Jew Stix Interviews Linder
Posted by alex in Alex Linder, AmRen, Linder appearances at 2:02 pm | 
Permanent Link
Nicholas Stix – 10/11/2007
Alex Linder is the operator of the Vanguard News Network. The motto of the web site is “No Jews, Just Right”. The Southern Poverty Law Center criticized VNN stating that its web site “[offends] even many of the most extreme racists and anti-Semites with Linder’s potty humor [and] untrammeled misogyny.” Alex Linder formerly worked for CNN’s “Evans & Novak” show and then “The American Spectator”. He was also a member of the National Alliance, which has similar views on many subjects as the VNN, but left the alliance after he allowed criticism of it on his own web site. Award-winning journalist Nicholas Stix interviewed him for the Global Politician.
Nicholas Stix (NS): You told me [in your email] that you’re holding the rally on May 26th.
Alex Linder (AL): Correct.
NS: So that will be Memorial Day Weekend?
AL: Yeah.
NS: And do you have any idea how many people you expect, or hope to get to show up?
AL: No, I really don’t. We’re advertising it on our forum, and wherever we can. And we are going to do some prep work to get the general public, but all are welcome, so we’ll see.
NS: Right. And do you have any idea of speakers you intend to invite?
AL: Yeah, I’m going to speak, we’re going to have Hal Turner speak, probably have Ed Fields speak.
NS: Ed Field [sic]?
AL: Yeah, and possibly one or two others.
NS: Now, I don’t have to tell you that this, these crimes have undergone a media blackout, in terms of the national media.
AL: That’s correct.
NS: How do you explain that?
AL: Well, it’s the Jewish media control. And the fact that any kind of non-white crime doesn’t fit their agenda, so they suppress it.
NS: Now, various reports have been published in, on blogs – both white and black blogs, oddly enough – which have claimed that both victims were sexually mutilated. I’m sure you’re familiar with these reports.
AL: Yes.
NS: No officials in local law enforcement in Knoxville or federal law enforcement have made these reports, to my knowledge. I’ve spoken with people, and they’ve refused to make any statements. Well, they’ve variously said they don’t know, the feds have, and local law enforcement has refused to confirm or disconfirm any of these reports. Do you have any idea where these reports have emanated from?
AL: Well, as best I can tell, they’re coming from people who are inside there who are relating it through [sighs] oh, by the time you get in a blog it’s either second or third person, but what are you gonna do? This stuff is always hushed up.
[Chuckles]. I would have to [pauses] Oh, God. I spent a couple of nights reading through everything and there’s, that’s out there, and it’s pretty clear it’s coming from the cop, investigation that they, that they sodomized ‘em, and they pissed on ‘em, and they dumped chemicals on ‘em.
NS: No, no, no. That’s not what I’m talking about.
AL: They covered it up. They cover it up.
NS: The documents, no the documents, the official documents show that they’ve been charged formally with having raped both members of the couple, the man and the woman. And with having raped the woman orally, vaginally, and anally. This is not at issue.
AL: Yeah.
NS: The issue is the charge, the claims that the, Mr. Newsom was sexually dismembered, and which would presumably be while he was alive, and that um that Ms. Christian had her breasts chopped off.
But there’s actually no apparent beef. The mainstream media outlet, the Knoxville News [Sentinel], did publish reports that the killers poured cleaning fluid down Ms. Christian’s mouth while she was alive, supposedly to get rid of DNA. So that’s not, I mean, that’s actually been in the mainstream media, the local media, of course. So, but the issue, the reports that have not been published by any mainstream media outlet are the blog reports charging the sexual mutilation of the victims.
AL: So, what?
NS: Hmm?
AL: So, what?
NS: No, I was just wondering if you had any sources.
AL: Look, you’re writing for AmRen.
NS: Right.
AL: AmRen wants to focus on the crime.
NS: Right.
AL: And obsess about it. I’m interested in the systemic nature of this problem, which is why it’s being suppressed. And that goes to the Jewish control. The Jews are the ones who produce the policies that ensure that this stuff happens. That’s the important thing here. Yeah, the fact is they were, any way you want to cut it, they were murdered, they were raped, and they were tortured, a combination of those. I know [American Renaissance editor Jared] Taylor wants to get people obsessing about that but that’s not the important thing here. The important thing here is that the Jews set up the system that allows this stuff to happen. It literally facilitates it. These kind of crimes weren’t happening fifty years ago, because niggers knew they would be lynched, and they were kept out of white communities, and white communities were allowed by law to protect themselves.
AL: Now, the Jews re-wrote the laws, and that is the main issue here. Now, I know you don’t want to say that, and I know that you are probably a Jew yourself.
NS: I most certainly am.
AL: You are a Jew, and yet you are writing for a ostensibly [laughs], a publication that, that represents white people. That’s what’s such a joke about Jared Taylor’s approach. Whites are second-class citizens at AmRen, just as they are in the broader society. It’s the Jews who set up the so-called civil rights that denied whites the free association. That’s what produces crimes like this. And Jared Taylor damn well knows that, but he won’t allow his people to say it on his Web site. So, we don’t take the same view that AmRen takes. That’s assuming that AmRen is honestly motivated, which I don’t assume personally.
NS: What do you think AmRen’s motivations are?
AL: I think it may well be just a false front.
NS: A false front for…?
AL: The Jews. The Jews are putting money into it. He’s allowing Jews to speak. He’s allowing Jews to criticize whites on a site; he does not allow whites to criticize Jews. You tell me how that’s any different from the New York Times or any other major media. Same system of taboos applies at AmRen that does everywhere else in society. And he wants his people to be obsessed about blacks and black crime. Blacks are a headless community. They’re not capable of leading themselves or organizing themselves. The Jews set up the NAACP [reader’s note: this is actually true], and the Jews re-wrote the rules so the white communities were left open to exactly this kind of crime. Which we have named a “hush” crime, ‘cause it focuses not only on the black criminals but the Jews who hush up what’s going on even while they’re trumping up the garbage allegations at Duke, and reporting on that crap for a year.
NS: [Writing feverishly.] I’m trying to keep up with you.
AL: I mean, I’ve written a bunch on our site, so if you have any problem, you’ll find what I’m telling you written there.
NS: Let me just go back here. Alright, I know you told me in your email that the Web site will announce the time and place, the exact time and location of the rally.
AL: Well, we have the time, but we don’t have the exact location or the [unclear] we’re not going to talk about it quite yet.
NS: Yeah, no, I, would imagine not. And so, I’ll just check around that time.
AL: Yeah, so if you check the week of the rally, we …. We might do it multiple places. It just depends. We want to have some access to the public. We don’t want, we’re tired of going to these events and applying for a permit and being shoved away in some little corner, and having to stick mirrors up our asses and fly helicopters overhead.
We’re just going to, simply – we’re going to use our rights.
NS: Oh, so, in other words, you might not – you might do it without a permit.
AL: [Chuckles] We’re going to do – yeah, we’re going to do it without a permit.
We’re going to assemble and speak where we feel it’s appropriate, not where the cops or any other group feels it’s appropriate.
NS: Alright, so I’ll send your love to Jared Taylor.
AL: Well, he I’m sure knows what I think.
NS: I’m sure he does.
AL: He knows damn well there’s a reason that all of this is going on. He knows exactly what it is, and there’s a reason that he doesn’t allow his people to talk about it, and that he doesn’t talk about it himself. So, either he’s being paid to, or he’s just a coward. And there’s no third option.
But we’re going to do right; fear no man, as [the late neo-Nazi leader and National Alliance founder, William] Pierce advised.
NS: I’m sorry, what…?
AL: I enjoy your articles; I’ve read ‘em in the past. I was disappointed to find out you’re a Jew. But …
NS: [Laughs out loud.]
AL: You still do pretty good work. I’ve seen, I can’t remember precisely, but I spent at least one day a couple of years ago reading through everything you’ve written, so.
NS: That’s a lot of writing.
AL: You’ve done quite a bit. I mean, do you freelance, or…?
NS: Well, sure. I’m a homeless writer.
AL: Yeah.
NS: Freelancing is what you do by necessity, not by choice.
AL: It’s a difficult thing, I know that. Should you write on anything touchy, even if you leave the Jew out of it.
NS: [Laughs] You know, one of your readers thought he did me a favor by stating that I’m only half-Jew. He’s mistaken. There’s no half-Jews [NS chuckles].
AL: Well, I appreciate your admitting it.
NS: Well, of course, it’s not something to admit or to hide. It’s a simple matter of fact. Either – it’s an all-or-nothing proposition.
AL: I think a lot of Jews try to hide that they’re Jews.
NS: I don’t know about that. But there, no there are a lot of people who don’t know that there’s no such thing as a half-Jew. Actually, the Nazis started that notion that you could be a part-Jew.
AL: Well, they had, what did they say, if one in four of your grandparents was, that qualified you?
NS: Oh, well, that’s not what I’m talking about. Either you have a Jewish mother or you don’t. That’s what makes a Jew. Or else you have to convert. That’s the issue of whether you had a grandparent, that’s irrelevant, unless you’re talking about your mother’s mother. That’s all that.
AL: I’m not sure that Israel sees it that way.
NS: What does Israel say?
AL: I think Israel has just that, that if you can prove one of your grandparents, even if it was not a female, you can still get in by their blood laws. And I know the Nazis at least to some degree talked to the rabbis and tried to base what they did on Jewish law.
NS: Well, that’s no, no, Jewish law is what I just said. I don’t know what Israel’s doing, but Jewish law is that either your mother’s a Jewish woman, or you have to have converted – that’s it. [This is true within Israel, as well as without, though Reform Jews perversely claim that someone who does not practice Judaism is not a Jew, regardless of whether his mother was a Jew. I say perversely, because the vast majority of Reform Jews – whose movement is reducible to Enlightenment atheism plus matzoh brei – are non-practicing.]
AL: That may be a little different from what Israel says.
NS: That’s possible, but that would be a political matter, not a religious matter, whatever they did.
AL: But you know, the main point about this here, is that we’re not going there to tie balloons, and it’s so pitiful when you read through the guest book that they have in the local paper where all the family and friends of these people respond, and they just, ‘Oh what can we do?’ these horri…, no these tragedies happen for a reason. And it’s, the reason is that the people running our society are Jews, and they intend our extermination. And they put in place these words and terms and frames and arguments, and this [unclear] safe way for whites to respond, having stupid candlelight vigils. And that’s absolutely the wrong way. There needs to be a hell of a lot of anger. And eventually, we’re going to have to physically displace the Jews. It’s just that simple.
And I don’t mind telling you that, because I’ve written that many times. I don’t know what it’s going to take to bring that about, but that’s the only solution.
NS: Well, seeing as I’m the head of the ZOG, I think that would be very difficult to pull off.
AL: [Laughs, chuckles, and coughs repeatedly.] Well, if you’re deflecting attention from the Jewish cause of this, then yeah, you’re helping ZOG, there’s no doubt about it. And that may well be what AmRen was set up to do, I don’t know, I have to judge it by its results.
NS: Well, no, no, I’m not trying to deflect anything. I mean, I’m perfectly, uh, I hadn’t planned on saying this, but since you’re talking about physically, violently displacing the Jews, you should know that guys like me are ready, willing, and able to kill to defend their own.
AL: So are we.
NS: [Laughs] O.k., just so that we understand each other.
AL: You Jews are the aggressor.
NS: The aggressor? Well, I’m an aggressive kind of guy, you know. So, you’ve read my work?
AL: Aggressor. [NS laughs loudly.] And not all whites are going to put up with it. And more and more are going to come to see that what we’re saying is correct.
Nicholas Stix is an award-winning journalist who writes on the realities of race, education, and urban life that are censored by the mainstream media and education elites. His work has appeared in the (New York) Daily News, New York Post, Toogood Reports, VDARE, Washington Times, Illinois Leader, Newsday, the American Enterprise, Weekly Standard, Insight, Chronicles, Ideas on Liberty, Middle American News, Front Page Magazine, Academic Questions, CampusReports, and countless other publications. He has a weekly column in Men’s News Daily.
Mr. Stix has taught at 6 colleges. His runs two web sites: Nicholas Stix, Uncensored and A Different Drummer
12 October, 2007 at 3:04 pm
Very nice stuff, Alex. I hope Jared Taylor sees this. I used to post on Amren as Sue from Ga, but got tired of being censored. Believe you me, I got censored for everything I said. Everyone else dislikes the censorship there, too, but many of them cannot stomach the Vanguard approach, which is to name the jew. They just can’t bring themselves to actually say out loud that it’s the jew who is allowing all this to occur.
I’ll never forget when one poster made a comment about posting at Vanguard, but then stated that “although we (Amrenners) probably consider ourselves ABOVE the average poster at Vanguard (because of the jew aspect I assume)….. Anyway, it wasn’t long after that that I left Amren. It was right about the time of the first rally in Knoxville last Spring. I just saw that Amren was going nowhere. I can’t see that having one conference every year is doing anything and censoring whites only alienates whites. What is the purpose of that…… I’m glad Vanguard exists for me personally. Even if I am a woman…….
12 October, 2007 at 4:19 pm
Good interview, and I believe Alex Linder is correct about amren and Jared Taylor. Like Susan, I used to comment frequently on amren. At first, all my comments were posted, but as I became more and more aware of the jew, my comments were censored. Ofcourse, I was still naiive about Taylor and the jews at that point, and wondered why I was being censored. Then, I read all about the American Renaissance Conference of 2004 brouhaha, and how Duke was dissed and called a Nazi by a mouthy, dwarf-jew. Soon after that, I began to notice that those who post on amren seemed mainly to whine and bitch about blacks and spics, but never, never was there a plan of action discussed, or even more importantly, there was never any talk about the jew being the head of the snake. So, to make this story short, I soon began to feel like I was eating a sandwich at amren, and what I needed was the whole meal which is how I ended up here at VNN. Taylor and his jews and sycophants are merely diversions for those seeking the truth. That site gives the reader just enough with the stats on black crime and studies concerning I.Q. to make him think he’s onto something, but once that same reader wants to know more and wants to get to the crux of the problem, he is censored. I have deleted amren from my favorites; frankly, it bores me. The last time I posted there concerning another black crime story, I simply asked the question, “Okay, we all know blacks are criminals, but what are you going to do about it other than bitch and whine.” The comment was censored.
12 October, 2007 at 4:29 pm
“You are a Jew, and yet you are writing for a ostensibly [laughs], a publication that, that represents white people. That’s what’s such a joke about Jared Taylor’s approach. Whites are second-class citizens at AmRen, just as they are in the broader society.” (Alex Linder)
American Renaissance’s motto: “SEE NO JEWS, HEAR NO JEWS, SPEAK NO JEWS”
I recall attempting to post a comment at AmRen over a year ago. Fully understanding which way the wind blows, I respectfully avoided “The Jewish Question” and focused my efforts on replying to an obnoxious “Hispanic” who was permitted to crash the board and pontificate to “Whitey” about our race’s destined demise.
Despite my professionalism and avoidance of the “JQ”, my comments were rejected by AmRen moderators [censors] apparently due to the fact that I directed my reply at the non-white antagonist. Indeed, white people are second class citizens over at AmRen and possibly even lower in the pecking order given that Taylor and Company permitted a non-white troublemaker to taunt white posters while rejecting an articulate white man’s response.
Then again, it makes perfect sense. After all, the Jews who ultimately run AmRen do not want their sheep-like readers to get any “wrong” ideas and become uppity, ya’ know. (Not one person on the board stood up to the mestizo loudmouth.) Make no mistake about it, Jared Taylor and his American Renaissance outfit is a false flag operation, much in the manner of The John Birch Society. Revilo P. Oliver’s remarks regarding Welch and Company bear repeating once again:
“After the conference between Welch and myself in November 1965, I determined to verify conclusively the inferences that his conduct had so clearly suggested, and, with the assistance of certain friends of long standing who had facilities that I lacked, I embarked on a difficult, delicate, and prolonged investigation. I was not astonished, although I was pained, by the discovery that Welch was merely the nominal head of the Birch business, which he operated under the supervision of a committee of Jews, while Jews also controlled the flow, through various bank accounts, of the funds that were needed to supplement the money that was extracted from the Society’s members by artfully passionate exhortations to “fight the Communists.” As soon as the investigation was complete, including the record of a secret meeting in a hotel at which Welch reported to his supervisors, I resigned from the Birch hoax on 30 July 1966 with a letter in which I let the little man know that his secret had been discovered.”
In the end, American Renaissance is fundamentally no different, regardless of the arrangements and organizational differences. If Taylor thinks he can out Jew the Jews at deception, he is sadly mistaken. In the immortal words of Maguire: “Plain spoken truth is your winning sword, fearless conscience your invincible armor.”
Jared Taylor is not on our side in the manner that really counts the most in this life or death struggle. He is a timid-minded soul craving “respectability” and who lacks the courage and integrity as demonstrated by both moral and intellectual honesty. In essence, he is nothing more than an Occidental Uncle Tom who is permitted to hob-knob with the power brokers and beltway insiders in the District of Corruption on occasion provided he does not rock the boat.
American Renaissance is nothing more than Jewish auxiliary that is dominated and directed by our race’s greatest nemesis. To insure compliance, the organization is operated under the supervision of Jews who ultimately oversee all operations, including the selection and publication of articles as well as the moderation of poster’s comments on the web site.
Despite this, some will argue that it produces good work that is beneficial to our cause. No doubt, the material is professionally researched and written and does serve to awaken readers to many issues that need to be addressed. However, this must be weighed against the harm the organization inflicts via the sheer amount of vitally important information it purposely conceals. There are many ways to achieve deception and perhaps the most effective is deception via omission.
Obviously, I do not accept the preposterous notion that Jared Taylor is refusing to mention the Jews as a tactical decision nor am I implying that all of our troubles will abate if only we name the Jew. My point is one of intellectual honesty and courage. For Jared Taylor to engage is such chicanery is deeply troubling to say the least. Again, to deny the obvious by consciously omitting relevant facts is tantamount to engaging in deceptive practices which constitutes a breech of integrity and no amount of double talk from his supporters will change this unfortunate fact.
In the end, it is a simple matter of calling a spade a spade. In other words, telling the truth about something, even if it is “politically incorrect” to do so. Don’t expect that from Jared Taylor any time soon. After all, he still thinks Jews are white! LOL!
Scipio Americanus
12 October, 2007 at 4:46 pm
Jared Taylor reeks of gefilte fish.
The guy is an obvious stooge.
You’d have to be a real dullard not to see that.
12 October, 2007 at 4:53 pm
“The guy is an obvious stooge.”
Of the three
Which is he?
12 October, 2007 at 7:30 pm
“The Three Stooges were an American vaudeville and comedy act of the mid 20th century best known for their numerous short subject films. They were commonly known by their first names: ‘Moe, Larry, & Curly’, and ‘Moe, Larry, & Shemp’, among other lineups. The act originally featured Moe Howard (born Harry Moses Horwitz), brother Shemp Howard (born Samuel Horwitz), and longtime friend Larry Fine (born Louis Feinberg). Shemp was later replaced by brother Curly Howard (born Jerome Lester Horwitz) in 1932″
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Stooges
12 October, 2007 at 7:54 pm
You got a Jew to admit his condition. He even admitted it as “most certain”. Is this a first in history?
Bravo, and good interview. White Nationalism has a spokesman.
I wonder if Mr. Stix purposely changed his surname to the name of the underground river which separated Hades from the world of the living in Greek mythology.
And the Jew Stix never really refuted anything you said, since that can’t be done, even by a Jew. All he did at the end was to say that he’s ready to fight to the death.
It’s us vs. them. That much is clear.
12 October, 2007 at 9:11 pm
Good interview, Alex. Do as many as you can.
12 October, 2007 at 9:29 pm
Bingo, Scipio!
Michael Collins Piper tagged Taylor as a likely false front opperator in his book JUDAS GOATS, and says basically the same things you do. American Renaissance is OK for newbies and serves that purpose well, and maybe, just maybe, that`s what Taylor is trying to do, considering the suffocating Judeo domination of the West. Getting the un-awakened into the racial tent does serve an essential purpose, even if it is a baby step. The censorship of vital cause and effect information at Am Ren is intolerable however, and makes one certainly suspect that they are a hijacked, or a paid for decoy operation.
12 October, 2007 at 9:52 pm
I remember Sue from Ga! So you’ve experienced the censor’s pencil too? I swear, censorship will be the death of Ameren! But do they even care, so long as their diversionary purpose has been served? I still read Amren regularly, but more and more I am getting fed up.
Amren reminds me of attending a conference on organized crime … to which the Mafia has been invited as the honored guest! And all the attendees are cautioned not to say anything that might offend the honored guest. In fact, the honored guest is probably paying for the hall.
They obsess over Blacks and Mexicans to an inordinate degree. In fact every ethnic group can be criticized — but one. And while they endlessly dwell on symptoms (which we all know anyway), they never get around to discussing causes. Anyone who attempts to do so gets censored.
Oh, incidentaly, you know that Taylor’s real name is Samuel, don’t you?
13 October, 2007 at 12:23 am
From Jared Taylor’s essay, Jews and American Renaissance:
“To put it more accurately, AR has taken an implicit position on Jews by publishing Jewish authors and inviting Jewish speakers to AR conferences. It should be clear to anyone that Jews have, from the outset, been welcome and equal participants in our efforts…Jews have a valuable role in the work of American Renaissance, and are welcome participants and speakers. Anyone who thinks otherwise has the choice of staying home or keeping his views to himself.”
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2006/04/jews_and_americ.php
NOTE: ALL comments regarding the article have been removed from the web site!
13 October, 2007 at 1:58 am
That was eye opening.
Stix is a jew writing for a pro-white organization and when Alex called him on the role of his people in causing the problems AmRen is fighting, he just laughed and made jokes.
I find it interesting that he never tried even once to refute Alex’s points.
-Brian
13 October, 2007 at 7:39 am
Hey, Sue from Ga, I read many/most of your posts on AmRen….I too have quit even attempting to post even the most innocent comments on the AR site. My IP or name must be flagged as persona non grata-I couldnt even submit the time/date/barometric pressure and get it posted. B
13 October, 2007 at 8:10 am
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2006/04/jews_and_americ.php
NOTE: ALL comments regarding the article have been removed from the web site!
I saved them. Is it normal to remove the comments from old stories?
I’ve been rereading the comments. One argument that came up more than once in the deleted comments was that by distancing themselves from anti-semites AR would gain jewish support.
How did that work out?
13 October, 2007 at 10:50 am
“NOTE: All comments regarding the article have been removed from the web site!”
You can get the comments from this site:
http://www.archive.org/index.php
The article was published April 14, 2006. You should look at the April 24 issue- that includes all 329 comments.
AMREN webmaster says they removed most comments as it was taking up too much space.
13 October, 2007 at 10:52 am
Enter amren.com at the above site.
13 October, 2007 at 3:07 pm
On the archive site, April 24th has stopped working, but other nearby dates still work. Be sure to save a copy for future reference.
13 October, 2007 at 3:18 pm
“One argument that came up more than once in the deleted comments was that by distancing themselves from anti-semites AR would gain jewish support.”
Jewish support? Who needs it? Who wants it?
Accepting “Jewish support” is fatal. It amounts to accepting a cup of lethal Kool-Aid
13 October, 2007 at 9:27 pm
I have mixed feeling about Jared Taylor and Amren. A few of my anti-jewish diatribes have gotten through but most never see the light of day. I wrote the webmaster at Amren about their censorship when jews are mentioned, and in their response they stated it may have been an oversight, but that as a rule “we don’t deal with jews”.
I also reminded people on the board that jewish organizations still attack and malign pro-white groups who are jew neutral or philo-semitic, so it’s useless to ingratiate yourself with them. White nationalism is a threat to jewish group interests and it matters not whether some are jew friendly or not. Jews hate and fear us and nothing we do will ever change that, so Jared and the Amren jew worshippers need to pull their noses out of their asses.
Alex conducted a great interview and is becoming a real bright spot in the WN community.
14 October, 2007 at 10:07 am
Two quick comments:
One, Jew Stix seems to be going to great lengths to avoid the concept of the demonic Jews acting as a Race – ONE in Purpose, with only ONE Commandment to guide all of their thoughts, and all of their actions:
“Is It Good For JEWS?”
There are the critical distinctions we must keep in mind at all times when dealing with the demons who walk the Earth known as Jews.
One, they get angry when we define them as subjects – Jews – because the facade is at least defined, and not to their benefit.
Two, their power – which, being parasitical, is drawn from their hosts – us – only functions when we see “Jew” as a verb, and that verb means “Conquest by Duplicity,” all, of course, in harmony with their One Racial Commandment, “Is It Good For Jews?”
The distinction Stix makes between “Jew” and “Israel” is simply trivial, designed, possibly, to sidetrack us from The Issue, and The Issue is RACE.
Jews, acting as a RACE, and us, deciding that what works for them will surely work for us, and defining ALL issues, as the demonic damn Jews always do, in terms of RACE – First, Foremost, Forever.
“Jew,” Israel,” all simply variations on the same conceptual theme of RACE, as a verb, as a process of social transformation.
New America
An Idea Whose Time Is HERE!
14 October, 2007 at 12:07 pm
Guess where this was posted:
Sure, Burnham’s viewpoint is cogent as far as it goes, but
the managers are working for someone and have been educated by
someone. Who is that someone? Who set the tone of our Civilizat-
ion economically, politically, and academically? Obviously, the
Jews did. They won the war, both militarily in Europe and cultur-
ally here in the Untied States. That is why the change has been
so fast-because it is being consciously directed by a self cons-
cious Elite. As McDonald says, it could have never happened this
quickly without such conscious direction. Yes, the WASP Elite are
in on it, but passively so. They don’t have a whole agenda except
to stay in power and World Domination. The Jews provide the rat-
ionale, the ethos, the ideologies, the money, and the driving
will. And the Jews will come out on top in the end if it goes
that far. The WASP Elite have burned their bridges with us. All
they have now is their funny money and the good will of a people
who have very little gratitude. After all, nobody respects trai-
tors.
Posted by Eric the Red at 10:26 PM on October 12
14 October, 2007 at 4:06 pm
AmRen helped me into WN.
The first step of the disaffected Kwan or misfit unable to become a Kwan usually is to ask:
Is there anyone else in the world who sees niggers and coloreds for what they are?
Attempting to answer this question leads to seeking out literature, etc. That’s where AmRen came in, for me. I skimmed their articles/posts now and then over a period of a couple months, then moved on, fortified.
The second step is Campbell Crawford Clan’s question: “Okay, we all know blacks are criminals, but what are you going to do about it other than bitch and whine” plus: “What’s the cause of niggers running loose?”
Don’t be too hard on old JT. Not every step can be a mountaintop.
There is a solution to the jewish problem.
14 October, 2007 at 9:09 pm
“Guess where this was posted:”
Yes, I saw that posted on Amren. I was astonished, sort of — but not really terribly much so. That kind of thing happens from time to time. I can’t figure out their strategy. Or is it not any “strategy”, but just carelessness? Sometimes it’s like somebody leaves a window open for several days, but then they notice it’s open and slam it shut again. Maybe someone’s been out sick or has a few days off. Or maybe it’s done on purpose, but just occasionally, to make it look like they’re really open to free speech and free exchange of ideas — when in fact they’re really not. Maybe they let every fifth or every tenth criticism slip through just to give an appearance of objectivity. I don’t know.
Or, maybe it’s not actually Amren’s policy that’s responsible for most of the censoring . I’ve often thought about this. I know they have “monitors” (polite word for censors) who are apparently volunteers. You have to wonder what is the real motivation of these volunteers, and just WHO these volunteers are. What is their own private agenda that they might be promoting? Why would anybody volunteer their time unless they might have some personal stake to pursue? Knowing that Amren is so friendly to Jews, it makes you wonder who is doing the “monitoring”. Who is getting rid of those posts?
In my own case, I never mention Jews (knowing what the deal is) and I don’t write diatribes about anyone. Neither do I use obscenity, threats or abuse. So what’s the problem? Still, my posts get censored out! Yet, strangely, there are some people who do all those things, and theirs get printed. When I’ve protested to Amren about these missing posts, they say it must have been some computer glitch or something beyond their explaining. They have no idea. Sure!
Actually, the worst thing that it amounts to is that Amren censors, not so much words, as IDEAS. That’s what I really object to! That steams me. There are certain ideas that you cannot express, and I am not even sure just what they are. Certainly the topic of Jews is one of them. We know that much. I would not object if they had, for instance,a clearly stated policy that they do not allow any criticisms on the basis of race, religion, or ethnicity. It that’s their rule, that’s OK with me. But they actually seem to encourage endless rants against blacks, Mexicans, and Moslems without the slightest inhibition. Sometimes it’s so overdone it gets embarrassing. In fact, any racial or religious group is open to criticism — except for one! Now, that is two-faced, and also very strange. What’s the real deal that’s going on there?
Amren is basically hypocritical, The Jew-coddling policy belies their stated motto, the Jefferson quote, that says there is not any truth that they would fear or wish to keep unknown. Oh, but, yes there is! There is certainly one thing they obviously fear and wish to keep unknown. If Mr. Taylor is going to maintain a policy of no discussion of Jews (except for praise) then he should at least be candid and take down that motto. To leave it up is dishonest and sheer hypocrisy.
Like Sgt.. Skull, I too have very mixed feelings about Samuel Taylor. He’s a mystery. He may be a courageous, self-sacrificing person who’s doing an admirable job. Or it may be something much deeper and more complex than that. Not everything is out on the surface here. Something seems not right. It may even be, like Madalyn Murray (see my other post), that he’s found his own “gimmick”. I simply don’t know.
14 October, 2007 at 11:20 pm
Here are excerpts from WINTERMUTE’s commentary regarding Jared Taylor & American Renaissance. I encourage everyone to read his posts in there entirety at Fallen Freedom along with the blog owner’s cogent remarks:
http://fallenfreedom.blogspot.com/2006/07/unavoidability-of-jewish-question.html
[EXCERPTS]:
Taylor has now sold himself and his organization lock, stock, and barrel to the Jews. They will slowly arrive in small numbers, accumulate slowly (not all will admit to Jewish ancestry or loyalty), provide AmRen with access to media and respectability. Jared Taylor will be the first White Nationalist who will appear in a major Northeastern Newspaper without the epithet “far right extremist” or “neo-Nazi” listed as his official title.
Mr. Taylor, who has built the most respectable WN organization in the United States, has effectively outlawed discussion of the Jewish question, which he has already disavowed on the Donahue show and various radio programs. It’s not hard to follow his logic, since it follows yours: given that Jews are so powerful, there is simply no way to even challenge them openly and prevail.
So far as it goes, that’s not an unfair statement to make. It may yet prove to be impossible, or it may not. My take is: it hasn’t been tried yet.
However:
As the years pass, and AmRen fills with Jews like Polichinello, Michael Weiner, and so forth, I predict one of two things will happen: either the group will be directed by its Jewish wing into purposeless and vicious encounters with Blacks and Mexicans, which can be used by “non-WN” Jews, via their media cousins, to destroy the legitimacy of all Euro-American Civil Rights movements, or they will simply be marginalized and encouraged to vent their increasing rage at more and more inconsequential targets, as the Birchers were. Remember, the Jews bought them out, and directed an anti-Communist group (in the 50s!) down avenues of complete irrelevance while they were roundly mocked so well and so often in the press that they are a laughingstock, even today.
Finally, consider the odds on the gamble Jared has just made with our future: for a few radio interviews, appearances on daytime TV, and columns on Horowitz’ FrontPage, he has turned his well assembled WN group into the new Birchers. Not only are Jews now in a position to completely neutralize or marginalize WN or any subsequent racialist movement, the sacrifice of maybe fifty activists and a few hundred million dollars (pocket change, really) will now allow them to claim far and wide that:
a) Jews are actually not monolithic, and have a variety of political positions and concerns, which they do not and, even more damaging and nightmarish, that
b) Jews are on “our” side or even worse, that they are “White”, which they are not.
The PR damage of these last two listed items, to my mind, is even more dangerous than the simple marginalization of racialist opposition to current attempts to erase culture, family, race, nation, heritage, and religion as mediating structures between the “hierarchically harmonious” civilizations that Whites create, on the one hand, and the totalitarian nightmares and chaos that seem the only expression of Jewish political action among foreign populations.
What I want for readers here to consider is this: Taylor is betting the farm on the fact that ‘awakening’ whites to Mexicans and Blacks will eventually lead to an understanding of the Jewish Question, even though he has just made it plain that there will be no open discussion of the latter.
He’s using a Trojan Horse strategy: get Jews to foot the bill to educate Whites to their own best interests, and then watch as those ever politically clever Whites put two and two together, and turn on their ‘benefactors’. It’s a fair bet, and if we were dealing with anyone else but Jews, it might work.
The Jews are betting that they can infiltrate, manipulate, and neutralize the largest and best WN organization in the US, and make it serve Jewish goals. My money is on them – they’ve taken down much larger targets. Jared Taylor is a marginal figure, if not despised, at least suspect. Charles Lindbergh was a god, and the Jews turned him into an unperson in a week’s time after the Dearborn speech. AmRen will be given the Free Republic treatment in short order, adding another few thousand Americans to the list of people whose entire information news intake is vetted by Jews first before consumption.
I think Taylor’s gamble is laughable because the level of political acumen (not to mention money, media access, etc.) between the two groups are not even remotely comparable.
15 October, 2007 at 8:53 am
“Knowing that Amren is so friendly to Jews, it makes you wonder WHO is doing the “monitoring”. Who is getting rid of those posts?”
i.e. Has a fox been placed in charge of the chicken coop?
15 October, 2007 at 10:42 am
Some really excellent insights here, Scipio, New Am. and Ein.
Taylor is reputed to know the Judenfrage well, but the larger and decisive question is: has he had a compromising Seder dinner, a la` Churchill in the Summer of 1936 ?
It appears from the “moderation” at his site that the enemy is operating within the gates and is already deeply imbedded.
15 October, 2007 at 3:46 pm
” has he had a compromising Seder dinner, a la` Churchill in the Summer of 1936 ?”
What? Do tell us about that! Sounds fascinating.
15 October, 2007 at 3:49 pm
“i.e. Has a fox been placed in charge of the chicken coop?”
i.e. Has a lox been placed in charge of the chicken coop?
15 October, 2007 at 6:42 pm
When some ostensible gentile or Christian is inexplicably defensive and protective about Jews, blacks, orientals, whatever — I have generally found, in cases of an apparent mystery like this, that you often have to look into the family — -or into the bedroom. The answer is very frequently found there. Is there a Jewish wife? A grandmother? In-laws? Cousins? A mistress or lover?
This is one of the possibe explanations for Taylor’s otherwise inexplicable behavior. Just one. The Queen Esther story has doubtless been duplicated many times down through Jewish history. It’s nothing new, nothing unique.
I have read speculations that Taylor’s wife is Jewish. Who knows? You can’t trust everything you read, of course. But I also read somewhere that his wife (Evelyn West, I believe) had worked for SPLC doing investigative work on David Duke. Taylor himself (if I remember correctly) has given interviews to SPLC. Isn’t that rather strange? It’s akin to BinLaden being granted interviews in the Pentagon.
That’s why I say that “Amren is like a conference on organized crime to which the Mafia has been invited as the Honored Guest! ” I can’t emphasize that absurdity enough. At first I was baffled. Later disheartened. Then disgusted, and left with a feeling of being used.
There are a number of open, self-admitted Jews who post on Amren. I have little problem with that. At least they’re straightforward and honest about it. But I suspect you also have a much larger number of crypto-Jews, and also gentiles with Jewish wives or relatives, something hidden in the woodpile. Inured though I am to shocks, I never cease to be amazed. Occasionally, a small comment slips through about Jewish cousins, or a grandmother, or uncle, or something such. So, one must count not only the high number of Jews, but the even higher number of those with Jewish affiliations. Maybe, for every open Jew, there are five (or even ten or more) who are not self-evident and open.
Here’s one example. Following the occasion of that infamous Amren conference a couple of years ago, where Duke was abused, vilified, cursed at — and was then blamed for causing a fracas! — there was a brief lifting of the ban on discussing Jews, before it was slammed down again. One of the most frequent, most well known posters on Amren (JohnPM) went simply berserk (in print), calling Duke all sorts of outrageous things, ranting irrationally as if he had lost his senses. Meanwhile, he wrote not a word of criticism of the Jewish “gent” who had actually caused the whole disturbance! Mr. Duke had said NOTHING, NOTHING abusive to the other man. Duke didn’t even respond to his insults. But Duke was being blamed for it! I was aghast at this complete misplacement of the blame. Some other posters wrote in to condemn John for his irrational response and his unfairness. (I did too, and I did it very mildly, but my several posts were not printed!) In disgust, I commented in private correspondence to another poster, on my amazement at John’s tantrum. That poster told me that he had also chided John, privately, and that John sent him a long, rambling, strange, incoherent, and somewhat sheepish reply explaining that he simply lost control [when the subject of "those who control the media" came up] — because he felt he” had to defend my people”. Well, there you have it! Those are the people who are, many of them, considered the star posters at Amren, claiming to represent the white cause. (Others, I must mention too, are “fundies”, Christian Zionists, who are perhaps even more rabidly pro-semitic than the Jews!)
Some of those former star posters have now defected over to Inverted World, which they feel is more philo-semitic — (John included). Interestingly, one of those posters now at IW says (in one of the posts there) that he had formerly been a volunteer “monitor” at Amren, and states that when he was there, because John was so well known and highly respected, he let John’s long and windy rants go through without even reading them! How nice! Meanwhile the rest of us got censored.
It is said that IW was formed to get away from “all the Jew-haters” at Amren. An astounding allegation, considering Amren’s sensitivity to Jewish interests! I have never posted anything at IW, and would not because I would not give them the traffic. However, it’s an interesting site to check out now and then. I particularly refer to a long-running discussion they have about Amren and Taylor. Really an attack. Everyone should read it. Despite Taylor’s protectiveness of Jews, they are mounting a merciless attack on him, demanding that he practically hand them a signed, notarized statement acknowledging The Holycause. They’ve been hammering him relentlessly on this, and he has not backed down, claiming that he is no expert on the subject of their Holycause, that he is not a historian, and is in no position to make any pronouncements about it or confirm any exact figures. He is willing to agree that it happened but he cannot verify any specific numbers. They don’t care! That’s not enough. They DEMAND a statement from him before discussing anything else. (One could almost call it not a statement but rather a “confession” — a confession of gentile guilt by which they can hold you in their debt forever after.)
Under the circumstances, I can almost feel sorry for Mr. Taylor, considering the unremitting pressure that he’s under. It’s akin to extortion. No matter how philo-semitic and protective Amren has been, that’s still not good enough for them. But Taylor should have known that. Regardless how many concessions he makes, it will NEVER be good enough. It’s like dealing with blackmailers — having succeeded once, don’t they always come back for more?
15 October, 2007 at 9:25 pm
Ahhh, the infamous July 22, 1936 dinner where Churchill was compromised and paid to peddle anti “Nazism” for the ‘Focus’ group by his Jewish benefactors and newfound ”friends”. His huge debts were also expuged (and his home estate Chartwell thus saved) about the same time by the same alien subverters like Robert Waley-Cohen & his co-ethnic cronies. An amazing pecuniary/ideological transformation indeed, for the sodden, obese ‘bull dog’ author of the Feb., 1920 article ZIONISM VS. BOLSHEVISM !!
For more documentation see: http://www.fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/wsc/waley_cohen.html
15 October, 2007 at 9:52 pm
It’s like this with all ostensible “intellectual conservatives.” The minute you criticize jews, or just Israel – BANG, here comes hysteria.
The example is old, but telling. During the Trent Lott fracas (2002), in which Lott indirectly praised Strom Thurmond for his long-ago opposition to racial integration laws (the biggie of such laws being the Civil Rights Act of 1964), EVERY so-called “conservative” or “libertarian” writer, blogger, and pundit RUSHED to condemn Lott in the most EXTREME and EMOTIONAL terms. Example. I couldn’t understand why. After all, according to the principles of individualism, racial integration laws are evil: they are physical force exercised by government against the peaceful choices of free adults (i.e. free association). Even jew Alissa Rosenbaum (“Ayn Rand”) had written that the 1964 Civil Rights Act was “the worst violation of property rights in American history.”
I wrote to people like Andrew Sullivan, Virginia Postrel, the above-linked John Bragg, some Objectivists and a bunch of Lew Rockwellians, pointing out that, by their own principles and formal statements, racial integration laws are improper; therefore, Lott was right.
Response? None of course. They went right on vociferously and hypocritically blasting Lott, using the terms “Jim Crow” and “racist.” To these people, it seemed, reading the wholly pernicious To Kill a Mockingbird was the formative experience of their lives, not libertarian principles. Extreme nigger-lovers, all.
But at first I rationalized this as party politics: Lott was seen at the time as a “liberal Republican” opposing Jorge Boosh’s allegedly more “conservative” mission. So Lott had to be gotten rid of, by hook or crook – and these pundits were merely doing the necessary hatchet job (though the dishonesty of this procedure disturbed me).
But then I realized the pundits truly and deeply hated segregation on principle – were avid integrationists, across the board. This shocked me. It meant they – ALL of them – rejected their “individualist principles” when it came to race. Nothing mattered more than integrating white and black and worshiping Martin Lucifer Coon, a communist and plagiarist who’d pushed for “the worst violation of property rights in American history.”
Then the truth dawned on me.
All these “libertarians,” “Objectivists,” “Rothbardians,” “dynamists,” “intellectual conservatives,” “constitutionalists,” “strict constructionists,” “neoconservatives,” blah blah blah – were yids.
JEWS.
They did not like White people. They do not. Many were liberals in the past, then “turned right,” but once a liberal, always a liberal. Strike that. Once a kike, always a kike.
In other words, Alex Linder was right.
I never visited those websites, believed that filthy crowd, or believed in their hypocritical “principles” again. Their attitude was: Fuck free association! Opposition to the Civil Rights Movement is evil, period!
Any “conservative” et al. who doesn’t openly oppose jews is a fraud – either a jew himself, or, as gw said, married to and/or fucking a kike/coon/slant.
America’s “political right” is as jewish as its “political left.”
15 October, 2007 at 11:18 pm
Tried that site. I got nothing. “Site not found on this server.”
I do know that Churchill was accused in 1924, by Lord Alfred Douglas, of being part of a Jewish plot that had bombed the ship carrying Lord Kitchener to Russia. Kitchener was on a mission to Russia in 1916, to try to arrange a peace, but itwas alleged that a Jewish cabal was determined to keep the war going — whether for the sake of profits or to hold Russia for Lenin to take over. The ship went down in the North Sea with about 800 aboard. It was blamed at the time on a German torpedo. I stumbled across this information by accident and there wasn’t much given. The whole incident remains shrouded in mystery to this very day.
Churchill sued Douglas for slander and Churchill won the case, sending Douglas to prison for 6 months. But winning a case in court does not necessarily prove anything true or false. There just wasn’t sufficient proof to substantiate Douglas’ claim. I would love to know more about this.
Incidentally, Churchill was apparently a spendthift, an alcoholic and a wastrel just like his father. His father, Lord Randolph, son of the Duke of Marlborough, married the American heiress Jenny Jerome (rumored to have been née Jacobson) from Brooklyn. She acquired a British title, and he got an American fortune. That handled his debts, for a while.
16 October, 2007 at 12:45 am
Learning this new information (about that 1936 “seder dinner”), and putting this together with Churchill’s later behavior through the 30′s and the 40′s, all of it fitting neatly into the Jewish interest, it would all seem to corroboraate Lord Douglas’ allegation made in 1924, for whatever it’s worth, that Churchill was even then working in collusion with the Jews. There has to be at least something to it. People don’t make up totally wild allegations from out of the blue. As they say, “where there’s smoke, there’s fire.” and there’s just too much of it in Churchill’s case. His behavior right through to the end of his life worked out strangely to the interest of Zionish and Communism. How could Douglass have known all that in 1924?
I might add that it was Churchill who clapped Sir Oswald Mosely, leader of the British fascists, under arrest at the very start of the war, and kept him interned under house arrest, without charge, throughout the duration of the war. Moseley had done nothing, he was accused of nothing, but that didn’t matter. In fact, he and Churchill had been even friends (or at least aquaintances) and there might even have been some family relationship, as the aristocracy was a small clique and most were interrelated with each other.
Mosley, incidentally never could see any Jewish problem and (just like Taylor) sought to court them and to recuit them into his fascist movement. He had absolutely no success! They despised them, and he couldn’t understand why they hated him so. Needless to say, Moseley and his movement amounted to nothing, and today he is just a small, bizarre footnote to history. An inconsequential oddity. I might add that his (first) wife was the granddaughter of the department store millionaire, Levi Ziegler, co-owner of Marshall Field in Chicago. Need I say more?
Lastly, as for Churchill, he came to power once again as Prime Minister from 1951 to 1955. The Third World invasion of Britain had gotten underway in 1948 with the historic sailing of the “Windrush”, carrying the first shipload of blacks from Jamaica. From then on, the invasion of Britain was underway. Churchill was in power for another four years and saw this happending beneath his eyes. — He declined to do anything to stop it.
16 October, 2007 at 7:24 am
Whites boinking and/or marrying jews is a deep and pervasive sickness. Worse even than getting in debt to them. It subverts your bloodline. This killed America.
Taylor needs to dump any kikess he’s attached to, and/or get out of debt. NOW.
There is a solution to the jewish problem.
16 October, 2007 at 11:29 am
GW. try a Google search, there are several links there. David Irving`s site has the best information on Churchill`s machinations. There are several articles there on Churchill`s debt expungement and his sudden ‘Seder dinner’ conversion to the Kosher conservative “Nazi” demonization smear & fear campaign of the late 1930`s.
I don`t know why the link does not work, but try: http://www.fpp.co.uk for a start and search there as well. Glück auf !
Incidentally, Taylor is now soliciting for a 2008 conference at his site and the featured speakers, except for Sam Dickson, appear to be rather lackluster.
16 October, 2007 at 9:36 pm
sgruber Says: Whites boinking and/or marrying jews is a deep and pervasive sickness. Worse even than getting in debt to them. This killed America.
In addition to the occasional poster at Amren who lets slip some unguraded remark about “my Jewish cousins” or something such, I have personally known or corresponded with some excellent, sharp, whites who I thought were on the same wave length and on our side. In fact, they claimed that they were. Everything they said sounded just right. But then they mentioned, only very casually, that their Jewish wives don’t always agree with them on this or that, but put up with them anyway. What can I say?
In fact, I know of one, a lawyer, and very sharp, a really smart guy and strongly pro-white, who apparently woke up as a result of being married to a Jew – who is now his ex-wife. Apparently, she was an educational experience for him! He didn’t know much about Jews before. Additionally, he’s surrounded by Jews in his profession every day, so that opened his eyes too. Otherwise, he might have remained naive to this day. So marriage to a Jew can work both ways. But generally, though such gentiles may be strongly pro-white, that commitment extends only up to where Jewish interests become compromised, then they balk. So, their usefulness to us is neutralized. If you can’t or won’t go to the root of the problem — and Jews are the root of it — then you’re useless really, no matter how pro-white you claim to be.
It seems the Jews, just like any other gangsters blackmailers, will try to get you in three main ways:
#1. Financially, in some way — and there are many ways
#2. Find some dirt on you; find your vice or your secret. How many of us are such saints that we don’t have some skeleton in the closet that we wouldn’t want to see printed on the front page of the local newspaper?
#3. Get you in the bedroom.
As for the last, many a strong man can be turned into a melting piece of silly-putty in the hands of a conniving and unprincipled woman. And many a man (and woman too) of otherwise good sense and high intelligence can become a simpering fool where sex enters the picture. In my own personal observation over long experience, white women I have known and worked with who were very strongly, even fanatically, committed to “civil rights” and the black cause, INVARIABLY turned out to be living with a black stud or to have had a black lover in the past. That was their turning point. They were hooked — just like a drug.
Observing this, it dawned on me years ago that these “racial conversions” where they suddenly “see the light” tend overwhelmingly to take place in the bedroom! After all, a person’s weakest spot, and where their inhibitions are all suspended, is in bed. What better place to win a convert?
So if you have a mystery that defies all other explanation, the best and first place to look — even before the checkbooks and the banking records — is in the bedroom. I cannot emphasize it strongly enough. That often will explain everything right there in an instant.
PS. Thanks for that David Irving reference.
PPS. Taylor’s site itself, in the past year and a half, has become “rather lackluster”. Wonder why!
16 October, 2007 at 11:44 pm
Jared’s significant other is Evelyn Rich. She interviewed David Duke in 1985, while working on a dissertation about the KKK.
17 October, 2007 at 7:13 am
It would appear that Churchill was working for kikedom from at least 1915 onwards. The ‘strategic’ interventions in Galipolli 1915 and Norway 1940 were almost designed to fail.
We can assume that his mother was of jewish descent, but do we know who his father really was? Mz Jerome’s infidelities were notorious even by the standards of the ‘English’ aristocracy.
Let’s not forget that ‘Winston’s’ reputed father died of syphilis!
I have always thought that the sinking of Kitchener’s ship was just too convenient for the war party in Britain. Similarly, the infamous Zimmermann Telegram which brought the US into the first jew world war has a kosher smell about it.
17 October, 2007 at 8:45 am
Churchill apparently loved the notion of miscegenation and “diversity” long before these topics became the rage toward the end of the 20th century. He liked to brag of his (supposed) Mohawk Indian ancestry. I’ve checked into this and read quite about his claim, and all I can find is that it’s in doubt. Geneologists have studied the assertion but can find no substantiation for it. It’s true that at least one of his ancestors did come from northern New York state, and not much else is known, so there is admittedly such a possibility, but it is not proven. Winston’s own descendent (I forget his name but it’s on the web) has researched it and doubts the story. It seems that Churchill liked to tell tall tales.
At any rate, whether it’s true or not, the real point here is that Churchill liked the idea of miscegenation and liked to talk about it, this particularly at a time when such a revelation would have been considered shocking. I once mentioned, in Nairobi, Kenya, that Churchill claimed to be part American Indian. They never heard of such a thing, to them it was unimaginable, and my statement was considered so utterly preposterous that I was almost laughed out of the room.
17 October, 2007 at 9:10 am
Linder is kind of a midget jew jman wantabe since he apparently scraped his judism after he woke up after he got booted from these jew media people in DC where he apparently worked a couple weeks or so at most before taking off on the internet with his so called “potty mouth”. Jews say he is “potty mouth” yet these assholes produce the most filth on the planet with their porn and rap shit? Since when have jews or niggers ever referred to themselves as “potty mouth” when they are the biggest shit mouths on earth?
We know the jew jman proletariet had it in for the pharisee richass jew bosses and hated to work so he likewise took off like a homeless beggar and pretended he was their media book mess-iah before they laid into his ass or so they said in the jew rebel book. That dude was like he original James Dean rebel but they all die young and become the martyr.
Linder is getting old and needs to die quick if he is to attain any mortality whatsoever even among the “potty mouth” lovers jews excluded of course.
Anybody ever heard the jew produced nigger funny guy Richard Pryors old stuff? That was some funny shit and his use of nigger nigger nigger was excellent. Pryor was your typical nigger and only fucked white nigger loving bitches marrying 3 white females in jew Hollywood of course.
Go listen to some mid 70s Richard Pryor to see how things need to return and revert back too. Niggers were still niggers then and jews didnt realize they were helping the white race to laugh at them. Now its all changed.
17 October, 2007 at 2:29 pm
The Kitchener conspiracy theories are outlined in Wikipedia (hardly an authorative source!) under: Herbert_Kitchener,_1st_Earl_Kitchener
Let’s not bother reciting Kaddish for him, he was a race traitor who was responsible for the deaths of over 20,000 White Boer women and childern in Britain’s concentration camps.
17 October, 2007 at 9:24 pm
gw, right on. And isn’t it a jew evolutionary strategy for jewesses to outbreed? I think MacDonald mentioned it in one of the first two books of his trilogy. (jewish descent is through the mother, and as Stix says, there are no “half-jews.”)
There is a solution to the jewish problem.
19 October, 2007 at 10:41 am
To all and sundry:
Thank you. Yes, I am the “Fr. John” that still tries (with intermittent success) to point out the irreconcilable differences between those ‘who say they are Jews and are not,” [Rev. 2:8,9] and we beleaguered Whites over at AmRen.
I have to say, I am totally exasperated by AmRen. I thought initially when I bought “Paved with Good Intentions” that Mr. Taylor, in seeking a future for his blond/blue-eyed son, was of like mind and race to me. But, just as I found out that Gwyneth Paltrow is the granddaughter of a Yid rabbi, the facts of Taylor’s praxis grow more and more ‘yiddische’ everyday.
I loathe ‘jewamongyou’ and ‘jewishwhiteandproud’ who post on AmRen. They deserve to be VISIBLY cursed by YHWH Almighty for their lies and abominations, just by being ‘Jewish’… in my lifetime, Lord Willing.
I remember one post of mine, that set EVERYONE a-flutter. I noted that a ‘jew’ said he was ‘white;’ and I, logically, clearly, and (quoting approved Yid sources) pointed out the “Khazarian factor;” that “jews are NOT white.” He he he.
Well, from then on, I was censored for over four MONTHS from posting at AmRen. The truth hurts, but Jews are NOT white, no matter HOW MANY Goyim they have to ‘breed through’ to achieve removal of the ‘mark of Cain.’ Paltrow included!!! The curse remains. Their souls are black, and NOT comely.
TO read all of your comments here, most of which are rendered with a restraint I rarely see on boards of this nature, (where four letter words seem to be the only vocabulary some ‘WN’ types know) was to let me know I am NOT alone, nor are those whom I shepherd.
The single most telling comment was from the person who noted that “John PM” is ONE OF THEM. Now that I know their delusion is so psychotic, that they can even believe in their hearts as they ‘pretend to be white,’ just as they have – for 1400 years- ‘pretended to be jews’, these ‘Pseudo-Psemites’ have finally achieved the NADIR of my regard for them, as the Deicides, liars, and sons of their Father, the Devil,[Jesus, St. John Chapter 8] the NT assigns to them.
I know now why Judas Iscariot, poster child of their race, is in the lowest pit of Hell! May they all arrive there, and right speedily.
Arise, men of Christendom, annihilate the Deicides. Show them no mercy as they showed the Lord of God no mercy. TAKE BACK OUR LAND. RAUS, JUDEN! GOTT MIT UNS!
Fram, Fram, Fram!
19 October, 2007 at 12:36 pm
Jews are NOT white, no matter HOW MANY Goyim they have to ‘breed through’ to achieve removal of the ‘mark of Cain.’ Paltrow included!!! The curse remains. Their souls are black, and NOT comely.
Their souls may be black, but [eg. Paltrow] their bodies can deceive!
a restraint I rarely see on boards of this nature, (where four letter words seem to be the only vocabulary some ‘WN’ types know)
Yes, sadly so. One has to wonder if those ubiquitous cursing, raving lunatics are deliberate plants to make all WNs look insane and to drive away persons of reason and intelligence.
the person who noted that “John PM” is ONE OF THEM.
And ONLY one. There are still more (that I have become aware of, over time), and I’m sure there must be even more than that. If I knew how many, I would probably be shocked.
20 October, 2007 at 4:56 pm
JEWS AT THE STEERING WHEEL
Jews at the helm of ostensibly non-Jewish organizations
(New listing at JTR, ever-growing. This list could go on for miles. It is only a sampling.)
Some valid questions about Jewish influence: to what degree do these people have allegiance to the Jewish victimology tradition, by extension to what degree do they hold dear the state of Israel and/or other Judeocentric interests within their respective organization’s policy? Also, to what degree do they reflect a “Jewish view of the world,” so popularly declared as something very real in Jewish circles — particularly in deconstructing and/or subverting the non-Jewish social, cultural, and political order? To what extent are these people activists in such public policy socialization processes, sensitizing the public to Jewish interests and concerns?
CULTURAL / ETHNIC
NAACP (and other African-American organizations)
NAACP Legal Defense Fund,
“Co” – Chairman – Martin D. Payson
“Co” – Vice Chairman – Daniel L. Rabinowitz
“This Website was made possible through the generous support of the Paul and Phyllis Fireman Charitable Foundation.”
Washington Kurdish Institute,
Executive Director: Mike Amitay — reputed to be the son of former head of AIPAC (the massive Jewish American lobbying organization for Israel), Morris Amitay.
American Institute of Polish Culture,
Founder and President: Blanka A. Rosenstiel
Emperor’s Clothes,
(ostensibly about Yugoslavia and the Balkans)
Editor: Jared Israel (apologist for Israel)
http://jewishtribalreview.org/coopt.htm
20 October, 2007 at 5:05 pm
More on Jared Israel:
http://www.rense.com/general30/caseasd.htm
20 October, 2007 at 5:12 pm
Re. JEWS AT THE STEERING WHEEL:
I’ve no precise statistics, though it would be fascinating to do a study, but I’ve repeatedly noticed for a very long time the enormous preponderance of ambassadors, supposedly representing the USA, who are Jewish. And these were just the immediately obvious ones. The non-obvious ones could raise the number to twice as many.
And there are the many others in diplomatic service.
eg. Who would have thought of John “Kerry’s” father? Who would have imagined Madeleine “Albright”? When outed, even she claimed she didn’t know she was a Jew.
20 January, 2008 at 10:03 am
I was wondering where some of the posters from Amren had gone…Sue from GA…. Fr.John…gw….etc….Hi to you all. I posted there for some time and still do, at times,yet I knew that the Jews are in control. I have had many posts censored when it concerned the jews. After hearing about what they did to David Duke, I knew who was in control of Jared. I was fired from my job after 20 years, two years ago, for posting on amren (at work, which I should have known better), and was reported by a “poster” at amren to the NAACP for reprimanding him, a supposedly white guy, marrying a black woman….. I lost my retirement due to this “poster” at amren. Had to take “lump sum” payout which was next to nothing. This was about the time “Joaquin” (probably a jew) and others were hot and heavy there. When I went back on amren a year or so later, I explained why I hadn’t posted for a long time and that a poster there contacted the NAACP and of course that was censored. I don’t use my name on there while posting now. They surely don’t want other posters to know anyone was reported to the NAACP just for commenting to another poster, do they? I had also at one time asked what happened to all the posters who used to post there and that comment was censored. Amren is a joke and I will not post anylonger. Wonder if those moderators have all our personal info and email info and if we are listed in their “little black books” for future punishment?