2 October, 2007
Western Women These Days
Posted by Socrates in New World Order, Socrates, feminism at 6:42 pm | 
Permanent Link
Posted by Socrates in New World Order, Socrates, feminism at 6:42 pm |
Permanent Link
Similar posts:
- 10/11/07 Employment These Days 66% similar
- 05/30/07 Women are Becoming Men 60% similar
- 12/02/09 Oh, Oh, It’s Surging! 55% similar
- 12/15/08 White Technology 54% similar
- 01/16/09 Israel Attacks UN Building in Gaza 54% similar
66 Responses to “Western Women These Days”
2 October, 2007 at 7:05 pm
Men own dogs more than women do. Women own cats.
It takes a man to create babies too, you know. So the title should read “Western Women and Men These Days.”
Stop putting all the damn blame on women, would you.
2 October, 2007 at 7:44 pm
What’s the quote by Himmler, that those who have pets instead of children commit a crime against humanity, or the nation?
2 October, 2007 at 8:24 pm
The whole dog thing is a little much.
It figures that a woman wrote such a tortured article. ;-)
2 October, 2007 at 9:14 pm
Good web-site -not racialist but close to truth. I guess closer you get to telling the truth, closer you get to be branded a “raceest an’ shyte”…Another aspect of this sad dog/cat mania is that people, both men and women, are very lonely, perhaps loneliner than ever, there’s little real contact among the sexes, and everything seems permeated by fear and distrust (largely thanks to judens’ inversion of reality through media and “educathsheen an’ shyte”…
But I agree that we should not lay all the blame on women. Men also have become all mad and drooly about their pats…once again, we should work together!
2 October, 2007 at 9:52 pm
I believe that the article was written by a woman, so she shared a woman’s perspective on the situation. This article was VERY TAME on this issue as there are a lot of wacky people out there (especially women) that treat their pets like children. I have two sisters that do. It is a disgrace. I want to slap them in their heads and remind them what their period is for. The pet care industry is having a field day as the shrivelling wombs of our race pop Midol for cramps and plug their birth canal’s with tampons to deal with the monthly side effect of one more white child never being born.
2 October, 2007 at 9:56 pm
Dogs and men (I’m being species-specific, so no feminist grumblings please) have lived & died in each others company since the proverbial dawn of time. Not every one of us is cut out for family life-many of us seek a solitary existence because it’s in our nature, not from selfishness or an unwillingness to hew to convention. Many who would sacrifice everything for the cause cannot bear the idea of losing a family in the struggle. A dog is the natural companion to the hunter and so it shall be, until the last of either of us lies in the earth.
As for one of her frames of reference..the contempt of moslems doesn’t impress me in the least-any adherent to one of the the Three Great Poisons is a mystic anyway….fairy tale believers willing to kill for their respective “G*d” I’m sure there’s better writing on that site ,I’ll give it a look in the future.
2 October, 2007 at 10:04 pm
In FT Worth, TX they sometimes have gun shows at the Will Rodgers Center. Right next door are the cattle and live stock buildings, poultry buildings, and other various remnants of our agricultural past.
After the gun show I decided to talk a stroll to one of the buildings that was hosting an obstacle course competition for dogs. I was somewhat surprised to see so many women that were involved in these events. And not only women, but a lot of lesbian couples- more than I remember seeing at the arts and crafts shows that are right next to the gun shows – and a few obvious homosexuals.
There they were running in front of fluffy and yelling instructions and encouragement thru the maize of ramps, tunnels, hoops and gates from point A to point B. I’m afraid to say it was pretty funny and entertaining. The crowd was engaged and pretty enthusiastic too.
There were a lot of wimpy looking husbands and boyfriends sitting in the bleachers who accompanied their wives on these trips. House trained too I suppose.
Women and their horses, women and their dogs, it’s just seems a little weird to me
2 October, 2007 at 10:06 pm
We are on the whole far too friendly and gooey with domestic(ated) animals. It makes the brain, the character into sentimental mush. Some distance should be observed. As for women, they’re a lot cause — truly “for the dogs”. Doesn’t mean white men have to make faggy voices and sleep with their pets for companionship. Tip: any woman too concerned with her pets (or even the idea of pets) is irretrievably lost on the wrong path and will lead you down her own narrow little road of self-centered bitchery. Avoid.
2 October, 2007 at 11:06 pm
What particularly disgusts me are all the young (twenty-something) women who live exclusively with a dog or two. They are legion. And all of them kiss their dogs in the mouth, and they do this in public. (Wet tongues sliding against each other: girl and dog.) The dogs typically sleep in the same bed as the girl, and both stink of dog. Where are the WHITE MEN to sleep with White women?
3 October, 2007 at 12:38 am
# sgruber Says:
2 October, 2007 at 11:06 pm
What particularly disgusts me are all the young (twenty-something) women who live exclusively with a dog or two. They are legion. And all of them kiss their dogs in the mouth, and they do this in public. (Wet tongues sliding against each other: girl and dog.) The dogs typically sleep in the same bed as the girl, and both stink of dog. Where are the WHITE MEN to sleep with White women?
Ugh, that’s gross. Tell me you’re kidding, sgruber, I’ve never seen that. Maybe bestiality will be the “new fad” soon – Mammal “love.”
3 October, 2007 at 2:14 am
Like cats and dogs
The women who write for this web site (corrupt.org) have what I feel is an enlightened attitude concerning matters of health, marriage and sex. While they do not specifically mention the jew, they do address the cultural problems brought forth by that race. These women recognize the damage being done to our men, women and children and call for women to reevaluate their judaized cultural and moral values. I thoroughly enjoyed Ms. McMagnus’ article titled “Viking Feminism” and I found I agreed with much of the reported Viking views about women. The fundamental upshot on the articles about dogs was that healthy women should be having children, not adopting dogs. Ms. McMagnus final take on dogs (and I heartily agree) “No dogs, except for working dogs are acceptable. Dogs are not our babies.” As for my personal evaluation on pets, I do not own one. However in the past I have had a few cats adopt me. I like cats. I have long said living with a cat is like living with an adult, while living with a dog is like living with a toddler (perhaps that is why certain women like those small bundles of canine joy other cultures consider lunch). I used to leave my cat for a week or more with food and water and when I returned home I never found any surprises. People who have problems with cats (and dogs) are frequently neurotic and their neuroses affect their animals. That is why they return home to find the place trashed and the furniture chewed or clawed to shreds. The other thing is I like women. I really like women. In fact I might now confess I love women. It’s true, I enjoy watching women. I revel in the sight of their bodies and how they move. Why I can sit for hours and watch beautiful woman. Cats are like women and in fact are frequently compared to women. In somewhat the same manner I enjoy watching women I enjoy watching cats. I find their hunting tactics are especially fascinating to watch – cats not women. Men are like dogs and in fact are often compared to dogs. It is interesting that this is considered a degrading comparison while comparing women to cats is somewhat less so. I find that men who do well with dogs often do not so well with women and in some cases replace their female companionship with that of a dog. Frequently men will talk about the faithfulness of dogs and the unfaithfulness of women. Humans and canines are both highly socialized animals, both have a certain “pack” mentality, so it makes sense that men would naturally feel a bit more commonality with dogs. I have spent some time on the farm and both animals have their place in that working environment. However in urban society I see no reason for dogs save that of dogs that serve a functioning role such as a seeing eye. Men will often counter this with the fact that dogs serve as protection, but in my training I have found that even vicious dogs can be fairly easily compromised. In a determined attack, dogs serve as little more than a buffer that allow for a bit of time before the attacker reaches your position. In that role they are a fairly expensive resource in both time and money. Personally I feel that a well armed and well prepared male has no need of a canine adjunct to serve as a buffer against attack. Another thing I have noted is that people who like dogs like to dominate and unlike a cat, a dog is an animal one can thoroughly dominate; so for those who feel a need to have that particular part of their psyche fulfilled, the dog is a perfect answer. On occasion I have lived in close proximity with wild canines like the wolf, fox and coyote and have been quite astonished at how these beasts differ from their domestic counterparts. Again I find the wild variety exhibit what one might consider more “adult” behavior than their domestic counterparts, at least the urban variety. I have also noted these canines are typically considered pests and are hunted and killed by the same men who claim to value their dogs. I have often thought this strange for I frequently like the wild cousins much better than their domestic counterparts. However I have found that these animals can indeed be pests and at times need to be eradicated in the interest of human welfare. Finally I have noted that Negroes often keep dogs but they seem to enjoy mistreating them. But while I have heard of Negroes (and other races) raising and fighting dogs, I have never heard of them doing the same with cats. Evidently cats simply do not care to serve as sport for men. Perhaps that is the same problem some men find with certain women.
3 October, 2007 at 2:37 am
No, he is not, Hoosier! I have seen that often enough. I know many women who have their dogs in their beds. And they treat them like babies. I met once a woman, not unattactive, who fed her (female!) dog only chosen steaks. We went to a walk in the countryside, the pet came across a heap of calf shit (that’s particularly stinking and ugly), and enjoyed dipping right into it, mouth full up to the eyes. The “owner-lady” became hysterically and- fainted. I did nothing, left it to her cleaning up her dog. She never again went out with me. BTW- she was frigid. She was degenerate and refused to acknowledge it. Who wants such a kind of woman to marry and live with? Or to have children with?
Let”s face it: Kids can be unruly, are a challenge to the parents, their wit and authority, dogs never: They obey without argument.
It’s repulsive, it’s flight from womens (and men’s) natural duties. But it’s all part of our decadent age.
Don’t overlook the fact: Our race will not survive by just more breeding in competition with niggs and muds, but by being in our own environment and culture, and you know, who controls it at present.
3 October, 2007 at 6:30 am
Yes, but did your woman tongue her dog, Arminius? I’d never marry a woman who french kisses dogs. I have my standards, gosh darn it.
Some women treat dogs just like white lemmings treat groids. Dress them up in cute little suits and pretend they’re just like us. Gotter run.
3 October, 2007 at 7:33 am
It is a tragedy that western wimmin are increasingly turning to pets as an outlet for their maternal instincts.
The same wimmin have probably aborted their genetic treasure….White children.
3 October, 2007 at 8:19 am
Glad to see Herr Stanton on here! You have lots of great articles on the old VNN, sir. Please, if you have the time, write some more!
As to the article in question… what’s the big deal? Nothing original. What the woman wrote is obvious. Women are using their pets as surrogates for real children. Not good for whites, but on the other hand, better a dog than another GD mulatto.
What’s disgusting are commercials that have a father saying “I just figured out a way so that when Susie graduates high school we’ll have enough money to finance her college.” That pisses me off. College? What’s the fucking point? Take off the pants, girl, shutup, make babies and take care of them. Motherhood is the best and most important thing our women can do as it directly impacts the future. Anything else is a waste of this precious short time we call our life.
3 October, 2007 at 8:30 am
I didn’t even finish reading the damn article. This is the kind of anti woman shit you all are known for far and wide. Men and their dogs throughout history–fine, no one even blinks an eye. But let females become responsible pet owners and all you all do is piss, moan, whine, and complain.
I’ve been in rescue for many years and I’ve know plenty of female pet owners, many of them married and mothers. They know they can do it both–be mothers, wives, and responsible pet owners. Yes, some of these females are single and childless. And some of these females are giving a much needed home to a needy animal UNTIL a worthy man comes along.
So, go to a dog park and meet a nice young white woman and stop complaining.
And some of these single, childless females choose dogs and cats because they don’t sit around and drink beer all night, patronize the titty bars, and become champion consumers of pornography. And they also don’t insult them, tell them they’re stupid and irrational and incapable of appreciating music, art, beauty, and truth, like some of the fuckfaces on the forum do.
And I’m NOT saying all men do this, but enough of you do to make some women want to stay away from you.
Most of the pets I’ve placed have gone to loving white families, not single people, fellas. Most of these families love their children more than they do their pets, but they have enough love left over to provide a fantastic home for a needy homeless dog or cat. And they do it both.
GET THE FUCK OVER YOURSELVES FOR SHITS’ SAKE. THIS COUNTRY IS FALLING APART NOT BECAUSE WHITE WOMEN ARE HAVING PETS, BUT BECAUSE NIGGERS AND JEWS HAVE RUINED IT FOR WHITE PEOPLE. STOP BLAMING WHITE WOMEN BECAUSE YOU ARE PISSED BECAUSE OF THAT.
STOP THE GODDAMN WHINING FOR A CHANGE AND GET OUT AND DO SOMETHING TO MAKE AMERICA A GREAT COUNTRY AGAIN.
3 October, 2007 at 8:36 am
(TALMUD) TOSAPOTH, JEBAMOTH 94b: “IF YOU EAT WITH A GENTILE , IT IS THE SAME AS EATING WITH A DOG.”
3 October, 2007 at 9:03 am
Not every one of us is cut out for family life-many of us seek a solitary existence because it’s in our nature, not from selfishness or an unwillingness to hew to convention.
That is true, but there needs to be a core of large white families that represent the MAJORITY of the nation in order to keep it growing. As long as everyone contributes something, than it will work out. But most need to contribut children. The current setup only favors Wall Street investors into places like Pet Smart.
3 October, 2007 at 9:09 am
Don’t overlook the fact: Our race will not survive by just more breeding in competition with niggs and muds, but by being in our own environment and culture, and you know, who controls it at present.
That’s half the equation that you have mastered, Jedi Warrior. The territory and nation will last only one generation if there are not large families to support it. HAVING CHILDREN will ensure survival.
3 October, 2007 at 9:09 am
I don’t think they French kiss their dogs as a deliberate, slow, sexual thing – they simply kiss them on the mouth like mothers kiss their babies, and the dog responds by sticking out its tongue and licking. Which does not deter the human bitch.
3 October, 2007 at 9:23 am
Why the fuck am I being moderated. You all know me by now.
3 October, 2007 at 10:28 am
This was going around the web a couple months ago, but maybe not everyone saw it. It’s pretty funny, but also has some truth.
*********************************
Excerpts from a Dog’s Daily Diary
8:00 am – Dog food! My favorite thing!
9:30 am – A car ride! My favorite thing!
9:40 am – A walk in the park! My favorite thing!
10:30 am – Got rubbed and petted! My favorite thing!
12:00 pm – Lunch! My favorite thing!
1:00 pm – Played in the yard! My favorite thing!
3:00 pm – Wagged my tail! My favorite thing!
5:00 pm – Milk bones! My favorite thing!
7:00 pm – Got to play ball! My favorite thing!
8:00 pm – Wow! Watched TV with the people! My favorite thing!
11:00 pm – Sleeping on the bed! My favorite thing!
Excerpts from a Cat’s Daily Diary
Day 983 of my captivity.
My captors continue to taunt me with bizarre little dangling objects. They dine lavishly on fresh meat, while the other inmates and I are fed hash or some sort of dry nuggets. Although I make my contempt for the rations perfectly clear, I nevertheless must eat something in order to keep up my strength.
The only thing that keeps me going is my dream of escape. In an attempt to disgust them, I once again vomit on the carpet.
Today I decapitated a mouse and dropped its headless body at their feet. I had hoped this would strike fear into their hearts, since it clearly demonstrates what I am capable of. However, they merely made condescending comments about what a “good little hunter” I am. Bastards.
There was some sort of assembly of their accomplices tonight. I was placed in solitary confinement for the duration of the event.
However,I could hear the noises and smell the food. I overheard that my confinement was due to the power of “allergies.” I must learn what this means, and how to use it to my advantage.
Today I was almost successful in an attempt to assassinate one of my tormentors by weaving around his feet as he was walking. I must try this again tomorrow — but at the top of the stairs.
I am convinced that the other prisoners here are flunkies and snitches. The dog receives special privileges. He is regularly released -and seems to be more than willing to return. He is obviously retarded. The bird has got to be an informant. I observe him communicate with the guards regularly. I am certain that he reports my every move. My captors have arranged protective custody for him in an elevated cell, so he is safe. For now…
3 October, 2007 at 11:12 am
Fine meat: the meat-producing dogs of St. Bernard cross, because of big and strong bodily form and loins, its meat is tender, tasty, delicious and nourishing after full-grown and slaughter, and has the effects such as nourishing Yin, tonifing the kidney, improving human health, nourishment and physiological regulation for human body.
3 October, 2007 at 2:23 pm
To Arminius: “BTW, she was frigid”……oh puhleaze! ! ! ! “She was degenerate and refused to acknowledge it” …..again, oh puhleaze! ! !
BTW Arminius….how do you “know” she was “frigid”….not from personal experience I presume. Guess she was attractive enough for you to attempt to have sex with her, dogs and degeneracy be damned. Maybe your talents as a lover just weren’t enough to get her “warmed up”……ya think.
You guys kill me with your constant need to dismiss and denigrate all things female. We’re this and we’re that…….never good enough. And yet, you keep coming back to us time and time again looking for something.
Like the old saying goes, fellas, there’s no such thing as a frigid female….just an inadequate male lover.
There’s a lot of things I like about you guys on this website but this need to constantly put down all women is too much. I imagine if you guys had to show your real lives for all to see, we’d see a lot of shortcomings…..both tangible and intangible here.
3 October, 2007 at 2:37 pm
This has needed saying for a long time.
3 October, 2007 at 6:14 pm
What I’ve noticed is that Americans, both male and female, MUST have their pets which seems pretty silly to me. My grandparents were farmers in Oklahoma, and always kept a dog or two. However, their dogs were only allowed in the yard; never in the house. The dogs were considered to be working animals only, and I was chastised more than once by my grandmother to never touch the dogs, because she did not want dogs for pets. Their dogs were there to work by rounding up the cattle and chasing off any small varmints that might invade the yard, and ofcourse, to keep any stray nigger away. Because I witnessed this as a child, it seemed to be a rational relationship with dogs. They work for you, and in return, you feed them and let them sleep in the yard.
Now, I have owned a couple of dogs in the past. Also, I have two children, and can assure any male or female, that raising children is far more rewarding than owning a dog. The love for a pet can never equate with the love of one’s children. I wouldn’t give my life for ANY dog…
3 October, 2007 at 6:48 pm
We have three Lesbian couples on our block and all of them own large male dogs. I would be surprised if any of these women were into kinky acts with the dogs although you never know. It’s probably just a case of them liking the fact that they have a “man” to wag their finger at and scold.
3 October, 2007 at 7:52 pm
susan,
No one is blaming women for the dysgenic state of society, which would of course be to credit them with far more foresight and will than they naturally possess. However, excessive concern for pets on the part of females is one other egregious symptom of a declining or at least crippled society, and one deserving mockery. You yourself have spent more time with pets than men, or at least in a productive capacity, and are now old and childless. Thus, you are “part of the problem”, a typical degenerate female — like it or not. We all have our shortcomings……but women have them in a more predictable pattern.
WN females love dogs; everyone knows that. They typically like vicious dogs, pits or the like, and have a chain-imagery fetish. This is of course speaks to their complete lack of taste and femininity. A man’s instinct is hopefully sound enough to know without any pause or reflection or argument that a female who likes vicious breeds of dog should be avoided, being herself vicious and half-canine. Women of all other cultures – with which I am familiar – would never think of “kissing” or sleeping with their pets; at worst a cat or a bird. They do not replace children with pets. No, it is not the fault of western women that they eschew child-bearing and femininity in favor of being pet-kissing spinsters; it is however a matter of mental health for males to know very well the vulgar morphology of the modern white western female and to be very careful in interaction with her, as she is little more, at this point, than a free-roving schizophrenic with license to do just about anything she sets her bitter little mind to.
3 October, 2007 at 8:21 pm
I have no concerns about lesbian women as long as they don’t seek to artificially inseminate and *attempt* to raise a more or less bastard child into such a screwed up *partnership*. To me they are doing us all a favor, eliminating their genes from the gene pool.
I have no concerns about women and dogs either; I’ve seen a fat white woman walking three large dogs in my neighborhood and then she pens them up in the back and takes her mulatto adopted Ethiopian girl for a walk. I never see the *man* of that relationship either. Wonder if she has one…I bet she feels ‘good’ that she saved another extraneous nigger child.
I go to the grocery store and up walks a white male and female married couple. The sheepish husband follows the brick hard looking wife while they push around their adopted black baby riding high on the cart. They *pet* it at intervals and hold up flashy items for it to grab at. I really wonder if they have something wrong with either their brains or their thinking processes….I hypothetically get these hypothetical daydreams of those retards hypothetically falling down a pit with spikes at the bottom…
I see juvenile niglets running around ChinaMart (TM) sucking down slurpees and they come up and ask me: “Cuse me sir, has you seen my momma?” I say “No” and they run off to accost some other person….
I see the brochure for my health benefits at my new job. On the front is a picture of a nigger family all cuddling and holding each other and it resembles the perfect nuclear family.
By contrast on page (2) I see the White family with the wife and child walking on the beach and the husband is trying to hold the hand of the wife, however the picture spins it psychologically to make it seem that she’s pulling away from the hubby as she’s at arm length. Her proximity is leaning away from him and is much closer to the child. This type of stuff is brutal to those that have no “Jewdar”. The inside message is that the PERFECT White family is one in which there is NO Husband and the White wife and child form the unit.
The proof of this psychological onslaught is what I see at work: PHD level White women with pictures of one or two children on their desks, but NO hubby picture in sight or the White woman in charge that shakes my hand hard enough to twist it off at the wrist, and I’m a decent sized guy btw 6’3″ 200 lbs. Her handshake reaffirms she’s in control and she is, in effect, the MAN. I would laugh if it weren’t so grim.
3 October, 2007 at 9:13 pm
susan Says: “There’s a lot of things I like about you guys on this website but this need to constantly put down all women is too much. I imagine if you guys had to show your real lives for all to see, we’d see a lot of shortcomings…..both tangible and intangible here.”
Dr. William Pierce once noted that feminism is a major factor in the decline of Western culture. If men at VNN merely point out that the majority of women embrace at least some feminist ideas, that observation shouldn’t turn us into “bad guys.” Further, as Alex has noted, while women are certainly welcome at VNN, it’s a website designed to be read by White males.
3 October, 2007 at 9:52 pm
The latest nasty thing I hear White American women saying is about their husbands: “I have two children” (meaning a child and a husband).
The White husband is always inadequate. He doesn’t make enough money to keep her in a McMansion with 200 pairs of shoes. He doesn’t pay enough attention to the child/ren’s emotional needs, although he’s Mr. Mom and babysits them all day. He keeps the finances straight and keeps a rein on her profligacy, for which he’s intensely resented. He is the voice of reason while she “periodically” screams she wants a divorce. I’ve seen it in the lives of friends, and it’s excruciating, especially because I’m usually friends with both the husband and the wife. (The wives are always complaining to ME about my friend.)
The games females play.
Oh yes, the husbands are also “no good” because, er, they’re human. Sometimes they’re too tired to hold down two jobs, pay attention to the aforementioned emotional needs of everyone except themselves, keep the money straight, the house clean, and the woman cheered up 24/7. Sometimes he even likes to go out with his guy friends, and he won’t quit smoking!!!! To hell with such defectives! – I’ll get a dog instead, trash-mouths the bitch. In many cases, though, she’s getting banged by her boss at work or her nigger “friend,” hardly a case of doing without benefit of a male. I’ve seen it all, and the White American woman is, on average, our race’s degenerate-without-peer.
Girls should be raised in a religion, kept away from all TV and all magazines (think Cosmopolitan), kept to the task of knitting and cooking until they’re ready to marry off in an arranged marriage and have and raise babies with their husband, who is the head of the household. This worked fine for most of human history minus the last 50 years. Despite the propaganda jews pushed during the last 50, women were much better off, more respected, and happier. Today they are largely miserable schizophrenics hopping from bed to bed until they wind up with a dog, literally. Don’t blame women (much). Blame the kikes who wrecked the laws, the culture, and the nation.
There is a solution to the jewish problem.
3 October, 2007 at 10:09 pm
sgruber –
I think you’re a punk, but that was a fine post, and I am with you on every point. Except one: a solution.
3 October, 2007 at 11:19 pm
Girls today are indeed mentally screwed up, but you can’t really fault them because in most cases they were raised by dads who didn’t fulfill their role as the protector-in-chief.
It’s the father’s job to shield the young ones (especially daughters) from the corrupting influences that threaten to turn them into degenerate race-mixing zombies.
This is the most important service any father can render unto his children (even more important than the breadwinner stuff).
And any father who fails to protect his kids from the onslaught of racially destructive propaganda out there (especially television) isn’t worth a flying f*ck.
BTW, my neighbor’s kids are home-schooled and you wouldn’t believe how well-behaved they are. They’re not at all like the typical spoiled brats that many people assume are the norm.
4 October, 2007 at 6:11 am
Needs a break: Feel better you little self righteous punk. I’ve had enough guys on this website contact me and let me know that this website is basically made up of losers banned from other websites who are bitter and angry and womanless in their lives.
Even Dave C, a frequent poster on the Forum and a fairly rational guy for VNN, nailed you all recently when he commented that the majority of you all couldn’t get a woman or hadn’t had one in so long you’d forgotten what one was like……hahaha.
I’m soon to be 53 and I get told all the time I don’t look a day over 40, if that. I may be childless, by choice (as most of the males on this website seem to be as well my friend) but I’m hardly old and I’m hardly bitter or schizophrenic as your post suggests. I have no doubt I could outperform you…….hot flashes, lupus, and arthritis be damned.
I can look back on my life and be proud of my choices and what I’ve brought to the table of white culture and society. I’ve provided a lot of white people, some single, mostly families, with much loved pets. I’ve saved hundreds and hundreds of animals from being killed, and I’ve helped a lot of white people down through the years in one capacity or another.
What have you done my friend….please inform us all what your accomplishments have been to spread the word of whiteness.
This morning I was waiting in line to sign for something I had just delivered to a store where they play nothing but nigger noise on the radio. The guy behind the counter is a nice friendly Indian who likes me and playfully teases and flirts with me as I do my job each morning. This morning there were several young white guys standing in line with me, so I thought I would ask the worker when he was going to play some white music and see who said what.
The worker laughed and joked with me, saying that the young white guys who come in there all seem to like that nigger noise. He said it was only the “old” people, over 40, who don’t like it. I looked at the white guys standing in line and not one of them said anything when I asked them if that is what they listen to at their home. They were too scared and gunshy to say anything. But a white woman, someone you dismiss as too much of a loser or whatever other names you heap on us, had the balls to say something about the nigger noise in the convenience store that we all are subjected to. And the worker said he would start playing a white station I recommended he play, 92.9 FM here in the Atlanta area. See….who have you confronted lately Mr. Big Stuff.
Care to comment on that, Mr. Know It All. If you’d been there this morning, no doubt you’d have looked the other way too and kept your mouth shut. That’s why I know you’re a big blowhard who comes on this website and talks big but does NOTHING in his personal life for white people. Just like 90% of you white guys here. Maybe 10% of you all put your money where your mouth is.
Where do you live….anywhere near Knoxville. Did you come to either rally last spring. Do you ever show your face at any event or do you just run your mouth on this website Boo Radley.
I’ll stack my life against any of you big talkers any time of the day or night. Just let me know fellas. Right now I’m trying to plan a rally in January for Channon and Christopher. I’ll let you know when or if anything gets done as I know you all will want to be there.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiight.
4 October, 2007 at 6:55 am
Oh Susan,
pity that we can’t meet, explanations were much easier! Don’t expect a woman to tell you about her disorders- only psychiatrists- or men find out about it the hard way. Fact: As there are impotent men, so there are women with a comparable psychological deficiency, called frigidity.
In the case I told above, the woman kept her dog out of sight- call that clever or bad conscience- until she believed to have me “in”. Then of course I soon found out the pervading influence the pet had upon her mind. Yes, she admitted it was a baby substitute. As I know a little of psychoanalysis, I quickly established a sexual connection: She had a mortal fear of childbirth- I refrain here from giving further details. I ended the relationship as, told above, she was not willing to change her ways. And because of this I had no chance to find out, when and where in her mental development that mis-education had taken place.
But, I am sure, and the above case proves it, too many females are twisted in their minds about their natural roles,- (either through religion, education or propaganda) also in their relations to men (who in turn, are misdirected to see in women only sex objects), and the results are then women who must be regarded as failures and lost to the preservation and development of our white race. Others have said that here clearly and I wholly agree with them.
4 October, 2007 at 7:26 am
What have you done my friend….please inform us all what your accomplishments have been to spread the word of whiteness.
I’m not a cheerleader for nebulosities like “whiteness”.
I may be childless, by choice …. I have no doubt I could outperform you…….hot flashes, lupus, and arthritis be damned.
And there you have it…
4 October, 2007 at 1:05 pm
Arminius: Oh, we can meet dude. I plan to come to the next planned rally in Knoxville or wherever it may be as long as I can drive there or ride with someone in the Atlanta area.
Please do seek me out. I’m blonde and reasonably attractive and usually have a big smile on my face. I like to stay happy and project that feeling to others as it beats looking morose and defeated.
You and needs a break: same ole same ole….nothing new here…just the same old woman bashing….nothing but goddamn complaining about everything female and womanly. Time for a new MO.
Hey fellas….surprise me….just once……say something nice about a white woman. Dig deep and I’m sure you can remember something you used to like about us.
I’m telling you fellas….only on VNN would so many white guys complain so bitterly about a white woman owning a dog or cat. If you could only step out of yourselves for a minute and see how ridiculous you sound.
All I can say is if you guys project this much nastiness, hatred, and bitterness toward the white women you meet in your everyday lives, no wonder you are womanless. You depress the hell out of me just reading what you’ve written. If I had to actually be around you, I just might think slitting my wrists looked better.
Because of your type, I’ve basically stopped posting on the Forum. I will occassionally say something here, but I’ve pretty much left VNN except to keep up with planned activities. I came here looking for activism and haven’t found much so far. Only a lot of angry bitter white guys……gosh what fun.
4 October, 2007 at 4:13 pm
Because of your type, I’ve basically stopped posting on the Forum.
Good, now get the fuck out of here, too. Look at you, flirting with any sap willing to throw you a bone. Ooh I got a PM from a guy who assures me you’re all frustrated little boys, ooh. Jesus, GO AWAY.
4 October, 2007 at 5:16 pm
“sue” on the forum, used “I” or “me” or “myself” forty-two times- in one post alone. (#62)
4 October, 2007 at 6:12 pm
needs a break:
What is your solution to the jewish problem?
4 October, 2007 at 8:50 pm
Maybe women have dogs because it’s impossible to find good, decent men nowadays? Anyone think of that instead of tossing around more of this women bashing nonsense.
Hmm…
What about men who have dogs? What there’s nothing to blame there? Again more men have dogs than women. Women have cats. So what is the problem here?
First moron guys don’t want women to be whores but then they want them out having sex to get pregnant. Which is it buddy?
Stop blaming women for lives problems. Men are as much to blame for this idiocy.
There’s as many problems created by men as women. For example, why the hell, on a white nationalist website would anyone, with morals and decency, start a topic entitled “Shaved women”? Can’t think of anything else but naked women… And then post naked pictures of women…hmm…
So jewish, so very jewish indeed.
That is what is wrong with white people. Always thinking with their penises or vaginas. So ladylike and gentlemanly.
4 October, 2007 at 8:57 pm
“”"Only a lot of angry bitter white guys……”"”
Getting turned down constantly and disrespecting women so much will lead to that. Don’t worry, they are saving their race. They’re doing such a good job most females leave this site once they see this bs spewing out of their mouths.
I feel bad for their mothers.
4 October, 2007 at 10:21 pm
I never heard of this term, “Disrespecting” till the niggers came up with it. How it ever became accepted I’ll never know.
Is this another case of wimmins emulating niggers?
Deep down in their hearts wimmin identify/sympathize with the niggers/minorities.
4 October, 2007 at 10:23 pm
Dat’s why dey always be troubles for us.
4 October, 2007 at 11:38 pm
I do not know who is more repulsive: the whining female who wrote this article or the people who agree with her.
The author goes far beyond complaining about people who have dogs instead of children. She wants to get rid of pet dogs entirely because they allegedly pose a threat to children. But why stop at dogs? Why not get rid of matches too? And automobiles? And cleaning fluids? Why pick on the dogs that poop out of doors? Don’t ducks and squirrels poop outdoors too? Don’t all wild animals poop outdoors? Why focus on dogs, most of whose owners pick up after them? And don’t other animals have germs too? Maybe children will get sick! Abolish the petting zoos, then, and abolish wildlife. Nothing is too extreme to insure baby’s safety.
The reason why Western civilization has been sliding steadily toward a soppy nursery school nicer-than-nice totalitarianism is because women have been given the vote and told that they need to have opinions. The female nesting and nurturing instinct needs to be confined to the home. Women should not have votes and should not be taught that their opinions about anything other than wallpaper, dinner menus, gardening, and childrearing matter in the least to the rest of us. Most women cannot take abstract ideas seriously anyway, so they just use them as tokens of social one-upsmanship, just like clothes and shoes. Nothing is more repulsive to me than a female whose misplaced maternal instincts are given free reign. I would much rather see a woman “baby” a dog than write drivel like this article.
As for the commentators who go along with her jaundiced view of pet ownership: I really think there is something defective about people who do not like dogs. I am a dog owner, and I have found that dogs bring out the best in people, including in myself. People in large urban areas, especially multiracial, multicultural urban areas, experience a great deal of isolation and mistrust of others. But when two dog owners meet, they know immediately that they have something in common. Nothing in my experience breaks down that isolation like dog ownership.
I have also found that owning dogs need not interfere with forming families and having children. Quite the opposite, I have seen women learn the pleasure of nurturing with a dog and then go on to have children. I have also seen couples meet based on pet ownership then go on to form families. Many women judge how a man will be with her and with her potential children by observing how he treats a dog. Dogs bring out the gentle and loving sides of even the toughest men, and women need to see that side to form attachments.
There is no EITHER-OR here. No “either dogs or people.” It is a BOTH-AND. I suspect that the people who are incapable of forming close relationships with people have lousy relationships with their canine substitutes. And people who are capable of truly loving animals are also capable of loving people. Even classic animal-loving misanthropes like Savitri Devi had very close relationships with their friends. They were just very choosy about those they befriended. I would hate to the be child of the woman who wrote that article.
5 October, 2007 at 1:10 am
Isn’t “disrespecting” the same thing as “showing disrespect for/to”? just like “painting” is the same as “applying paint to”…
Anyway, grouping women in with niggers and then “wondering” (to wonder about) why there are 50 men in the WN movement for every woman, go figure…
5 October, 2007 at 1:11 am
i forgot to add some nigger slang to show how white i am… um, sho nuff
5 October, 2007 at 7:06 am
That’s why in the old macho chauvinist sexist days men had clubs to congregate and discuss matters. Women on the other hand, cannot handle the truth that which were trying to correct the behavior,and for men as well. Bashing women perceived by sue as though were cavemen. Listen up sue and the like, there’s going to come a time when thing aren’t going to be peaches and cream. The cushy system as it were, your mouth will soon learn to STFU.
5 October, 2007 at 10:11 am
“”"Deep down in their hearts wimmin identify/sympathize with the niggers/minorities.”"”
Riiight. All women are like this? Really?
Because I am not. Actually I can care less about anybody but my family. I hate everyone and people like you are even making me hate my own kind. I already hate about 90% of my own kind, might as well make it the whole fucking race.
I am extremely bitter towards human beings.
5 October, 2007 at 10:46 am
Summer,
It truly annoys me when I hear women say that there are no decent men around. What the hell? There are plenty of good men and always has been. Open your eyes.
What I see are many women who are impossible to please. Apparently, these same woman think they’re so special that there are no men good enough for them. As these women become older, (and wierder) and are without a mate or children, they’re really gonna need that cat or dog!
5 October, 2007 at 11:44 am
Blah, blah, blah…..that’s all your noise sounds like to me anymore.
needs a break: I have not “flirted” with anyone here at VNN. I simply state what I have to say and leave it at that. Yes, some guys have contacted me but I did not come here looking for a man. Good thing too……… But I did come here looking for activism.
And there is one guy who lives not too far from me in the metro area, and we email back and forth about various issues. This guy is a true gentleman and I can’t figure out why he’s single. But he’s too young for me….he needs a young female with whom he could have a family…if he even wants one. But, he is a joy to communicate with.
Oh, and by the way, I went into the convenience store today that used to play nigger noise and they had white music on for the first time.
Let’s hear it for the activist WHITE WOMAN who knows how to get things accomplished.
And Summer, I wouldn’t go looking for a nice guy here. Most of the decent ones I’ve encountered are already married and the single ones are just too angry to even communicate with.
They are not lost forever, but they are so far gone that you really shouldn’t even attempt to rehab them. It’s really very sad, because so many of these guys here do have some redeemable qualities but the anger and bitterness just completely overwhelms any of the good.
I have communicated with quite a few, married and single, and most of the married ones are polite and courtenous, but the single guys are so angry and bitter that you can’t even have a conversation with them without them becoming explosive over the slightest little thing.
It has happened to me numerous times where I was having what I thought was a nice conversation exchanging pleasantries and WHAM they misconstrue something I said and just tear you to shreds. It isn’t worth the pain you have to endure to try to be friends with any of these guys. It’s really a shame because these guys share your feelings about race and diversity and multiculturalism and jews, but they simply cannot let go of their anger.
I have salvaged a couple of these email relationships but only because I took the time and trouble to explain myself so that the guy “got” what I was saying and smoothed over whatever perceived slight he experienced. Some of them I have not salvaged because of the anger issue on their part. Oh well, can’t win them all…….
My advice: If you cannot find a nice white guy who shares at least some of your interests and goals in life as a white women, go get yourself a dog or cat. Might as well at least give a needy animal a home than to be completely alone.
And maybe….don’t give up….just when you think all the nice guys are gone….a nice guy might just walk into your life. The funny thing is that these guys think they’re nice, but they obviously don’t get how much anger and bitterness and nastiness they project. And as you can see from the above posts, it does no good to try to talk to them, they just continue to explode in anger and unsults.
5 October, 2007 at 12:31 pm
“”"Summer,
It truly annoys me when I hear women say that there are no decent men around. What the hell?”"”"
Well I have a good man so, there must be one. ;) A good man doesn’t sit on message boards and disgrace women like the way a lot of men on this msg board do. There are hardly any good men anymore just like there are hardly any good women. Everybody is screwy.
“”"There are plenty of good men and always has been. Open your eyes.”"”
I did and I found one. For other women there aren’t many options. You can have a man who wants to or has screwed more than a dozen broads in his lifetime, or a wigger, or a partier or someone who doesn’t want kids. Good choice there. (Same goes for trying to find a good women as seeing they’re both alike nowadays.)
“”"What I see are many women who are impossible to please. Apparently, these same woman think they’re so special that there are no men good enough for them. As these women become older, (and wierder) and are without a mate or children, they’re really gonna need that cat or dog!”"”"
Not all women are hard to please. I’m easy to please. I do not ask for much from my fiancee, I do not bitch at him constantly and I don’t irratate him everyday. I don’t need a rose everyday. Just a hug and kiss and I am fine.
5 October, 2007 at 12:46 pm
Susan – Thanks for what you said. I already do have a wonderful man who is kind and courteous and is in no way abusive and hateful as the men on these msg boards. We have a 10 week old daughter together and I am proud he is her father. He has a great mentality is on the right tract and knows the world’s problems isn’t the woman’s fault. He knows everyone is to blame. He knows men are to blame because they lost their grip on the world and are trying to get it back and he knows women are to blame because they are followers. He knows the biggest problem is jews and niggers come next. Etc etc. I am glad I have found him because if I didn’t I would feel as lost as any female coming to this website and leave hating white men even more.
“”"just when you think all the nice guys are gone….a nice guy might just walk into your life. The funny thing is that these guys think they’re nice, but they obviously don’t get how much anger and bitterness and nastiness they project. And as you can see from the above posts, it does no good to try to talk to them, they just continue to explode in anger and unsults.”"”
The men on this msg board are filled with so much hate its baffling. They try to place blame on everyone but themselves and they end up putting most of the blame on their white women. White men are the ones who lost grip on the worlds power, not the white women. They need to face facts and try to get things back in order but without hating their own kind. They need to stop driving women away and when a woman approaches this msg board, congradulate her for being on the right tract and treat her with the respect (not a nigger word and white person came up with it) and love she deserves or their race will be lost.
They also need to understand women think differently on political issues than men do. Yes we are interested in what the nigger and jews are doing to whites but we don’t fully comprehend politics like men do, so they need to be a little relaxed with us, if they want to speak political with us. (I try not to engage in political conversations although I do not consider what 5 niggers did to a white man political persay.)
These men seriously need a woman to bring them back to earth. They need a hug from a woman they care about. I know that’s so womanly and men don’t have feelings, bs, men love to get a hug from that special person just as much as a woman does.
5 October, 2007 at 3:58 pm
The men on this msg board are filled with so much hate its baffling.
It’s not baffling at all.
Nothing the male commenters on this blog have said hasn’t already been said by Alex Linder himself many times.
In other words, they are very much a reflection of the webmaster’s own attitudes and opinions.
If the woman-bashing stuff here upsets you as much as you say it does, then you need to contact Mr Linder directly (via email or whatever) and take the matter up with him since he is the ultimate source and origin of the “problem”.
5 October, 2007 at 4:44 pm
Very well said Summer. And I’m glad you have a nice man. Yes, some of these guys do need a hug, but unfortunately you can’t get near enough for all the anger and bitterness to give them what they need!!!
Isn’t that funny….I mean I’ve had several men tell me what I need….I don’t think I need to say what THAT is….and yet what so many of these guys need is just what we all like and need: love and attention and affection.
Instead, we white people continue to complain, argue, accuse, and just generally behave badly toward one another.
I’ll just sit here and wait for the next explosion……..
6 October, 2007 at 5:13 pm
“This guy is a true gentleman and I can’t figure out why he’s single.” Susan
Well let me fill you in on ‘why’ he’s single. It’s something YOU should already know because you are a woman. Women, in general, only *say* they want a nice guy but it’s a lie. None of them *really* do.
Most women are liars when it concerns this particular issue. I’m not sure how many times I’ve heard a woman say: “I can’t seem to find a ‘nice’ guy anywhere!” or “Are all the good ones taken?” etc etc blah blah and on and on when there are literally *nice* guys everywhere within a 10 block radius of said woman. No, what the woman really means is that she can’t land an alpha male at this particular time.
The truth is that the above average woman prefers the most ‘alpha’ male she can get. Women place more importance on a man’s survival value whereas in contrast a man places more value on a woman’s reproductive value. That’s why big boobs, clear skin, silky hair, a nice hip to waist ratio and a good arse are essentially what turns a man’s switches. It’s evolutionary biology and there’s no thinking involved.
For a woman, the man has to demonstrate high survival value and show the promise of being a good provider. Most above average attractive women are approached in bars and clubs and other locales by ‘nice’ guys all the time and these same women blow them off at every turn.
It’s not even a thinking process so much as it is an evolutionary one. The more important criteria is survival value and not presumed ‘niceness’. Even the nice guys that get through the initial ‘screen’ are then screened several more times by the woman for congruency in their ‘game’ and their presentation and to determine their future survival ability. I could go on and on, but I’ll spare the typing expense.
6 October, 2007 at 6:20 pm
Thoughtcrime – I agree.
I always say this. Never go searching for your ‘sexy, gorgeous blonde big boob hollywood want to be type chick.’ They always turn out to be psychos or whores. Those women always want money and more money. All for cosmetic surgery of course.
Just go for an average looking girl. They are the best choice, honestly. No need for “only blonde and only big boobs.” MOST white women have an average a – c cup anyways and anything bigger usually are implants. I don’t think guys like implants. I couldn’t possibly invision a woman with implants breast feeding her child. The child might pop one of those. *giggles*
6 October, 2007 at 7:17 pm
That’s why big boobs, clear skin, silky hair, a nice hip to waist ratio and a good arse are essentially what turns a man’s switches.
I have to disagree with you about the “big boobs” stuff (and the “great arse” stuff too).
This noxious “big boob” nonsense was planted in white men’s heads by the jew porn industry and unfortunately the majority of white men appear to have been taken in by it.
Personally, I can honestly tell you that the only physical attribute I ever looked for in a white woman was a pretty (or reasonably pretty) face and that’s it.
And, no, I don’t think I’m the only one who thinks this way because I’ve seen surveys that indicate that most men still have a preference for above-the-neck beauty even now.
Look at pictures of Charles Lindbergh’s wife (Google the name Anne Morrow Lindbergh) if you want to see what most white men were lusting after before the jew porn industry began cranking out sleazy mass-produced smut.
Does Lindbergh’s wife look like she had big boobs to you?
6 October, 2007 at 7:37 pm
She is pretty. Very plain looking (meaning not a load of makeup) and not anorexic. Yeah I don’t believe women should wear loads of makeup and be anorexic. Women need a bit of meat on them. Helps the curves show. :) (Not being fat, just what the use to look like.)
6 October, 2007 at 9:33 pm
MHK: Thank you darling and bless your little heart. You are absolutely right about what white men used to look for and still do in a white woman. It’s always been mostly about a pretty if not pleasant face. The big boobs shit came in with Hollywood in the fifties, I would imagine, when Marilyn Monroe and Jayne Mansfield and Sophia Loren types were being pushed in a big way to American men.
Despite what many of you say about Michael Savage, he does have something of value to say about this image of womanhood that was pushed on men back in the fifties. He says these women looked like Buicks from the front, and most men really did not find them that attractive but were afraid to say so for fear of being labeled a homo.
The great beauties of the early Hollywood era, Bergman, Lombard, Crawford, Garbo, Hepburn, Lamar, Leigh, all had beautiful faces but were not large breasted. They all had to diet when they arrived in Hollywood to get pencil thin, and were given the star treatment in other ways to make them even more beautiful, but they were known for having pretty faces.
That’s one reason why early movies are so fascinating to me….because actresses really had to emote with their faces back then. There wasn’t so much talking, and no talking in silent movies, and they had to convey emotion through their faces.
But getting back to American men and what they want in women….if you guys here think that most American men look for a woman with big breasts and wide hips, you are in the minority my friends. MHK is right…. American men have been snookered and have fallen for that crap–hook, line, and sinker.
I’ve known many men who have told me that the first thing that attracts them is the face. It’s pretty much the same for women too. I mean it’s only natural that a face is the first thing you notice because that’s where the eyes are……duh.
Summer is right about one thing. You guys need to get over this looking for one kind of woman who fits some esoteric idea of womanhood to you. Look for an average to nice looking face and then find a pleasant personality to go with it. I guarantee there are still plenty of females out there who fit this mold.
If you guys can’t find this, then you need to seriously consider the possibility that the problem may be YOU.
7 October, 2007 at 12:10 pm
“I have to disagree with you about the “big boobs” stuff (and the “great arse” stuff too). This noxious “big boob” nonsense was planted in white men’s heads by the jew porn industry and unfortunately the majority of white men appear to have been taken in by it.” MHK
No disrespect intended, but you sound like a programmed automaton. I hate ethnocentric Jews just as much, if not more than the next White, but claiming Jews are responsible for and somehow directing evolutionary sexual selection and preference is ridiculous.
You are also lying to yourself when you say that big boobs and a great arse do nothing for you, because it’s not an intellectual preference, rather an evolutionary fitness one (unless you are not hetero?). The breast region on a female serves several purposes: it’s a secondary sexual characteristic, provides milk for the developing child, provides visual sexual maturity clues to an interested male, and serves as a buttocks mimic which reinforces the visual interest/sexuality of said female.
There is no voluntary cognitive process to this. A good sized balcony and a great arse (along with other visual cues that signal a woman’s sexual/reproductive fitness–bright eyes, clear skin, waist to hip ratio, symmetrical face, clean shiny hair etc..all visual cues by the way) will flip the switches of the majority of men and attraction will be generated.
There is no intellectualizing over this type of phenomenon; the aforementioned cues are ‘switches’ that for the majority of men are subconscious and directed by evolutionary selection.
7 October, 2007 at 7:52 pm
To Thoughtcrime and et al on this thread: No wonder you idiots are alone and womanless. You are all total idiots who are totally undeserving of a good woman.
I sit here and laugh my ass off at what you all write, all your esoteric bullshit about what attracts men and wonder to myself: what planet did these idiots fall off of…..
Sit alone in your little 12×12 bedroom banging away on the typewriter all night, ranting to no one and accomplishing nothing……..just don’t ever wonder why you are alone.
This is my last post on this thread. I know when it’s hopeless.
7 October, 2007 at 7:53 pm
And of course, I guess my age is showing. I meant to say “computer” not typewriter.
8 October, 2007 at 12:46 am
…it’s not an intellectual preference, rather an evolutionary fitness one (unless you are not hetero?)…
I swear I’m 100% heterosexual.
8 October, 2007 at 2:55 pm
There is a theory of selection I heard about a long time ago called “implanting”, where we get implanted with some image when we are very young (with minds that are like “open slates”) and that sets up a selection criteria that never leaves for life. This can happen more than once, but, only after quiet a long time. By the time we have passed puberty, most of our “implants” have probably been set, and we have a small bucket of implants that will be triggered when we encounter someone that matches one of our implants enough to cause the synapse.
That is why some people always go for clones of previous mates, no matter how bad it might have gone and no matter how many times it goes sour for them. They probably only have ONE implant, and just can’t be satisfied with any other “type”.
If this theory has any validity, it would suggest that we really can’t do much about our own selection criteria, but, we can have a major impact on how our children will select a mate – by restricting any images before them except the ones we are willing to risk getting to be an “implant”.
Again, if this theory has credence, then, that could have been another reason for the jews pushing us to integrate our schools – one side effect (or maybe the MAIN desired effect) would have been to allow plenty of opportunities for young whites to get implanted with an image of a black person of the opposite sex, and we would wind up with a lot of young adults crippled with an “implant”, or uncontrollable urge to mate with a black – an urge that would stay with them FOR LIFE.
I can personally attest to something like that at least 3 times in some folks around here I know pretty well – pre-teen, or early teenaged, daughters announce that they “like black guys”. I once talked to one myself and I could see it in her eyes – she REALLY DID LIKE THEM. I came away with the feeling that she had somehow been mesmerized and was acting out someone else’s commands to her own detriment – the implanting theory backs this up.
Damn jews, like putting toxin in the punch bowl at an all-white party. Dammit!
8 October, 2007 at 4:52 pm
# susan Says:
7 October, 2007 at 7:52 pm
“To Thoughtcrime and et al on this thread: No wonder you idiots are alone and womanless. You are all total idiots who are totally undeserving of a good woman.”
You are simply proving my theory that the majority of women are walking around in an emotionally hypersensitive state which obscures reality. The fact that you can’t even admit it is what gets to me personally.
Women are guided by their emotions and what ‘feels’ right. This is about as complex as it gets I think for the average woman. Women are all about ‘feeling’ and ‘having fun’ and ‘being entertained’ etc etc. ad infinitum.
Why don’t you comment on the information I offered instead of emotional name-calling drivel?
Also, didn’t you mention earlier that you don’t have kids? Not trying to be personal, but if you don’t have kids and you are a middle aged or older woman as I suspect, and nothing is physically wrong with you, then if you don’t have children by this age, then you are, genetically speaking, a failure.
Up to this point, you have taken your unique combination of genes and thrown them in the shitbox. To me that’s one of the worse things that can happen to a person. If you don’t intend on having kids ever, the least you can do is donate some eggs.