I think the "9/11 Truth Movement" is about to get big, fast. More people are finding out the truth. Imagine what that could do for White Nationalism when huge numbers of Americans learn about the Neocon/Israeli hand in murdering our citizens...

Exactly, and that's why they will stop at nothing to prevent the truth from getting to the punters. Evidently 90% of the US Soldiers in Iraq believe that they're there to avenge Saddam's involvement in 911 when we all know he had nothing to do with.

We have open access to the internet. US Military don't. The forces of darkness would LOVE to silence it. We've got idiots like the three stooges on this thread alredy trying to do the same thing.

Exactly, and that's why they will stop at nothing to prevent the truth from getting to the punters. Evidently 90% of the US Soldiers in Iraq believe that they're there to avenge Saddam's involvement in 911 when we all know he had nothing to do with.

We have open access to the internet. US Military don't. The forces of darkness would LOVE to silence it. We've got idiots like the three stooges on this thread alredy trying to do the same thing.

Who are the three stooges?

Watch this video:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change

Pay attention to the part that shows explosions taking place BELOW the free-falling top of the structure.

Listen to the testimony of eyewitnesses, all speaking of multiple explosions.

Think about the circumstances of the collapse of Building #7.

Watch the videos.

I am downloading the video now, had problems watching it on goggle.

I asked for the most important piece you got not the bundle and elaborate on it a little. For instance if it is the witnesses hearing explosions I want to know if it was milliseconds before the collapse or 5 minutes.

There are three forum entities who are adamant that the "official 9-11 story" is the only valid conspiracy-theory. Those three have spent much time here employing every cheapjack debate ploy and every logical fallacy available to quash discussion of 9-11.
The premier wordspinner among them is called JP Slovjanski. He has over 5,000 posts here, over half of them dedicated to "debating" against those who are skeptical of ZOG's official story. The other two stooges are characters called Hate. Dept. and Fissile. They usually don't offer any attempt at "debate" but go straight to name-calling.
Look up their posts.

Who are the three stooges?

I am downloading the video now, had problems watching it on goggle.

I asked for the most important piece you got not the bundle and elaborate on it a little. For instance if it is the witnesses hearing explosions I want to know if it was milliseconds before the collapse or 5 minutes.

The explosions were at numerous points during the incident, from various locations. Some before the planes ever hit. Some soon after the planes hit. Some minutes before the towers collapsed. Some right as the towers collapsed. Some from the basements. Some from the lower floors. Some from the floors near the level of the damage in the towers.

The point is, there were a shitload of explosions going off on 9/11. One individual video isn't going to tell the whole story.

Keep an open mind and take a look at the available evidence. Also, remember that there are a lot of liars out there.

The explosions were at numerous points during the incident, from various locations. Some before the planes ever hit. Some soon after the planes hit. Some minutes before the towers collapsed. Some right as the towers collapsed. Some from the basements. Some from the lower floors. Some from the floors near the level of the damage in the towers.

The point is, there were a shitload of explosions going off on 9/11. One individual video isn't going to tell the whole story.

Keep an open mind and take a look at the available evidence. Also, remember that there are a lot of liars out there.

Keeping an open mind I have to say that controlled demolitions are not carried out with detonations taking place across the time spans you mention.

9-11 was the primary catalyst to my awakening. The lock-step acceptance of Osama's guilt without any proof. The decision to attack Afghanistan (an ally) without any good reason. I never before realized that the media was uniformly controlled. I knew the democrats and republicans were a sham, but I always thought that ABCNBCCBSCNNFOX were competitors. 9-11 showed me that there were issues that the TV networks all agreed on and those issues all seemed "good for jews." I've long thought that the WN movement was making a big mistake not grabbing this issue and openly questioning the official version of events. It pleases me greatly to see Alex Linder speak out on 9-11 and to see many VNNers have the intellect to see that we are being scammed.

Aside from the indestructible passport, the 9-11 issue is very similar to the jewish question. There is really no single fact, statement, testimony or shred of evidence that proves "jews did 9-11." You have to look at the preponderance of evidence. Even then, you cannot come to the truth until you are ready to accept it.

Aside from the indestructible passport, the 9-11 issue is very similar to the jewish question. There is really no single fact, statement, testimony or shred of evidence that proves "jews did 9-11." You have to look at the preponderance of evidence. Even then, you cannot come to the truth until you are ready to accept it.

I just wanted to examine the evidence 1 piece at a time.

Keeping an open mind I have to say that controlled demolitions are not carried out with detonations taking place across the time spans you mention.

Typically, not AFAIK.

But that is the evidence we have to work with. Most of the explosions were concentrated near the collapses, but there were many others that occurred unexpectedly. Which is why a new, comprehensive investigation is called for.

I asked for the most important piece you got not the bundle and elaborate on it a little. For instance if it is the witnesses hearing explosions I want to know if it was milliseconds before the collapse or 5 minutes.

The owner of the WTC complex admitted that WTC 7 was demolished 8 hours after the initial attack.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8025455768291694664&q=911+video

To Joe Snuffy,

All of us would like to see the hard evidence you seek - bar none. Access denied. The strongest evidence to prove controlled demolition (for ANY collapsed building) is an analysis of the reinforcing steel in the rubble - no way around it - the residue (or lack thereof) of explosives would constitute conclusive proof. Access denied. Who is powerful enough and BOLD enough to deny access to the strongest piece of evidence - the controlling authorities. Draw you own conclusions. I, and many others, conclude, or at least suspect with powerful inclination, that the parties who caused the controlled demolition, and the parties that deny access to the stongest evidence to prove it, are one and the same. But, you say, correctly using PLATO's logic, we are JUMPING THE GUN - if we can't get the evidence to prove it, then how do we even know there was a contolled demolition. That response, though textbook logically sound, seems to be rather STUPID to those of us who are outraged at the denied access to the evidence. You can be forgiving if you like, but I, and many others, are looking to the contolling authorities as the most likely ones to be responsible because they are the ones who HID THE EVIDENCE.
The same thing goes with the case of the lost flights. The strongest evidence of a hijacking, or of a malfunction, or whatever, are the tape recordings between the flight controllers and the pilots of THE VERY FIRST PLANE on that day that showed up on the controllers screen as going off course. That recording would prove, or disprove, whether or not a hijacking was in progress, OR, if there were some other malfunction that prevented the pilots from communicating back (in that case, the recording would only have the voice of the flight controller repeatedly trying to raise the pilot, but no response from the pilot). This evidence is the STARTING POINT for any investigation to the loss of these flights. ACCESS DENIED. Got that? The public is NOT ALLOWED to hear the tape recording of the very first moment when someone (a flight controller) suspected something was wrong. We, the interested public, are left to grumble and squak and speculate endlessly, all because the controlling authorities have something to hide and refuse to let us in on it. Everything else we talk about here is after-the-fact and speculation because we have been denied access to the primary evidence. You can draw your own conclusions or suspicions. Contumacyman. NOTE: They played the tape recordings of the shuttle crash ON THE SAME DAY IT HAPPENED (nothing to hide there). Also, back in the 80's, when we were friends with the Iraqis, a navy jet shot down an Iraqi jet and they played the tapes between the navy cockpit and their contollers ON NATIONAL TV - again, no one had anything to hide. The ONLY REASON to withhold the evidence is because somebody powerful has something to hide. Contumacyman.

Contumacyman...please check your private messages...there is one from me.

The strongest evidence of a hijacking, or of a malfunction, or whatever, are the tape recordings between the flight controllers and the pilots of THE VERY FIRST PLANE on that day that showed up on the controllers screen as going off course. That recording would prove, or disprove, whether or not a hijacking was in progress, OR, if there were some other malfunction that prevented the pilots from communicating back (in that case, the recording would only have the voice of the flight controller repeatedly trying to raise the pilot, but no response from the pilot). This evidence is the STARTING POINT for any investigation to the loss of these flights. ACCESS DENIED. Got that? The public is NOT ALLOWED to hear the tape recording of the very first moment when someone (a flight controller) suspected something was wrong.

Very good and notice the strongest stuff is rarely discussed by 911 flack catchers. They'll go on and on about invisible airplanes and collapsing buildings which, however useful, must remain hypothetical until an open investigation is demanded by the public. The climate for such an investigation seems to be improving as Bush's credibility is eroding.

I do not worry too much over alternative explanations about what occurred that day. I keep my eyes on who wants me to shut up and ask no questions.

Very good and notice the strongest stuff is rarely discussed by 911 flack catchers. They'll go on and on about invisible airplanes and collapsing buildings which, however useful, must remain hypothetical until an open investigation is demanded by the public. The climate for such an investigation seems to be improving as Bush's credibility is eroding.

I do not worry too much over alternative explanations about what occurred that day. I keep my eyes on who wants me to shut up and ask no questions.

I agree with you, Franz (may I call you Franz). As I said many times on the monster 911 thread, while research on alternative theories is useful and should continue, WNs should focus more on " who wants me to shut up and ask no questions" that threaten to convince Americans that the Official ZOG Theory is a pack of lies.

We know who...rhymes with screw and you...as in screw you.

Time to get un-screwed, itz.

If ZOG was indeed at the bottom of this, it stands to reason that they would look to the world’s foremost expert demolition team to get the job done. Controlled Demolition, Inc.(CDI) stands head and shoulders above all others in the demo industry. Most of the video that we’ve all seen of TV is from CDI demolitions. CDI has performed almost all of the world's high profile demolitions as well.

I suspect that CDI did the Twin Towers job, here’s why:

Mark Loizeaux

It is not difficult to envision a scenario whereby, Mark Loizeaux, President of CDI was convinced to do the job either by money or by being sold the lie that it would be necessary for the towers to fall in the interests of national security. Zog could have told him that it was only a matter of time before the radical Muslims hit the towers again after their first failed attempt and therefore, if CDI took them down first, in a controlled fashion, that there would be less loss of life. He could have been told that he would actually be saving lives. We are all well aware of the jew’s ability to spin convincing webs of lies.

I submit:

#1) CDI is the likely choice for such a job. Mark Loizeaux is a demolition expert, and his company, Controlled Demolition Inc. in Phoenix, Md., has taken down more than 7,000 structures around the world by imploding them with explosive charges.
http://www.washingtontechnology.com/news/17_18/last-byte/19660-1.html

#2) On 9/13/01, only two days after the towers went down, Mark Loizeaux, President of CDI arrived at the site with clean-up plans! Miraculously, it took Loizeaux only 2 days to draft a detailed and voluminous clean-up proposal that CDI was ultimately awarded, There were no other customary competitive sealed bids presented to Bloomberg‘s city of New York for consideration. How much was CDI paid? No one knows.

#3) Where was Mark Loizeaux just prior to and on 9/11/01 is the question of the year? Can anyone verify his whereabouts? I can’t. Why wasn’t his name mentioned in any of the 9/13/01 news reports or subsequent investigative news reports or even in the congressional hearings?

#4) CDI has also carried out the destroying chemical weapons production facilities, including a current project at Fort Detrick, Md., to demolish the facility that made weapons-grade anthrax. The company also destroys chemical weapons and missiles. All this work requires, “Top Secret military clearance.”

#5) Google “loizeaux demolition” and scan the links. Get a load of some of Marks comments!

My only reservations of my own suspicions of CDI doing the job come from understanding that a demolition job as large as the Twin Towers would have necessitated many months of planning, complete access to the buildings, allot of “un-noticed” pre-demolition work activity in the building and most likely many participants. And by virtue of these facts, it does seem incredible that not one person has stepped forward to expose the scheme.

Having said that, I would not be surprised if allot of the participants who were involved in the scheme are no longer with us.