You are part right. The original "neocons" were communist in the democrat party that jumped over to the republican party so Kikes would be able to influence both parties. Just Kikes being Kikes.

I doubt that...

Get this fucking jew hate dept. off of here.

Warning:

The conspiracist views expressed here in regards the 9/11 tragedy do not necessarily reflect the views of VNN nor do they reflect the views of white nationalists in general.

9-11 was not a "tragedy." It was a crime, one of the most evil crimes to have been perpetrated on American soil -- surpassed only by the "Civil" War," nigger integration, and the current jew-imposed anti-white open borders policy.

Devere bro you post worked exactly as you planned.

ENEMY WITHIN:

Hate Dept. , Fissle, (probably the same guy)

Devere bro you post worked exactly as you planned.

ENEMY WITHIN:

Hate Dept. , Fissle, (probably the same guy)

It appears to have shown up two or three scurrying about in the light. Of course, we don't know for sure. But I think a (mental) yellow star under their usernames is in order -- unless they manage to prove otherwise. (I am assuming they've seen at least the videos. If they haven't, that in itself raises a yellow star.)

It appears to have shown up two or three scurrying about in the light. Of course, we don't know for sure. But I think a (mental) yellow star under their usernames is in order -- unless they manage to prove otherwise. (I am assuming they've seen at least the videos. If they haven't, that in itself raises a yellow star.)

Give these kikes yellow stars and banish them to opposing jews.

On a subject like this I would think Jews would want to blend in, hence go with the popular opinion, while maybe occasionally throwing in a few(important) doubts.
To assume everyone who does not believe in every conspiracy theory related to the jew that gets throw up is themselves a jew is just a bit paranoid is it not? Who do you think would find that more than a little amusing?

To assume everyone who does not believe in every conspiracy theory related to the jew that gets throw up is themselves a jew is just a bit paranoid is it not?

Generally speaking, yes, but I submit we are not speaking generally, in regard to 9-11.
The preponderance of the evidence in regard to 9-11 points toward conspiracy in general and government involvement specifically.
Whether the towers were brought down with conventional explosives, nuclear ones, by the damage from the airplanes alone or any combination thereof is speculation at this point - and I don't think anyone has claimed differently.
But it speaks volumes when someone comes along and calls people names merely for speculating or expressing opinions. Some of us have been on the internet long enuf and argued in more than enuf debates to recognize a skunk when we smell one.

EDIT: Besides, HG, no one has claimed to believe "every conspiracy theory related to the jew", at least not in this topic. That straw man wont hunt, sorry.

Generally speaking, yes, but I submit we are not speaking generally, in regard to 9-11.
The preponderance of the evidence in regard to 9-11 points toward conspiracy in general and government involvement specifically.
Whether the towers were brought down with conventional explosives, nuclear ones, by the damage from the airplanes alone or any combination thereof is speculation at this point - and I don't think anyone has claimed differently.
But it speaks volumes when someone comes along and calls people names merely for speculating or expressing opinions. Some of us have been on the internet long enuf and argued in more than enuf debates to recognize a skunk when we smell one.

Yes. This is a pivotal issue for zog and the jew. Exposure on this one could bring it all down. I don't think they think they can allow the spread of 9-11 truth unopposed.

Personally, I don't think the Fissile/Hate guy opposition is any opposition to speak of or be concerned about. And I rarely bother to respond to them. They do serve occasionally as eliciters from us of crushing and reinforcing arguments in our favor. Mostly they are merely fairly minor distractors and polluters -- and can simply be ignored. Almost never are they able to present challenging arguments -- for the simple reason that they have none.

I wasn't really serious about the yellow stars. Who cares?

Maybe I (and others of a similar mindset) have not communicated my thinking as to 9/11 well enough. Bottom line, none of us can KNOW what happened. The buildings came down in what looked for all the world to see like controlled demolition. The post-crash pentagon photos looks A LOT like a missle hole. The insurance plans and payouts for the WTC's look fishy, and, finally, the government's withholding of evidence to clear it all up is nothing short of criminal (obstruction of justice).

What gets folks like me railed up is when other white nationalists (purportedly) here don't seem to think the government's obstruction here is a big deal, and they don't seem to mind going along with the incredible "official" tales about it all.

I classify myself as a skeptic, and the "other" camp as blind-faith believers. I focus on the WTC7 collapse because that seems to me like the best case for an objective hard core case of insurance fraud. The ideas we discuss here are supposed be taken in the spirit they are offered - speculation due to the withholding of the primary evidence.

No one needs to be painted with any negative characterizations because we speculate about the various theories to fill in for the withheld evidence. I can accept that maybe a white nationalist is not interested in anything but the official version of 9/11, but, I have to wonder how much help they would be in a crunch because the government operatives will always peddle some fairy tale as part of its dealings with the white movement, and we need to surround ourselves with good skeptical folks who have enough perception to see through deceptions and avoid falling for it.

Contumacyman

in a crunch because the government operatives will always peddle some fairy tale as part of its dealings with the white movement, and we need to surround ourselves with good skeptical folks who have enough perception to see through deceptions and avoid falling for it.
Contumacyman

First of all I don't know what your definition of a "crunch" exactly is, but I have to tell you that I very well could have a more skeptical mind than most of the conspiracist types here. Just because I don't swallow all of the counter-intuitive stuff you people buy into, most of which has been debunked on its face, doesn't mean that I'm not skeptical of many other things. This so-called skepticism you allude to, borders on paranoia. No--it IS paranoia and it is an absolute embarrassment.

If I were in your camp I could have hypothesized the most stupfyingly complex and unlikely plot, and not one of you would have taken me to task or attempted to discuss it or question my rationale--you would have accepted it, because it involves an e-vill conspiracy...

Skepticism necessarily includes critical thinking; it doesn't include seeing things that just aren't there.

PS: Hal Turner doesn't believe the buildings were sabotaged. Tom Metzger doesn't. What are you going to call them?

Yes. This is a pivotal issue for zog and the jew. Exposure on this one could bring it all down. I don't think they think they can allow the spread of 9-11 truth unopposed.

Personally, I don't think the Fissile/Hate guy opposition is any opposition to speak of or be concerned about. And I rarely bother to respond to them. They do serve occasionally as eliciters from us of crushing and reinforcing arguments in our favor. Mostly they are merely fairly minor distractors and polluters -- and can simply be ignored. Almost never are they able to present challenging arguments -- for the simple reason that they have none.

Well put. I agree with your views about the 9-11 truth movement. It could be the pivotal issue in toppling the ZOG. 9-11 is really nothing in and of itself compared to the perpetual wars that Uncle Zoggy has been waging around the world for the last 60 years since the jew won WW two.

But it is that one traumatic event indelibly seared onto the collective imagination and in that sense exposing "what really happened" could show the people, the ordinary folks out there, that their government, far from being their own, is now controlled by an evil and vicious cabal of wicked men, aka ZIONIST JEWS. And this can be easily proven.

So let's keep the ball rolling and the arguments sound. The more people who learn the truth, the more people will be set free.

I doubt that...

That is historical fucking fact.

Do you read much?

Duke, MacDonald?

The attack on the WTC on 911 was intended to reduce jewish power, whoever did it.
Now before you say how much Israel benefits from the resulting Afghanistan and Iraq military actions, remember what the status quo was before 911. The Middle East sure seemed more stable than it is today.

I have outlined somewhere else my somewhat mystically based belief that the WTC were taken out by the same forces in British Aristocracy that supported Hitler in WWII, of which the Bush famiily are loyal servants/agents.

Of course it is required of all such agents fighting jewish power to rise to prominence by publically kissing kosher ass and continue to do so to avoid impeachment.

I think it is also not too much of a stretch to say that the attack on the Pentagon was a counter attack in retaliation for the WTC destruction ordered by jewish loyalists in the Air Force.

911 was a one day civil war. The results?

The ZOG dollar fell against the Euro for 4 years, only recently stabilizing. Gold has become more expensive. Interest rates have increased. The stock market is still not back to pre-911 levels.

Folks, jews took a hit and it wasn't from neo-Nazis but old school Nazis.

And more is sure to follow.