Feb 21, 9:56 AM (ET)
By WILL LESTER
WASHINGTON (AP) - Two Republican governors are threatening legal action to block an Arab company from taking over operations in major U.S. ports and some GOP lawmakers say the deal should be closely examined.
In the uneasy climate after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the Bush administration decision to allow the transaction is threatening to develop a major political headache for the White House.
New York Gov. George Pataki and Maryland Gov. Robert Ehrlich on Monday voiced doubts about the acquisition of a British company that has been running six U.S. ports by Dubai Ports World, a state-owned business in the United Arab Emirates.
The British company, Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co., runs major commercial operations at ports in Baltimore, Miami, New Jersey, New Orleans, New York and Philadelphia.
Both governors indicated they may try to cancel lease arrangements at ports in their states because of the DP World takeover.
"Ensuring the security of New York's port operations is paramount and I am very concerned with the purchase of Peninsular & Oriental Steam by Dubai Ports World," Pataki said in a news release. "I have directed the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to explore all legal options that may be available to them."
Ehrlich, concerned about security at the Port of Baltimore, said Monday he was "very troubled" that Maryland officials got no advance notice before the Bush administration approved the Arab company's takeover of the operations at the six ports.
"We needed to know before this was a done deal, given the state of where we are concerning security," Ehrlich told reporters in the State House rotunda in Annapolis.
The arrangement brought protests from both political parties in Congress and a lawsuit in Florida from a company affected by the takeover.
Public fears that the nation's ports are not properly protected, combined with the news of an Arab country's takeover of six major ports, proved a combustible mix.
Republican Sen. Lindsay Graham of South Carolina said on Fox News Sunday that the administration approval was "unbelievably tone deaf politically." GOP Rep. Tom Davis of Virginia said on ABC's "This Week,""It's a tough one to explain, but we're in a global economy. ... I think we need to take a very close look at it."
Democratic Sen. Robert Menendez of New Jersey said Monday that he and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., will introduce legislation prohibiting the sale of port operations to foreign governments.
At least one Senate oversight hearing was planned for later this month.
Critics have noted that some of the 9/11 hijackers used the UAE as an operational and financial base. In addition, they contend the UAE was an important transfer point for shipments of smuggled nuclear components sent to Iran, North Korea and Libya by a Pakistani scientist.
The Bush administration got support Monday from former President Carter, a Democrat and frequent critic of the administration.
"My presumption is, and my belief is, that the president and his secretary of state and the Defense Department and others have adequately cleared the Dubai government organization to manage these ports," Carter told CNN. "I don't think there's any particular threat to our security."
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff made the rounds on the talk shows Sunday, asserting that the administration made certain the company agreed to certain conditions to ensure national security. H said details of those agreements were secret.
During a stop Monday in Birmingham, Ala., Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said the administration had a "very extensive process" for reviewing such transactions that "takes into account matters of national security, takes into account concerns about port security."
Arabs guarding Jews ports-no we can't have that????:D
Facts are:US Coast Guard handles all security at all US ports.It's all bullshit;more smoke and mirrors.
To deny them from doing so infringes on rules pertaining to free trade. Namely, GATT. I smell discrimination here, also
If I were an Ayrab country I wouldn't risk buying U.S. ports or whatever it is. That just invites the ZOG to lay blame on the enemy of the jews when something "bad" gets imported by "terrorists".
If I were an Ayrab country I wouldn't risk buying U.S. ports or whatever it is. That just invites the ZOG to lay blame on the enemy of the jews when something "bad" gets imported by "terrorists".
If I lived in Baltimore, Miami, New Jersey, New Orleans, New York or Philadelphia, I would be waiting for an attempt to connect this with Iran. Then I would pack up and get the hell out of town.
Enkidu
Hunter S. Thompson, "Big dark, coming soon"
If I were an Ayrab country I wouldn't risk buying U.S. ports or whatever it is. That just invites the ZOG to lay blame on the enemy of the jews when something "bad" gets imported by "terrorists".
They get big money for doing so and they have the expertise when it comes to freighters and so forth.
I was rather amused by this story. Considering, the constant involvement of Kike owned ISraeli security companies in this and that event or matter-- and nary a single public voice opposed.
They get big money for doing so and they have the expertise when it comes to freighters and so forth.
I was rather amused by this story. Considering, the constant involvement of Kike owned ISraeli security companies in this and that event or matter-- and nary a single public voice opposed.
"They get big money for doing so..." This is the operative phrase here. These oil-rich, dollar-rich nations have so many overflowing dollars, they don't know what to do with them all. Apparently, the deal has already been done and money has already exchanged hands, and even with the approval of jew kommissar Chertoff. I would imagine that the kching-kching of the government cash register and the huge cash windfall to the ZOG war effort was THE most important consideration in putting control of these ports up for bid. The money-grubbers at the top, however, probably didn't consider that there would be such tremendous public protest. To them it was all about an easy source of much-needed income. But to the average Kwan, this deal is unbelievably absurd, on its face, and rightly so. This will make an excellent talking point for WNs.
[color="Red"]I'm so depressed about outsourcing I called the suicide hotline and got a call center in Pakistan. They got all excited and asked me if I could drive a truck.
UAE is an American backed, corrupt dictatorship, Israel has no problem with them, naturally.
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!!
UAE is an American backed, corrupt dictatorship, Israel has no problem with them, naturally.
Because of the Zero tax rate in the UAE,many world wide businesses are located there at present.
Almost all of the businesses are NOT Arab owned ,but private businesses from all over the world,just located there(usually just on paper like off shore investments) not associated with Arabs at all.
The probability is that theses companies are Chinese,Japanese or European far more than Arab.
If I were an Ayrab country I wouldn't risk buying U.S. ports or whatever it is. That just invites the ZOG to lay blame on the enemy of the jews when something "bad" gets imported by "terrorists".
When the arab countries already own 25% of the US I don't see why they would stop buying.