Books and Freedom
Posted by Socrates in Socrates, William Pierce, William Pierce Wednesday at 1:03 pm | 
Permanent Link
by Dr. William Pierce.
[…]
“Reading Marius’ obituary called to mind the very special status Jews have in our society. We may criticize anyone — except Jews. Of course, a liberal isn’t likely under any circumstances to be critical of a homosexual or a feminist or a non-White or a member of any other group currently patronized by liberals. But as long as he assures everyone that many of his best friends are perverts or Blacks or what have you and that his criticism is intended to be constructive, he will be forgiven for an occasional sharp remark aimed toward them. But if he ever makes the mistake of referring to Jews in anything but the most flattering terms, his name goes on a hate list and is never removed.”
For the audio version of this article, go [Here] and scroll down to 12-04-1999.
15 December, 2010 at 5:47 pm
Interesting article, but I’ve never equated books with freedom or anything else, except mere dust collectors, sometimes obstacles over which one must leap. As far as universities founded to advance the cause of Xianism, hell what can you expect but jew worship! You’ll never destroy the mass adulation of the jews, until you destroy the cult that was made the official religion of the West by Constantine, it could happen in Europe but the United States ????
Anyway Dr. Pierce is right, will never have literature thats nothing more than jew propaganda Until we break that mind control
15 December, 2010 at 5:54 pm
One other great author that exposed the jews was Knut Hamsun, who quite rightly could be equated as an American-Norwegian.
16 December, 2010 at 1:27 am
Books can be quite influential, NdG. The Republic, The Prince, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Unsafe at any Speed, Mein Kampf, The Bible, Common Sense, Shakespeare, Homer, Gilgamesh, etc. Never underestimate the power of the printed word. A well-read person is a well-informed and maybe even a well-armed person.
16 December, 2010 at 1:41 pm
Our young people do not read, instead choosing to devote themselves to mindless video games and Negro worship.
18 December, 2010 at 3:47 am
Could it be that Heathcliff represents the Jew? He’s a cruel, scheming, covetous, arrogant dark-skinned outsider who brings nothing but misery to Wuthering Heights. Did Emily Bronte ever have any experience with Jews?
18 December, 2010 at 3:47 pm
You could be right Tim. Although Heathcliff in Wuthering Heights is assumed to be a gypsy he doesn’t turn the farmhouse into a pigsty or try a bit of pimping on the side. No, his behavior is really too manipulative for the average gypo to manage but is pretty damn jewish.
One of the characters also describe him as being from ‘Tatary’. Yep, Heathcliff is a yid. Well done Emily.
The classics of English literature could turn out to be a gold mine if we re-read them from a White Nationalist perspective.