Archive for the 'natural rights of Whites' Category

28 November, 2021

Posted by Socrates in leftism, leftists, liberal mindset, liberalism, liberals, natural law vs. positive law, natural rights of Whites, negative vs positive rights, rightists at 11:58 am | Permanent Link

In this case, “negative” doesn’t mean what you might think: A negative right = a right you were born with. A natural right. A positive right = an artificial “right” which requires someone else’s labor or money in order for you to enjoy that “right” (e.g., free college, free healthcare). Leftists embrace positive rights. Rightists […]

17 September, 2021

Posted by Socrates in law, laws, lawyers and judges, leftism, natural law vs. positive law, natural law/natural justice, natural rights of Whites, White philosophy, White thought at 12:41 pm | Permanent Link

This is about natural law. It is no longer followed in America. In place of natural law is something called “positive law.” It’s liberal law. Under positive law, laws exist/are made based solely on whether Congress, or a state legislature, or a court, thinks the laws are legitimate laws. Whether they are moral or reasonable, […]

5 January, 2014

Posted by Socrates in anti-White themes, Cultural Marxism, immigration, jewed culture, multiculturalism, natural rights of Whites, Socrates, Western civilization, Western culture, white nationalism, White philosophy, White rights, White solutions, White thought at 5:11 pm | Permanent Link

If you asked 100 people if negroes in the Congo have a natural right to live among themselves, without the presence of foreign interlopers such as Chinese or Swedes, most of the people would say “yeah, sure, they have that right.” They would say that because they know that some rights are not government-given or […]