16 February, 2011
The Health of the Nation
Posted by Socrates in Socrates, William Pierce, William Pierce Wednesday at 12:00 pm | 
Permanent Link
by Dr. William Pierce.
[…]
“If we want to determine the health of a nation, we likewise look for signs and make measurements. And of course, it’s necessary to understand which signs are the important ones. Most Americans today seem to believe that the only important signs are economic signs. They believe that if the stock market is going up, unemployment is low, and people are spending lots of money, everything is rosy. Which is to say, if they are economically comfortable, if they can buy the things they want, they are inclined to believe that the nation is healthy.”
For the audio version of this article, go [Here] and scroll down to 03-18-2000.
16 February, 2011 at 10:28 pm
The state of any economy, much like any other field of activity involving humans, is a reflection, however apparently indirect, of the quality of those humans. “As above, so below”, and a chaotic economy reflects humans of a avaricious, sensual, chaotic, unbalanced, brutish level.
Brutes procreate indiscriminately, and can barely plan even their next meal. This unthinking animal level of short-term and desire-driven semiconsciousness is what is driving so much of the “machine” of the economy. For every over-reach, the iron pendulum swings to over-correction…
16 February, 2011 at 10:38 pm
So, based on my last post, how could “duh ‘combinny” be otherwise? The roots of this goes back further than Descartes, or Socrates, or even Moses.
The ethic of the present system is hardly based on “rational self-interest”, for how could such degenerated beings have “reason” apart from their animalistic and super-malleable desires, and what possible good could come out of the “self-interest” of a “self” so illusory, narrow, frail, and constrained to the motives of belly and loins? Tie the tubes, drop the blade, decongest the planet and most of the woes of duh ‘combinny disappear with the scum which create that “market of [manufactured] needs”, the ugly and naked “homo econimus”.
17 February, 2011 at 6:41 am
Roger Barnett today: What the so called U.S. federal appeals court most recently said here http://courtlistener.com/ca9/WLo/ana-vicente-v-roger-barnett
A year ago, as spun by the left-liberal LA TIMES: http://articles.latimes.com/2009/feb/20/nation/na-illegal-immig-rancher20
17 February, 2011 at 10:18 am
Great article by Dr. Pierce. It is happening in Chicago in a big way now.
17 February, 2011 at 12:28 pm
Here it is 11 years after that broadcast and the situation has gone from bad to worse. I guess Whitey isn’t going to fight back against his tormentors until Pedro and Esperanza are squatting in his living room and blocking his view of the niggerball game on TV. How much more of this shit are we going to swallow? Are we supposed to just crawl away into some corner and die?
17 February, 2011 at 5:03 pm
For Mayor of shitcago not one white man on the ballot. We got Joo Emanuel, Carol Mosley Braun (black bitch, formerly married to a joo and two spicks. Spiccago will be another Doodytroit or Gary, IN on another 15 years.
17 February, 2011 at 11:20 pm
The list thickens! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proscription
17 February, 2011 at 11:25 pm
Back by popular demand:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/74/Fasces_lictoriae.svg/2000px-Fasces_lictoriae.svg.png
19 February, 2011 at 7:35 pm
While statistics can be used as helpful tools of diagnosis, for those at a certain level of knowledge, there is the danger of a kind of “superstition of facts”. No one is immune totally to this approach, but consider how ultimately self-defeating it can be to pile up FACTS (however sound and polished) as “ammo”, all to have the enemy, by his very nature intransigent and unconvinced, spit out another “dat beez raciss.” What made Doc Pierce effective, to me, was the passion that came out in his more unguarded moments on audio, not the evidences, numerous and certainly convincing, he collected and propagated. That is why I prefer VNN. Slickness is never put at the expense of fire.
19 February, 2011 at 7:56 pm
Not meaning to bully the pulpit, but that first post of mine, under a different name, has opened up certain new vistas in my ponders. For instance, would a Chicago turned back into wild land not provide not only a mud-free zone, but an ecological step to recovery, a source of plentiful wild game?
Why are conservatives afraid of conservation itself? Why are there some “elitists” so tied up in a particular economic system that they abandon every other form of elitism that cannot be crunched down into how much wampum one can pile up in a lifetime, how “marketable” ones constructed “individuality” is? Most critically, and perhaps most relevant to the original post, what would an organic economy (Greek, “household-order” (?)) grown out of a integral idea, both Ecologic and Eugenic, look like? What of an order of “Not profit, but honor”?
The root of such would certainly be more sound than the “rational self-interest” (self-interested rationalizations?) that is the compass of “homo econimus”.
21 February, 2011 at 3:04 am
A “superstition of facts”….Yes, just so. That’s why it is no use trying to argue with a Jew or a Nee-groid, as such creatures have no interest in facts. The Black is comfortable believing that a mad scientist named Yacoub accidentally created the White Race in a test tube 6000 years ago; The Jew convinces himself that his aunts and uncles in Europe were marched into a “gas oven”, escaped, were captured again, were subjected to bizarre Nazi medical experiments and then gassed several more times in the same Easy-Bake oven before immigrating to Yonkers in 1946. You cannot use human reasoning with non-humans!
21 February, 2011 at 7:20 pm
A “superstition of facts”….Yes, just so. That’s why it is no use trying to argue with a Jew or a Nee-groid, as such creatures have no interest in facts.-
Right Tim, the only debate with jews and groids is with the jaw bone of an Ass