16 December, 2006

Studying the Would-Be Architects of the New World Order

Posted by alex in economy, globalization, New World Order at 3:28 pm | Permanent Link

[Globalization has been taught in American schools for decades. Despite what the prof says, globalization is a net negative for Whites. Globalization = dollar first, race last. Cheap goods and cheap people is not as good as dear goods and dear people. The people realize this, but the interests of the transnational elite, dominated and led by jews, today dominate the peoples’ interests. The U.S., for example, has absolutely no interest in linking its future with Mexico, a failed nation full of genetic detritus.]

North American Union leader says merger just crisis away

Leading intellectual force behind effort toward EU-style unity looks at future

By Jerome R. Corsi

Robert Pastor, a leading intellectual force in the move to create an EU-style North American Community, told WND he believes a new 9/11 crisis could be the catalyst to merge the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

Pastor, a professor at American University, says that in such a case the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP – launched in 2005 by the heads of the three countries at a summit in Waco, Texas – could be developed into a continental union, complete with a new currency, the amero, that would replace the U.S. dollar just as the euro has replaced the national currencies of Europe.

In May 2005, Pastor was co-chairman the Council on Foreign Relations task force that produced a report entitled “Toward a North American Community,” which he has claimed is the blueprint behind the SSP declared by President Bush, Mexico’s then=President Vicente Fox, and Canada’s then-Prime Minister Paul Martin.

At American University in Washington, D.C., Pastor directs the Center for North American Studies where he teaches a course entitled “North America: A Union, A Community, or Just Three Nations?” As WND previously has reported, Pastor is on the board of the North American Forum on Integration, the NAFI, a non-profit organization that annually holds a mock trilateral parliament for 100 selected students drawn from 10 universities in the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

Pastor had published an interview in Spanish in the Oct. 24 issue of Poder y Negocios. He told the magazine crises can force decisions that otherwise would not be made.

“The 9/11 crisis made Canada and the United States redefine the protection of their borders,” Pastor explained. “The debt crisis in Mexico forced the government to adapt a new economic model. The crises oblige the governments to make difficult decisions.”

This was the first time WND had found a major intellectual leader behind the push to integrate North America suggesting that a crisis of 9-11 proportions might be just what was needed to advance the process toward establishing a North American Union and the amero. [That’s very interesting indeed. PNAC, the conference of 25 “American” Likudnik jews, called for a “New Pearl Harbor” just before it happened. The Establishment calls its shots, in effect daring you to do something about it.] WND reached Pastor in his office at American University and conducted a telephone interview to make sure the Spanish publication accurately reflected his views.

He affirmed the Spanish interview represents his thinking.

“What I’m saying is that a crisis is an event which can force democratic governments to make difficult decisions like those that will be required to create a North American Community,” he said. “It’s not that I want another 9/11 crisis, but having a crisis would force decisions that otherwise might not get made.” [Translation: if we have to slaughter a few thousand cattle to stampede the herd in the right direction, we’ll do it.]

Pastor noted, for example that “Europeans, facing the crisis of two World Wars, turned to the European Community as a means to prevent war and advance their economic interests.”

“The United States turned to the Marshall Plan when faced with the crisis of Western Europe falling into the hands of communism,” he said. “So, I’m not advocating, or encouraging, or wanting a crisis, I’m only saying that in order to take important initiatives, sometimes one manner in which this occurs is when there is a crisis to which leaders need to respond.”

Pastor told WND he lamented that the leadership of the three North American countries is not positioned to make the type of tough decisions needed to advance a North American Community agenda.

In his interview with Poder y Negocios, he argued, “Canada has a minority government and Mexico will soon have a minority government that will be confronted with what amounts to an uprising that we hope will be peaceful. The United States has a lame duck president whose principle preoccupation is the war in Iraq and instability in the Middle East.”

Pastor further told WND Mexico’s Fox made a tactical mistake by laying out an overly ambitious agenda to integrate with the United States.

“President Bush then took on the issue of illegal immigration, and it proved to be much more difficult than anticipated,” he said. In the absence of strong North American leadership, is a crisis the way greater North American integration can be expected to happen?

“There are alternatives to a crisis for getting a major decision adopted by the president and by the congress,” Pastor responded. “But what I am saying is that we lack the kind of North American leadership we need. Our founding fathers created a system of governance that was not designed to be efficient but was designed to protect freedom. Therefore, you created checks and balances that did protect freedom but also made it difficult to move forward on important issues.”

Pastor was asked what North American leaders would need to do to move toward integration.

“We need to form a customs union to move North American integration to a new level,” Pastor argued. “A customs union would eliminate rules of origin on the border and agree to a common external tariff. This would not be easy but not as difficult as NAFTA was, and it would lead to efficiencies in our economies and in the end contribute to a better standard of living for all parties.”

Pastor also called for a North American Investment Fund to invest in Mexico’s infrastructure.

“If we had a North American Investment Fund,” Pastor explained, “over the long term, you would narrow the income gap between Mexico and the U.S.”

[And why would we want to do that? For those of you who didn’t major in International Relations, the above is North-South bs. North-South is the view that the rich north owes something to the poor south, and this disparity is the cause of the South being poor and backwards. It’s just more anti-White bullshit aimed at extracting dollars from your pocket and putting them in Hymie’s and Pedro’s. Pastor’s ilk does not believe in nations, it belives in the New World Order. Of course, at the same time it has no problems with ‘minorities’ overrunning and remaking White culture while retaining their own disgusting identities. Any kind of NWO plan essentially posits muds as eternal teenagers – full freedom, no responsibility. And Whites as the opposite – no freedom, full responsibility. Sound like a good deal to you? Of course not. What you and I need is a White America, in which we continue to build our own distinct subrace of White people.]

WND previously reported Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, dropped his support for legislation (S. 3622) he introduced in the 109th Congress to create a North American Investment Fund after WND pointed out the proposed law would advance an important part of Pastor’s agenda to create a North American Community.

Pastor was careful to distinguish that his proposals were designed to create a North American Community and that he never has proposed to create a North American Union as an EU-style regional government.

“What I am recommending is a series of functional steps that are more than incremental,” Pastor admitted. “Each of the proposals I have laid out represent more than just small steps. But it doesn’t represent a leap toward a North American Union, or even to some confederation of any kind. I don’t think either is plausible, necessary, or even helpful to contemplate at this stage.”

The idea seems to be to put new structures in place that change the look of the landscape. WND pointed out to Pastor that this step-by-step approach is the same approach taken to create the European Union. The memoirs of Jean Monnet, regarded as the architect of European unity, finally disclosed he had used a strategy of deceit, knowing his plan to form a European Union would never succeed if it were openly disclosed.

Pastor was asked if he thought a North American Union was a bad idea.

“No,” he replied. “I don’t think a political union of North America is an inherently bad idea, nor do I think it is a good idea for North America right now. I teach a course at American University in which I look at the different options for political integration of North America, and I put the options before the students.”

Then why is a North American Union a bad idea right now?

“The reason the political integration is not a good idea at this stage now, perhaps never, is because of people like yourself who immediately begin to fear that their sense of America could disappear,” Pastor responded. “Somehow, if you’re fearful that America’s sovereignty will disappear, you won’t even take small steps forward. You just get mired in the status quo. The problem is that the world is moving very rapidly, and you can’t stay competitive if you don’t move.” [Typical progressive bullshit. Melding America with Mexico is regressive not progressive. Well, insane is a better term. What you middle-class parents need to understand is that Pastor’s ideas are what you’re paying to have your kid taught if he’s studying liberal arts. You’re paying your enemy to indoctrinate your child against your family, nation, and race’s interests. Now that is insane.]

Pastor did not reject the idea that a North American Union could form, but only after further continental economic integration and the development of a North American Community in which people are able to think as citizens of North America. [Regressives always want people to be loyal to increasingly distant abstractions, rather than kin and nation.]

Is China the winner in the NAFTA super-corridors being planned for North America?

“If you define trade in zero-sum terms, China may be the winner in the transportation corridors,” Pastor conceded. “But even in zero-sum terms, consumers benefit from the increasing imports that give them more choice and give them more quality. In the final analysis, we are all consumers.”

Pastor affirmed he favors globalism.

“I believe,” he explained to WND, “that globalization is a net plus for the world economy, for the middle class, and for all people.”


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 08/29/06 New World Order: NAFTA Superhighway from Mex to Can through US 52% similar
  3. 08/15/07 The Amero: New Money for a New Society 36% similar
  4. 09/23/09 The New World Order 31% similar
  5. 06/28/18 Jews: the People of the New World Order 31% similar
  6. 09/12/18 The New World Order: It Ends Sovereignty 30% similar
  7. 4 Responses to “Studying the Would-Be Architects of the New World Order”

    1. Robert Says:

      Does anybody else here see a convergence of events happening?

      The erosion of the founding principles of America, combined with it’s planned financial and demographic destruction leading to the creation of the North American Union, complete with the total control of Big Brother through the most advanced “surveillance society” government the industrialized world has ever seen.

      The truth about the Jewish occupied government’s complicity in the 911 attacks becoming more mainstream everyday, pressuring the Jewish establishment to designate Israel as the scapegoat for the world’s current jewish problems, Including: 911, the Iraq invasion, and the destruction of America. The first steps of the Jewish media’s approval of the current attacks on the Jewish State are illustrated through the world attention to the recent media coverage of the Iranian Holocaust conference.

      If you look at the jewish prophetical writings in the bible and see them, not as prophecies per say, but as blueprints for world domination, then you can see how they will use the “Endtime” religious themes to control and dominate the masses in the coming years after the collapse.

      Will the ultimate financial and political solution be:

      A) the destruction of the Jewish State of “Israel”, bringing the illusion of peace to the middle east and the illustration of illusory justice to the wicked Jews, “who start all the wars in the world” and

      B) the destruction of the Jewish controlled USA bringing an end to US/Jewish imperialism and peace to the rest of the world leaving China as the emerging Super-power capable of managing and organizing the Rise of the North American Union?

      Most people know the Zionist goal of relocating all the world’s Jews to their Jewish homeland has been a farce from the beginning. The jewish state of israel is just a strategic satelite, a decoy, and a heat-sink, used by the Jews to deflect attention from the rest of the world’s Jews in postitions of control and power in every other country on the face of the planet.

      The question is, when all is said and done, with Israel and America:

      Will the Jews continue to live as they always have, Parasites to the wealthy and powerful Nations of the World?

    2. pseudo-doc Says:

      The question for me is:

      Will White Nationalists continue to believe in collapse/destruction/apocalypse to console themselves?

      Nations today are not destroyed. Even Germany was not destroyed. Jews will always be riding high, talking low, playing the middle, while negroes and the rest keep breeding a brown storm and we continue to lose ourselves.

    3. Beast Says:

      We’re all one little suitcase nuke in flyover away from Gulag USSA.

      Keep your power dry and don’t let the spooks disappear you.

      Best bible verse I ever read: For I beheld a jew riding a nigger and hell followed with him.

      Death to Israel, death to the Jews, who have gotten quite adept at committing acts of terror and blaming others to stir up trouble. Rat fink mf’s that they are.

    4. bryan o'driscoll Says:

      Re pseudo-doc:
      I agree that we tend to look towards an apocalyptic future as a possible way out of our present plight. I don’t think that many of us realise how terrible such a situation would actually be. However, I disagree with you that it could not happen and that nations could not be destroyed. For instance, I firmly believe that there will not be a United States fifty years from now; in other words that nation will be destroyed. More than likely its destruction will result from internal conflict and break down rather than from external attack, although it could well be a combination. In the past nations have been destroyed. For example, the Mongols totally destroyed a number of nations and peoples. They simply wiped them out. The Bysantine Christian civilization and most of its people which existed over five hundred years ago in Asia Minor and along the eastern Mediterranean coast is almost completely extinct.
      It’s true that no modern nation state has been totally destroyed, yet. Russia and Germany were partially destroyed and are quite different than before 1914 and 1939 respectively, but they still exist. Nevertheless, because it hasn’t happened recently doesn’t mean that it can’t or won’t. A catastrophic combination of economic, military and environmental disasters could change our world out of all recognition. As different from today as today is from fifteen thousand years ago. Our era of civilizations is just a blip in time, and the age of the jew is just a blip in that era. The jew is too destructive and malevolent a parasite to successfully adapt and prevail continuously. He will pass too during the period when there is no civilization to feed on. The jew and our civilization will only be a faint memory twenty thousand years from now. The most important thing is that our race survive in some way, shape or form through the coming ages so that it can spread out across the stars in the distant future.