dominated by Jews. Reason ten was elaborated by Nesta Webster. And many other books have been written about the connection between Jewry and freemasonry on the one hand, and freemasonry and the French revolution on the other hand. The books of Wichtl, Ludendorff, de Poncin etc. come to mind. So I won´t go into details here.

        But there were also books of contemporaries about the influence of freemasonry on the events of the French Revolution. The Abbe de Barruel has written a book with dealt with the influence of freemasonry „Memoires pour servir a l’histoire de Jacobinisme“ (Paris 1798).

        Freemasonry played also a major part in the Jewish Revolution in Russia, as Juri Lina makes quite clear. I would suppose that freemasonry was more essential in the Jewish Revolution in France, because in the Russian Revolution the conspiring Jews could rely on a mass of hating Jews. I think that might be the most important difference between the two revolutions, which were in many respects similar.

        Jews, who are themselves organized in Masonic loges, are today eager to shift the blame for our plight on freemasonry. So they write books about Skull and Bones and the Illuminati, but never about B´nai Brith. Freemasonry is still an important force, but it is also the fall-guy in the ongoing third Jewish revolution.

        An interesting question is whether the freemasons have real secrets, which allow them to be agents of change. An alternative explanation would be psychological and sociological, and would declare that people in secret societies are more determined, have less scruples etc. And if you are an atheist these psychological and sociological peculiarities would finally reduce to biological peculiarities. The question whether freemasonry has some kind of “magic” secrets or operates on the biological peculiarities of human beings is quite similar to the above-mentioned question whether the Jews are satanic or superstitious. I have no clear answers to these questions, which are finally metaphysical questions. But they must be answered when we are really determined to let the ongoing third Jewish revolution fail. I think most people at VNN don´t want to deal with these questions. But they should consider whether their Jewish education makes them reluctant to deal with them. If Newton and Darwin are the great heroes, as we are told at our schools, then we have no room for these questions. One should consider that most whites today are today characterized by utter madness, at least concerning the big picture. I often ask myself why most of our people are so crazy, that they are the best dupes of the Jews, even better ones as the negroes. I know the orthodox view at VNN is, that whites are too idealistic and the Jewish media are used to deflect the idealism to the benefit of the Jews, but I am not sure whether this is the whole answer. If you read Michael Hoffman´s interesting book about Masonic Psychological Warfare you might think that there is more behind the mind control of the masses and the role of trigger events thereby.

        Reason Ten: The official picture of the French Revolution is completely falsified. Compare Lina´s account of the storm of the Bastille with what are you are told about this event at school, or with the account the Jews give the French when they force them to celebrate their national holidays. The masters of the big lie in action, so it would seem. In similar manner crucial events of the Russian revolution were completely falsified (read Lina for more details). The whole off-topic discussion was brought up because even a white nationalist (O´Farell) bought an old lie, namely the famous fake-dictum by Marie Antoinette. Could it be that the old lies are still in circulation, because descendants of that group who invented them are still in charge and control the media? I would say yes. You can say the same about the old lies about the Third Reich.

        Ok, those were my reasons, why the French Revolution was a Jewish production.

        There is vague feeling in everyone that the French Revolution is very significant and nobody can say on what this feeling is grounded. I think all here at VNN would share that assessment that an understanding of the Jewish role would explain this vague feeling, because we all know how big is the Jewish role in the world today and how big in was during the 20th century.

        The French Revolution must be considered as a turning point in history. It seems that he French Revolution was the first of three planned great Jewish Revolutions. It established the City of London as Jewish powerhouse with old-fashioned means of domination. The second was the Russian Revolution. It established Wall Street as Jewish powerhouse of an even greater Empire. And the third is in the making. It is planned to establish the temple of Jerusalem as powerhouse of a global empire with openly tyrannical means of domination.

      44. jimbo Says:

        re: Sehnsucht nach dem Reich

        “During the Russian revolution the trigger event was the shooting at the winter palace. Read what Juri Lina has to say about this event”

        it’s a year or so since i read Lina’s book and, as stated previously, my copy is currently on loan. Does this refer to an incident during the actual October 1917/St Petersburg ‘putsch’ or to the (in)famous 1905 ‘massacre’? If i recall Lina correctly, that particular incident involved the Tsar’s ‘palace guard’ returning fire @ Jew snipers ensonced in trees in a near-by park who were shooting not only the few dozen ‘protestors’ but also @ the police and military.

        The resulting casualties(wholly and solely attributable to the yoos!) are what constitutes the myth of the 1905 ‘massacre’.

        The tragedy is that this Hymie horse-shit is still taught to the yoo-befuddled-goyim of the (je)West and largely believed!

        As for the ‘predicted’ third revolution of the yoos: more and more white people are waking up to these goblins because of the internet but will it be enough and will it be soon enough?

        One thing i think is for sure, though: the internet was a WILDCARD that the yoos had not foreseen and it has caused them ALL SORTS OF PROBLEMS…hence: their frantic efforts to shut it down/curtail it/censor it/whatever by all sorts of crazy accusations and innuendos.

        However, even if it was SHUT DOWN TO-MORROW, there are still MANY MORE WHITE PEOPLE aware of them then, say, even as recently as 20yrs ago….at the VERY LEAST: this may well ‘force’ their hands into acting before they are 100% prepared.

        And, of course, that sort of hasty, precipitious action can lead to failure! “the hasty stroke oft goes astray.”

        Sehnsucht nach dem Reich: awesome post, BTW!

      45. SHMUELY Says:

        This is becoming a very interesting thread. I wonder what Edouard Drumont has to say about the subject in his famous study, LA FRANCE JUIVE? He does cover the subject in chapters 2 & 3, including ‘La Kabbale’ and ‘Le grand Sanhedrin’. To my knowledge, this book has never been translated into English, and it certainly should. Alfred Rosenberg also studied the subject and wrote about it in his published anthologies, as well as in the NS MONATSHEFTE, of August, 1939. There are also articles on the subject in the multi volume periodicals, FORSCHUNGEN über das JUDENTUM, and WELTKAMPF=die JUDENFRAGE in GESCHICHTE und GEGENWART. These German language publications were done by university scholars during the Third Reich, and most have yet to ever be translated into English, in whole.

        There is clearly a lot of translating and scholarly research yet to be done

      46. Celtic Warrior Says:

        Gentlemen, your collective erudition is most interesting!
        Can anyone shed some light on the suicide, probable murder, of crown prince Rudolf von Habsburg and his mistress at Mayerling near Vienna in 1889.
        I suspect another jewish conspiracy is awaiting discovery.

      47. van helsing Says:

        Not to mention the murder of Diesel, whose engine designs runs on just about anything.

        But we have to use petrol…

      48. Mati The Estonian Says:

        Its kind of old tread but I will post anyway ;)
        So much attention to mr Lina so it will me proud to be his countrymen …
        And “Sehnsucht nach dem Reich” as made very nice comments and totally
        on point – You should concider you own website for this good information.
        I just want do add few links I found to add those exellent post here.
        GOD speed.

        http://judicial-inc.biz/1_master_supreme.htm

        http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm

      49. dfg Says:

        机票查询 深圳机票 深圳打折机票 深圳特价机票 打折机票预订 机票预定 特价机票预订 飞机票查询

      Leave a Reply

      You may use the following HTML tags in your comments.

      <a abbr acronym b blockquote cite code del em i q strike strong>