7 December, 2008

Professor Charles Weinblatt, University of Toledo

Posted by Socrates in Bradley R. Smith, Holocaust, holocaust racket, Socrates at 10:37 pm | Permanent Link

by Bradley R. Smith: [Here].


  • 13 Responses to “Professor Charles Weinblatt, University of Toledo”

    1. jim donaldson Says:
      7 December, 2008 at 11:11 pm

      “Professor Weinblatt writes: “People are imprisoned in some European nations for questioning the Holocaust in order to prevent another Holocaust. …””

      Of course. Because once eveyone realized how they’ve been lied too, insulted and denigrated, made to feel guilty, over BULLSHIT, I’m sure there WILL be a Holocaust. And that’s what they’re trying to prevent. It’s logical, when you think about it. }: )

    2. Zarathustra Says:
      8 December, 2008 at 3:00 am

      I’m sorry, but I just don’t like the looks of this Bradley Smith fellow. I mean, would you buy a used car from this man?

      Anyway. Weinblatt is no different from the other 15-18 million Jews in the world. They are all paranoid megalomaniacs and they all think in pretty much the same way. It seems like they are always doing everything they can to promote anti-Jewish hostility with their obnoxious arrogance and sneakiness. Then they complain about how much the world hates them.

      No wonder Jews invented the field of psychiatry. They’re all crazy as bedbugs.

    3. TSman Says:
      8 December, 2008 at 7:14 pm

      Professor Weinblatt writes: “Until people learn to stop hating each other because of the color of their skin…
      Here we go again, it’s that damn skin again. It seems the darker it is the more it makes you rob, rape and murder. I think it’s the skin’s fault. Yeah, it’s definitely a “skin condition”. LOL

    4. 2050 Says:
      8 December, 2008 at 10:04 pm

      Bradley’s cool.
      His one person with proof question is genius. Leaves them stammering and dripping spit off their lip, while they try to figure out how to get back at him.

    5. anonymous Says:
      9 December, 2008 at 11:09 am

      This Bradley guy is a first-rate hypocrite.

      Babbles on and on about how he and his libertarian position would never think of preventing someone from freely expressing their ideas, but yet the hypocrite refuses to post perfectly valid, polite and well reasoned comments with regards to jews. Give it a try yourself and you’ll see. First I tried to post a comment in my own words, but Bradley wouldn’t post it. So then I just went and grabbed some of Kevin MacDonald’s scholarly writings on the jew subject and tried to post those figuring they were written in such a scholarly manner that Bradley would post them, but no.

    6. Socrates Says:
      9 December, 2008 at 11:34 am

      Again, Smith isn’t a WN. He’s a historical revisionist.

    7. anonymous Says:
      9 December, 2008 at 12:12 pm

      Yeah, he’s obviously not a WN but that still doesn’t change the fact that he’s being hypocritical because on the one hand he goes on and on about how he would never prevent someone from freely expressing their ideas, but then he goes right ahead and does what he professes not to do. I mean, isn’t that the crux of what he’s saying? That he doesn’t prevent other people from saying things that don’t agree with what he believes?

    8. anonymous Says:
      9 December, 2008 at 12:23 pm

      Alex, how about giving a lecture on your show where you discuss in depth what the problem is with these historical revisionists and their inability or unwillingness to put it all together so to speak, with regards to the jews and the jewish problem. Historical revisionism is so entwined with jews and the jewish problem, it’s facinating how these revisionists like Bradley and others go out of their way to ignore this.

    9. Zarathustra Says:
      9 December, 2008 at 3:15 pm

      Anonymous, instead of complaining that Smith doesn’t give you the chance to post your views, why not just do so here?

    10. jim donaldson Says:
      9 December, 2008 at 9:35 pm

      I do like his “One person, with proof…” question. I argued with some numbskull the other day (just doing my part to counteract the brainwashing), and he went on about the NAZIS, the death camps, etc. I think he threw Anne “My breasts are on fire!” Frank in there, somewhere (And why use her anyway? She wasn’t killed by anyone). Then, of course, the “6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000” who were killed by the NAZIS. I mentioned the signs at Aushcwitz, etc. He said, “it may be less, but they were still gassed” I said, “Oh yeah? Name ONE!” It was a delight to see the look of complete beffudlement on his face. I’m going to follow up on this with him in a week or so–“Have you found a name yet?” Rich!

    11. Zarathustra Says:
      9 December, 2008 at 10:53 pm

      Just think, 600,000,000 Jews were marched into “gas ovens” and not one such oven has ever been found. Not one gassed corpse ever recovered. Not one credible eyewitness who can prove anything. Not one set of blueprints detailing the construction of those gas ovens.
      You know what all that tells me about the Holocaust?

      It means the Germans were even better at hiding their unspeakable crimes than we imagined!!!!

    12. nerk twins Says:
      9 December, 2008 at 11:35 pm

      First off these crazy Hate Heebs aint giving up the Holohoax hustle without a king hell fight. To debate them is pointless. They are all nuts, nothing penetrates that iron skull, thats the reason 500 to 1000 exploding rockets a day fly over the wall in Mount Doom uhh…… …we mean Isreal. Secondly, if the Nazis did exterminate jews on a large scale, they didn’t get enough of em.

    13. jim donaldson Says:
      10 December, 2008 at 1:08 pm

      Zarathustra!

      I didn’t see any little green men from Mars yesterday. That must mean they’re really good at hiding!