I hear ya, Sun of Sparta and Hoax This. . . but getting back to serious business, I'll include the following article from American Free Press in our new tabloid. What yaw'll think??

The Real Cost of US Support for Israel: $3 Trillion

By Christopher Bollyn
(americanfreepress.net)

While it is commonly reported that Israel officially receives some $3 billion every year in the form of economic aid from the U.S. government, this figure is just the tip of the iceberg. There are many billions of dollars more in hidden costs and economic losses lurking beneath the surface. A recently published economic analysis has concluded that U.S. support for the state of Israel has cost American taxpayers nearly $3 trillion ($3 million millions) in 2002 dollars.

“The Costs to American Taxpayers of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: $3 Trillion” is a summary of economic research done by Thomas R. Stauffer. Stauffer’s summary of the research was published in the June 2003 issue of The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.

Stauffer is a Washington, D.C.-based engineer and economist who writes and teaches about the economics of energy and the Middle East. Stauffer has taught at Harvard University and Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service. Stauffer’s findings were first presented at an October 2002 conference sponsored by the U.S. Army College and the University of Maine.

Stauffer’s analysis is “an estimate of the total cost to the U.S. alone of instability and conflict in the region – which emanates from the core Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”

“Total identifiable costs come to almost $3 trillion,” Stauffer says. “About 60 percent, well over half, of those costs – about $1.7 trillion – arose from the U.S. defense of Israel, where most of that amount has been incurred since 1973.”

“Support for Israel comes to $1.8 trillion, including special trade advantages, preferential contracts, or aid buried in other accounts. In addition to the financial outlay, U.S. aid to Israel costs some 275,000 American jobs each year.” The trade-aid imbalance alone with Israel of between $6-10 billion costs about 125,000 American jobs every year, Stauffer says.

The largest single element in the costs has been the series of oil-supply crises that have accompanied the Israeli-Arab wars and the construction of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. “To date these have cost the U.S. $1.5 trillion (2002 dollars), excluding the additional costs incurred since 2001,” Stauffer wrote.

The cost of supporting Israel increased drastically after the 1973 Israeli-Arab war. U.S. support for Israel during that war resulted in additional costs for the American taxpayer of between $750 billion and $1 trillion, Stauffer says.

When Israel was losing the war, President Richard Nixon stepped in to supply the Jewish state with U.S. weapons. Nixon’s intervention triggered the Arab oil embargo which Stauffer estimates cost the U.S. as much as $600 billion in lost GDP and another $450 in higher oil import costs.

“The 1973 oil crisis, all in all, cost the U.S. economy no less than $900 billion, and probably as much as $1,200 billion,” he says.

As a result of the oil embargo the United States created the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to “insulate Israel and the U.S. against the wielding of a future Arab ‘oil weapon.’” The billion-barrel SPR has cost U.S. taxpayers $134 billion to date. According to an Oil Supply Guarantee, which former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger provided Israel in 1975, Israel gets “first call” on any oil available to the U.S. if Israel’s oil supply is stopped.

Stauffer’s $3 trillion figure is conservative as it does not include the increased costs incurred during the year-long buildup to the recent war against Iraq in which Israel played a significant, albeit covert, role. The higher oil prices that occurred as a result of the Anglo-American campaign against Iraq were absorbed by the consumers. The increase in oil prices provided a huge bonus for the leading oil companies such as British Petroleum and Shell, who are major oil producers as well as retailers. The major international oil companies recorded record profits for the first quarter of 2003.

The Washington Report seeks to “provide the American public with balanced and accurate information concerning U.S. relations with Middle Eastern states.” The monthly journal is known for keeping close tabs on the amount of U.S. taxpayer money that goes to Israel and how much pro-Israel money flows back to Members of Congress in the form of campaign aid.

The journal’s website, www.wrmea.com, has an up-to-date counter at the top that indicates how much official aid flows to Israel. While the counter currently stands at $88.2 billion, it only reflects the minimum, as it does not include the many hidden costs.

“The distinction is important, because the indirect or consequential losses suffered by the U.S. as a result of its blind support for Israel exceed by many times the substantial amount of direct aid to Israel,” Shirl McArthur wrote in the May 2003 issue of Washington Report.

McArthur’s article, “A Conservative Tally of Total Direct U.S. Aid to Israel: $97.5 Billion – and Counting” tallies the hidden costs, such as interest lost due to the early disbursement of aid to Israel and funds hidden in other accounts. For example, Israel received $5.45 billion in Defense Department funding of Israeli weapons projects through 2002, McArthur says.

Loans made to Israel by the U.S. government, like the recently awarded $9 billion, invariably wind up being paid by the American taxpayer. A recent Congressional Research Service report indicates that Israel has received $42 billion in waived loans. “Therefore, it is reasonable to consider all government loans to Israel the same as grants,” McArthur says.

Support for Israel has cost America dearly – well over than $10,000 per American – however the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been extremely costly for the entire world. According to Stauffer, the total bill for supporting Israel is two to four times higher than that for the U.S. alone – costing the global community an estimated $6 to $12 trillion.

Here's another lil "tid bit" I'll stick in that "sucker": (What yaw'll think?)

Meet just a few of your Jewish Supremacist Warmongers
From left to right: William Kristol, Richard Perle, Ari Fleischer, Israeli Prime Minister and Mass-Murderer Ariel Sharon, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Abrams, Douglas Feith

Since we should all be focused on the Mexican invasion, this essay by Dr. Pierce about the brutal gang rape and murder of a sweet little innocent White girl at the hands of mestizo filth would be a good esay to run. You probably don't need to run the whole essay just this part with some exposition of her murder:

Martinez and six other members of the mestizo gang to which he belongs, the Bloods, grabbed 14-year-old Brandy Duvall from a Denver bus stop, where she was waiting for a bus. They took her to a house where one of the gang members lives, and they held the 14-year-old White girl down on a mattress while she was gang-raped for several hours. The gang members then took turns sexually torturing the White junior high school student. They repeatedly rammed a broomstick into her vagina while she screamed and begged for her life. Then, after they had finished amusing themselves, Martinez and the other mestizos handcuffed the bleeding White girl, put a hood over her head, and drove her to a drainage ditch. There they stabbed Brandy Duvall 28 times with a butcher knife and then dumped her body into the ditch, where she bled to death. After that the gang members went back to the house and disposed of the bloody mattress on which she had been gang-raped and sexually tortured.

http://www.natvan.com/free-speech/fs993a.html

the poor kid was murdered on May 30, 1997

here is her picture along side the mestizo gang leader Martinez:

You could call it "Your Daughter is Next".

The Weenie may sue you for using it, but my sons tell me this is one of the best graphics. Politically astute, they're.

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/cartoons18.htm

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/cartoons48.htm

Glenn,

The mexican invasion is paramount to highlight for the first issue. Use at least 2 or 3 of the good photos on this thread.

There should be an on-going and special section devoted to the truth about 911.

Besides your other selected essays and reports, for filler, use these important essays as follows, go to Solar General and they should be printed in their entirety as space permits. Make sure that you include Solar General in your LINKS section and I also recommend that you add John Kamiski‘s website.

NATIONALIST PRIMER (found at Solar General)

* Who Rules America
* Racial Compact
* When Victims Rule
* Color of Crime

These online books are also found at Solar General. I deleted some of the heavier stuff, but the link gives all of them.

ONLINE BOOKS

* The Thirteenth Tribe
* White Power
* Mein Kampf
* Yggdrasil's Library
* Leaderless Resistance
* The Six Million Myth
* The Turner Diaries
* The Future of Man
* Six Million Really Died?
* Hoax of the 20th Century
* The Racial Origin of Jews
* The Protocols
* This Time the World
* 88 Precepts
* The International Jew

Also, direct them to my archive of cartoons to be found at VNN.

Here’s some of my personal recommendations for publication in the first addition:

[color="RoyalBlue"]HEY WHITEMAN!
HERE'S WHAT THE JEW THINKS OF YOUR CONSTITUTION!

[color="RoyalBlue"]WHITE NATIONALISM POINTS IT OUT

[color="RoyalBlue"]TOO MANY NIGGERS ON TV ARE CAUSING TROUBLE AT HOME

Not enough time for polls. TWS has a deadline of April 30th. I'll consider all title suggestions, then make the final decision.

Now be a useful lad, and go find me some good WN articles, graphics, and/or cartoons. And post them here for consideration.

I'd be inclined to take offence at the "be a useful lad" comment if it had come from any other poster. But seeing as it's from Miller, I'll let it pass...

So I found this article... written by a front-line police officer, it's a great synopsis of what happens when you try to integrate a large 3rd world population into a white civilization... in this case Middle eastern Muslims into Sydney, Australia...

Quadrant Magazine Society January 2004 - Volume XLVIII Number 1-2

I BELIEVE that the rise of Middle Eastern organised crime in Sydney will have an impact on society unlike anything we have ever seen. .....

Full article: http://www.quadrant.org.au/php/article_view.php?article_id=581

Immigration is THE hot topic, I would hope the edition would focus on that, including other topics in which we all agree is certainly OK as well. Having said that I would leave the 911 stuff out, please save the debate on that for another thread, that's my two cents as they say. I'm looking forward to the issue.:cheers:

How about running that TAA cartoon showing the White lemming couple holding the nigger baby they'd adopted ?? I just might include that one.

Here's the cartoon, from the NSM Northwestweb site. They turned it into a flyer.

I got your PM. I'll start looking for the requested information. And of course you can count on me to distribute some of those newspapers up here.:box:

Here's another graphic I saw on Nasty Nikki's blog. I'm sure we can come up with an idea on how to use it in the new paper.

Rounder - here's the AFP article you requested, but I found it at a different website. It looks like the Lovearth.net website downloaded it from Rense's website, which originally captured it from AFP. Link:

http://www.lovearth.net/therealcostofussupportforisrael.htm#cost

BEGIN ARTICLE
The Real Cost Of US Support For Israel
$3 Trillion

by Christopher Bollyn, September 19, 2003

While it is commonly reported that Israel officially receives some $3 billion every year in the form of economic aid from the U.S. government, this figure is just the tip of the iceberg. There are many billions of dollars more in hidden costs and economic losses lurking beneath the surface. A recently published economic analysis has concluded that U.S. support for the state of Israel has cost American taxpayers nearly $3 trillion ($3 million millions) in 2002 dollars.

"The Costs to American Taxpayers of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: $3 Trillion" is a summary of economic research done by Thomas R. Stauffer. Stauffer's summary of the research was published in the June 2003 issue of The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.

Stauffer is a Washington, D.C.-based engineer and economist who writes and teaches about the economics of energy and the Middle East. Stauffer has taught at Harvard University and Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service. Stauffer's findings were first presented at an October 2002 conference sponsored by the U.S. Army College and the University of Maine.

Stauffer's analysis is "an estimate of the total cost to the U.S. alone of instability and conflict in the region - which emanates from the core Israeli-Palestinian conflict."

"Total identifiable costs come to almost $3 trillion," Stauffer says. "About 60 percent, well over half, of those costs - about $1.7 trillion - arose from the U.S. defense of Israel, where most of that amount has been incurred since 1973."

"Support for Israel comes to $1.8 trillion, including special trade advantages, preferential contracts, or aid buried in other accounts. In addition to the financial outlay, U.S. aid to Israel costs some 275,000 American jobs each year." The trade-aid imbalance alone with Israel of between $6-10 billion costs about 125,000 American jobs every year, Stauffer says.

The largest single element in the costs has been the series of oil-supply crises that have accompanied the Israeli-Arab wars and the construction of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. To date these have cost the U.S. $1.5 trillion (2002 dollars), excluding the additional costs incurred since 2001, Stauffer wrote.

The cost of supporting Israel increased drastically after the 1973 Israeli-Arab war. U.S. support for Israel during that war resulted in additional costs for the American taxpayer of between $750 billion and $1 trillion, Stauffer says.

When Israel was losing the war, President Richard Nixon stepped in to supply the Jewish state with U.S. weapons. Nixon's intervention triggered the Arab oil embargo which Stauffer estimates cost the U.S. as much as $600 billion in lost GDP and another $450 in higher oil import costs.

"The 1973 oil crisis, all in all, cost the U.S. economy no less than $900 billion, and probably as much as $1,200 billion," he says.

As a result of the oil embargo the United States created the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to "insulate Israel and the U.S. against the wielding of a future Arab 'oil weapon'." The billion-barrel SPR has cost U.S. taxpayers $134 billion to date. According to an Oil Supply Guarantee, which former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger provided Israel in 1975, Israel gets 'first call' on any oil available to the U.S. if Israel's oil supply is stopped.

Stauffer's $3 trillion figure is conservative as it does not include the increased costs incurred during the year-long buildup to the recent war against Iraq in which Israel played a significant, albeit covert, role. The higher oil prices that occurred as a result of the Anglo-American campaign against Iraq were absorbed by the consumers. The increase in oil prices provided a huge bonus for the leading oil companies such as British Petroleum and Shell, who are major oil producers as well as retailers. The major international oil companies recorded record profits for the first quarter of 2003.

The Washington Report seeks to "provide the American public with balanced and accurate information concerning U.S. relations with Middle Eastern states." The monthly journal is known for keeping close tabs on the amount of U.S. taxpayer money that goes to Israel and how much pro-Israel money flows back to Members of Congress in the form of campaign aid.

The journal's website, http://www.wrmea.com, has an up-to-date counter at the top that indicates how much official aid flows to Israel. While the counter currently stands at $88.2 billion, it only reflects the minimum, as it does not include the many hidden costs.

"The distinction is important, because the indirect or consequential losses suffered by the U.S. as a result of its blind support for Israel exceed by many times the substantial amount of direct aid to Israel," Shirl McArthur wrote in the May 2003 issue of Washington Report.

McArthur's article, "A Conservative Tally of Total Direct U.S. Aid to Israel: $97.5 Billion - and Counting" tallies the hidden costs, such as interest lost due to the early disbursement of aid to Israel and funds hidden in other accounts. For example, Israel received $5.45 billion in Defense Department funding of Israeli weapons projects through 2002, McArthur says.

Loans made to Israel by the U.S. government, like the recently awarded $9 billion, invariably wind up being paid by the American taxpayer. A recent Congressional Research Service report indicates that Israel has received $42 billion in waived loans. "Therefore, it is reasonable to consider all government loans to Israel the same as grants," McArthur says.

Support for Israel has cost America dearly - well over than $10,000 per American - however the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been extremely costly for the entire world. According to Stauffer, the total bill for supporting Israel is two to four times higher than that for the U.S. alone -costing the global community an estimated $6 to $12 trillion.

Source: http://www.rense.com/general41/trill.htm
END ARTICLE

Looks like we're on a winning streak, Rounder. Here's the other article you requested. Link:

http://www.crusader.net/texts/bt/bt06.html

BEGIN ARTICLE

The Race War of Black Against White
by Paul Sheehan
from the Sydney Morning Herald, May 20, 1995

The longest war America has ever fought is the Dirty War, and it is not over. It has lasted 30 years so far and claimed more than 25 million victims. It has cost almost as many lives as the Vietnam War. It determined the result of last year's congressional election.
Yet the American news media do not want to talk about the Dirty War, which remains between the lines and unreported. In fact, to even suggest that the war exists is to be discredited. So let's start suggesting, immediately.
No matter how crime figures are massaged by those who want to acknowledge or dispute the existence of a Dirty War, there is nothing ambiguous about what the official statistics portray: for the past 30 years a large segment of black America has waged a war of violent retribution against white America.
And the problem is getting worse, not better. In the past 20 years, violent crime has increased more than four times faster than the population. Young blacks (under 18) are more violent than previous generations and are 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder than young whites.
Nearly all the following figures, which speak for themselves, have not been reported in America:
According to the latest US Department of Justice survey of crime victims, more than 6.6 million violent crimes (murder, rape, assault and robbery) are committed in the US each year, of which about 20 per cent, or 1.3 million, are inter-racial crimes.

Most victims of race crime - about 90 per cent - are white, according to the survey "Highlights from 20 Years of Surveying Crime Victims", published in 1993.

Almost 1 million white Americans were murdered, robbed, assaulted or raped by black Americans in 1992, compared with about 132,000 blacks who were murdered, robbed, assaulted or raped by whites, according to the same survey.

Blacks thus committed 7.5 times more violent inter-racial crimes than whites even though the black population is only one-seventh the size of the white population. When these figures are adjusted on a per capita basis, they reveal an extraordinary disparity: blacks are committing more than 50 times the number of violent racial crimes of whites.

According to the latest annual report on murder by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, most inter-racial murders involve black assailants and white victims, with blacks murdering whites at 18 times the rate that whites murder blacks.
These breathtaking disparities began to emerge in the mid-1960's, when there was a sharp increase in black crime against whites, an upsurge which, not coincidentally, corresponds exactly with the beginning of the modern civil rights movement.
Over time, the cumulative effect has been staggering. Justice Department and FBI statistics indicate that between 1964 and 1994 more than 25 million violent inter-racial crimes were committed, overwhelmingly involving black offenders and white victims, and more than 45,000 people were killed in inter-racial murders. By comparisons 58,000 Americans died in Vietnam, and 34,000 were killed in the Korean war.
When non-violent crimes (burglary, larceny, car theft and personal theft) are included, the cumulative totals become prodigious. The Bureau of Justice Statistics says 27 million non-violent crimes were committed in the US in 1992, and the survey found that 31 per cent of the robberies involved black offenders and white victims (while only 2 per cent in the reverse).
When all the crime figures are calculated, it appears that black Americans have committed at least 170 million crimes against white Americans in the past 30 years. It is the great defining disaster of American life and American ideals since World War II.
All these are facts, yet by simply writing this story, by assembling the facts in this way, I would be deemed a racist by the American news media. It prefers to maintain a paternalistic double-standard in its coverage of black America, a lower standard.

END ARTICLE

In case the link above goes bad, here's a backup:

http://www.heretical.com/miscella/sheehan.html

Christ - a man steps away from the 'puter a few days, and gets wayyy behind...

My belated 2 cents:

Possible Paper Title: "The American Majority" in bold, perhaps with the addition of "The Newspaper for the White Dispossessed" underneath in smaller print: Makes the reader instantly feel a part of a multitude.

Possible caption for the cover pic of the shit horde:" MexAmerica: Hordes of Wetback Invaders Stealing Our Nation."

I strongly agree that the incendiary Hate Whitey quotes from the sheet "activists" should be included: the Whites who get fired up over Lou Dobbs' more genteel expose' of the roaches' arrogant aggression will explode when hit in the mug with the really hi-octane rocket fuel that spews directly from the hideous brown mouth parts.

But above all, of course, shine that spotlight on Big Hymie: 1965 immivasion act, etc.

My .02 for what it is worth. I'd include some native talent in JaneWhite's cartoons. They are grey tone so copy will be as provided by the artist and they are very professional looking, plus if you ask her nicely and give her some lead time and explain what the main thrust of the issue is going to be she can editorialize her work so that the paper becomes a more uniform whole.

I'm not trying to thrust her unwillingly into the spotlight, but she has a great talent it would be a shame to waste.

The Weenie may sue you for using it, but my sons tell me this is one of the best graphics. Politically astute, they're.

Excellent ohgolly. I'll definately include it in TSW.

Good hush-crime article, Mr Sutter. I may use it.