20 April, 2009

Between the Lines

Posted by Archives in 'Middle East', Arch Stanton, Iran at 12:12 am | Permanent Link

by Arch Stanton.


(Israel to Go to War with Iran Hours After Order, Press TV, 18 Apr 2009.
[Article]).

Israel is reportedly preparing for a massive attack on Iran ‘s nuclear sites “within days of being given the go-ahead by its new government.”

Welcome to WWIII – exactly as planned in the jew’s very own Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

According to a report by The Times, the Israel Defense Force (IDF) is taking every step to ready itself for “what would be a risky raid” on Iranian nuclear facilities.

“Risk? Vhat risk? Silly goyim, this is no more risky than touching off any global nuclear exchange!” And to think this is all because paranoid jews refuse to allow others in that region the potential to develop a single example of the many nuclear weapons the jews already have.

“Israel wants to know that if its forces were given the green light they could strike at Iran in a matter of days, even hours,” one senior Israeli defense official told The Times.

Vhy not? Israel bombed Iraq in 1981 and Syria in 2007. Attacking neighbors: itz vhat kikes do! And just who is the jewish cop that controls the traffic signals? Inquiring minds want to know!

“They are making preparations on every level for this eventuality. The message to Iran is that the threat is not just words,” the source added.

Imagine Israeli “preparations” in action: “Hello Jew York? Maury? Yeah, this is your uncle Benny in the Middle East. Call that monkey in Washington. Tell him to ship us another huge cache of your American weapons immediately! And while you’re at it have those useful idiots in your Congress reinstate conscription. We’re going to need lots of goyim cannon-fodder for the coming holocaust.”

To ready itself for the “massive aerial assault” on Iran Israel has moved to equip itself with three Airborne Warning and Control (AWAC) aircraft and regional missions to simulate the attack.

Really? And just how are they doing that? Let’s see now, who supplies Boeing 707s and AWACs technology? Three? How much will that cost? Will they actually pay to put these AWACs aircraft online or are they just going to “borrow” them from the US Air Force? The article says nothing other than Israel “has moved to equip itself.”

Israel’s Home Front Command also announced plans earlier to mobilize the Israeli army for the largest military exercise in its history on June 2.

The nationwide drill is aimed at preparing the public for the retaliation that Israel could face.

The report cites Iran ‘s enrichment facility in Natanz, its heavy water reactor in Arak , and the country’s Fuel Manufacturing Plant (FMP) in the central province of Isfahan as prime Israeli targets.

The distance from Israel to at least one of the cited locations is more than 870 miles, for which Israel prepared for by conducting a training exercise last year.

A June report by The New York Times revealed that Israel carried out a major military exercise earlier in the month that appeared to be a rehearsal for a potential bombing of Iranian nuclear installations.

Sure seems like a lot of effort for an attack that probably won’t happen unless Obama gives it “the green light” – a move he claims he will not authorize. Step right up suck – er – ladies and gentlemen, place your bets, 1000 to 1 odds on Obama stepping in to prevent Israel’s attack on Iran.

More than 100 Israeli F-16 and F-15 fighters, helicopters and refueling tankers participated in the maneuvers over the eastern Mediterranean and Greece .

More than 100 F-16s? These must be a part of the 100-plus F-16s the US gave to Israel a few years ago. Last I remember, the jews have no production facilities for F-15 fighters, helicopters and refueling tankers and I haven’t seen any foreign sources stepping in to make any gifts of late. Might we assume this is all American equipment that is above and beyond the billions in foreign economic aid the American taxpayers give to Israel every year? I wonder how much of this type of aid was given to the Iranians? Last I heard the Iranians had to buy all their military weaponry and the last purchase consisted of 24 SS300s from Russia that have yet to be delivered.

“We would not make the threat [against Iran] without the force to back it,” The Times quoted one intelligence official as saying. “There has been a recent move, a number of on-the-ground preparations, that indicate Israel ‘s willingness to act.”

Gee, one would think the jews would more accurately state, “We would not make the threat [against Iran] without the American-supplied weapons to back it”

The source, however, admitted that it was unlikely that Israel would carry out an attack without receiving “at least tacit approval” from the new US administration.

Tacit approval? I can just hear Benny Nuttin’Yahoo now: “Launch the attack! Obama has given us tacit approval, a little bird told me so! Congress? Don’t worry about Congress. We control America and they know it!”

The Times report comes as earlier on Thursday a Washington think tank cautioned against an Israeli mission to take out Iranian nuclear facilities, saying it is unlikely to be hailed a success.

Cautioned against an Israeli mission? Exactly who was it that “cautioned the Israelis?” I can just hear Mr. Milquetoast ambassador saying, “Um, er, excuse me, ahem, excuse me, Mr. Jew but we don’t really think…that is, perhaps it would be unwise to attack Iran – unless you really want to of course. And by the way, do you need another boatload of our advanced weapons? Of course this would be a tax free gift from the American taxpayers who love you because you are God’s chosen people.”

“A military strike by Israel against Iranian Nuclear Facilities is possible and the optimum route would be along the Syrian-Turkish border then over a small portion of Iraq then into Iran , and back the same route,” reads the report by the Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS).

“The number of aircraft required, refueling along the way and getting to the targets without being detected or intercepted would be complex and high risk and would lack any assurances that the overall mission will have a high success rate,” warned the assessment.

Of course America stands by to help its “gallant little ally” with billions of dollars of support and is ever ready to carry the needed water for mission planning, like supplying needed intelligence. Remember that American spy caught in Iran who really wasn’t a spy? She was just a simple reporter working for the jewspaper.

An Israeli strike on Iran is widely believed to require the green light from the Pentagon.

“Widely believed” by whom? I for one don’t believe Israel needs permission from anyone but the jews’ own high priest of the money-masters. That would be Lord God Rothschild and his angents of death. (Angents- angels/agents) When it comes to understanding the profit angle presented by a major war, no one knows more about the profits of war than the great and mighty Lord God Rothschild.

The US Air Force should grant permission to Israeli bombers to fly across Iraq .

“Should grant?” Ya think?

Ephraim Kam, the deputy director of the Institute for National Security Studies, played down the prospect of any such permission by President Barack Obama’s administration.

Now the disclaimer. We have a jew telling us that Obama is unlikely to give Israel permission they don’t need or care about. How much more weaselly can this get?

“The American defense establishment is unsure that the operation will be successful,” he told The Times.

Really? Like they were unsure if popping off the A-bomb at the Trinity test site would result in an uncontrolled reaction that would light the atmosphere on fire and incinerate the earth? It seems the psychopathic jew has no problem whatever living large at the cosmic roulette table.

The new US administration has struck a more “reconciliatory tone” in dealing with Iran .

Any details on this “reconciliatory tone”? Perhaps a fly on the wall might hear something like the following: “Look you ignorant sand monkeys, we have supplied the jews with tons of our most modern weapons and their delivery systems. You better damn well do exactly what they say or they will vaporize you with American-made bombs. And you know how that turned out for Iraq.” Never forget, Israel is our gallant little ally in the Middle East! We support Israel with our blood, the blood of our children and the money we manufacture; there is nothing – nothing – we will not sacrifice for the jew!”

The US Vice President Joe Biden said earlier that he did not believe that Netanyahu would take the risk of attacking Iran, adding, “He would be ill-advised to do that.”

And then his nurse stepped in to wipe the drool from his chin.


  • 9 Responses to “Between the Lines”

    1. One of...oh screw it! Says:

      I guess the next question is: “What would Joan Jett..errr..I mean Russia..do”?

      timesonline picked this up..scroll down and see what a stinking mass of humanity they’ve got slobbering in the comments section.
      You’d think it was a website run by a bunch of fundamentalists of the “Gawuhd Blayass Izz-Rah-Ail” ilk. http://tinyurl.com/ct77ou

    2. Howdy Doody Says:

      What has exactly been and today the relationship between the Chicom government since 1948 when these two New regimes appeared ?
      ============================================
      April 20 2009

      Jewish policital forces hated the Kennedys because Joe Kennedy Sr. admired Adolf Hitler. Jack Kennedy held similar views as his father. JFK wrote in his 1945 diary the following words about the most hated man of the 20th century:

      After visiting these two places (Berchtesgaden and the Eagle’s lair on Obersalzberg), you can easily understand how that within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived. He had boundless ambitions for his country which rendered him a menace to the peace of the world, but he had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.

      (Prelude To Leadership – The European Diary of John F. Kennedy, Summer 1945, Regnery Publishing, Inc., Washington DC, p. 74)

    3. Parsifal Says:

      The Jews don’t like to mention inconvenient facts like JFK’s admiration for Der Fuhrer (happy 120th Bday, Uncle Adolf), just like they never mention his relationship with a Nazi double-agent while he was stationed in Washington during WWII. That’s why Joe Kennedy Sr. wanted FDR to transfer JFK to the Pacific, a place where he supposedly couldn’t get into trouble. And except for getting his PT boat smashed in two by a Jap destroyer and almost getting his entire crew killed, he behaved himself.

      The Jews also never mention that as President, JFK had his brother, Atty General RFK, spy on “Doctor” ML King. Neither Kennedy brother seems to have thought very highly of King, although thanks to Jewish mythology many Negro households still have portraits on their walls showing the three of them together like the Three Stooges.

    4. Howdy Doody Says:

      My oh my, if only the Internet would have been around in Charles A. Lindbergs time, old FDR and Cabal would have been sent packing in a time when we were 90% White, and not brain washed as a Nation.

      Any one who has not read Charles Lindbergs speech in Iowa of Sept. 11 1941 should take a read.

    5. Ein Says:

      Forgive me, Howdy — we may have been 90% white, but we sure were brainwashed, even so.

    6. old_dutch Says:

      If the jews do attack Iran in the coming weeks; most of you will wish that 100,000 copies or more of VNN’s new newspaper had been printed.

      http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=978594&postcount=1

      I realize it takes a big effort to put some money in an envelope. Address the envelope. Put a stamp on it. And mail it.

    7. Stan Sikorski Says:

      I hope the kikes light the fuse. It’ll be the last thing they ever do.

    8. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      “Any one who has not read Charles Lindbergs speech in Iowa of Sept. 11 1941 should take a read.”

      Why not listen instead?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_F48oaOskI

    9. Parsifal Says:

      Well said, Stan.